Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Inlet performance”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1975

Effects of selected design variables on three ramp, external compression inlet performance

Two inlet performance tests and one inlet/airframe drag test were conducted in 1969 at the NASA-Ames Research Center. The basic inlet system was two-dimensional, three ramp (overhead), external compression, with variable capture area. The data from these tests were analyzed to show the effects of selected design variables on the performance of this type of inlet system. The inlet design variables investigated include inlet bleed, bypass, operating mass flow ratio, inlet geometry, and variable capture area.

Kamman, J. H.↗
NASA NTRS1997

IPAC-Inlet Performance Analysis Code

A series of analyses have been developed which permit the calculation of the performance of common inlet designs. The methods presented are useful for determining the inlet weight flows, total pressure recovery, and aerodynamic drag coefficients for given inlet geometric designs. Limited geometric input data is required to use this inlet performance prediction methodology. The analyses presented here may also be used to perform inlet preliminary design studies. The calculated inlet performance parameters may be used in subsequent engine cycle analyses or installed engine performance calculations for existing uninstalled engine data.

Barnhart, Paul J.↗
NASA NTRS2022

Identification of Best Practices for Predicting Inlet Performance Using FUN3D Part 2: Installed Inlets.

A series of studies were performed to assess the impacts of boundary condition type and placement, grid refinement, and modeling parameters such as turbulence model and flux limiter on the predicted inlet performance for installed inlet configurations using the FUN3D flow solver. Two configurations were considered for the study; a wall-mounted Boundary Layer Ingestion (BLI) inlet and the C607 propulsion model tested in the 8x6 Supersonic Wind Tunnel at the NASA Glenn Research Center. The results of the studies were to be used to recommend best practices, as well as to assess the accuracy of FUN3D for inlet predictions. The results of BLI inlet stud-ies showed a minimal impact of grid refinement on the predicted inlet performance for a constant mass flow rate through the inlet. For the C607 propulsion model, the results showed that while the FUN3D predictions at the Aerodynamic Inter-face Plane (AIP) qualitatively agree with the experimental data, FUN3D showed a tendency to overpredict the circumferential distortion metric (IDCmax) and un-derpredict both the radial distortion metric (IDRmax) and the pressure recovery at the AIP (PRAIP ), with the differences between FUN3D and the experimental data increasing with increasing grid refinement and Mach number. Additionally, the outflow boundary location studies performed for both geometries showed that the solution at the AIP was not significantly impacted by the outflow boundary location as long as it was not placed at the location of the AIP. The modeling parameter studies did not indicate a path forward for improved predictions for either inlet con-figuration. Finally, comparisons between the mass flow plug and outflow geometry versions of the C607 propulsion model illustrated favorable agreement, which indi-cates that the differences observed are not caused by the outflow boundary model for this problem. This problem poses significant challenges to Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solvers due to the presence of shocks and flow separation in the inlet.

FUN3D↗
NASA NTRS1975

Inlet performance of the integrated Langley scramjet module

The inlet concept for the Langley Scramjet Module has been developed and proven in Langley wind tunnels over a Mach number range from 2.3 to 6.0 (flight simulation of Mach 2.6 to 7.6). This modular engine concept is designed to integrate with the airframe, which results in precompression of the engine airflow by the vehicle bow shock and additional expansion of the nozzle exhaust gas by the afterbody of the vehicle. With these integration advantages, the inlet can be designed with modest contraction ratios and fixed geometry. Also, the module nozzle exit area can be equal to the capture area, which permits the cowl to be alined with the local flow producing minimum external drag. The inlet leading edges and planar compression surfaces are swept at 48 deg, which provides spillage at low Mach numbers for starting and which reduces the pressure gradient on the top surface to permit ingestion of the vehicle forebody boundary layer into the inlet without separating. Three fuel injection struts provide for the use of a short combustor having low internal cooling requirements. Schedules for mass capture ratio, contraction ratio, and total pressure recovery are well within the acceptable range for a good scramjet propulsion device. The fixed geometry, minimum external drag design has proven to be a practical, high-performance inlet concept.

Trexler, C. A.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Possibilities for improved supersonic inlet performance

The results from detailed large-scale inlet tests were examined to assess the penalties, in terms of vehicle cruise range, for boundary-layer bleed, less than ideal engine-face pressure recovery, inlet weight, and external cowl drag. The assessment suggested specific improvements in the design of the inlet system that may increase the range of a typical supersonic transport approximately 6.9%. While no single design improvement can account for a large increase in range, careful attention to each design detail can yield a substantial total improvement. Because of noise considerations, future engines for advanced supersonic transports may be approximately 50% larger than used for the present study, making the effects of improved inlet performance even more important.

