Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “LLNL”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

IER 500: AWE-LLNL Measurement Campaign at DAF [Slides]

Presentation Hosted at Device Assembly Facility (DAF). Joint collaboration by Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). Multiple measurements were recorded through a two-week period with 12 unique objects measured. LLNL deployed Machine learning software program for diagnostic assessments. Current status notes the dedicated DAF team LLNL maintains. Additionally, LLNL is compiling a report on the AWE-LLNL measurements and designing security benchmark experiments. The presentation concludes with future work envisioned.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2025

OPCW Twining Project Visit by the National Laboratory of Scientific and Technical Police (LNPST) to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Forensic Science Center (LLNL)

PURPOSE FOR TRIP Through the Organisation for Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) Twinning and Assistance Program, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Forensic Science Center (LLNL) has been paired with Morocco’s National Laboratory of Scientific and Technical Police (LNPST), with the goal of mentoring LNPST to become an OPCW Designated Laboratory. The purpose of this visit was for LLNL staff to mentor staff from LNPST as they participated in hands-on, laboratory-based exercises to analyze proficiency test samples prepared by LLNL. This visit was designed to help LNPST scientists strengthen their skills in OPCW proficiency testing.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗
DOE OSTI2024

Small arms suppression project (LLNL final report)

US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) was seeking a technological leap in small firearms weapon suppressor technology, because anticipated enemy capabilities are requiring the operators to have smaller detection cross sections to ensure the safe execution of missions. Suppressors have been developed almost exclusively through trial-and-error methods since the time of the original design by Hiram Maxim over one hundred years ago. Consequently USSOCOM deemed it prudent to perform a physicsbased study of weapon suppression to understand performance limits and possibly identify breakthrough technologies. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s (LLNL’s) high performance production level computational tool called ALE3D (Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian 3D and 2D) has unique physics models and numerical algorithms for modeling suppressor dynamics. The flexible and extendable code framework supports fully integrated hydrodynamics, heat transfer, solid and fluid dynamics, and chemistry that can be applied to simulating propellant-driven motion of a bullet down a gun barrel, the transfer of heat from the burning propellant to the barrel and suppressor, the chemistry of muzzle flash, and the shock/acoustic/optical signatures in the near-field. LLNL’s originally anticipated role was to augment ALE3D for this task, by developing the software and analysis methodologies specific to the simulation of blast and muzzle flash phenomena. It was believed that insights provided by our ALE3D simulations in tandem with a coordinated experimental component by our other team members from Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and the U. S. Army Armament, Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC), would have excellent prospects of yielding useful suppressor design improvements that could be transitioned to industry and utilized by US Special Operations Command. The three year effort has come to fruition with the development of revolutionary suppressor designs that far outperform any previous or current design by anyone outside this multi-lab team.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2024

LLNL NESHAPs 2023 Annual Report

Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC operates facilities at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in which radionuclides are handled and stored. These facilities are subject to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) in Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 40, Part 61, Subpart H, which regulates radionuclide emissions to air from Department of Energy (DOE) facilities. Specifically, NESHAPs limits the emission of radionuclides to the ambient air to levels resulting in an annual effective dose equivalent of 10 mrem (100 µSv) to any member of the public. Using measured and calculated emissions, and building-specific and common parameters, LLNL personnel applied the EPA-approved computer code, CAP88-PC, Version 4.1.1.0, to calculate the dose to the maximally exposed individual member of the public for the Livermore Site and Site 300.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2024

LLNL measurements of thermally irradiated HEU sample and saltwater-matrixed HEU sample

