Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Juno spacecraft”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Reconstruction of Earth Flyby by the Juno Spacecraft

The Juno spacecraft conducted a successful gravity-assist flyby of the Earth on 09 October 2013, putting the spacecraft on a trajectory to reach Jupiter in July 2016. The DSN tracking was supplemented by tracking from two ESA stations, giving us an unprecedented, near continuous level of tracking for an interplanetary spacecraft flyby of Earth. We discuss the process of reconstructing that trajectory, the challenges encountered in that effort, and the results. In particular, no anomalous velocity change was observed at or near perigee as has been observed in some of the previous Earth gravity assist flybys by other spacecraft.

orbit determination↗

Modeling Meteoroid Impacts on the Juno Spacecraft

Events which meet certain criteria from star-tracker images on board the Juno spacecraft have been proposed to be due to interplanetary dust particle impacts on its solar arrays. These events have been suggested to be caused by particles with diameters larger than 10 μm. Here, we compare the reported event rates to expected dust-impact rates using dynamical meteoroid models for the four most abundant meteoroid/dust populations in the inner solar system. We find that the dust-impact rates predicted by dynamical meteoroid models are not compatible with either the Juno observations in terms of the number of star-tracker events per day, or with the variations of dust flux on Juno's solar panels with time and position in the solar system. For example, the rate of star-tracker events on Juno's antisunward surfaces is the largest during a period in which Juno is expected to experience the peak impact fluxes on the opposite, sunward hemisphere. We also investigate the hypothesis of dust leaving the Martian Hill sphere originating either from the surface of Mars itself or from one of its moons. We do not find such a hypothetical source to be able to reproduce the star-tracker event-rate variations observed by Juno. We conclude that the star-tracker events observed by Juno are unlikely to be the result of instantaneous impacts from the zodiacal cloud.

Interplanetary dust↗

Juno Gravity Science: Five Years of Radio Science Operations with Ka-band Uplink

Since entering orbit on July 4, 2016, the Juno spacecraft has executed 34 closest approach passes of Jupiter, completing the prime mission. During each closest approach, called perijove, the spacecraft comes within 4,000 km of the cloud tops and the motion of the spacecraft becomes perturbed by the gravitational field of Jupiter. These small changes in the motion of the spacecraft are detected using the Juno Gravity Science Instrument by measuring the Doppler shift of the radio link between the Juno spacecraft and NASA’s Deep Space Network (DSN). During a majority of these closest approach passes, the 34-meter DSS-25 antenna transmits simultaneous X-band and Ka-band uplink to the spacecraft. Juno’s onboard X-band transponder and Ka-band translator phase-coherently return the signals back to Earth for reception at the same DSS-25 antenna. The precise frequency of these signals is measured by processing open-loop recordings of the signal. These measurements, characterized by ~5-10 micron/sec accuracies (after calibration of charged particle noise and Earth troposphere), have probed the gravity field of Jupiter to unprecedented precision, allowing for discoveries of Jupiter’s core size and depth of the zonal winds. Successful operations of the instrument during perijoves requires careful planning and coordination between DSN engineers, the Juno project, and the Juno science team. This work discusses the operations of the Juno Gravity Science Instrument after five years of prime mission operations. Lessons learned are documented to be applied to future missions and the Juno extended mission. Although the Juno extended mission formally started on August 1, 2021, on June 7, 2021, the trajectory was modified with a flyby of Ganymede, the third Galilean moon of Jupiter. Gravity and radio science investigations of Jupiter and its moons will continue to play a key role in Juno’s objectives during the extended mission.

Oudrhiri, Kamal↗

Chandra's Observations of Jupiter's X-Ray Aurora During Juno Upstream and Apojove Intervals

The Chandra space telescope has recently conducted a number of campaigns to observe Jupiter's X-ray aurora. The first set of campaigns took place in summer 2016 while the Juno spacecraft was upstream of the planet sampling the solar wind. The second set of campaigns took place in February, June and August 2017 at times when the Juno spacecraft was at apojove (expected close to the magnetopause). We report on these upstream and apojove campaigns including intensities and periodicities of auroral X-ray emissions. This new era of jovian X-ray astronomy means we have more data than ever before, long observing windows (up to 72 kiloseconds for this Chandra set), and successive observations relatively closely spaced in time. These features combine to allow us to pursue novel methods for examining periodicities in the X-ray emission. Our work will explore significance testing of emerging periodicities, and the search for coherence in X-ray pulsing over weeks and months, seeking to understand the robustness and regularity of previously reported hot spot X-ray emissions. The periods that emerge from our analysis will be compared against those which emerge from radio and UV wavelengths.

