Impact testing machine Patent
Impact testing machine for imparting large impact forces on high velocity packages
Johnson, C. E.↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “IMPACT TESTING MACHINE”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Mode-II-Fracture Specimen And Holder
Test specimen and loading frame developed for fatigue and fracture testing of materials under mode-II (sliding-mode) loading. Assembly placed in compression-testing machine. Loads directed oppositely along centerline cause self-similar crack to propagate. Enables consistently accurate alignment of specimens before insertion of specimen/frame assemblies into compression-testing machine. Makes design attractive for testing in hostile environments in which access to machine or furnace limited. Additional feature, with little or no modification, placed horizontally into impact testing machine and subjected to loading at high speeds.
Buzzard, Robert J.↗
Statement of Work for Impact Testing
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (“LLNL”) will outsource impact testing (also known as drop hammer testing) of PETN (Pentaerythritol tetranitrate) to Safety Management Services Inc. (“Subcontractor”). This document describes the objective, technical approach, and deliverables. Subcontractor will conduct impact testing studies on three PETN samples. LLNL will provide the samples. LLNL selected this company for impact testing because LLNL has an impact test machine purchased from the same vendor. The objective of this work is to answer the following questions: 1) What are the variations in impact sensitivity results between three PETN samples LLNL will provide?; 2) What is the effect of starting mass on impact sensitivity of PETN?
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
Internally damped, self-arresting vertical drop-weight apparatus
A vertical dropped-weight impact test machine has a dropped-weight barrel vertically supported on upper and lower support brackets. The dropped-weight barrel is chambered to receive a dropped-weight assembly having a latch pin at its upper end, a damping unit in the middle, and a tup at its lower end. The tup is adapted for gathering data during impact testing. The latch pin releasably engages a latch pin coupling assembly. The latch pin coupling assembly is attached to a winch via a halyard for raising and lowering the dropped-weight assembly. The lower end of the dropped-weight barrel is provided with a bounce-back arresting mechanism which is activated by the descending passage of the dropped-weight assembly. After striking the specimen, the dropped-weight assembly rebounds vertically and is caught by the bounce-back arresting mechanism. The damping unit of the dropped-weight assembly serves to dissipate energy from the rebounding dropped-weight assembly and prevents the dropped-weight assembly from rebounding from the self-arresting mechanism.
Ambur, Damodar R.↗
Internally damped, self-arresting vertical drop-weight impact test apparatus
A vertical dropped-weight impact test machine has a dropped-weight barrel vertically supported on upper and lower support brackets. The dropped-weight barrel is chambered to receive a dropped-weight assembly having a latch pin at its upper end, a damping unit in the middle, and a tup at its lower end. The tup is adapted for gathering data during impact testing. The latch pin releasably engages a latch pin coupling assembly. The latch pin coupling assembly is attached to a winch via a halyard for raising and lowering the dropped-weight assembly. The lower end of the dropped-weight barrel is provided with a bounce-back arresting mechanism which is activated by the descending passage of the dropped-weight assembly. After striking the specimen, the dropped-weight assembly rebounds vertically and is caught by the bounce-back arresting mechanism. The damping unit of the dropped-weight assembly serves to dissipate energy from the rebounding dropped-weight assembly and prevents the dropped-weight assembly from rebounding from the self-arresting mechanism.
Ambur, Damodar R.↗
Internally damped, self-arresting vertical drop-weight impact test apparatus
A vertical dropped-weight impact test machine has a dropped-weight barrel vertically supported on upper and lower support brackets. The dropped-weight barrel is chambered to receive a dropped-weight assembly having a latch pin at its upper end, a damping unit in the middle, and a tup at its lower end. The tup is adapted for gathering data during impact testing. The latch pin releasably engages a latch pin coupling assembly. The latch pin coupling assembly is attached to a winch via a halyard for raising and lowering the dropped-weight assembly. The lower end of the dropped-weight barrel is provided with a bounce-back arresting mechanism which is activated by the descending passage of the dropped-weight assembly. After striking the specimen, the dropped-weight assembly rebounds vertically and is caught by the bounce-back arresting mechanism. The damping unit of the dropped-weight assembly serves to dissipate energy from the rebounding dropped-weight assembly and prevents the dropped-weight assembly from rebounding from the self-arresting mechanism.