Sorensen, N. E.↗
NASA NTRS1998

Inlet Performance Analysis Code Developed

The design characteristics of an inlet very much depend on whether the inlet is to be flown at subsonic, supersonic, or hypersonic speed. Whichever the case, the primary function of an inlet is to deliver free-stream air to the engine face at the highest stagnation pressure possible and with the lowest possible variation in both stagnation pressure and temperature. At high speeds, this is achieved by a system of oblique and/or normal shock waves, and possibly some isentropic compression. For both subsonic and supersonic flight, current design practice indicates that the inlet should deliver the air to the engine face at approximately Mach 0.45. As a result, even for flight in the high subsonic regime, the inlet must retard (or diffuse) the air substantially. Second, the design of an inlet is influenced largely by the compromise between high performance and low weight. This compromise involves tradeoffs between the mission requirements, flight trajectory, airframe aerodynamics, engine performance, and weight-all of which, in turn, influence each other. Therefore, to study the effects of some of these influential factors, the Propulsion System Analysis Office of the NASA Lewis Research Center developed the Inlet Performance Analysis Code (IPAC). This code uses oblique shock and Prandtl-Meyer expansion theory to predict inlet performance. It can be used to predict performance for a given inlet geometric design such as pitot, axisymmetric, and two-dimensional. IPAC also can be used to design preliminary inlet systems and to make subsequent performance analyses. It computes the total pressure, the recovery, the airflow, and the drag coefficients. The pressure recovery includes losses associated with normal and oblique shocks, internal and external friction, the sharp lip, and diffuser components. Flow rate includes captured, engine, spillage, bleed, and bypass flows. The aerodynamic drag calculation includes drags associated with spillage, cowl lip suction, wave, bleed, and bypass.

Jules, Kenol↗
NASA NTRS1993

Computational parametric study of sidewall-compression scramjet inlet performance at Mach 10

A computational parametric study of three-dimensional, sidewall-compression scramjet inlets was performed to identify the effects of geometric parameters on inlet performance. The parameters were the leading-edge sweep angle, varied between 30 and 60 deg, and the leading-edge position of the cowl, located at the throat and at two forward positions. A laminar boundary layer with cold-wall (T(sub wall) = 300 K (540 R)) boundary conditions was imposed. The parametric study was performed for a Mach number of 10 and a unit free-stream Reynolds number of 7.06 x 10(exp 6) per meter (2.15 x 10(exp 6) per foot) at a geometric contraction ratio of 5. The performance of each configuration was evaluated in terms of the mass capture, throat Mach number, total pressure recovery, kinetic energy efficiency, and internal compression. One computation of an unswept configuration was included as a baseline to determine the effects of introducing leading-edge sweep on the flow-field parameters. The purpose of the computational parametric study was to perform a trade-off of the effects of various parameters on the global performance of the inlet. Although no single optimal configuration emerged, trade-offs among the stated performance parameters identified a leading-edge sweep angle of 45 deg as possessing the most attractive performance characteristics.

Holland, Scott D.↗
NASA NTRS1981

A large-scale investigation of engine influence on inlet performance at angle-of-attack

A low-speed wind tunnel test was conducted in the NASA/Ames 40-x-80-foot wind tunnel to investigate the effect of engine/inlet flowfield interaction on inlet performance near flow separation. The effect of engine/inlet flowfield interaction was determined by comparing the performance of a large-scale subsonic inlet (CR = 1.26) close-coupled and remote-coupled to a TF-34 turbofan engine. The remote coupled inlet configuration removes the influence of the engine on the inlet flowfield and further, typifies conventional small-scale inlet test techniques which generally provide no simulation of turbomachinery effects. Test results indicated that engine interaction allows the inlet to operate with lower distortion levels at and beyond the separation angle-of-attack attained without engine interaction.

Hodder, B. K.↗
NASA NTRS1959

Effect on Inlet Performance of a Cowl Visor and an Internal-Contraction Cowl for Drag Reduction at Mach Numbers 3.07 and 1.89

Two methods for reducing the external cowl angle, and hence the cowl pressure drag, were investigated on a two-dimensional model. One method used at both on- and off-design Mach numbers was the addition of a cowl visor that had the inner surface parallel to the free stream at 0 deg angle of attack. The other method investigated consisted in replacing the original cowl by a flatter cowl that also provided internal contraction. Both the visor and the internal-contraction cowl reduced the cowl pressure drag 64 percent or more. The visor had little effect on inlet performance at the design Mach number except to reduce the stability range slightly. At off-design, the visor caused an increase in critical pressure recovery.

