Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “LANSCE accelerator”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Multi-beam operation of LANSCE accelerator facility

The Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE) accelerator facility has been in operation for 50 years performing important scientific support for national security. The unique feature of the LANSCE accelerator facility is multi-beam operation, delivering beams to five experimental areas. The near-term plans are to replace obsolete and almost end-of-life systems of the LANSCE linear accelerator with a modern 100-MeV Front End with significant improvement in beam quality. This paper summarizes experimental results obtained during the operation of the LANSCE accelerator facility and considers plans to expand the performance of the accelerator for near- and long-term operations.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

Upgrading the LANSCE accelerator with a SNS RF-driven H− ion source

The LANSCE accelerator is currently powered by a filament-driven, biased converter-type H− ion source that operates at 10%, the highest plasma duty factor for this type of source, using only ∼2.2 SCCM of H2. The ion source needs to be replaced every 4 weeks, which takes up to 4 days. The measured negative beam current of 12–16 mA falls below the desired 24 mA acceptance of the LANCSE accelerator. The SNS (Spallation Neutron Source) RF-driven, H− ion source injects ∼50 mA of H− beam into the SNS accelerator at 60 Hz with a 6% duty factor and an availability of >99.5% but requires ∼30 SCCM of H2. Up to 7 A h of H− have been produced during the 14-weeks-long source service cycles, which is unprecedented for small emittance, high-current, pulsed H− ion sources. The emittance of the SNS source is slightly smaller than the emittance of the LANSCE source. The SNS source also features unrivaled low Cs consumption and can be installed and started up in <12 h. LANSCE and SNS are working toward the use of SNS H− ion sources on the LANSCE accelerator because they could (a) fill the LANSCE accelerator to its capacity, (b) decrease the source replacement time by a factor of up to 7, and (c) increase source lifetime by a factor of about 4. This paper discusses some of the challenges that emerge when trying to match a different H− source into an existing injector with significantly different characteristics and operating regimes.

Stockli, Martin P.↗

LANSCE Accelerator Modernization Project (LAMP) Overview [Slides]

LANSCE is based on a high-current 800 MeV proton accelerator capable of delivering 1 MW of beam power to the central target area. The LANSCE accelerator provides beam simultaneously to 5 separate experimental areas. LANSCE operates with 650 µs RF macro pulses at 120 Hz. Within this macro pulse several different beam timing patterns are utilized. LANSCE also accelerates H + and H – simultaneously. LANSCE celebrated 50 years of beam delivery in 2022.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

Advancement of LANSCE accelerator facility as a 1-MW Fusion Prototypic Neutron Source

The Fusion Prototypic Neutron Source (FPNS) is considered to be a testbed for scientific understanding of material degradation in future nuclear fusion reactors (Zinkle and Moeslang, 2013; Summary Report on the FPNS Workshop, 2018; Pitcher et al., 2019). The primary mission of FPNS is to provide a damage rate in iron samples of 8-11 dpa/calendar year with He/dpa ratio of 10 appm in irradiation volume of 50 cm 3 or larger with irradiation temperature 300–1000 °C and flux gradient less than 20%/cm in the plane of the sample. The Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE) is an attractive candidate for the FPNS project. The Accelerator Facility was designed and operated for an extended period as a 0.8-MW Meson Factory. The existing setup of the LANSCE accelerator complex can nearly fulfill requirements of the fusion neutron source station. The primary function of the upgraded accelerator systems is the safe and reliable delivery of a 1.25-mA continuous proton beam current at 800-MeV beam energy from the switchyard to the target assembly to create 1 MW power of proton beam interacting with a solid tungsten target. The present study describes existing accelerator setup and further development required to meet the needs of FPNS project.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

LANSCE Accelerator Modernization Project Conceptual Design Report

The accelerator complex now known as the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE) began operation in 1972 as LAMPF, the Los Alamos Meson Production Facility. In the intervening 53 years, the complex has been expanded in capability several times, both in terms of its accelerator performance and the user facilities it supports.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