Lunar & Planetary Science & Exploratio↗

Wave and Particle Analysis of Z-Mode and O-Mode Emission in the Jovian Inner Magnetosphere

We report some of the most intense Z-mode and O-mode observations obtained by the Juno spacecraft while in orbit about Jupiter in a low to mid-latitude region near the inner edge of the Io torus. We have been able to estimate the density of the plasma in this region based on the lower frequency cutoff of the observed Z-mode emission. The results are compatible with the electron density measurements of the Jovian Auroral Distributions Experiment (JADE), on board the Juno spacecraft, if we account for unmeasured cold plasma. Direction-finding measurements indicate that the Z- and O-mode emission have distinct source regions. We have also used the measured phase space density of the JADE and the Jupiter energetic particle detector instruments to calculate estimated local growth rates of the observed O-mode and Z-mode emission assuming a loss cone instability and quasilinear analysis. The results suggest the emissions were observed near, but not within, a source region, and the free energy source is consistent with a loss cone. We have thus carried out the quasilinear wave analysis of the assumed remote Z- and O-mode wave growths. It is shown that the remotely generated waves, propagated through an inhomogeneous medium to the satellite location, may account for the observed wave characteristics. The importance of Z-mode in accelerating electrons in the inner Jovian magnetosphere makes these new wave mode confirmations at Jupiter of particular interest.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗

Juno Orbit Determination Experience During First Year At Jupiter

The Juno spacecraft successfully inserted into a polar orbit around Jupiter on 5- July-2016. Since the Jupiter Orbit Insertion (JOI) maneuver, Juno has completed six orbits around Jupiter. The mission plan at the time of JOI was for Juno to perform two 53.5-day capture orbits before executing a Period Reduction Maneuver (PRM) to place the spacecraft into its intended 14-day science orbit. This maneuver was canceled due to a concern with the propulsion system. As a result, the Juno spacecraft will remain in its longer orbit period for rest of its mission. This paper discusses the Navigation Team’s experience: the orbit determination strategy and how it changed due to the cancellation of the PRM, challenges fitting the data during perijove, and how we reconstructed the trajectory during Juno’s first year in orbit.

Thompson, Paul↗

Initial Operations Experience and Results from the Juno Gravity Experiment

Radio communications between the Juno spacecraft, in orbit around Jupiter, and the Earth-based observing stations of NASA’s Deep Space Network enable measurements of the Doppler shift induced on the radio signals by Juno’s motion in the Jovian environment. This measurement of the Doppler shift improves the knowledge of Jupiter’s gravitational field. As a radio science instrument, Juno’s gravity science instrument utilizes a ground component at the Deep Space Network’s DSS-25 antenna, equipped with simultaneous dual X- and Ka-band transmitters and receivers, and a spacecraft component, which includes X- and Ka-band transponders to relay the transmitted signal back to Earth. Originally planned to be in 14-day orbits around Jupiter, a risk identified in the propulsion system led to the decision to stay in the 53-day orbit period. Rapid turnaround of observation planning led to successful near-term perijove passes. Although maintaining a 53-day orbit period provides a scientific benefit to the gravity science investigation, the longer orbit period further increases the large dynamic range in Doppler shift and pointing angles induced by the geometry of each perijove. Between entering orbit at Jupiter on July 5, 2016 and September 2017, the Juno spacecraft has executed eight closest approach periods every 53 days where science data was collected. The first five perijove passes were conducted in different telecom configurations, each presenting unique challenges in data collection and processing. Perijoves PJ-01, PJ-02, PJ-03, and PJ-06 utilized the high-gain antenna and various configurations of the X- and Ka-bands. Perijoves PJ-04 and PJ-05 utilized the medium-gain antenna at X-band only while the spacecraft was off-Earth point. Additional perijoves are planned every 53-days, with an additional five by March 2018. Lessons learned from operating and collecting data at each perijove are documented and will be utilized in future perijoves. Analysis of the first two gravity science perijoves has improved the precision of Jupiter’s gravity field by a factor of five, providing crucial constraints on the interior structure of Jupiter.

