Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “LETID”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Understanding Microscopic Mechanisms of LeTID and LID and their Unifying Features by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance

LID degradation involves not only creation of ~ 10^12 cm^-3 recombination centers, but also ~ 10^16 cm^-3 shallow negative-U traps. In Ga-doped Si, LID EPR defects don't appear, but some traps are still created. LeTID: Si DB and H-hyperfine EPR signatures. We postulate that the defect responsible for LeTID is a partially hydrogenated (multivacancy) with a Si dangling bond and H in the vicinity. O involvement is possible yet unclear. We prove that H is related to the structure of the LeTID defect with isotope experiments and its EPR signal is comparable and linear with the Si DB signal upon LeTID degradation. Working on simulating these results with DFT to obtain more detailed defect structure.

Cz Si↗

Energy Yield Loss Due to LETID

This presentation presents an open-source LETID model part of the PVDegradationTools, which can calculate solar modules degradation due to Light and Elevated Temperature (LETID).

degradation↗

Understanding the Mechanism of Light and Elevated Temperature Induced Degradation of p-type Silicon Solar Cells (Final Report)

Light- and elevated-temperature-induced degradation (LeTID) was first discovered in multicrystalline Si (mc-Si) solar cells and was initially attributed to metal impurities. Later, LeTID was reported in Czochralski (Cz) and float-zone (FZ) Si, and is considered as an important efficiency loss mechanism in p-type passivated emitter rear contact (p-PERC) Cz Si solar cells. LeTID causes ~10% relative and permeant efficiency losses in these cells in warmer climate regions where the module temperature is > 50 °C. Unlike light-induced degradation (LID), which is also observed in p-PERC cells, LeTID is slower and takes weeks to months in the field to saturate. Another difference compared to LID is that regeneration in LeTID proceeds very slowly, and field regeneration could take > 25 years — essentially the life of the module. Unlike B-O defects that are responsible for LID, neither B nor O impurities are directly involved in LeTID. LeTID appears to be unique to p-type Si, and is also observed in Ga-doped Si. Currently, most experimental evidence relates LeTID to the injection of hydrogen present in the dielectric surface passivation layers, such as SiN x and Al 2 O 3 , into the monocrystalline Si (c-Si) bulk during the fast-firing step. The involvement of hydrogen is further strengthened by controlled studies that show that increasing the amount of hydrogen in the dielectric during fast-firing increases the degree of LeTID. Similar to LID, a regeneration process has been discovered for LeTID. Regeneration of LeTID defects occurs when samples are exposed to 2–4 Suns illumination at elevated temperatures of 140–220 °C for 2–15 hr. Given the slower kinetics of LeTID and sample regeneration compared to LID, this poses a challenge for the manufacturing and field reliability of p-PERC cells, which will be the leading photovoltaic technologies over the next decade. Therefore, there is a need to understand LeTID and develop strategies to mitigate this effect. The defect responsible for LeTID has been extensively studied with over 100 publications, but direct spectroscopic evidence of this defect’s structure is lacking. Without an atomistic understanding of the LeTID defect, it is difficult to assess the long-term efficacy of the current industrial mitigation strategies. This, in turn, has implications on energy production for tens of gigawatts of these cells that will be deployed yearly worldwide. Using electron paramagnetic resonance, we identified a defect associated with LeTID with a g-value of 2.006, which we attribute to an Si dangling bond in an extended defect such as a vacancy agglomerate with H possibly within or in close vicinity. These vacancy agglomerates are likely created during the firing process, during which time H atoms are also injected into the bulk from the hydrogenated SiN x dielectric layer. Our atomistic-level insight shows that the LeTID defect can be mitigated by targeted intrinsic defect engineering of the c-Si material through a slower pull rate of the Cz ingot or 1000 °C oxygen ambient processing of the Si wafer to reduce the vacancy concentration. This project was a collaborative effort between the Colorado School of Mines and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Degradation Mode Identification by Photocarrier Lifetime Spectroscopy on Devices and Test Structures

In this presentation, I examine the basic concepts of the device physics that can be used to distinguish various degradation and recovery modes on a cell level. The known degradation modes (bulk LeTID and LID, UVID, etc.) are due to defects and impurities that cause the photocarrier recombination according to Shockley-Reed-Hall (SRH) statistics. The SRH recombination rate strongly depends on the balance of electron and hole capture rates into the defects, which in turn, are governed by their local concentrations. The strongest recombination takes place at approximately equal concentrations of electrons and holes, while at low injection conditions (when one type of carrier dominates) the SRH recombination is suppressed. For cell degradation modes that affect the passivated interface (UVID, H-induced TOPCon contact degradation) the defects are at the interface under low-injection conditions due to either high local doping or the adjacent built-in charge in the dielectric. This mode is characterized by changes in the "diode prefactor" J01 slope in the inverse lifetime-injection level curve. In contrast, bulk degradation (LeTID, LID) affects bulk lifetime, with J01 slope unchanged. Carrier lifetime - injection level plots therefore serve as clear indicators of different degradation modes and are shown by experimental examples.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

R&D to Ensure a Scientific Basis for Qualification Tests and Standards (Final Report)

