SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “LWR”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Overview of recent SCALE activities for Non-LWR inventory and decay heat analysis
In 2019, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission initiated a project for the development and assessments of non-light-water reactor (non-LWR) accident progression using the SCALE and MELCOR simulation tools. SCALE simulations are used to generate nuclide inventories, full-core power distributions, decay heat, and kinetics parameters to initialize MELCOR simulations of severe accident scenarios. Five non-LWR concepts were studied: high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR), heat pipe reactor (HPR), high-temperature fluoride salt-cooled reactor (FHR), molten salt-fueled reactor (MSR), and sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR). This paper summarizes the SCALE results obtained in 2021 for the first three non-LWR concepts, compares characteristics and results to common LWRs, and provides the strategy for the analysis of the remaining two non-LWRs. (authors)
Hydrothermal corrosion of SiC in LWR coolant environments in the absence of irradiation
Not Available
SCALE Non-LWR Models for NRC Volume 3
This dataset contains input and result files of computational simulations with the SCALE code system. The simulations cover radionuclide inventory and reactivity analyses of various advanced reactors. Users wanting to reproduce results from this dataset are required to obtain a license to the SCALE code system for which details on the distribution can be found here: https://www.ornl.gov/scale/releases
SCALE Non-LWR Models for NRC Volume 5
This dataset contains input and result files of computational simulations with the SCALE code system. The simulations cover radionuclide inventory generation, criticality calculations, and dose rate/shielding analyses of various advanced reactors. Users wanting to reproduce results from this dataset are required to obtain a license to the SCALE code system for which details on the distribution can be found here: https://www.ornl.gov/scale/releases
Assessing I 2 S-LWR economic competitiveness using systematic differential capital cost evaluation methodology
One of the major factors impeding nuclear power plant (NPP) construction is their economics. In this study, a systematic differential economics evaluation approach was developed through the use of the Code of Accounts guidelines to assess the costs of nuclear power plants. The methodology, entirely based on publicly available data, may serve as a template to evaluate direct costs for reactors of any size and design at any stage of developments. In particular, this approach was used to assess the costs of the Integral Inherently Safe Light Water Reactor (I 2 S-LWR). The I 2 S-LWR is a design concept of a large (~1000 MWe) light water reactor. One of its key design features promoting inherent safety is implementation of an integral primary circuit configuration, which however necessitates a compact design of the core and primary circuit components. Through the methodology here presented, a representative loop PWR design was taken as a reference and the differential cost was estimated for each individual account based on the design difference, or similarity. Cost scaling techniques were applied to the accounts representing systems that differ from the ones of the reference PWR. Cost estimating techniques were used to evaluate cost of innovative components that are not part of standard PWR designs. By evaluating the cost difference of the I 2 S-LWR from the standard PWR, rather than the absolute cost, the uncertainty in the estimate is reduced. A similar approach was used by ORNL to estimate the cost of a Fluoride-salt High-temperature Reactor (FHR). A traditional four-loop PWR plant with a core thermal power of 3417 MWth (1144 MWe) was selected as the reference. Costs for that plant were prepared in 1978 by the Department of Energy (DOE) Energy Economics Data Base (EEDB), averaging actual cost incurred in the construction of several nuclear power plants (NPP), itemized with a great level of detail according to the Code of Accounts. This best estimate costs are denoted PWR12-BE. For each account, the cost of equipment, site labor and site material is provided. Industry experts at Westinghouse Electric Company performed a “sanity check” of the cost items, adjusting the cost of several items to match the current market and supply chain data. The detailed cost assessment of I 2 S-LWR was performed, systematically analyzing cost for each account, and applying the differential economics approach. First, Relative importance of each account, i.e., its contribution to the total cost was established, to help focus analysis on the most significant contributors. Moreover, the accounts describing components that are different than that of the PWR12-BE were identified. The integral configuration of the reactor has important implications on the cost of the reactor plant equipment (accounts 22x). Turbine generator equipment (Accounts 23x) is not believed to be much different than that of the reference design. I 2 S-LWR structures (Accounts 21x) mainly differ from that of a standard LWR as several buildings (containment building, shield building, annex building, waste processing building, fuel storage building) are integrated into a single building (nuclear island). Yardwork has a higher cost for the I 2 S-LWR, as the NI is partially below grade. On the other hand, due to its compact Nuclear Island