Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Lithium metal anode”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Deconvoluting the impact of current collector structure and electrolyte selection on Coulombic efficiency of lithium metal anodes

Lithium metal batteries are regarded as a promising avenue for significantly boosting the gravimetric energy density of batteries, particularly for electric vehicles. However, the instability of the lithium metal anode continues to hinder performance. While 3D structured current collectors for lithium metal anodes have been frequently proposed as a solution, few studies explore the impact of these structures when combined with various electrolytes and the inclusion of a lithium reservoir within the structure. This study pairs four commercially available copper current collectors with four different electrolytes to assess how these factors influence cycling performance with a 4 mAh/cm2 lithium reservoir. Coulombic efficiency (CE) measurements revealed no statistically significant difference in CE across different current collectors within the same electrolyte. However, significant variations were noted when the current collector remained intact, and the electrolyte was changed. Although polarization, electrochemical impedance, and lithium morphology varied between structures and electrolytes, no consistent patterns emerged to suggest superior performance by any specific current collector structure. Therefore, the choice of structure appears inconsequential when a lithium reservoir is present, and efforts should focus on selecting and designing the electrolyte.

White, Julia↗

A novel polymeric lithicone coating for superior lithium metal anodes

Lithium metal (Li) is commonly regarded as the “holy grail” of rechargeable batteries and can serve as anodes for constituting various high-energy lithium metal batteries (LMBs). However, it suffers from two notorious issues: (1) continuous formation of inhomogeneous solid electrolyte interphase and (2) Li dendritic growth. Here, in this study, we developed a novel polymeric lithicone via a new molecular layer deposition (MLD) process, using lithium tert-butoxide (LTB) and hydroquinone (HQ) as precursors. We revealed that such an MLD process enabled the resultant LiHQ to grow linearly in a highly controllable and cyclic mode at a growth rate of 4 Å cycle −1 . Furthermore, its low process deposition temperature of 150 °C made it possible to practice high-quality coatings over Li anodes directly. We demonstrated that, very compellingly, this LiHQ coating could protect Li anodes from corrosion and dendritic growth. As a consequence, this LiHQ coating has enabled Li||Li symmetric cells an extremely long cyclability up to 8000 Li-plating/stripping cycles without failure. More excitingly, we demonstrated that, coupled with LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) cathodes, the LiHQ-modified Li anodes could help the resultant Li||NMC811 realize a much better capacity retention and much longer cyclability. Thus, this study represents a strategic route for developing commercializeable LMBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Interfacial Pressure Improves Calendar Aging of Lithium Metal Anodes

Lithium metal is a very attractive anode material because its theoretical specific capacity is approximately 10 times higher than conventional graphite anodes. Despite great promise, Li anodes suffer from capacity fade due to instabilities with the electrolyte as well as stranding of active Li. We have previously shown that applied interfacial pressure improves Li anode cycling because the pressure reduces the propensity for Li isolation and enables easier reconnection. Many researchers have also shown that calendar aging can lead to Li capacity loss and this has been attributed to either electrolyte decomposition with concurrent Li corrosion or to the formation of stranded Li. Our prior research focused on calendar aging during cycling suggests the mechanism for calendar aging is largely related to stranding of Li during rest and reconnection of the stranded Li upon further cycling, evidenced by similar average Coulombic efficiencies and Li loss in cells with and without rest. Because our calendar aging studies suggest Li stranding as a major cause of Coulombic efficiency drops and our Li cycling studies suggest this can be mitigated partially through applied interfacial pressure, we hypothesized that applied pressure would improve calendar aging by reducing stranded Li and enabling reconnection. We systematically varied applied pressure (0-1000 kPa) on Li metal anodes during cycling tests with and without intermittent calendar aging periods. Though the Coulombic efficiency decreases during aging periods, the lost capacity is recovered during subsequent cycles, as shown though average Coulombic efficiency and cumulative Li capacity loss analysis. We find that application of pressure partially mitigates calendar aging, in accordance with our hypothesis that calendar aging is caused by Li standing and can be mitigated to some degree with interfacial pressure. This is further supported by our results showing that the average Coulombic efficiency and cumulative Li capacity losses are similar over 50 cycles for cells that were continuously cycled and cells with periodic calendar aging periods. This result indicates that the losses during aging are reversible, which is consistent with Li stranding and reconnection. We show that pressure is one mitigation technique that helps reduce Li calendar aging in this study, but our finding that calendar aging is primarily governed by the stranding and reconnection of dead Li has wider implications. This research suggests that other mitigations which have been shown to prevent dead Li formation or encourage reconnection during cycling would also likely be successful for the purpose of improving calendar aging. The authors were supported by a Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program. This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (NTESS), a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) under contract DE-NA0003525. This written work is authored by an employee of NTESS. The employee, not NTESS, owns the right, title and interest in and to the written work and is responsible for its contents. This work was authored in part by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Any subjective views or opinions that might be expressed in the written work do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Government.

