Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “LPBF”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

13 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

In-Situ Process Monitoring, Synchronization, and Mapping Laser Powder Bed Fusion Builds of Ti6Al4V

The use of in-situ process monitoring is of interest to lower the cost of inspection for the qualification of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) parts. Precise monitoring of the LPBF-AM build process constitutes a multi-scale and multi-discipline task. There are several significant challenges to the in-situ approach: the synchronization of sensor signals to process steps, the physical interpretation and classification of sensor signals, managing very large datasets, and comparing the inputs with the observed monitoring signals. At NASA Langley Research Center, a configurable architecture additive testbed has been developed to monitor the build process with synchronized sensors. The philosophy and method adopted for the synchronization of the cameras with laser power & position Ti-6Al-4V LPBF are described. The synchronized in-situ monitoring signals are compared with ex-situ nondestructive inspection and optical microscopy observations. Such comparisons permit a better understanding of how the sequential process actions of LPBF-AM can affect build quality.

Laser Powder Bed Fusion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Towards Qualification and Certification of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Ti-6Al-4V with In-Situ Process Monitoring and Automated Defect Detection

Qualification and certification of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) parts are two challenges that must be answered to ensure suitability for critical applications. In-situ monitoring using high frame rate thermal and conventional optical imaging sensors is applied to the LPBF build process. Currently, the large volume of data from such sensors becomes untenable for manual inspection in production environments. This presentation serves to address this in-situ monitoring deficiency in two ways. First, a framework for managing data streams from LPBF process monitoring sensors is described. Second, two candidate image analysis techniques are presented: one is a set of heuristics that are easily interpretable, and the other is an uninterpretable convolutional neural network. These strategies are compared in terms of performance, computational expense, and speed. These methodologies represent platforms for connecting processing conditions to process modeling efforts aligned with the qualification and certification mission for LPBF Ti-6Al-4V components.

Qualification↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Additive Manufacturing Moment Measure (AM3) Approach to Predictions of Solid Cooling Rate and Time Above Melt

Qualification of a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (LPBF-AM) process requires knowledge of the multi-scale material physics during the process, per part. As the LPBF-AM build occurs, each moment is influenced by the process history. Knowledge of the build sequence can be used to generate a discretized time-space-condition point field that when coupled with a nearest neighbors’ calculation results in a generalized and fully parallel process model computation. This GPU accelerated approach was developed for part-scale analysis of build files along with in-situ process monitoring sensor data and is termed the “Additive Manufacturing Moment Measure” (AM3). The AM3 approach will be presented and then used to evaluate an AM Bench relevant geometry with synchronized in-situ process data, ex-situ nondestructive evaluation, and optical microscopy observations. These comparisons permit a better understanding of how the process actions can affect the LPBF-AM build quality and the signals generated during in-situ process monitoring.

Additive Manufacturing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Modified Rosenthal Solution for Prediction of In Situ Alloyed GRCop-42 Melt Pool

Literature suggests that the energy needed to in-situ alloy material via additive manufacturing is higher per unit volume than their pre-alloyed counterparts, often despite the in-situ formation of thermodynamically favorable phases. This work, via experiments on in-situ alloyed GRCop-42 (Cu-4 at% Cr-2 at% Nb), will explore the energy needs of an elemental powder blend during in-situ alloying via laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Empirically derived models will explore the influence of elemental thermophysical properties, net energy of in-situ reactions, and powder characteristics on the resulting LPBF energy demands, weld pool size and shape, and porosity evolution. Additionally, the influence of energy input during printing on the in-situ reaction to form Cr2Nb will be explored. Evolution of Cr2Nb dispersoid and copper grain shape, size, and texture can be related to the temperature reached, cooling rate, and time-as-melt during in-situ alloying via LPBF.