footprint, I 2 S-LWR facilitates (and includes in its reference version) the use of seismic isolators, which contribute to reducing the direct cost. The total capital investment cost (TCIC), on the $/kW basis, of I 2 S-LWR is 5.84% lower than that of PWR12-BE, in spite of the lower power output of I 2 S-LWR. However, for the Western US (0.7 g), benefits of the seismic isolation are more pronounced, and the I 2 S-LWR total capital investment cost is 13.02% lower than that of PWR12-BE. If the I 2 S-LWR is compared to a PWR10-BE (traditional loop design, but scaled to the same power level as I 2 S-LWR), the savings are even higher, in the range 11.12%–17.89%. The analysis indicates that I 2 S-LWR has potential to offer an economically attractive design, with TCIC lower than that of a nuclear power plant based on a traditional loop PWR design. In other words, I 2 S-LWR design offers significantly enhanced safety, while at the same time improving economics. The differential economics approach developed in this paper can be used in identifying changes in cost of key components in order to improve the economics of a nuclear reactor design. The method can also help compare the economics of advanced Generation IV reactors and innovative water-cooled SMR (Small Modular Reactors) with respect to standard LWR technologies. In summary, the differential economics approach and can be used as a tool capable of helping stakeholder decisions.
Need for LWR metrology standardization: the imec roughness protocol
© 2018 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). As semiconductor technology keeps moving forward, undeterred by the many challenges ahead, one specific deliverable is capturing the attention of many experts in the field: line width roughness (LWR) specifications are expected to be <2 nm in the near term, and to drop below 1 nm in just a few years. This is a daunting challenge and engineers throughout the industry are trying to meet these targets using every means at their disposal. However, although current efforts are surely admirable, we believe they are not enough. The fact is that a specification has a meaning only if there is an agreed methodology to verify if the criterion is met or not. Such standardization is critical in any field of science and technology and the question that we need to ask ourselves today is whether we have a standardized LWR metrology or not. In other words, if a single reference sample were provided, would everyone measuring it get reasonably comparable results? We came to realize that this is not the case and that the observed spread in the results throughout the industry is quite large. In our opinion, this makes the comparison of LWR data among institutions, or to a specification, very difficult. We report the spread of measured LWR data across the semiconductor industry. We investigate the impact of image acquisition, measurement algorithm, and frequency analysis parameters on LWR metrology. We review critically some of the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) metrology guidelines [such as measurement box length >2 μm and the need to correct for scanning electron microscope (SEM) noise]. We compare the SEM roughness results to AFM measurements. Finally, we propose a standardized LWR measurement protocol - the imec roughness protocol - intended to ensure that every time LWR measurements are compared (from various sources or to specifications), the comparison is sensible and sound. We deeply believe that the industry is at a point where it is imperative to guarantee that when talking about a critical parameter such as LWR, everyone speaks the same language, which is not currently the case.
A simulation of I 2 S-LWR selected transients
The Integral Inherently Safe (I 2 S-LWR) reactor was designed to improve the safety performance of PWR types reactors, and several design basis accidents were eliminated using innovative approaches to the I 2 S-LWR plant layout. However, some accidents such as station blackout (SBO), main steam line break (MSLB) type accident – the secondary hot leg break (SHLB) – were deemed statistically relevant, and the work performed here was to simulate these events using the system thermal–hydraulics code RELAP5 coupled to the 3D spatial kinetics code PARCS. The safety response of the reactor to a station blackout is predicted to be acceptable at both beginning of cycle (BOC) and end of cycle EOC core conditions with either the UO 2 or U 3 Si 2 fuel options considered here. In the analysis of the SHLB performed here, an unprotected (no SCRAM) condition was assumed to highlight the I 2 S-LWR capabilities. Results indicate that with the UO 2 core, the fuel temperatures rise notably, but no fuel melting was predicted and departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) limits were not exceeded. Similarly, the U 3 Si 2 fuel performed well, but with lower fuel temperatures and decreased DNBR. Following the break of the steam line in the I 2 S-LWR, shutdown is achieved after about two minutes via negative reactivity from loss of primary flow. In all cases considered, the I 2 S-LWR appears to accomplish the goals of increased safety performance. Further design improvements and other fuel options may marginally improve on the observed safety performance. Additionally, higher fidelity analysis with the next generation subchannel, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), or full core transport may be useful in refining the prediction of the peak fuel and cladding temperatures, as well limiting DNBR during the accidents.