applied pressure↗

Lithicone‐Protected Lithium Metal Anodes for Lithium Metal Batteries with Nickel‐Rich Cathode Materials

The high energy density advantage of lithium (Li) metal batteries (LMBs) makes them increasingly desirable; however, problems such as strong reactivity and dendrite growth of Li metal anode limit their practical uses. In this work, a novel Li‐containing glycerol (LiGL) or lithicone protection layer on a 50 μm thick Li metal anode is employed for improving the performance of LMBs. This LiGL layer was accurately deposited via a molecular layer deposition (MLD) process at 150 °C, using lithium tert‐butoxide and glycerol as precursors. The as‐formed LiGL coating layer is highly tunable in its thickness by simply adjusting MLD cycles and shows a good stability and outstanding ionic transport properties. The LiGL layer is found to effectively mitigate side reactions and enhance cycling stability in both symmetric cells and full cells. Specifically, the LMBs with LiGL@Li anode of 400 MLD cycles and LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 cathode enable a capacity retention of ≈87%, much higher than ≈35% of the cells with bare Li after 200 cycles at a charge/discharge current density of 2.1 mA cm −2 . This work paves a feasible way for practical LMBs with improved capacity and stability through applying an innovative protection layer on Li metal anodes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Interface Modifications of Lithium Metal Anode for Lithium Metal Batteries

Lithium metal batteries (LMBs) enable much higher energy density than lithium–ion batteries (LIBs) and thus hold great promise for future transportation electrification. However, the adoption of lithium metal (Li) as an anode poses serious concerns about cell safety and performance, which has been hindering LMBs from commercialization. To this end, extensive effort has been invested in understanding the underlying mechanisms theoretically and experimentally and developing technical solutions. In this review, we devote to providing a comprehensive review of the challenges, characterizations, and interfacial engineering of Li anodes in both liquid and solid LMBs. Finally, we expect that this work will stimulate new efforts and help peer researchers find new solutions for the commercialization of LMBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Surface-Treated Composite Polymer as a Stable Artificial Solid Electrolyte Interphase Layer for Lithium Metal Anodes

Lithium (Li) metal batteries (LMBs) are one of the most promising high energy density batteries to meet the demands of electric transportation. However, the practical applications of LMBs are hindered by short cycle life and safety concern, mainly associated with side reactions between Li metal anode and liquid electrolyte and the growth of Li dendrites during cycling. In this study, we develop a stable artificial solid electrolyte interphase (aSEI), which consists of a surface-treated (S T ) PEO–Li 6.4 Ga 0.2 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 composite polymer coating layer (CPL) on Li metal anode. The developed aSEI is stable against selected electrolyte and enables a uniform electrodeposition of Li. Therefore, S T CPL@Li||LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) cells exhibit improved cycling stability compared with bare Li||NMC811 cells at moderate to high current densities. Notably, using a 50 µm thick Li and a practical NMC811 cathode (~4.8 mAh cm -2 ), a capacity retention of 85% is obtained for S T CPL@Li||NMC811 cells at a current density of 2.4 mAcm -2 after 300 cycles compared with 24% for bare Li||NMC811 cells. Furthermore, S T CPL@Li||NMC811 cells demonstrate higher capacities at charge current densities of 2.4, 4.8 and 7.2 mAcm -2 compared with bare Li||NMC811 cells. Further, these findings suggest that S T CPL is promising for high current density practical LMBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Interfacial pressure improves calendar aging of lithium metal anodes