Ambur, Damodar R.↗
Internally damped, self-arresting vertical drop-weight impact test apparatus
A vertical dropped-weight impact test machine has a dropped-weight barrel vertically supported on upper and lower support brackets. The dropped-weight barrel is chambered to receive a dropped-weight assembly having a latch pin at its upper end, a damping unit in the middle, and a tup at its lower end. The tup is adapted for gathering data during impact testing. The latch pin releasably engages a latch pin coupling assembly. The latch pin coupling assembly is attached to a winch via a halyard for raising and lowering the dropped-weight assembly. The lower end of the dropped-weight barrel is provided with a bounce-back arresting mechanism which is activated by the descending passage of the dropped-weight assembly. After striking the specimen, the dropped-weight assembly rebounds vertically and is caught by the bounce-back arresting mechanism. The damping unit of the dropped-weight assembly serves to dissipate energy from the rebounding dropped-weight assembly and prevents the dropped-weight assembly from rebounding from the self-arresting mechanism.
Ambur, Damodar R.↗
Evaluation of a Compression-Loaded-Stitched-Multi-Bay Fuselage Panel With Barely Visible Impact Damage
The experimental results from a stitched VaRTM carbon-epoxy composite panel tested under uni-axial compression loading are presented along with nonlinear finite element analysis prediction of the response. The curved panel is divided by frames and stringers into six bays with a column of three bays along the compressive loading direction. The frames are supported at the frame ends to resist out-of-plane translation. Back-to-back strain gages are used to record the strain and displacement transducers were used to record the out-of-plane displacements. In addition a full-field-displacement measurement technique that utilizes a camera-based-stereo-vision system was used to record the displacements. The panel was loaded to 1.5 times the predicted initial buckling load (1st bay buckling load, P(sub er) from the nonlinear finite element analysis and then was removed from the test machine for impact testing. After impacting with 20 ft-lbs of energy using a spherical impactor to produce barely visible damage the panel was loaded in compression until failure. The buckling load of the first bay to buckle was 97% of the buckling load before impact. The stitching constrained the impact damage from growing during the loading to failure. Impact damage had very little overall effect on panel stiffness. Panel stiffness measured by the full-field-displacement technique indicated a 13% loss in stiffness after impact. The panel failed at 1.64 times the first panel buckling load. The barely visible impact damage did not grow noticeably as the panel failed by global instability due to stringer-web terminations at the frame locations. The predictions from the nonlinear analysis of the finite element modeling of the entire specimen were very effective in the capture of the initial buckling and global behavior of the panel. In addition, the prediction highlighted the weakness of the panel under compression due to stringer web terminations. Both the test results and the nonlinear predictions serve to reinforce the severe penalty in structural integrity caused by the low cost manufacturing technique to terminate the stringer webs, and demonstrates the importance of this type of sub-component testing and high fidelity failure analysis in the design of a composite fuselage.
Baker, Donald J.↗
Experimental Results From Stitched Composite Multi-Bay Fuselage Panels Tested Under Uni-Axial Compression
The experimental results from two stitched VARTM composite panels tested under uni-axial compression loading are presented. The curved panels are divided by frames and stringers into five or six bays with a column of three bays along the compressive loading direction. The frames are supported at the ends to resist out-of-plane translation. Back-to-back strain gages are used to record the strain and displacement transducers were used to record the out-of-plane displacements. In addition a full-field measurement technique that utilizes a camera-based-stero-vision system was used to record displacements. The panels were loaded in increments to determine the first bay to buckle. Loading was discontinued at limit load and the panels were removed from the test machine for impact testing. After impacting at 20 ft-lbs to 25 ft-lbs of energy with a spherical indenter, the panels were loaded in compression until failure. Impact testing reduced the axial stiffness 4 percent and less than 1 percent. Postbuckled axial panel stiffness was 52 percent and 70 percent of the pre-buckled stiffness.