TREAT Neutronics Analysis of Water-Loop Concept Accommodating LWR 9-rod Bundle
Abstract. Simulation of a variety of transient conditions has been successfully achieved in the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility during operation between 1959 and 1994 to support characterization and safety analysis of nuclear fuels and materials. A majority of previously conducted tests were focused on supporting sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) designs. Experiments evolved in complexity. Simulation of thermal-hydraulic conditions expected to be encountered by fuels and materials in a reactor environment was realized in the development of TREAT sodium loop experiment vehicles. These loops accommodated up to 7-pin fuel bundles and served to simulate more closely the reactor environment while safely delivering large quantities of energy into the test specimen. Some of the immediate TREAT restart operations will be focused on testing light water reactor (LWR) accident tolerant fuels (ATF). Similar to the sodium loop objectives, a water loop concept, developed and analyzed in the 1990’s, aimed at achieving thermal-hydraulic conditions encountered in commercial power reactors. The historic water loop concept has been analyzed in the context of a reactivity insertion accident (RIA) simulation for high burnup LWR 2-pin and 3-pin fuel bundles. Findings showed sufficient energy could be deposited into the specimens for evaluation. Similar results of experimental feasibility for the water loop concept (past and present) have recently been obtained using MCNP6.1 with ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data libraries. The old water loop concept required only two central TREAT core grid spaces. Preparation for future experiments has resulted in a modified water loop conceptual design designated the TREAT water environment recirculating loop (TWERL). The current TWERL design requires nine TREAT core grid spaces in order to place the water recirculating pump under the TREAT core. Due to the effectiveness of water moderation, neutronics analysis shows that removal of seven additional TREAT fuel elements to facilitate the experiment will not inhibit the ability to successfully simulate a RIA for the 2-pin or 3-pin bundle. This new water loop design leaves room for accommodating a larger fuel pin bundle than previously analyzed. The 7-pin fuel bundle in a hexagonal array with similar spacing of fuel pins in a SFR fuel assembly was considered the minimum needed for one central fuel pin to encounter the most correct thermal conditions. The 9-rod fuel bundle in a square array similar in spacing to pins in a LWR fuel assembly would be considered the LWR equivalent. MCNP analysis conducted on a preliminary LWR 9-rod bundle design shows that sufficient energy deposition into the central pin can be achieved well within range to investigate fuel and cladding performance in a simulated RIA. This is achieved by surrounding the flow channel with an additional annulus of water. Findings also show that a highly significant increase in TREAT to specimen power coupling factor (PCF) within the central pin can be achieved by surrounding the experiment with one to two rings of TREAT upgrade fuel assemblies. The experiment design holds promise for the performance evaluation of PWR fuel at extremely high burnup under similar reactor environment conditions.
Immediate Dismantling of a Large Fleet of LWR NPPs: Consequences for Spent Fuel and Waste Management - 16027
The experience feedback shows that the complete dismantling of one Light Water Reactor (LWR) unit is an activity now globally well under control (reactor pressure vessel and its internals removal and cutting included). However some specific industrial difficulties may arise in view of the dismantling of numerous LWR units simultaneously. Indeed more than 300 LWR units are currently operated worldwide, which have been commissioned these last 50 years. So in some countries, many units may be permanently shut down over a period of few years in the next decades. Such a situation addresses the issue of the overall management of large quantities of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and decommissioning waste for the concerned units. For example, in France, the legislative and regulatory framework for the nuclear facilities favors their dismantling 'as soon as possible' after their permanent shutdown which implies as well to limit the duration of the transition period from operation to decommissioning. Furthermore 58 LWR units have been commissioned between 1977 and 1999 in France - on average more than 2 units per year. In this context, the operator (Electricite de France - EDF) plans to remove quickly the SNF then to perform dismantling actions immediately after the permanent shutdown of the LWR units. One issue is to remove the SNF from all the relevant units, even if this removal is simultaneous in many units (permanently shut down or still under operation). Similar issue has to be taken into account regarding the management of the radioactive waste (RW) produced by the dismantling and clean-up actions, notably the RW that cannot be disposed of in a near surface repository. One method followed by the French technical support organization (Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire - IRSN) to analyze these issues is the use of estimates of flows of SNF and RW. These estimates are based