Project return on investment in a photovoltaic (PV) system depends increasingly on maintaining high energy yields, and the system lifetime is a major factor in levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). Thus, the rate of PV deployment and the success of these assets depends upon reliable long-term power generation. The overarching objective of this program is to improve photovoltaic (PV) module reliability via development of tests and standards. Where reliability problems or risk are discovered, we can design tests to ensure that these liabilities don't affect future generations of products. Customers can use these tests to understand which products are susceptible to certain degradation mechanisms, and manufacturers can use the tests to design unwanted characteristics out of their products. The work under this program identifies PV reliability needs, performs characterization that provides scientific understanding of targeted degradation mechanisms, and translates those data into practical and predictive test protocols and standards. Major accomplishments include: A model for polarization-type potential induced degradation (PID-p) was developed and validated against experimental data. NREL is currently leading a new edition of IEC 62804-1 for PID detection. PID-p can cause large losses in current and voltage for some module designs on cloudy days. Finite element modeling (FEM) and experiment was used to determine when cells crack in a module. It was shown that cells in landscape orientation are much more likely to crack than those on portrait orientation. Shortly thereafter, the first products with portrait-oriented cells were introduced. Studies of how to test for light and elevated temperature degradation (LeTID) culminated with the publication of IEC TS 63342. Software to predict the progression of LeTID was developed, validated, and made publicly available. Field validated tests and international standards for durability of PV module coatings abrasion, backsheets, and encapsulants were developed. Examples are IEC 62788-1-1, IEC 62788-2 ED2, IEC TS 62788-7-2, IEC 62788-7-3 ED1, IEC 63209-2. NREL led the development a high-temperature testing technical specification, and published guidelines that enable installers to determine whether higher-temperature testing is needed, simply based on location and mounting configuration. In a number of our case studies, variations in the bills of materials or workmanship have been associated with variations in reliability. These observations emphasize the importance of quality assurance to reliability. A framework for criticality (i.e. Pareto) analysis was developed and published. The framework helps us and other researchers determine what problems should be addressed for reliability research to have the biggest industry impact. NREL continues to participate actively in international standards development and stakeholder engagement activities, including organizing an annual PV Reliability Workshop. These activities are important for ensuring we address issues that are relevant and timely, and that we convey our results to those who may benefit.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

PV Lifetime Project (2024 NREL Annual Report)

DOE’s PV Lifetime project was initiated in 2016 with the goal of accurately characterizing the early-life evolution of photovoltaic (PV) field performance. Different PV cell and module technologies result in different initial degradation rates due to effects like light-induced degradation (LID) and light & elevated temperature-induced degradation (LeTID). To accurately characterize the initial field degradation of maximum power (Pmp) requires the use of high-accuracy indoor IV curve measurements at standard test conditions. Therefore, PV modules involved in this study are removed from the field once or twice per year and brought indoors for measurement under constant temperature and irradiance conditions.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

PV Lifetime Project - 2025 NLR Annual Report

DOE's PV Lifetime project was initiated in 2016 with the goal of accurately characterizing the early-life evolution of photovoltaic (PV) field performance. Different PV cell and module technologies result in different initial degradation rates due to effects like light-induced degradation (LID) and light and elevated temperature-induced degradation (LeTID). To accurately characterize the initial field degradation of maximum power (Pmp) requires the use of high-accuracy indoor IV curve measurements at standard test conditions. Therefore, PV modules involved in this study are removed from the field once or twice per year and brought indoors for measurement under constant temperature and irradiance conditions. Overall annual degradation rates are as follows: our first modules to be deployed (Jinko, Trina, QCells) have annual median degradation rate between -0.4%/yr and -0.5%/yr mainly concentrated in the first year. Mission Solar, LG and Panasonic modules are all displaying modest degradation, better than -0.3% / year. Indeed, Mission Solar fielded modules degraded less than their control modules which remain indoors and un-exposed. This is also true for the LONGi monofacial modules, which had some field degradation, but not as much as the degradation of the indoor control modules. The LONGi bifacial modules on the other hand have degraded more in the field than their monofacial counterparts, although still a modest amount (-0.4 %/yr). Of the four newest module types in the study, only one has had better than average degradation. REC360NP2 (N-type TOPCon) had a slight performance increase over the first year and a half of field deployment. For the other three new module types (plus one older module type), degradation was more rapid. In our study of 16 module types, four have demonstrated degradation faster than -1%/yr: two N-type Heterojunction, one PERC bifacial and one PERC shingled module. The two heterojunction modules in our study are degrading the most rapidly. Sunpreme n-HIT bifacial modules are showing a loss rate around -1.5%/yr, for over -10% total to date. This is largely attributed to loss in front-side Isc. This is distinct from the REC 405AA-Pure modules which have degraded -6.8% in only a year and a half, for an annualized decline of -3.9 %/yr. For this module type, the decline is roughly half in Voc, with the remaining split between FF and Isc. Of the remaining two module types, Prism Solar PERC bifacial has declined -5% total since 2019, although this loss appears to have stabilized in the most recent measurement. The Solaria PowerX-400R Shingled module type has also lost around -3.2% in the first 1.5 years of field deployment. It remains to be seen if these losses will continue with time.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

PV Module BOM and Test Data

This dataset contains compiled results from annual PV Module Reliability Scorecards published by PV Evolution Labs – also known as PVEL. These scorecards show summary results of PV module testing performed by PVEL and name specific models of PV modules as "Top Performers" in various tests. Full details on testing, Top Performer status and other criteria for inclusion in Scorecards are documented in reports and online documentation available from https://www.modulescorecard.pvel.com. This dataset is not affiliated with PVEL and is intended only to simplify sorting and filtering Scorecard data and finding specific PV module models and Top Performer results. Note that data included in Scorecards has evolved over time, so not all data is available for all years, and testing protocols and Scorecard criteria have been changed over time.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Interconnect: Cooperative Research and Development Final Report, CRADA Number CRD-13-00507 (Project 4)

This CRADA modification involves analyses on a variety of CdTe-PV related materials, test structures, solar cells, and modules produced at FSLR and/or NLR and adds analysis related to module degradation and reliability. Materials will be provided by FSLR, NLR, and/or by interleaving FSLR and NLR layers and processes. Module reliability activities will include technical risk assessment, materials characterization, module and test structure characterization, modeling, accelerated test development, and outdoor testing.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