Lithium (Li) metal is a promising anode because its theoretical specific capacity is approximately ten times larger than graphite. However, Li anodes suffer from long-term capacity fade due to Li stranding (becoming electronically disconnected) and electrolyte decomposition. Applied interfacial pressure has been shown to improve Li anode cycling, likely due to reincorporating stranded or “dead” Li into the anode. Calendar aging can also lead to Li capacity loss due to electrolyte decomposition/Li corrosion and the formation of stranded Li. Some research suggests that calendar aging during cycling results in reversible capacity losses due to Li stranding and reconnection. We here investigate the effect of applied interfacial pressure on Li anode calendar aging during cycling with incorporated rest steps in a localized high-concentration electrolyte (LHCE) to understand if pressure can mitigate stranded Li formation during rest by manipulating the Li morphology. Pouch cells exhibit more stable cycling and denser Li deposits between 10 kPa and 1,000 kPa of applied pressure compared to no applied pressure. Despite drops in CE during periodic rest cycles, the average cumulative lost capacity and average coulombic efficiency (CE) of cells over 50 cycles show that cells aged with incorporated rest steps perform similarly to cells cycled without added rests. This similar average CE suggests that dead Li is largely responsible for drops in CE during rest rather than irreversible Li corrosion and that the dead Li can be reconnected in subsequent cycling. The addition of a lithiophilic ZnO coating to the Cu working electrode increases the adhesion and coverage of Li deposits at low pressures and improves CE during the first cycle.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Localized High–Concentration Electrolytes with Low–Cost Diluents Compatible with Both Cobalt–Free LiNiO 2 Cathode and Lithium–Metal Anode

High-nickel layered oxide cathodes and lithium-metal anode are promising candidates for next-generation battery systems due to their high energy density. Nevertheless, the instability of the electrode–electrolyte interphase is hindering their practical application. Localized high-concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) present a promising solution for achieving uniform lithium deposition and a stable cathode–electrolyte interphase. However, the limited choice of diluents and their high cost are restricting their implementation. Four novel cost-effective diluents and their performance with highly reactive LiNiO 2 cathode and Li-metal anode are reported here. The results show that all the LHCE cells exhibit a Coulombic efficiency of >99.38% in Li | Cu cells and a capacity retention of >85% in Li | LiNiO 2 cells after 250 cycles. Advanced characterizations unveil that the stable cell operation is due to well-tuned electrode–electrolyte interphases and Li deposition morphology. In addition, online electrochemical mass spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry reveal that the gas generation and heat-release are greatly reduced with the LHCEs presented. Altogether, the study provides new insights into the role of diluents in LHCEs and offers valuable guidance for further optimization of LHCEs for high energy density lithium-metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Tackling issues of lithium metal anodes with a novel polymeric lithicone coating

Lithium metal (Li) has been hindered from as anodes in commercial batteries for over 50 years, due to two main issues: continuous formation of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and lithium dendritic growth. In this work, we report a new strategy to tackle these issues, i.e., using molecular layer deposition (MLD) to grow an ionically conducting but electrically insulating polymeric lithicone coating, an Li-containing triethanolamine (LiTEA). Our electrochemical tests revealed that this LiTEA coating could serve as an exceptional protection layer over Li anodes. Consequently, the LiTEA-coated Li electrodes could achieve a superior cyclability of > 10000 Li stripping/plating cycles at a current density of 5 mA cm -2 and a long cyclability of > 5500 cycles at 2 mA cm -2 in Li||Li symmetric cells without failures, under a fixed areal capacity of 1 mAh cm -2 . Characterizations using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron microscopy verified that Li + ions could be easily extracted through and deposited under the LiTEA coating during the stripping/plating processes. Consequently, this LiTEA coating significantly inhibited the formation of SEI and Li dendrites. This underlies the long cycling lifetime of the LiTEA-coated Li||Li cells. Coupling with the nickel-rich LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) cathodes, more encouragingly, the LiTEA-coated Li anodes could remarkably extend the cyclability and sustainable capacity of the resultant Li||NMC full cells. Finally, we also demonstrated that the performance of Li||NMC cells could be further improved through combining an LiTEA-coated Li anode with an Li 2 S-modified NMC811 via atomic layer deposition (ALD). Thus, this study is inspiring for developing high-energy Li||NMC lithium metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Origin of the lithium metal anode instability in solid-state batteries during discharge