Baker, Donald J.↗
STANDARD REFERENCE MATERIAL CHARPY TESTING FROM HIGH FLUENCE SURVEILLANCE CAPSULE
The Palisades Nuclear Generating Station included in its original surveillance program a surveillance capsule, designated A-60. The capsule was removed from its surveillance position in early 1995 and has been resident in the spent fuel pool since that time. It was harvested to perform characterization of surveillance specimens in this capsule in 2023. This capsule was irradiated to a fluence of 1.96x1020 n/cm2 (E> 1MeV) that is equivalent for more than 150 effective full power years for the current US reactor pressure vessel (RPV) fleet. This capsule contained several materials, including Charpy specimens of standard reference material (SRM) from Heavy-Section Steel Technology (HSST) A533-B Plate 01. To perform Charpy testing of this highly irradiated material, the new Charpy specimen transfer system was designed and implemented on Charpy impact testing machine in the hot cell to accommodate remote testing of these specimens. This new transfer system includes integrated environmental chamber to cool or heat Charpy specimens to the desired temperature. Testing of this highly irradiated material revealed very large shift of Charpy transition temperature, 188oC.
Sokolov, Mikhail [ORNL] (ORCID:0000000256373346)↗
Investigation of high-speed impact phenomena /III/, volume I
Facilities, equipment, techniques, and experimental procedures for high speed meteoritic impact phenomena
IMPACT TESTING MACHINE↗
High-repetition-rate particle injector for electrostatic accelerator
Operation of high impact rate particle injector for electrostatic accelerator to simulate long-term micrometeoroid bombardment
IMPACT TESTING MACHINE↗
Testing of Fusion Machine Components Against Cryogenic Pellet Impacts
Shattered pellet injection (SPI), currently the most effective method of disruption mitigation, is currently implemented on tokamaks worldwide for experimental purposes. Cryogenic pellets are formed and fired into an angled surface before entering the plasma. The impact with the angled surface causes the pellets to fragment into a cloud of particles with the purpose of increasing the surface area for ablation. As pellets traverse guide tubes, depending on design, there is a chance of an off-normal pellet impact. Pellet impacts are also, depending on design, possible in the plasma chamber if not fully ablated and assimilated, or if the fragment plume is not directed in the proper direction. This paper outlines a series of pellet impact tests on various tiles and components relevant to the ITER, JET, and ASDEX Upgrade SPI systems. In conclusion, testing was done to assess the potential damage from pellet and fragment plume impacts through high-speed imaging and the visual inspection of components.
Cryogenic pellets↗
A SLINGSHOT SHOCK TESTER
Design and operation of slingshot shock testing machine for small specimens for accelerations to 40000-g and impact velocities to 200-fps
SHOCK TESTING MACHINE↗
On the simulation of ballistic shock loads
Blast or penetrator-impact induced shocks are characterized by high acceleration levels, particularily in the higher frequency range and for a short time duration. These shocks are dangerous for the equipment of ships, combat vehicles, airplanes or spacecraft structures. As ballistic shock loads are insufficiently simulated by laboratory test machines, researchers designed a ballistic shock simulator. The impact induced shocks are simulated by an explosive and the vehicle to be bombarded is replaced by a simplified structure. This structure is suitable to accommodate any equipment which can be tested up to their load limits.
