SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “HTTR REACTOR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2023

Release of a High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor (HTTR) Steady State Multiphysics Model to the Virtual Test Bed

In response to climate change, global governments and private industry have established a common goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 \cite{osti_1865910}. This goal requires a reassessment of current energy demands and production methods. Reducing emissions at an affordable cost while maintaining grid reliability requires a nationwide collaborative effort among government and industry in the United States. Nuclear power is the leading low-carbon electricity generation method. In the past 50 years, the use of nuclear power has reduced carbon dioxide emissions by over 60 gigatons and has played a crucial role in the security of energy supply~\cite{IEA}. In the U.S., nuclear power accounts for 20\% of the electrical supply and provides energy reliably. Advanced reactors will operate at higher temperatures, operate more efficiently, utilize more energy stored within fuel, and reduce the amount of waste produced \cite{osti_1616270}. To face these challenges and goals, the U.S. Department of Energy has created an initiative to focus on the modeling and simulation tools to support future nuclear power plant design, licensing, and operations. The Virtual Test Bed (VTB)~\cite{vtb2023} was launched by the National Reactor Innovation Center (NRIC) in collaboration with the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program to support the advanced nuclear reactor community. The VTB involves teams from both Idaho National Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory and aims to provide example models for a broad range of both current and future advanced reactor designs. A feature of the VTB is the automatic testing of these models to ensure continued functionality as simulation tools are further developed. The VTB and the advanced reactor models documented there are important resources for this initiative. This work describes the inclusion of a new model on the VTB---a High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor (HTTR) steady-state model \cite{LABOURE2023109838}.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Release of a High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor (HTTR) Steady-State Multiphysics Model to the Virtual Test Bed

The National Reactor Innovation Center (NRIC) accelerates the demonstration and deployment of advanced nuclear energy through inspiring stakeholders and the public, empowering innovators, and delivering successful outcomes. The Virtual Test Bed (VTB) supports this mission by providing an open-source repository of advanced test reactor models for industry, academia, and the public to utilize. During my time at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), I: • Verified the input files of the High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor • Generated computational results • Created user documentation for the HTTR • Uploaded a steady-state HTTR model to the Virtual Test Bed • Authored a conference publication on the model

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2016

UO{sub 2} and PuO{sub 2} utilization in high temperature engineering test reactor with helium coolant

High temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) is one of high temperature gas cooled reactor (HTGR) types which has been developed by Japanese Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI). The HTTR is a graphite moderator, helium gas coolant, 30 MW thermal output and 950 °C outlet coolant temperature for high temperature test operation. Original HTTR uses UO{sub 2} fuel. In this study, we have evaluated the use of UO{sub 2} and PuO{sub 2} in form of mixed oxide (MOX) fuel in HTTR. The reactor cell calculation was performed by using SRAC 2002 code, with nuclear data library was derived from JENDL3.2. The result shows that HTTR can obtain its criticality condition if the enrichment of {sup 235}U in loaded fuel is 18.0% or above.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2018

HTTR 3 D Cross Section Generation with Serpent and MAMMOTH

The High Temperature Test Reactor (HTTR) is a graphite moderated thermal reactor with a nominal power output of 30 MWth. The purpose of this work is to prepare a set of neutron cross sections for use in the transient analyses of three Loss of Forced Cooling (LOFC) events planned for this reactor. The cross sections are generated with the Serpent 2 3 D Monte Carlo code to include the axial heterogeneity and the strong axial coupling of this core. The approach yields good agreement of results when compared to previously used 2 D lattice models, which require a fine spatial discretization and, surprisingly, comes at a higher computational cost. In addition, the temperature distribution must be considered to obtain reasonable cross sections and the axial leakage component dominates the spectral effects in the core. Consequently, a temperature model as a function of the fuel and moderator temperatures is adopted, and the core is depleted to 390 effective full-power days (EFPDs). A full tabulation of cross sections is prepared at this burnup point for a variety of fuel and moderator temperatures. Next, the multiphysics reactor application MAMMOTH is used to evaluate the quality of these cross sections using a diffusion solver. As expected, the homogenization error in the cross sections is significant and the Super Homogenization (SPH) correction from MAMMOTH is necessary to preserve key reaction rates. The SPH corrected MAMMOTH results are in excellent agreement with the Serpent results and reproduce both the reference power profile and temperature coefficients at each tabulation point. This fact confirms the accuracy of the SPH corrected cross sections and demonstrates the maturity of using Serpent 2 and MAMMOTH for 3 D cross section generation, even for reactors as complex as the HTTR. Finally, the authors recommend that the cross sections should be parametrized with the local burnup and that a full core burnup calculation with coupled thermal fluids would provide a better estimate of the initial condition for any subsequent transient analysis. Unfortunately, this was not within the scope of this work, and direct analysis with these tabulations should be considered as a first order approximation, at best.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Sensitivity analysis of xenon reactivity temperature dependency for HTTR LOFC test by using Relap5-3D code - 18365