Mitigation of Beam Losses in LANSCE Linear Accelerator

Suppression of beam losses is essential for successful operation of high-intensity accelerator facility. The LANSCE accelerator started routine operation in 1972 as a 0.8 MW average proton beam power facility for meson physics research, and delivered highpower beam for a quarter century. The accelerator currently delivers 100 MeV proton beam to Isotope Production Facility (IPF) and 800 MeV H- beams to various experimental areas. The accelerator is equipped with two independent injectors for H + and H - beams, merging at the entrance of a 201.25 MHz Drift Tube Linac (DTL). The DTL performs acceleration up to the energy of 100 MeV. After the DTL, the Transition Region beamline directs a 100 MeV proton beam to the Isotope Production Facility, while the H - beam is accelerated up to the final energy of 800 MeV in an 805- MHz Coupled Cavity Linac. The H - beams, created with different time structure by a lowenergy chopper, are distributed in the Switch Yard (SY) to four experimental areas: the Lujan Neutron Scattering Center equipped with a Proton Storage Ring (PSR), the Weapons Neutron Research facility (WNR), the Proton Radiography facility (pRad), and the Ultra-Cold Neutron facility (UCN). Multi-beam operation requires careful control of accelerator tune to minimize beam losses. In this paper we review main effects affecting beam losses in LANSCE linear accelerator and discuss methods to reduce them.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

The LANSCE experimental program: accelerator requirements

The LANSCE accelerator complex exploits a flexible, high power 800 MeV proton linear accelerator to enable a broad swath of experimental work supporting multiple scientific programs. The beam requirements for these programs are diverse and change over time. The purpose of this document is to record, at a high level, the experimental requirements driving the beam delivery requirements for each experimental facility at LANSCE. Revision 0 serves to baseline the current set of experiments, and we expect to revise the document on an as-needed basis when either the experimental requirements change or are found to require a more complete definition.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

LAMP Low-Energy Region Options: Workshop Report and Ranking Assessment

The LANSCE accelerator complex at Los Alamos National Laboratory provides beam to five user facilities: IPF, pRad, UCN, WNR and the Lujan Center. Each user facility receives a beam tailored to its specific requirements, including species (H+ or H- ) and beam pulse format. The capabilities and beam requirements of the LANSCE user facilities are documented elsewhere. The core components of the LANSCE accelerator complex – the beam source area, drift-tube and cavity-coupled linear accelerators – are more than 50 years old; a critical subsystem for beam delivery to the Lujan Center, the proton storage ring (PSR), is approximately 40 years old, with its last major refresh being completed in the late 1990s. The LAMP project is intended to begin a revitalization and update of the LANSCE accelerator complex, starting with the beam source region, drift-tube linac, and PSR.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

LANSCE 21st Century Deterrence

The LANSCE accelerator is an important tool in the assessment and certification of the nation’s nuclear stockpile. LANSCE provides critical materials and nuclear data needed to develop a predictive capability for the performance of nuclear weapons. As the stockpile ages, materials are replaced, and manufacturing processes change, it is critical that we understand how these changes impact device performance. Dynamic proton radiography and neutron diffraction are ideally suited to contribute to this need. These capabilities are essential to enabling the NNSA labs to become more responsive and agile in advancing the deterrent of the future.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

Beam dynamics in independent phased cavities

Linear accelerators containing the sequence of independently phased cavities with constant geometrical velocity along each structure are widely used in practice. The chain of cavities with identical cell lengths is utilized within a certain beam velocity range, with subsequent transformation to the next chain with higher cavity velocity. Design and analysis of beam dynamics in this type of accelerator are usually performed using numerical simulations. A full theoretical description of particle acceleration in an array of independent phased cavities has not been developed. In the present paper, we provide an analytical treatment of beam dynamics in such linacs employing Hamiltonian formalism. We begin our analysis with an examination of beam dynamics in an equivalent traveling wave of a single cavity, propagating within accelerating section with constant phase velocity. We then consider beam dynamics in arrays of cavities, utilizing an effective traveling wave propagating along with the whole accelerator with the velocity of synchronous (reference) particle. The analysis concluded with the determination of the matched beam conditions. Finally, we present a beam dynamics study in 805 MHz Coupled Cavity Linac of the LANSCE accelerator facility.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

New accelerator capabilities with the high-gradient C-band [Slides]

LANSCE accelerator upgrades: Applications such as pRad desire higher proton beam energy. Material science at LANL will benefit from powerful directional high repetition rate X-ray sources. As it considers itself to be the NNSA accelerator laboratory, LANL should play role in developing compact accelerators for various national security missions.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

LAMP Operational Concepts

This brief report describes the major operational changes resulting from accelerator design and implementation of the LAMP scope. Improvements in operational performance are discussed, along with implications for integration with the existing LANSCE accelerator complex. Potential impacts to the present LANSCE operational modes and integration with the existing personnel and machine protection systems are also discussed.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