Buccino, Dustin↗

An Overview of the Juno Mission to Jupiter

Arriving in orbit around the planet Jupiter in 2016 after a five-year journey, the Juno spacecraft will begin a one-year investigation of the gas giant in order to understand its origin and evolution by determining its water abundance and constraining its core mass. In addition, Juno will map the planet's magnetic and gravitational fields, map its atmosphere, and explore the three-dimensional structure of Jupiter's polar magnetosphere and auroras. Juno will discriminate among different models for giant planet formation. These investigations will be conducted over the course of thirty-two 11-day elliptical polar orbits of the planet. The orbits are designed to avoid Jupiter's highest radiation regions. The spacecraft is a spinning, solar-powered system carrying a complement of eight science instruments for conducting the investigations. The spacecraft systems and instruments take advantage of significant design and operational heritage from previous space missions.

Juno↗

A Survey of Small-Scale Waves and Wave-Like Phenomena in Jupiter’s Atmosphere Detected by JunoCam

In the first 20 orbits of the Juno spacecraft around Jupiter, we have identified a variety of wave‐like features in images made by its public‐outreach camera, JunoCam. Because of Juno's unprecedented and repeated proximity to Jupiter's cloud tops during its close approaches, JunoCam has detected more wave structures than any previous surveys. Most of the waves appear in long wave packets, oriented east‐west and populated by narrow wave crests. Spacing between crests were measured as small as ~30 km, shorter than any previously measured. Some waves are associated with atmospheric features, but others are not ostensibly associated with any visible cloud phenomena and thus may be generated by dynamical forcing below the visible cloud tops. Some waves also appear to be converging, and others appear to be overlapping, possibly at different atmospheric levels. Another type of wave has a series of fronts that appear to be radiating outward from the center of a cyclone. Most of these waves appear within 5° of latitude from the equator, but we have detected waves covering planetocentric latitudes between 20°S and 45°N. The great majority of the waves appear in regions associated with prograde motions of the mean zonal flow. Juno was unable to measure the velocity of wave features to diagnose the wave types due to its close and rapid flybys. However, both by our own upper limits on wave motions and by analogy with previous measurements, we expect that the waves JunoCam detected near the equator are inertia‐gravity waves.

Lunar and Planetary Science and Exploration↗

Capabilities and Performance of Juno’s Radio Science Instrumentation

The Juno Gravity Science Instrument is a radio science instrument onboard the Juno spacecraft, which entered orbit around Jupiter in 2016. The prime objective of the radio science investigation is to estimate the gravitational field of Jupiter from the Doppler shift on the radio link between the spacecraft and the Earth-based observing antennas of NASA’s Deep Space Network (DSN). The instrument is composed of a ground component at the DSN’s DSS-25 antenna, equipped with simultaneous dual X- and Ka-band transmitters and receivers, and a spacecraft component, which includes X- and Ka-band transponders to relay the transmitted signal back to Earth. The frequencies of these signals are measured using sensitive open-loop and closed-loop receivers of the DSN. Using the unique geometry of Juno’s orbit around Jupiter and the exquisite precision of the radio science instrumentation (~5-10 microns/sec one-way), the gravity field of Jupiter has been probed to unprecedented precision, allowing for discoveries of Jupiter’s core size and depth of the zonal winds. This precision is thanks to a detailed data processing and calibration techniques. An Advanced Water Vapor Radiometer measures the tropospheric delay and a linear combination X- and Ka-band links calibrates for Earth ionosphere, solar plasma, and Jovian plasma. Recent measurements probed the electron content inside Jupiter’s Io Plasma Torus, a doughnut-shaped ring of charged particles caught in Jupiter’s magnetosphere. Results from these measurements not only contributes to the scientific literature but also informs the performance of the instrument itself and can be used in future planning.

Oudrhiri, Kamal↗

Juno Trajectory Redesign Following PRM Cancellation

In October 2016, the Juno spacecraft was operating in 53.5-day capture orbits and final preparations were underway for a Period Reduction Maneuver (PRM) to achieve the planned 14-day science orbits. However, one week before PRM execution, a main engine propulsion system anomaly prompted an indefinite PRM delay and immediate updates to the Juno reference trajectory. This paper outlines stopgap trajectory design activities immediately following PRM delay and longer-term trajectory redesign considerations including various possible PRM epochs, orbit period, longitude grid characteristics, and eclipse avoidance strategies that culminated in the decision to cancel PRM and adopt a new 53-day reference trajectory.

