Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “IFAR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

13 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2021

IFAR Liner Benchmark Challenge #1 - DLR Impedance Eduction of Uniform and Axially Segmented Liners and Comparison with NASA Results

This paper presents the contribution from the German Aerospace Center (DLR) to the first liner benchmark challenge under the framework of the International Forum for Aviation Research (IFAR).Therefore, two sets of acoustically damping wall treatment, called ’liner samples’, have been produced by additive manufacturing based on the design data provided by NASA coordinating this benchmark. These liner samples have been integrated and acoustically characterized in the liner flow test facility DUCT-R at DLR Berlin as well as in the liner flow test facility GFIT at NASA Langley. Besides the dissipation coefficients and the axial pressure profiles, the liner wall impedance was educed by first determining the axial wave numbers and then applying a straightforward method based on the one-dimensional Convected Helmholtz Equation. Finally, the comparison of the liner impedance values to the NASA results show a fairly good agreement.

liner characterization↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

ARMD Overview for IFAR

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aeronautics Research↗
DOE OSTI2022

Causes of fuel–ablator mix inferred from modeling of monochromatic time-gated radiography of OMEGA cryogenic implosions

Here, we present evidence, in the context of OMEGA cryogenic target implosions, that laser imprint, known to be capable of degrading laser-direct-drive target performance, plays a major role in generating fuel–ablator mix. OMEGA cryogenic target implosions show a performance boundary correlated with acceleration-phase shell stability; for sufficiently low adiabats (where the adiabat is the ratio of the pressure to the Fermi pressure) and high in-flight aspect ratios (IFAR's), the neutron-weighted shell areal density and neutron yield relative to the clean simulated values sharply decline. Direct evidence of Rayleigh–Taylor fuel–ablator mixing was previously obtained using a Si Heα backlighter driven by an ~20-ps short pulse generated by OMEGA EP. The shadow cast by the shell shortly prior to stagnation, as diagnosed using backlit radiographs, shows a softening near the limb, which is evidence of an ablator–fuel mix region for a low-adiabat implosion (α ~ 1.9, IFAR = 14) but not for a moderate adiabat implosion (α ~ 2.5, IFAR = 10). We find good agreement between experimental and synthetic radiographs in simulations that model laser imprint and account for uncertainty in the initial ablator thickness. Furthermore, we further explore the role of other mechanisms such as classical instability growth at the fuel–ablator interface, species concentration diffusion, and long-wavelength drive and target asymmetries.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
NASA NTRS2019

Overview of Liner Activities in Support of the International Forum for Aviation Research

This paper provides an overview of liner research being conducted by members of the International Forum for Aviation Research (IFAR). The IFAR consists of representatives from a number of national research labs and is established to enable information exchange on aviation research activities. NASA has provided three challenges that explore different aspects of acoustic liner research, and will compile the results from each of the partners into a common database when the challenges are completed. The goal of the first challenge is to compare experimental methods applied at different national labs for acoustic liner evaluation, and to compare impedance eduction methodologies for uniform liners. The second challenge is to evaluate the ability of 3D propagation codes to predict the effects of spanwise variable-impedance liners on the acoustic pressure field. The third challenge is to explore different approaches to simultaneously educe the impedances for each zone of a three-zone liner. Each challenge is intended to be conducted as a blind test. Thus, only representative results achieved by the NASA Liner Physics Team for each of the three challenges are presented herein. When the results from all participants are available, the compiled results are intended to be provided in future reports.

Jones, Michael G.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Investigation of Flow Direction Effects on Impedance Eduction for Acoustic Liners

In support of a collaboration with the International Forum for Aviation Research (IFAR), the NASA Langley Liner Physics Team has acquired a detailed dataset for use in the evaluation of flow direction effects on the acoustic liner impedance eduction process. Measurements are acquired with four acoustic liners designed to cover a range of sensitivities to source sound pressure level and tangential mean flow effects, specifically at source levels of 120 and 140 dB and centerline Mach numbers of 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3. These measurements include detailed flow profile surveys upstream and downstream of the liner test window, as well as acoustic pressure data over the extent of the test window. The results clearly demonstrate the importance of the choice of Mach number used in the impedance eduction analysis. Average Mach number differences of less than 0.01 result in significant variation in the educed impedance spectra. These data will soon be supplied to the IFAR partners and will be made available for the general public within the next year.

acoustic↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Investigation of Flow Direction Effects on Impedance Eduction for Acoustic Liners

In support of a collaboration with the International Forum for Aviation Research (IFAR), the NASA Langley Liner Physics Team has acquired a detailed dataset for use in the evaluation of flow direction effects on the acoustic liner impedance eduction process. Measurements are acquired with four acoustic liners designed to cover a range of sensitivities to source sound pressure level and tangential mean flow effects, specifically at source levels of 120 and 140 dB and centerline Mach numbers of 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3. These measurements include detailed flow profile surveys upstream and downstream of the liner test window, as well as acoustic pressure data over the extent of the test window. The results clearly demonstrate the importance of the choice of Mach number used in the impedance eduction analysis. Average Mach number differences of less than 0.01 result in significant variation in the educed impedance spectra. These data will soon be supplied to the IFAR partners and will be made available for the general public within the next year.

acoustic↗
NASA NTRS2019

NASA Investments in Electrified Propulsion

Presentation to the International Forum on Aviation (IFAR) at the Electric Hybrid Propulsion Workshop #2 in Budapest, Hungary. This presentation is to provide an overview of NASA's investments in electrified propulsion as a starting point for the workshop, which will concentrate on the safety of electrified airplanes and potential for international collaboration.

Jankovsky, Amy↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Influence of Source Type on Acoustic Liner Impedance in No Flow

This paper presents findings from a study conducted under a challenge of the International Forum for Aviation Research (IFAR), which consists of partners from various national research labs around the world. A series of normal incidence impedance tube tests are performed to identify differences in acoustic impedance for various types of source excitations. These source types include single-tone, multitone, and broadband. To better understand these differences, six unique acoustic liners are tested using these source types at various sound pressure levels and frequencies. Multitone sources of up to five discrete frequencies at a time (both harmonic and nonharmonic excitations) are included. Predictions are also shown to assess capability of capturing source type in the acoustic liner design process. It is determined that impedance behavior due to single-tone and broadband source excitations is largely well-understood and predictable. Multitone source excitations, however, yield unpredictable impedance characteristics that appear highly dependent on the summed coherent waveform that is incident upon the acoustic liner. Future work on this topic is warranted to improve impedance prediction capability of multitone excitation.

acoustic liner impedance multitone prediction sour↗
NASA NTRS2015

Air Traffic Management Technology Demonstration (ATD-1) - Concept to Operations

In order to enable arrival management concepts and solutions in a NextGen environment, ground-based sequencing and scheduling functions have been developed to support metering operations in the National Airspace System. These sequencing and scheduling algorithms as well as tools are designed to aid air traffic controllers in developing an overall arrival strategy. The research presented provides an outline of the challenge of bringing time based scheduling to the terminal environment and the steps that were taken to bring the technology from concept to testing in an operational environment, and finally acquisition by the FAA. ATM Technology Demonstration-1 (ATD-1), is a set of technologies that provides an efficient solution for managing arrival aircraft beginning from just prior to top-of-descent and continuing down to the runway. The ATD-1 suite of technologies has been tested separately, and each has demonstrated benefits in throughput, delay, and fuel-efficiency. Together, the integration of terminal arrival tools allow arrival aircraft to safely fly closer together on more fuel-efficient routes to increase capacity, and reduce delay, fuel burn, noise, and greenhouse gas emissions.

DEMO↗