David Scannapieco↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Additive Manufacturing Moment Measure - A Parallel Computation Technique for Determining Build Variance in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process

Additive manufacturing (AM) has unique process attributes that facilitate the creation of optimized, complex, and unique parts for aerospace applications. However, the multi-scale and complicated building process for AM parts can cause unexpected build conditions that result in microstructural variability within the deposited material. The need for richer datasets and computational modeling capabilities to improve AM process reliability is a consequence of this microstructural variability. A computational approach, referred to as the Additive Manufacturing Moment Measure (AM3), addresses this need by leveraging the way AM processes fuse material in precise, incremental steps. During the layering sequence, each previous step contributes to the condition of the current step at the center of the heat source. The precise steps can be selected to systematically create a time-space point field with co-located machine input and in-situ sensor data. The sequential nature of the AM process, coupled with nearest neighbor calculations, allows for a fully parallel computation for part-scale build profile analysis. The AM3 concept introduced here enables part-scale assessment directly from build files and in-situ process monitoring sensors alike. The AM moment measures were calculated for build point fields and compared with co-located in-situ and ex-situ nondestructive evaluation and optical microscopy observations. These comparisons permit a better understanding of how the sequential process actions can affect the quality of a laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) build. Details of the AM3technique will be discussed and compared to measured LPBF part characteristics. The AM3 results indicate a strong potential to advance the qualification process for aerospace applications.

Additive Manufacturing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Additive Manufacturing Model-Based Process Metrics: Reduced Order Modeling of the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process

The multi-scale and complex process of printing additively manufactured (AM) parts can have unexpected, but predictable, build conditions that result in material microstructure variability. In this work, we describe a fully parallel reduced order modeling approach that has been developed to evaluate the evolution of AM processes, termed the AM moment measure method. This method couples the known sequence of the AM process with a physically informed nearest neighbors’ calculation to map the conditions of a part-scale build. The result is a map of the build that is derived directly from build files or in-situ process monitoring sensors. The methodology and terminology of the approach will be described, and computed build maps will be calculated and compared for various laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) builds of Ti-6Al-4V. Such comparative results develop understanding of how the sequential process actions can affect the LPBF-AM build quality and microstructure variability.

Laser Powder Bed Fusion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Powder Bed Fusion Laser Beam Metals Additive Manufacturing: Process Monitoring Approaches for Qualification and Certification

The use of in-situ process monitoring is of interest to lower the cost of inspection for the qualification of powder bed fusion laser beam metal (PBF-LB/M) additively manufactured (AM) parts. Precise monitoring of the PBF-LB/M AM build process constitutes a multi-scale and multi-discipline task. There are several significant challenges to the in-situ approach: the synchronization of sensor signals to process steps; the physical interpretation and classification of sensor signals; managing very large datasets; and comparing the inputs with the observed monitoring signals. At NASA Langley Research Center, a configurable architecture additive testbed has been developed to monitor the build process with synchronized sensors. The philosophy and method adopted for the synchronization of the cameras with laser power and position throughout a complex PBF-LB/M AM build will be described. The synchronized in-situ monitoring signals are compared with ex-situ nondestructive inspection, x-ray computed tomography (XCT). Such comparisons permit a better understanding of how the sequential process actions of LPBF-AM can affect build quality. The multi-scale and complex process of printing additively manufactured (AM) parts can have unexpected, but predictable, build conditions that result in material microstructure variability. This presentation will describe an additive manufacturing model-based process metric (AM-PM) computational method that is a fully parallel reduced order modeling approach developed to evaluate the evolution of AM processes. This method couples the known sequence of the AM process with a physically informed nearest neighbors’ calculation to map the conditions of a part-scale build. The result is a map of the build that is derived directly from build files or in-situ process monitoring sensors. The methodology of the approach will be described and mapped to the porosity observed from XCT for a complex PBF-LB/M build. Such comparative results develop understanding of how the sequential process actions can affect the PBF-LB/M AM build quality and microstructure variability.

