Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “LINEAR EQUATION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2010

A Chess-Like Game for Teaching Engineering Students to Solve Large System of Simultaneous Linear Equations

Solving large (and sparse) system of simultaneous linear equations has been (and continues to be) a major challenging problem for many real-world engineering/science applications [1-2]. For many practical/large-scale problems, the sparse, Symmetrical and Positive Definite (SPD) system of linear equations can be conveniently represented in matrix notation as [A] {x} = {b} , where the square coefficient matrix [A] and the Right-Hand-Side (RHS) vector {b} are known. The unknown solution vector {x} can be efficiently solved by the following step-by-step procedures [1-2]: Reordering phase, Matrix Factorization phase, Forward solution phase, and Backward solution phase. In this research work, a Game-Based Learning (GBL) approach has been developed to help engineering students to understand crucial details about matrix reordering and factorization phases. A "chess-like" game has been developed and can be played by either a single player, or two players. Through this "chess-like" open-ended game, the players/learners will not only understand the key concepts involved in reordering algorithms (based on existing algorithms), but also have the opportunities to "discover new algorithms" which are better than existing algorithms. Implementing the proposed "chess-like" game for matrix reordering and factorization phases can be enhanced by FLASH [3] computer environments, where computer simulation with animated human voice, sound effects, visual/graphical/colorful displays of matrix tables, score (or monetary) awards for the best game players, etc. can all be exploited. Preliminary demonstrations of the developed GBL approach can be viewed by anyone who has access to the internet web-site [4]!

Nguyen, Duc T.↗
DOE OSTI2019

Solving a system of linear equations: From centralized to distributed methods

For a wide range of control engineering applications, the problem of solving a system of linear equations is often encountered and has been well studied. Traditionally, this problem has been mainly solved in a centralized manner. However, for applications related to large-scale complex networked systems, centralized algorithms are often subjected to some practical issues due to limited computational power and communication bandwidth. As a promising and viable alternative, distributed algorithms can effectively address the issues associated with centralized algorithms by solving the problem efficiently in a multi-agent setting that accords with the distributed nature of networked systems. Distributed algorithms decompose the entire problem into many sub-problems that are solved by individual agents in a cooperative manner. In this survey paper, we provide a detailed overview of the state of the art relevant to distributed algorithms for solving a system of linear equations. We will first review basic distributed algorithms including both discrete-time and continuous-time algorithms. Then we will discuss the extended algorithms to achieve communication efficiency. Furthermore, we will also introduce distributed algorithms to obtain the minimum-norm solution for a system of linear equations with multiple solutions, as well as the least-squares solutions when there is no solution. Finally, the relationship of distributed algorithms for solving a system of linear equations to the existing distributed optimization algorithms is discussed.

Wang, Peng↗
DOE OSTI2018

Communication-efficient Distributed Solutions to a System of Linear Equations with Laplacian Sparse Structure

Two communication-efficient distributed algorithms are proposed to solve a system of linear equations Ax = b with Laplacian sparse A. A system of linear equations with Laplacian sparse A can be found in many applications, e.g., the power flow problems and other network flow problems. The first algorithm is based on the gradient descent method in optimization and the agents only share two parts of the system state instead of that of the whole system state, which saves significant communication. The two parts shared by every agent through a communication link are the state information of its own and its neighbors connected by the communication link. The second method is obtained from an approximation of the Newton method, which converges faster. It requires twice as much communication as the first one but is still communicationefficient due to the low dimension of each part shared between agents. The convergence at a linear rate of both methods is proved. A comprehensive comparison of the convergence rate, communication burden, and computation costs between the methods is made. Finally, a simulation is conducted to show the effectiveness of both methods.

Wang, Peng↗
NASA NTRS1982

Out-of-Core Solutions of Complex Sparse Linear Equations

ETCLIB is library of subroutines for obtaining out-of-core solutions of complex sparse linear equations. Routines apply to dense and sparse matrices too large to be stored in core. Useful for solving any set of linear equations, but particularly useful in cases where coefficient matrix has no special properties that guarantee convergence with any of interative processes. The only assumption made is that coefficient matrix is not singular.