notably on a phasing-scenario and a planning template defined for the decommissioning of the units of one nuclear power plant (NPP) and coupled to an overall schedule for phase out all the units of the fleet. The estimates relative to the next decades can be compared to the current experience feedback of flows of SNF and RW for units under operation, in order to identify risks when facing decommissioning. The risks highlighted are driven by key parameters (as duration of the main dismantling actions) of the estimates which can be adapted to minimize their impact. On this basis, it is possible to identify the key-factors to dismantle each unit of NPPs and phase out the fleet regarding SNF and RW management. It is noteworthy that this work needs to be done in any case upstream the studies and the implementation of dismantling actions. Finally it can be underlined that another issue is the human resources (staff, skills and knowledge) necessary to perform all the decommissioning actions, but this aspect is not addressed in the present paper. (authors)
Microstructure Investigations of U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} Irradiated by Heavy Ions at LWR Temperatures
Searching for a nuclear fuel material with enhanced accident tolerance compared to the conventional UO{sub 2} fuel is one of the key objectives of the accident tolerant fuel (ATF) campaign. Having both high thermal conductivity and high uranium load, U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} is expected to provide lower operating temperature/stored energy and advantageous neutron economy as a light water reactor (LWR) fuel material. Therefore, U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} has been regarded as a promising candidate fuel material by the ATF community. To evaluate the qualification of U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} as an ATF fuel in LWRs, its fuel performance during both steady-state operation and power transients must be well understood. As a typical nuclear fuel material applied in research reactors, the fuel performance of U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} at low temperatures (<300 deg. C) has been extensively studied through both experimental and computational approaches. However, under LWR conditions, the temperature of U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} can go beyond 600 deg. C. In that case, the references collected in U{sub 3}Si{sub 2}'s applications in research reactors are inadequate for the validation of U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} as an LWR ATF. Experimental efforts that are dedicated to the LWR conditions must be made to help examine U{sub 3}Si{sub 2}'s qualifications as well as provide valuable references for the development related models in advanced fuel performance code. Gaseous fission products accumulate in nuclear fuel during operation and form fission gas bubbles. The evolution of those fission gas bubbles results in increase of volume (swelling), degradation of thermal conductivity, and eventually fission gas release, compromising the integrity and performance of fuel elements in multiple aspects. Hence, fission gas behavior is one of the most important components of fuel performance. In-pile irradiation and corresponding post-irradiation examinations (PIEs) undoubtedly provide most reliable information on the actual performance of a nuclear fuel. However, the high cost and long lead time involved in in-pile irradiation limit its wide applications. On the other hand, heavy ion irradiation is capable of simulating the neutron effects on materials, especially the behavior of energetic fission fragments in nuclear fuel materials, to a considerable extent. Therefore, heavy ion irradiation was used in this study to investigate the microstructural evolution of U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} under LWR-temperature irradiation, focusing on the difference from low temperature irradiation and fission gas behavior.
Rate Theory Modeling and Simulation of Silicide Fuel at LWR Conditions
As a promising candidate for the accident tolerant fuel (ATF) used in light water reactors (LWRs), the fuel performance of uranium silicide (U 3 Si 2 ) at LWR conditions needs to be well understood. In this report, rate theory model was developed based on existing experimental data and density functional theory (DFT) calculations so as to predict the fission gas behavior in U 3 Si 2 at LWR conditions. The fission gas behavior of U 3 Si 2 can be divided into three temperature regimes. During steady-state operation, the majority of the fission gas stays in intragranular bubbles, whereas the dominance of intergranular bubbles and fission gas release only occurs beyond 1000 K. The steady-state rate theory model was also used as reference to establish a gaseous swelling correlation of U 3 Si 2 for the BISON code. Meanwhile, the overpressurized bubble model was also developed so that the fission gas behavior at LOCA can be simulated. LOCA simulation showed that intragranular bubbles are still dominant after a 70 second LOCA, resulting in a controllable gaseous swelling. The fission gas behavior of U 3 Si 2 at LWR conditions is benign according to the rate theory prediction at both steady-state and LOCA conditions, which provides important references to the qualification of U 3 Si 2 as a LWR fuel material with excellent fuel performance and enhanced accident tolerance.