Two scintillation vials, kindly provided by the PNNL team, were received in the LLNL radiochemistry building on June 10, 2024; one containing approximately 2 mL dissolved thermally-irradiated HEU, and the other containing dried salt from irradiated seawater. A quick, semiquantitative screening count of the salt showed that the activation product activities were very low, with the highest activity being ~1 Bq 24 Na. The dissolved HEU solution was transferred to a Prindle vial (LLNL standard counting geometry) and weighed. Approximately 2 mL 3 M HNO 3 was added so that the solution completely covered the bottom of the vial and Gamanal software would be able to accurately generate an efficiency curve. This sample, called “PNNLFP24” is the irradiated HEU solution received, gravimetrically diluted by a factor of 1.7356 ± 0.0003, and was sent for quick gamma counting prior to further modification. Meanwhile the salt was quantitatively transferred to a 250 mL polyethylene bottle and dissolved in 160 mL 3 M HNO 3 . After counting, 50 µL PNNLFP24 was aliquoted for Resonance Ionization Mass Spectrometry (RIMS) analysis, and then 10.0 mL of the salt solution (6.03% of the total salt, gravimetrically) was added to the remaining PNNLFP24 solution to make “PNNLFPSW24”. After weighing, two 100 µL aliquots were removed for RIMS and DES, and 3 mL was aliquoted for microfluidic chemistry. The remaining “PNNLFPSW24” solution was weighed and proceeded for singles and coincidence counting on the MCBOS system.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2025

LLNL Microbenchmarks

The LLNL Microbenchmarks repository will contain open-source microbenchmarks for HPC system benchmarking activities. The repository will contain the code for various microbenchmarks developed for Request For Proposal (RFP) response evaluation and system acceptance.

Brink, Stephanie [Lawrence Livermore National Labo↗
DOE OSTI2025

The Concept and Role of Reference Architectures In NIF LRU Refurbishment Factories within LLNL

The National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) operates one of the most advanced laser systems in the world, relying on a vast number of optical components and Line Replaceable Units (LRUs) to maintain its functionality. Over time, these components degrade due to operational wear, necessitating refurbishment to sustain performance. However, many NIF LRU refurbishment factories have been “mothballed” or suffer from aging infrastructure, inconsistent work flows, and inefficiencies due to different approaches to production control and management. This paper explores the concept of reference architecture as a standardized framework to guide the redevelopment and restructuring of NIF LRU refurbishment factories. By establishing a common reference architecture, the refurbishment process can achieve reduced inefficiencies, produce quality products, and enhanced coordination across factories. This paper evaluates existing reference architectures, particularly those that integrate technical architecture, business architecture, customer context perspectives, and proposes tailored reference architecture for NIF LRU refurbishment factories.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2025

Image Alignment and Flat-Field Correction of Film and Computed Radiography Images on the LLNL Flash Testbed

Computed radiography (CR) imaging plates and film are used in HEAF firing tanks and in the NDE group. The imaging plates allow for the creation of high-resolution digital images with flash X-ray (FXR). A typical treatment of flash X-ray radiographs is flat-field correction, where the image from an experiment is normalized by a “flat-field” or “bright-field” image. This flat-field image is taken in an identical configuration to the experimental image, but without the object or experiment in the field of view (FOV). This treatment reduces spatial effects from the FXR spot size and detector misalignment, as each pixel value in the corrected image represents a ratio of collected radiation with the object in FOV to the collected radiation without the object in FOV. One challenge in the creation of a corrected image is the misalignment of the CR plate or film pack between capturing the flat-field image and the experimental image. Fiducial structures can remedy this issue. Small (3.18mm) stainless steel ball bearings serve as good fiducial structures due to their small size and high radiographic contrast. Spheres are view-agnostic geometry, always presenting a circular cross section no matter the orientation. This process was developed for images from the flash X-ray testbed. The flash testbed was used to compare the X-ray transmission at different thicknesses of aluminum and copper step wedges. Each step wedge section is a rectangular shape, so evaluation is made much simpler if the rectangles are not rotated with respect to the image. This alignment process aligns the object and flat-field images together and leaves the rectangles of each step aligned with the image.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

LLNL Automized Surface Titration Model

The LLNL Automized Surface Titration Model (L-ASTM) is a community data-driven surface complexation modeling workflow for simulating potentiometric titration of mineral surfaces. The model accepts raw experimental potentiometric titration data formatted in a findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) structure. The workflow was coded in Python and coupled to PHREEQC for surface complexation modeling and PEST for data fitting and parameter estimation.