Hollburg, Uwe↗
Materials and processes laboratory composite materials characterization task, part 1. Damage tolerance
A test run was performed on IM6/3501-6 carbon-epoxy in which the material was processed, machined into specimens, and tested for damage tolerance capabilities. Nondestructive test data played a major role in this element of composite characterization. A time chart was produced showing the time the composite material spent within each Branch or Division in order to identify those areas which produce a long turnaround time. Instrumented drop weight testing was performed on the specimens with nondestructive evaluation being performed before and after the impacts. Destructive testing in the form of cross-sectional photomicrography and compression-after-impact testing were used. Results show that the processing and machining steps needed to be performed more rapidly if data on composite material is to be collected within a reasonable timeframe. The results of the damage tolerance testing showed that IM6/3501-6 is a brittle material that is very susceptible to impact damage.
Nettles, A. T.↗
Development of a Composite Material Aerodynamic Demise Model for the Object Reentry Survival Analysis Tool (ORSAT)
The reentry demise of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites is an increasing concern for modern spacecraft at end of life. Unlike traditional materials such as metals, shredding of the material by aerodynamic forces appears to be a major component of the reentry demise mechanism. This paper will describe a new mechanical, strength-based, material demise model for the Object Reentry Survival Analysis Tool (ORSAT) Version 7.1. The model is based on laboratory in-situ and residual strength tests of several FRP materials performed during the NASA Orbital Debris Program Office’s Phase II Composite Material Demise test campaign. To test the residual strength of partially charred FRP materials, the authors tested 107 rectangular shaped samples of different thicknesses that were previously exposed to high-enthalpy flow at the University of Texas at Austin’s Inductively Coupled Plasma Torch facility. Tests were performed under normal atmospheric conditions at NASA Johnson Space Center’s Experimental Impact Laboratory using a Chatillon TCD1000 tensile test machine configured with a three-point bending jig. Mean fracture load, residual strength, delamination, and flexural modulus were measured for each test. An engineering model of aeromechanical demise for each material was developed by correlating the measured residual strength of the samples with the duration and magnitude of the applied heat flux and the mass loss and char progression. This model has been implemented in ORSAT 7.1 for the built-in, charring carbon fiber/epoxy and charring glass fiber/epoxy material models. The new model was verified by calculating the demise of hundreds of FRP composite fragments of various shapes and sizes and checking the calculations for consistency, with specific focus on material characterization in one-dimension. Further tests are planned in hypersonic flow facilities to validate the assumptions used in the model.
Priscilla A. Mendoza↗
Development of a Composite Material Aerodynamic Demise Model for the Object Reentry Survival Analysis Tool (ORSAT)
The reentry demise of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites is an increasing concern for modern spacecraft at end of life. Unlike traditional materials such as metals, shredding of the material by aerodynamic forces appears to be a major component of the reentry demise mechanism. This paper will describe a new mechanical, strength-based, material demise model for the Object Reentry Survival Analysis Tool (ORSAT) Version 7.1. The model is based on laboratory in-situ and residual strength tests of several FRP materials performed during the NASA Orbital Debris Program Office’s Phase II Composite Material Demise test campaign. To test the residual strength of partially charred FRP materials, the authors tested 107 rectangular shaped samples of different thicknesses that were previously exposed to high-enthalpy flow at the University of Texas at Austin’s Inductively Coupled Plasma Torch facility. Tests were performed under normal atmospheric conditions at NASA Johnson Space Center’s Experimental Impact Laboratory using a Chatillon TCD1000 tensile test machine configured with a three-point bending jig. Mean fracture load, residual strength, delamination, and flexural modulus were measured for each test. An engineering model of aeromechanical demise for each material was developed by correlating the measured residual strength of the samples with the duration and magnitude of the applied heat flux and the mass loss and char progression. This model has been implemented in ORSAT 7.1 for the built-in, charring carbon fiber/epoxy and charring glass fiber/epoxy material models. The new model was verified by calculating the demise of hundreds of FRP composite fragments of various shapes and sizes and checking the calculations for consistency, with specific focus on material characterization in one-dimension. Further tests are planned in hypersonic flow facilities to validate the assumptions used in the model.
Priscilla A. Mendoza↗