Improvements to Bison Validation Base for LWR Fuel
The Bison fuel performance code is being developed by Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to analyze a wide range of fuel forms and operating conditions with the flexibility to conduct simulations in 1D through 3D geometries. Bison plays an important role in the development of advanced fuel with improved accident tolerance for existing light water reactors (LWRs), the improved understanding of mechanisms in fuel designs in a wider range of operating conditions, and the facilitation of future development of fuel for advanced reactor designs. Additionally, industry interest in advanced fuels has also driven Bison development for advanced fuels in the last few years. All of these factors combine to create a potential increase of new Bison users. These new users will potentially be interested in the Bison LWR validation base for examples of Bison's capabilities and how to use Bison. Current users also rely on the Bison validation base as a demonstration of the best practices settings and material behavioral models. Bison, both through direct updates to the Bison source code and to the nearly daily changes and improvements in the underlying MOOSE framework source code, undergoes nearly continuous changes. It is necessary that these source code changes are reflected with updated input files in the Bison validation base. Periodic updates of the validation case input files should also be accompanied by a review and revision of the validation case documentation on which our users rely. Therefore our efforts under this milestone were guided by two objectives: (1) Update the Bison LWR validation input files to use current Bison simulation settings, and (2) Enhance the ease-of-use for Bison through improved documentation These objectives build on the goals identified FY18 CASL milestone reports. During FY18 we addressed issues with the robustness of Bison and identified a need to migrate the assessment suite to the more reliable tensor mechanics module system and set a goal of standardizing the Bison input files. The FY18 CASL milestone report on updates to the Bison documentation system listed continued development of user-focused guides and examples along with revisions to the validation case documentation as future development goals. During FY19 we have separated these two objectives into four different focus areas for our work on this milestone. Our first two focus areas target the existing Bison validation suite: update the existing LWR validation cases and the accompanying documentation. The second two focus areas center on adding new capabilities: a new Bison LWR validation case and expansion of user support documentation. In the following report each of these four focus areas are discussed as a separate section. We conclude the report with a summary of potential future work to build on the efforts of this year.
Polaris-PARCS Sensitivity Study on LWR Fuel Cycles: Polaris Input Options
This study is the first of a multi-phase effort to assess the sensitivity of light-water reactor (LWR) core-level prediction biases to changes in lattice-level calculation parameters. Prediction bias is the measured-to-predicted difference in a core-level quantity of interest (QOI) which can be estimated by comparing the simulation results with the plant-measured data for key nuclear parameters. The LWR two-step neutronics codes employed herein are the SCALE–Polaris lattice physics code (v6.3.1) and the Purdue Advanced Reactor Core Simulator (PARCS) nodal diffusion simulator (v3.4.2), both funded and used for confirmatory analysis to support licensing by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Polaris–PARCS is used to model Watts Bar Unit 1 cycles 1–3 and Peach Bottom Unit 2 cycles 1–3. This study focuses on the impact of changes to Polaris input options such as scattering treatment or quadrature settings and how these input options induce changes in core-level quantities of interest (QOIs)bias. The report documents multiple bias assessments for different modeling choices and compares the bias magnitude to the QOI measurement uncertainties. Future companion reports will investigate the sensitivity of core-level LWR prediction bias to Polaris input options and Polaris-computed QOIs such as few-group assembly-homogenized cross sections to gain an understanding of the key drivers of prediction bias at lattice and core levels for application of a two-step LWR neutronics procedure in a licensing scenario.
Fission gas swelling in U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} at LWR conditions
In order to evaluate the feasibility of replacing uranium dioxide fuel with U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} fuel, it is crucial to examine the fuel performance of the silicide fuel under typical LWR conditions. At this early stage of U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} fuel development, before undertaking costly in-pile irradiation experiments and corresponding post-irradiation examinations, it is appropriate to utilize modeling tools to estimate the behavior of U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} in LWRs based on available in-pile irradiation experiments as well as the state-of-the-art calculation capabilities provided by density functional theory (DFT). Therefore, a comprehensive investigation of the fission gas swelling behavior of U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} at LWR conditions is reported here. The modeling efforts in this study are based on the Gas Release and Swelling Subroutine for Steady-State and Transient (GRASS-SST) rate theory (RT) model of fission gas bubble evolution that has been successfully applied to a variety of fuel materials in numerous types of reactors. Both existing in-pile irradiation data and DFT-based calculations were used for the optimized parametrization of the RT model. In addition, the fuel-cladding interaction was captured by coupling the RT model with simplified mechanical correlations. Both the swelling behavior and the fission gas bubble size distribution were predicted by the rate theory model. At LWR conditions, the RT model predicts that intragranular bubbles dominate the gaseous swelling behavior and that the evolution of intergranular bubbles and corresponding gas release are suppressed, confirming the qualification of U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} as a LWR fuel.