Solchan, Han↗
DOE OSTI2023

Joint LLNL, LANL, SNL, and IRSN High Multiplication Subcritical (Multiplicity) Benchmark Integral Experiment Execution (CED-3b Report)

This report documents the experimental configurations and measurements for IER-518: Joint LLNL, LANL, SNL, and IRSN High Multiplication Subcritical (Multiplicity) Benchmark Experiments. These measurements involved a series of subcritical configurations at the Sandia Critical Experiments (SCX) facility at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). The purpose of these measurements was to produce time tagged neutron count data of configurations that exceed a subcritical multiplication of 20, which is the high end of the fundamental physics benchmarks currently available in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project Handbook (ICSBEP). These measurements leverage experimental configurations 1 and detector systems 2 from previously accepted ICSBEP benchmark evaluations, allowing evaluations of these measurements to be performed at greatly reduced cost.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

LLNL DOE Order 420.2 D Implementation Plan

This plan will serve as the basis for the ongoing implementation of DOE O 420.2D to contractor requirements applicable to the use of Radiation Generating Devices (RGDs) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL).

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2024

Project DarkStar: Vision for LLNL in 2030

DarkStar was a Strategic Initiative (FY2021-FY2024) to investigate applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) to scientific problems of complex hydrodynamics, shockwave physics and energetic materials. The research focused on physics and engineering design as a process that can be tremendously accelerated through merging AI with advanced physics simulation on exascale-class platforms, and to experimentally validate this revolutionary new approach through dynamic materials campaigns. A central thread of scientific inquiry was in the application of AI to enable human understanding of how to control hydrodynamic instability (which has impacts to areas such as inertial confinement fusion) via engineering features and time-dependent sources. Motivated by an unfinished line of research started by Dr. Johnny von Neumann, AI-enabled simulation approaches were developed that allowed DarkStar researchers to uncover several ground-breaking discoveries regarding hydrodynamic instability, including how to completely suppress Richtmyer-Meshkov instability (RMI). These S&T discoveries, along with other advances, have shown the way for an entirely new approach to time-dependent problems known as inverse design – the idea that complex systems can be developed directly from a final state that is to be achieved and resolve the initial design via satisfying several constraints simultaneously via AI/ML. Through experimental campaigns conducted across a wide range of facilities in the NNSA complex (the High Explosive Application Facility at LLNL, the Dynamic Compression Sector/Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Lab, and Special Technologies Laboratory at MSTS) the radical new AI/ML approach to engineering complex material dynamics was verified, establishing a new field of study within the realm of shock physics. As advanced manufacturing capabilities continue to develop, the great importance of inverse design as a means to apply that technology effectively for NNSA missions will feature prominently over this decade. DarkStar has positioned NNSA as a world-leader in this newly emerging cross-disciplinary area of AI methods for advanced physics simulation and pioneered multiple novel approaches that have enabled the broader scientific community. By allowing us to see past the horizon, to 2030 and beyond, DarkStar has illuminated the vast potential of AI/ML to impact a wide range of new national security missions and, consequently, multiple areas of further research have already emerged across the NNSA and DOD complex.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2024

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Annual Report (FY 2023)

As Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s most significant resource for supporting internally directed research and development, the LDRD Program provides investments in cutting-edge science and technology that allow the Laboratory to attract and retain the world’s most talented scientists and engineers and enables them to expand the frontiers of knowledge and anticipate emerging national security challenges. In this annual report, we summarize how Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) uses LDRD investments to advance our knowledge in strategic science and technology domains, develop our world-class workforce, and foster innovation in key programmatic areas.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2023

AWAKEN Site A5 - LLNL Scanning Lidar (Halo XR+ #190) / Raw data

These data include raw scanning Doppler lidar measurements from the deployment of the LLNL HALO XR+ (s/n 190) at the A5 site. The raw measurements include uncalibrated beam azimuth angles, radial velocity, backscatter, signal to noise ratio per each line of sight, and range-gate.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

WFIP3 - RHOD Site - LLNL Scanning Lidar (Halo XR+ #190) / Raw Data

These data include raw scanning Doppler lidar measurements from the deployment of the LLNL HALO XR+ (s/n 190) at the Rhode Island site for WFIP3. The raw measurements include uncalibrated beam azimuth angles, radial velocity, backscatter, signal to noise ratio per each line of sight, and range-gate.

17 WIND ENERGY↗