A high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) has superior safety characteristics. A loss of forced cooling (LOFC) test using a high-temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) was carried out to verify the inherent safety characteristic of HTGR when forced cooling is diminished without reactor scram. In the test, all-gas circulators were tripped with an initial reactor power of 9 MW. The reactor power decreased from 9 MW to 0 MW by negative reactivity feedback in the core. Re-criticality was shown after about 8 h. This study focused on developing a point kinetics method with RELAP5-3D code for an LOFC accident. For future HTGR design and safety analysis, point kinetics method is important because of simple method. One key element of the point kinetics method is the reactivity performance estimation. There is a large temperature difference between the inlet and outlet of the core in HTGR, and the temperature fluctuation range has been large in several accidents. We analyze the temperature dependency of xenon-135 reactivity and show that the temperature dependency of xenon-135 microscopic absorption cross-section affected the re-criticality time of the LOFC test. This finding will be useful for predicting the emerging time and the peak level of reactor power increase after becoming re-critical. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2017

Improvements to PHISICS/RELAP5-3D{sup C} Capabilities for Simulating HTGRs

Accurate, high-resolution full core simulations of prismatic high temperature reactors for burnup and transient analysis remain a challenge. The cores are geometrically large, but some features are quite small (tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) particles, burnable poison pellets). The treatment of both neutron scattering in graphite and resonance capture are complex and not adequately captured using the methods traditionally used in High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors (HTGR) and commonly used in Light Water Reactors (LWR). For transient analysis, temperature feedback is a function of the TRISO fuel form, but full core models cannot resolve phenomena at this scale without averaging over space and energy. For burnup calculations, a second level of heterogeneity must be resolved to capture the local effects of fuel and burnable poisons, while accurately propagating their effects through and between blocks. The HTGR Methods and Simulation group has been utilizing the INL-developed PHISICS/RELAP5-3D{sup C} (P/R), code suite for participation in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Modular High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor (MHTGR) Benchmark, funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE) under the Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) program. The MHTGR-350 benchmark consists of several lattice, steady-state and transient exercises, and the P/R code has been successfully applied to most of the cases defined. In addition to this code-to-code verification activity, it is planned that P/R will be validated using data from several Loss of Forced Cooling (LOFC) tests performed at the High Temperature Test Reactor (HTTR) in a joint effort with Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) under the Civil Nuclear Energy Working Group (CNWG) project. These verification and validation simulations will identify code and model discrepancies, sensitivities, and establish the current state-of-the-art in HTGR simulation. The Department of Astronautical, Electrical and Energy Engineering (DIAEE), 'Sapienza' University has been involved in the development of P/R since 2014 through various graduate and PhD student projects. In the framework of this collaboration the P/R optimization for application on the OECD MHTGR-350 and HTTR models will be carried out.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2016

HTTR-GT/H2 test plant - conceptual design study on new intermediate heat exchanger - 18747

Japan Atomic Energy Agency is developing a nuclear cogeneration demonstration test facility named HTTR-GT/H2 that is connected to the existing test reactor HTTR. In the facility, an intermediate heat exchanger (IHX) at maximum service temperature of 900 deg. C is to be newly constructed to supply the high temperature helium flows to both the helium gas turbine system and the hydrogen production system. The conceptual design study on the IHX is conducted considering the future application to the Gas Turbine High Temperature Reactor 300 Cogeneration (GTHTR300C). Several new concepts are proposed and incorporated in the demonstrating IHX design in order to (1) ease integration of the IHX with the gas turbine system to simplify the cogeneration plant layout; (2) allow conventional low-cost steel for construction of the IHX pressure vessel and nozzles; (3) flexibility to accommodate thermal expansion of the bundle and internal structures.; (4) maintaining the structural integrity at elevated service temperature range. This paper describes the conceptual design study results for the IHX and technical issues to be solved in the future design phases. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2017

PHISICS/RELAP5-3D Adaptive Time-Step Method Demonstrated for the HTTR LOFC#1 Simulation