Thermal Aging Degradation of Cast Stainless Steels in LWR Systems
Cast austenitic stainless steels (CASSs) have been extensively used for the large components of light water reactor (LWR) power plants such as primary coolant piping and pump casing. Since a large number of massive CASS components are installed in every modern nuclear power plant, any significant degradation of CASS components will raise serious concerns on the integrity of the entire power plant. Upon the presumption that the replacement cost of such massive components is prohibitive, therefore, thorough scientific understanding and systematic monitoring the thermal aging degradation of CASS components should be essential requirements for assessing the plant safety. In the past few decades many researches have concluded that the formation of Cr-rich α-phase by Spinoidal decomposition of δ-ferrite phase, which is formed in high temperature region during cooling, is the primary mechanism for the thermal embrittlement. Cracking mechanism in the thermally-embrittled duplex stainless steels consists of cleavage initiation at ferrite and crack propagation via separation of ferrite-austenite interphase. It has been known, however, that such thermal aging embrittlement is observed only in accelerated aging conditions and the cast stainless steel grades used in nuclear plants have performed well without experiencing real embrittlement. It has been speculated that long-term thermal aging for ≥ 60 years could lead to further decomposition of designed phases and increase of precipitation. This will result in significantly increased susceptibility to embrittlement or other degradation due to thermal aging-radiation synergistic effect, irradiation-induced degradation, stress-corrosion cracking, and general corrosion. Currently, therefore, the thermal embrittlement of CASS components is one of the most serious concerns for extended operation of nuclear power plants. A scientific research is underway to address the issues related to the thermal aging degradation of CASS components. The research aims to provide knowledge-based conclusive prediction for the integrity of the CASS components of LWR power plants during extended operation up to and beyond 60 years. This presentation intends to provide an introductory overview on the thermal aging phenomena in LWR relevant conditions and discussion on the measurements of mechanical property degradation after accelerated and LWR relevant thermal aging treatments. First, the thermal aging effect on toughness is discussed in terms of the causes of embrittlement and influential parameters. Second, the talk will include a comprehensive discussion on the thermal aging effects in different CASS grades (i.e., CF3, CF3M, CF8, and CF8M), which will focus on the influence of alloying elements such as molybdenum and carbon. Third, approximate analysis on thermal reaction in CASS was carried out using Arrhenius equation to decide the effective temperature range for accelerated aging experiments to simulate 60 and 80 years of services in limited time frame. The results will provide valuable insights in the degree of thermal aging. Fourth, calculation on equilibrium precipitation was performed for model CASS alloys using the CALPHAD program, and the results will be used to describe the precipitation behaviors in association with the degradation in mechanical properties. (authors)
Gaseous swelling of U 3 Si 2 during steady-state LWR operation: A rate theory investigation
Rate theory simulations of fission gas behavior in U 3 Si 2 are reported for light water reactor (LWR) steady-state operation scenarios. We developed a model of U 3 Si 2 and implemented into the GRASS-SST code based on available research reactor post-irradiation examination (PIE) data, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations of key material properties. Simplified peripheral models were also introduced to capture the fuel-cladding interaction. The simulations identified three regimes of U 3 Si 2 swelling behavior between 390 K and 1190 K. Under typical steady-state LWR operating conditions where U 3 Si 2 temperature is expected to be below 1000 K, intragranular bubbles are dominant and fission gas is retained in those bubbles. The consequent gaseous swelling is low and associated degradation in the fuel thermal conductivity is also limited. Those predictions of U 3 Si 2 performance during steady-state operations in LWRs suggest that this fuel material is an appropriate LWR candidate fuel material. Fission gas behavior models established based on this work are being coupled to the thermo-mechanical simulation of the fuel behavior using the BISON fuel performance multi-dimensional finite element code.