Gertsma, Laurence W.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Top-mounted inlet performance for a V/STOL fighter/attack aircraft configuration

Inlet flow-field and compressor-face performance data were obtained for a 0.095-scale model of vertical/short take-off landing (V/STOL) fighter/attack aircraft configuration with twin top-mounted inlets. Tests were conducted at Mach numbers from 0.6 to 2.0 and angles of attack and sideslip up to 27 deg. and 12 deg., respectively. Reynolds number was held constant at 9.8 x 10 to the 6th power per meter. The effects of inlet location, wing leading-edge extension (LEX) planform area, canopy-dorsal integration, variable incidence canards, and wing leading- and trailing-edge flap deflections were determined. The results show that at Mach numbers up to 0.9, distortion is relatively low (20% or less) at all angles of attack and sideslip. However, at Mach numbers of 1.2 and above, operation may be restricted because of either high distortion or low pressure recovery (80% or less), or both. These difficulties may be overcome with alterations to the LEX/canopy/body juncture.

Smeltzer, Donald B.↗
NASA NTRS1981

An investigation of engine influence on inlet performance

The performance of a conventional engine/inlet installation, in which inlet and engine flow field interaction occurs, was compared to the performance of the same inlet remote coupled to the engine. The remote coupled inlet configuration decouples the influence of the engine on the inlet flow field and simulates current small scale inlet test techniques in which inlet airflow is provided by a vacuum source or coupled engine. The investigation was conducted in the NASA-Ames 40- by 80-foot wind tunnel using a General Electric TF-34 turbofan engine and a subsonic inlet having an average inlet contraction ratio of 1.26. Test results indicated that engine interaction allows the inlet to operate with lower distortion levels at and beyond the separation angle-of-attack experienced without engine interaction.

Hodder, B. K.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Inlet Performance of the NFAC 1/50th-scale 80- by 120- Foot Wind Tunnel

The National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex 80- by 120-Foot Wind Tunnel (80x120) was dedicated in 1987 and rated at 100 knots for full-scale aircraft testing at NASA Ames Research Center. The 80x120 is the world’s largest wind tunnel, designed as an open circuit tunnel with a large aerodynamically treated inlet open to the ambient atmospheric air. In 2017, damage was sustained within the wind tunnel drive system, opening a window to do testing using the existing 1/50th-scale model of the 80- by 120-Foot Wind Tunnel within the full-scale 80- by 120-Foot Wind tunnel test section. The objective of the research was to quantify the turbulence levels within the 1/50th-scale test section as a function of onset atmospheric wind direction (± 90 deg from tunnel center-line), variable test section speed (5 – 50 m/s) and purposeful obtrusion of wind flow into the inlet. The model wind tunnel inlet, contraction, and test section are geometrically identical to that of the full-scale wind tunnel and model testing provides aerodynamic performance characteristics under controlled test conditions allowing for insight into the full-scale test section flow quality. The test section turbulence levels are minimally affected by the onset direction of the ambient atmospheric wind, but are dramatically affected by the speed in the tunnel while operated in the presence of winds. Original design specifications were axial/vertical/lateral turbulence ≤ 0.5% at maximum test section speed, though early full scale tunnel testing determined that lateral turbulence would be ≤ 0.6%. For test section speeds ≥ 30 m/s the tunnel is within the design specification limits. Between 5 m/s and 30 m/s, the test section turbulence levels are dependent on the onset wind direction and test section speed where test section turbulence in the axial, vertical and lateral directions was seen to be between 0.5% and 1% and, at times, greater than 1%. Finally, testing was performed with blockage designs at the inlet to disrupt the wind flow quality entering the tunnel contraction zone in an attempt to create higher levels of turbulence for high turbulent test conditions simulating the earth’s boundary layer. The highest turbulence levels measured were 6% in the axial direction by use of large spires designed to obstruct ≈ 50% of the inlet area.

Inlet Performance↗
NASA NTRS1990

A numerical study of the effects of reverse sweep on a scramjet inlet performance

A comparative numerical study of performance parameters of a similar and an opposite sweep sidewall compression inlet is made. The focus of the study is the investigation of the impact of alternate backward-forward sweep on the compression sidewalls as opposed to back-ward sweep on all the sidewalls. Two equivalent scramjet inlet configurations are designed for this purpose. These inlets have the same wetted areas of compression and expansion and same height and width; but in one inlet all the compression surface are swept back (similar sweep inlet) whereas in the other inlet, alternate surfaces are swept backward and forward (opposite sweep inlet). The cowl closure in both cases begins at the start of the throat region. A three-dimensional Navier-Stokes code is used to calculate the flow through these inlets. Results of these calculations are used to compare the two designs for their performance and flow quality. Effects of boundary- layer ingestion on the performance and overall flow features are also investigated.

Kumar, Ajay↗