A collaborative effort between Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) and Idaho National Laboratory (INL) as part of the Civil Nuclear Energy Working Group is underway to model the high temperature engineering test reactor (HTTR) loss of forced cooling (LOFC) transient that was performed in December 2010. The coupled version of RELAP5-3D, a thermal fluids code, and PHISICS, a neutronics code, were used to model the transient. The focus of this report is to summarize the changes made to the PHISICS-RELAP5-3D code for implementing an adaptive time step methodology into the code for the first time, and to test it using the full HTTR PHISICS/RELAP5-3D model developed by JAEA and INL and the LOFC simulation. Various adaptive schemes are available based on flux or power convergence criteria that allow significantly larger time steps to be taken by the neutronics module. The report includes a description of the HTTR and the associated PHISICS/RELAP5-3D model test results as well as the University of Rome sub-contractor report documenting the adaptive time step theory and methodology implemented in PHISICS/RELAP5-3D. Two versions of the HTTR model were tested using 8 and 26 energy groups. It was found that most of the new adaptive methods lead to significant improvements in the LOFC simulation time required without significant accuracy penalties in the prediction of the fission power and the fuel temperature. In the best performing 8 group model scenarios, a LOFC simulation of 20 hours could be completed in real-time, or even less than real-time, compared with the previous version of the code that completed the same transient 3-8 times slower than real-time. A few of the user choice combinations between the methodologies available and the tolerance settings did however result in unacceptably high errors or insignificant gains in simulation time. The study is concluded with recommendations on which methods to use for this HTTR model. An important caveat is that these findings are very model-specific and cannot be generalized to other PHISICS/RELAP5-3D models.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2025

NEA HTTR LOFC Project Test#2 Benchmark Results

The High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor (HTTR) is a 30 MW prismatic high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) owned and operated by the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA). Staring in 2010, HTTR was used in a series of three loss of forced cooling (LOFC) tests without SCRAM to demonstrate the inherent safety of HTGRs.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Development of safety requirements for HTGRs design - 18467

The safety requirements for the design of High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors (HTGRs), which is analogous to the IAEA specific safety requirements (SSR) for Light Water Reactor (LWR) design (IAEA SSR-2/1), has been developed by the research committee established in the Atomic Energy Society of Japan so as to incorporate the HTGR safety features demonstrated by High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor (HTTR), lessons learned from the accident of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station and requirements for the coupling of the hydrogen production plants with nuclear plant. The safety design approach was determined to establish a high level of safety design standards by utilizing inherent safety features of HTGRs. The safety requirements is then developed using the objectives provisions tree methodology based on the safety design approach. The requirements for a structural integrity of fuel during accident conditions, for a confinement structure instead of a leak-tight pressure resistance containment vessel, for a passive residual heat removal from outside of reactor pressure vessel, etc., which are significantly different from those of LWR, are stated in the developed safety requirements. This paper describes overview of the proposed HTGR specific safety requirements. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2013

Benchmark analysis of high temperature engineering test reactor core using McCARD code

A benchmark calculation has been performed for a startup core physics test of Japan's High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor (HTTR). The calculation is carried out by the McCARD code, which adopts the Monte Carlo method. The cross section library is ENDF-B/VII.0. The fuel cell is modeled by the reactivity-equivalent physical transform (RPT) method. Effective multiplication factors with different numbers of fuel columns have been analyzed. The calculation shows that the HTTR becomes critical with 19 fuel columns with an excess reactivity of 0.84% Δk/k. The discrepancies between the measurements and Monte Carlo calculations are 2.2 and 1.4 % Δk/k for 24 and 30 columns, respectively. The reasons for the discrepancy are thought to be the current version of cross section library and the impurity in the graphite which is represented by the boron concentration. In the future, the depletion results will be proposed for further benchmark calculations. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Development of a core coolant flow distribution calculation code for HTGRs - 18484

In order to ensure the thermal integrity of fuel in high temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs), it is necessary that the maximum fuel temperature in the normal operation is to be lower than the thermal design target. In the core thermal-hydraulic design of block-type HTGRs, the maximum fuel temperature should be evaluated considering data such as thermal power, core geometry, power and neutron fluence distributions, and core coolant flow distribution. The core coolant flow distribution calculation code used in the design stage of High Temperature engineering Test Reactor (HTTR) presupposes to run on UNIX systems, and its operation and execution procedure are complicated and not user-friendly. Therefore, a new core coolant flow distribution calculation code with a user-friendly system such as simple and easy operations and execution procedures has been developed. In this paper, the outline of the new code is described and the simulation result of an out-of-pile test with one fuel column are shown as the first step of the code validation. The simulation results provide good agreement with the test one. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2024