Laser Powder Bed Fusion↗
NASA NTRS2020

In-Situ Alloying of GRCop-42 via Additive Manufacturing: Precipitate Analysis

In situ alloying of elemental Cu, Cr, and Nb to form GRCop-42 (Cu-4at. % Cr-2at. % Nb)using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing (AM) was successful. Evaluation of the in situ alloyed GRCop-42(ISGRCop-42) was conducted using phase extraction to explore the effects of AM process conditions on the formation of Cr2Nb precipitates from elemental powders. It was found that ISGRCop-42successfully and repeatedly formed Cr2Nb at a yield as high as 89%of potential Cr2Nbcontent. Initial work shows that powder preparation was the most influential factor in alloying success, followed by laser power.

Additive Manufacturing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Principles of Directed Energy Deposition for Aerospace Applications

Metal Additive Manufacturing is changing how components are fabricated for rocket propulsion and aerospace applications. Many additive manufacturing technologies are evolving, and active research is being conducted across academia, industry, and government to advance processes, materials, design, post-processing and applications. While much focus has been on Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) techniques, several large-scale techniques are also rapidly evolving using directed energy deposition (DED).

Additive Manufacturing↗
NASA NTRS2024

Correlations of Additive Manufacturing Model-Based Process Metrics With Spatter-Induced Porosity in the Powder Bed Fusion-Laser Beam/Metallic Process

Components fabricated using the powder bed fusion laser beam metallic (PBF-LB/M) additive manufacturing (AM) process comprise a multitude of sequential weld passes. Qualifying materials for components in critical applications requires a thorough understanding of pertinent processing-microstructure-property relationships. Porosity defects have a strong adverse effect on the mechanical properties of a material. The morphology of porosity defects created by lack of fusion in PBF-LB/M often exhibit high aspect ratios that can act as stress concentrators and become crack initiation sites. The occurrence of spatter induced porosity is studied using synchronized AM model-based process metrics and porosity measured by high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. A novel AM process metric is introduced to quantify the relative exposure to spatter ejecta impacts and incorporation throughout the sequence of the PBF-LB/M process. Further characterization using optical metallography and scanning electron microscopy indicated that both keyhole and lack of fusion porosity correlated statistically with the spatter ejecta impact field of the PBF-LB/M process. Both keyhole and lack of fusion porosity can be predicted by the spatter exposure process metric, which can be exploited to control the fusion sequence.

Additive Manufacturing↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Novel Additive Manufacturing Process Metric for Predicting Spatter-related Porosity in Laser Powder Bed Fusion

Components fabricated using the powder bed fusion laser beam metallic (PBF) additive manufacturing (AM) process comprise a multitude of sequential weld passes. Porosity defects resulting from weld pass inconsistencies are a concern for PBF materials and have a strong adverse effect on the mechanical properties. In an effort to understand and avoid spatter induced porosity, this work aims to provide a novel computational technique that can be used to quantify and predict the sequence-sensitive impact of spatter upon the PBF process stability and consequential porosity in as-printed material. A novel spatter impact AM model-based process metric (AM-PM) is introduced to model and quantify the impact that spatter has on the PBF process. The occurrence of spatter induced porosity is studied using thermal rise, lack of fusion, and spatter impact AM-PMs synchronized with porosity measured by high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Six cylindrical specimens were designed to compare the AM-PM correlations with porosity across two different laser powers and three hatch scanning strategies. A point field based computational approach is shown to be effective for testing the influence of the different AM-PMs and interrogating the physical process conditions underlying the porosity formation. Further, characterization using optical metallography and scanning electron microscopy indicated that both keyhole and lack of fusion porosity correlated with the spatter impact AM-PM, which can be exploited to predict and control spatter related porosity by the hatch strategy. Efforts to predict porosity composition within PBF material should incorporate the PBF process disturbances that can result from spatter. The spatter impact AM-PM can be readily incorporated into the development of defect prediction models at the part scale.

Additive Manufacturing↗