Post-DTL Beam Delivery

Ensuring that the beam delivered from the upgraded Front-End (FE) meets the Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) at each user facility is critical to the success of the LANSCE Accelerator Modernization Project (LAMP). For a high-intensity, multi-user facility like LANSCE, compliance with beam loss and radiation thresholds is as important as the charge delivered to each target. While early LAMPF/LANSCE operations relied on iterative tuning to minimize losses from beam halo and tail particles, the new FE may introduce different beam distributions and loss modes—making predictive modeling essential. To manage this, the F2E (Front-End to End) effort is developing detailed particle-tracking models that reflect realistic beamline conditions, including halo formation and expected diagnostic readings. These "snapshot" simulations aim to benchmark live machine performance at a given moment. This will help quantify how beam quality from the new FE will propagate downstream through the facility. Only by validating these models can we confidently assess and mitigate the potential impacts of the LAMP FE on beam delivery. Post-DTL, the beam splits to serve five major user facilities. Historically, low-energy beam transport has been modeled using TRACE, and higher-energy sections with TRANSPORT. These have now been unified into MAD-X format and validated with codes such as Elegant, pyOrbit, XSuite, Impact-Z, and HPSim. The primary focus now is on accurate modeling of full particle distributions (including beam halo) as they traverse the accelerator and beamlines to each experimental station. All models are at various stages of validation with empirical data.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

SRF Resonators for a bi-directional Energy Ramping Upgrade of the Isotope Production Facility Beamline at LANL

The LANL Isotope Production Facility (IPF) is one of the two high-current proton linear accelerators operated under the auspices of the DOE Office of Nuclear Physics Isotope Development and Production for Research Applications Program. The IPF beamline operates with a fixed 100-MeV energy proton beam, diverted from the LANSCE accelerator and guided towards the isotope production target station. The fixed beam energy limits the number of isotopes that can be produced at IPF, and adversely affects the purity of isotopes produced at non-optimal energies. In particular, the IPF program is receiving increasing numbers of requests for high purity isotopes such as Np-236 (national security applications) and Re-186 (medical therapy). These are typically produced via (p,n) and (p,2n) nuclear reactions, requiring very tight control of the incident energies on the production targets to ensure an end product with a high radionuclidic purity. It is well known that this level of energy control cannot be achieved when a 100 MeV beam of mono-energetic protons is degraded to the required energies, typically below 30 MeV, as too much energy spread is acquired. Operating the IPF beamline at lower, mono-energetic beam energies such as at 40 MeV will allow the required tight energy control in target assemblies to ensure a high purity product. In addition, NP has requested a LANL/BNL/ORNL collaboration focus on establishing a national large-scale production capability for the therapy isotope Ac-225. Recent nuclear cross section measurements done at LANL show that due to a steep rise in production cross section towards higher proton energies (See Figure 2), proton beams at energies substantially greater than 100 MeV will be highly beneficial for Ac-225 production [AC255]. Such higher-energy beams cannot be delivered to IPF at present. Lower-energy beams (70 MeV and 40 MeV) can be delivered but only in sole-use mode; all other LANSCE users must be offline during 70 MeV or 40 MeV operation.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗

LANSCE Facility Longevity Assessment

This LANSCE Facility Longevity Assessment examined 34 total systems critical to the operation of the LANSCE accelerator complex. These systems are primarily owned, operated, and maintained by AOT Division. Based on the criteria used in this assessment, there are 12 AOT Division systems that are potential high risk as related to longterm LANSCE operations. These systems may also impact the success of LAMP. Also summarized in this report are the facility activities planned over the next decade. These include general facility maintenance and infrastructure upgrades, as well as planned electrical system upgrades. The LANSCE Facility Operations (LFO) Division is responsible for this activity scope and budget planning. Most of the planned activities are general in nature and should have little impact on accelerator operations or LAMP activities as currently envisioned. However, close coordination with between AOT, LFO, and LAMP would be prudent. A next step should be to develop an actionable plan to address the high-risk systems. Potential criteria for developing such a plan could include: (1) Evaluating the global impact of the system (operations, program, safety, etc.), (2) Ranking by impact (ranked now by risk), (3) Estimating cost to implement the corrective actions (Is there already a plan or not?), and (4) Estimating the time required for corrective actions. An alternative could include integration of the assessment data into both the Asset Management System and the Maintenance Analytics Risk Register.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