Bordi, John J.↗

Juno Gravity Science: Preparing for Data Collection at Jupiter

One of the primary goals of the Juno mission is to investigate Jupiter’s interior by mapping its gravitational field with the gravity science instrument. The Juno spacecraft has two radio science components that comprise the gravity science instrument: the X-band telecommunications system for a X-up/X-down link and a Ka-band Translator for a Ka-up/Ka-down link. The Deep Space Network’s DSS-25 beam waveguide antenna at the Goldstone Deep Space Communications Complex in California provides the X- and Ka-band uplink alongside an Advanced Water Vapor Radiometer to calibrate tropospheric effects. X-band and Ka-band downlink data are collected with both open-loop and closed-loop receivers located at the complex. Utilization of Ka-band provides scientific benefit to the Doppler measurements, but also adds operational challenges. Pointing of the uplink and downlink Ka-band signals requires additional systems to be calibrated and operated by the Deep Space Network; and the higher frequency of Ka-band means the signal dynamics are increased by a factor of four over X-band signals. Due to the spacecraft’s elliptical orbit and 4000 kilometer perijove altitude, it accelerates at an extreme rate as it approaches Jupiter, inducing large dynamic ranges in Doppler range of approximately 6 MHz over 3 hours at Ka-band. After the installation of a new Ka-band transmitter at DSS-25 for Juno was completed in 2015, end-to-end testing was conducted to ensure readiness for operations at Jupiter and provide an initial assessment of the performance. Cruise testing was conducted in the same operational configuration that the system will be used in during perijove passes. Processed open-loop data yielded uncalibrated Doppler residuals of 1.9 mHz at X-band and 6.0 mHz at Ka-band with 5-second compression time. Conduction of these tests has prepared the instrument and the operations team for science data collection during the science phase of the mission.

Buccino, Dustin↗

Juno Mission Simulation

The Juno spacecraft is planned to launch in August of 2012 and would arrive at Jupiter four years later. The spacecraft would spend more than one year orbiting the planet and investigating the existence of an ice-rock core; determining the amount of global water and ammonia present in the atmosphere, studying convection and deep- wind profiles in the atmosphere; investigating the origin of the Jovian magnetic field, and exploring the polar magnetosphere. Juno mission management is responsible for mission and navigation design, mission operation planning, and ground-data-system development. In order to ensure successful mission management from initial checkout to final de-orbit, it is critical to share a common vision of the entire mission operation phases with the rest of the project teams. Two major challenges are 1) how to develop a shared vision that can be appreciated by all of the project teams of diverse disciplines and expertise, and 2) how to continuously evolve a shared vision as the project lifecycle progresses from formulation phase to operation phase. The Juno mission simulation team addresses these challenges by developing agile and progressive mission models, operation simulations, and real-time visualization products. This paper presents mission simulation visualization network (MSVN) technology that has enabled a comprehensive mission simulation suite (MSVN-Juno) for the Juno project.

space vehicles↗

Maneuver Operations During Juno’s Approach, Orbit Insertion, and Early Orbit Phase

The Juno spacecraft was launched on August 5, 2011 for a 1795-day journey to Jupiter, and arrived on July 5, 2016 with the successful Jupiter Orbit Insertion (JOI) maneuver. This paper will discuss the maneuver operations that took place starting from the Jupiter approach phase (specifically TCM11 on February 3, 2016) through JOI, and the first year of Juno orbital operations through OTM07.

Pavlak, Thomas A.↗

Maneuver Design for the Juno Mission: Inner Cruise

The Juno spacecraft launched in August 2011 and, following a successful Earth flyby in October 2013, is on course for a nominal orbit insertion at Jupiter in July 2016. This paper examines the design and execution of deterministic and statistical trajectory correction maneuvers during the first approximately 27 months of post-launch operations that defined the "Inner Cruise" phase of the Juno mission. Topics of emphasis include the two deep space maneuvers, Earth flyby altitude biasing strategy, and the sequence of trajectory correction maneuvers executed in the weeks prior to the successful Earth gravity assist.

Pavlak, Thomas A.↗