NEA HTTR LOFC Project Test#3 Benchmark Results

In the second half of FY23, the High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor (HTTR) Loss Of Forced Cooling (LOFC)#3 data for the 9 MW test case with Vessel Cooling System (VCS) off were made available through the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) LOFC project framework; the neutronic model developed for the initial test (LOFC#1) achieved a satisfactory level of maturity, demonstrating its accuracy in predicting power evolution and core re-criticality, but LOFC#3 should be used primarily to investigate thermal hydraulic phenomena, as the reactor was shut down prematurely due to overheating in the upper reactor components, which prevented re-criticality; this report focuses on advancing the HTTR thermal hydraulic model to accurately simulate the LOFC#3 scenario, including simulating the LOFC#3 benchmark and generating the corresponding benchmark specifications, aiming to ensure consistency across participant models and provide essential data for future participants, including private industry stakeholders seeking to validate their computational tools.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2016

HTTR-GT/H2 test plant - system design - 18680

Pre-licensing basic design for a cogenerating HTGR test plant system is presented. The plant to be coupled to JAEA s existing 30 MWt 950 deg. C test reactor HTTR is intended as a system technology demonstrator for JAEA s commercial Gas turbine High Temperature Reactor Cogeneration (GTHTR300C) plant design. More specifically the test plant of HTTR-GT/H2 aims to 1) demonstrate the licensability of the GTHTR300C for electricity production by gas turbine and hydrogen cogeneration by thermochemical process and 2) confirm the operation control and safety of such cogeneration system. With construction and operation completion by 2025, the test plant is expected to be the first of a kind HTGR-powered cogeneration plant operating on the two advanced energy conversion systems of closed cycle helium gas turbine for power generation and thermochemical iodine-sulfur water-splitting process for hydrogen production. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2022

FY22 Status Report on the ART-GCR CMVB and CNWG International Collaborations

This work presents the numerical model for the high temperature test reactor (HTTR) loss of forced cooling (LOFC) experiment with the INL codes Griffin, BISON, and RELAP-7, based on the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) framework. Promising results were obtained, with the overall behavior of the reactor successfully captured. Changes in the heat transfer coupling, as compared to the fiscal year (FY)-21 model, enabled drastic improvement of the steady-state solution, both in terms of computational time and global energy discrepancies. The former was reduced by a factor of roughly 60, whereas the latter decreased from 11% to less than 2%. Furthermore, the discrepancy in the steady-state multiplication factor was improved from +2,300 and +2,900 pcm (for the 30 and 9 MW cases) to -700 and +1,200 pcm, respectively, and now falls well within the large measurement uncertainties stemming from graphite impurities. Validation of the Monte Carlo model used to generate cross sections was also performed against available measurements. Though significant, the discrepancies remain acceptable overall in light of the large uncertainty. Numerous improvements are still needed to better compare with the experiment involving the 9 MW case and to instill greater confidence in the model’s ability to accurately predict the 30 MW behavior. Specifically, the power levels predicted by the 9 MW transient simulation following re-criticality remain low, pointing to an underestimation of the passive cooling of the core. A key aspect of future work will be to better understand the flow pattern during the LOFC event, particularly to determine if natural or forced convection is occurring inside the reactor pressure vessel (RPV). More generally, additional validation data would be immensely useful for further enhancing the numerical model and better matching the experiments. In addition, a more sophisticated thermal-hydraulics model that simulates all the channels as a single system model should be considered to take into account the rest of the primary loop. Finally, even if the results are in better agreement with the experiments, sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification will be necessary to evaluate the model uncertainty.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2019

MULTIPHYSICS STEADY-STATE SIMULATION OF THE HIGH TEMPERATURE TEST REACTOR WITH MAMMOTH, BISON AND RELAP-7

In this work we present a new approach to solving a multiphysics steady-state simulation for the High Temperature Test Reactor (HTTR) using one Super Homogenization (SPH) corrected homogenized 3-D neutronics model in MAMMOTH, multiple heterogeneous 2-D axisymmetric fuel pin models in BISON and several 1-D annular flow thermohydraulics models in RELAP-7. The coupling of the different physics is complicated by the fundamentally disparate models, potentially affecting the stability of the global system. A pseudo-transient to converge the temperature fields is used to circumvent this difficulty. The benefit of doing so as opposed to having fully 3-D heterogenous models for all physics is that the computational burden for reactors as complex as HTTR may quickly become unbearable while coarse models may not capture all the essential phenomena of the problem. The driving purpose of this work is to establish a self-sustaining steady-state solution that can be used to start safety transients.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2019

MULTIPHYSICS STEADY-STATE SIMULATION OF THE HIGH TEMPERATURE TEST REACTOR WITH MAMMOTH, BISON AND RELAP-7

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2019

MULTIPHYSICS STEADY-STATE SIMULATION OF THE HIGH TEMPERATURE TEST REACTOR WITH MAMMOTH, BISON AND RELAP-7

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