Yip, E. L.↗
DOE OSTI2021

Distributed and communication-efficient solutions to linear equations with special sparse structure

In this paper we report two distributed and communication-efficient algorithms based on the multi-agent system are proposed to solve a system of linear equations with the Laplacian sparse system matrix. One algorithm is based on the gradient descent method in optimization. In this algorithm, the agents only share partial information instead of all of their collective state vectors to save significant communication. The other algorithm is obtained by approximating Newton’s method for a faster convergence rate. Although it requires twice as much communication as the first one, it is still communication-efficient given the low dimension of the information shared among agents. The convergence at a linear rate is proved for both algorithms, and a comprehensive comparison of their convergence rate, communication burden, and computation costs is also performed. The proposed algorithms can be applied to various systems to solve those problems that can be modeled as a system of linear equations with a Laplacian sparse system matrix. Simulation results with the electric power system illustrate their effectiveness.

42 ENGINEERING↗
NASA NTRS1995

A General Method for Solving Systems of Non-Linear Equations

The method of steepest descent is modified so that accelerated convergence is achieved near a root. It is assumed that the function of interest can be approximated near a root by a quadratic form. An eigenvector of the quadratic form is found by evaluating the function and its gradient at an arbitrary point and another suitably selected point. The terminal point of the eigenvector is chosen to lie on the line segment joining the two points. The terminal point found lies on an axis of the quadratic form. The selection of a suitable step size at this point leads directly to the root in the direction of steepest descent in a single step. Newton's root finding method not infrequently diverges if the starting point is far from the root. However, the current method in these regions merely reverts to the method of steepest descent with an adaptive step size. The current method's performance should match that of the Levenberg-Marquardt root finding method since they both share the ability to converge from a starting point far from the root and both exhibit quadratic convergence near a root. The Levenberg-Marquardt method requires storage for coefficients of linear equations. The current method which does not require the solution of linear equations requires more time for additional function and gradient evaluations. The classic trade off of time for space separates the two methods.

Nachtsheim, Philip R.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Algorithms for solving large sparse systems of simultaneous linear equations on vector processors

Very efficient algorithms for solving large sparse systems of simultaneous linear equations have been developed for serial processing computers. These involve a reordering of matrix rows and columns in order to obtain a near triangular pattern of nonzero elements. Then an LU factorization is developed to represent the matrix inverse in terms of a sequence of elementary Gaussian eliminations, or pivots. In this paper it is shown how these algorithms are adapted for efficient implementation on vector processors. Results obtained on the CYBER 200 Model 205 are presented for a series of large test problems which show the comparative advantages of the triangularization and vector processing algorithms.

David, R. E.↗
DOE OSTI2017

Exact non-linear equations for cosmological perturbations

We present a complete set of exact and fully non-linear equations describing all three types of cosmological perturbations—scalar, vector and tensor perturbations. We derive the equations in a thoroughly gauge-ready manner, so that any spatial and temporal gauge conditions can be employed. The equations are completely general without any physical restriction except that we assume a flat homogeneous and isotropic universe as a background. We also comment briefly on the application of our formulation to the non-expanding Minkowski background.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Solving linear equations with messenger-field and conjugate gradient techniques: An application to CMB data analysis

We discuss linear system solvers invoking a messenger-field and compare them with (preconditioned) conjugate gradient approaches. We show that the messenger-field techniques correspond to fixed point iterations of an appropriately preconditioned initial system of linear equations. We then argue that a conjugate gradient solver applied to the same preconditioned system, or equivalently a preconditioned conjugate gradient solver using the same preconditioner and applied to the original system, will in general ensure at least a comparable and typically better performance in terms of the number of iterations to convergence and time-to-solution. We illustrate our conclusions with two common examples drawn from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) data analysis: Wiener filtering and map-making. In addition, and contrary to the standard lore in the CMB field, we show that the performance of the preconditioned conjugate gradient solver can depend significantly on the starting vector. In conclusion, this observation seems of particular importance in the cases of map-making of high signal-to-noise ratio sky maps and therefore should be of relevance for the next generation of CMB experiments.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