Enabling the lithium metal anode (LMA) in solid-state batteries (SSBs) would increase energy density and specific energy compared with lithium-ion batteries. However, pore formation in LMAs with irregular morphology, even at low current density, during discharge results in an unstable, high-impedance interface. Understanding and addressing this inherent anode instability is essential for increasing the power densities in SSBs. Herein, we suggest that the morphology of the stripped electrode is related to dislocations in the LMA. To investigate the influence of dislocations, symmetric cells, Li|Li 6.25 Al 0.25 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO)|X-Li, are studied, where X-Li represents the microstructurally controlled LMA obtained via suitable thermomechanical processing. Operando impedance measurements are corroborated with SEM, confocal microscopy, and AFM data. Based on the experimental observations, a mechanism for pore formation is proposed. Here we show that the stack pressure required to maintain a stable interface is governed by the lithium microstructure and its thermomechanical processing history.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Probing the Effectiveness in Stabilizing Lithium Metal Anodes through Functional Additives

A variety of electrolyte additives were comprehensively evaluated to understand their relative capability in stabilizing lithium metal anode. Although the Li||Cu test is an effective test to rule out ineffective additives, a reliable assessment of individual additives cannot be obtained just by a single evaluation method. Therefore, various methods must be combined to truly assess the stabilization of a lithium anode. Moreover, it was also discovered that a significant depletion of electrolytes occurred during the end-of-life of the lithium batteries, which partially contributed to the sudden failure of the lithium batteries during cycling. However, the main culprit of the sudden failure was identified as the significant increase in the resistance of the lithium metal anode. Further, when used as an additive, cyclic fluorinated carbonates are the most effective in stabilizing the lithium anode and improving the cycling performance of lithium batteries among all the common additives. Despite its cost-effectiveness, the additive in the conventional electrolyte approach provides insufficient protection for lithium metal due to the complete consumption of the additive materials, which is necessary to repair the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI). Therefore, it is suggested that a larger ratio (>15 wt %) of the SEI former should be employed to achieve effective lithium stabilization.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Non‐Linear Kinetics of The Lithium Metal Anode on Li 6 PS 5 Cl at High Current Density: Dendrite Growth and the Role of Lithium Microstructure on Creep

Abstract Interfacial instability, viz., pore formation in the lithium metal anode (LMA) during discharge leading to high impedance, current focusing induced solid–electrolyte (SE) fracture during charging, and formation/behaviour of the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI), at the anode, is one of the major hurdles in the development of solid‐state batteries (SSBs). Also, understanding cell polarization behaviour at high current density is critical to achieving the goal of fast‐charging battery and electric vehicle. Herein, via in situ electrochemical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements, performed with freshly deposited lithium microelectrodes on transgranularly fractured fresh Li6PS5Cl (LPSCl), the LiǀLPSCl interface kinetics are investigated beyond the linear regime. Even at relatively small overvoltages of a few mV, the LiǀLPSCl interface shows non‐linear kinetics. The interface kinetics possibly involve multiple rate‐limiting processes, i.e., ion transport across the SEI and SE|SEI interfaces, as well as charge transfer across the LiǀSEI interface. The total polarization resistance R P of the microelectrode interface is determined to be ≈ 0.8 Ω cm 2 . It is further shown that the nanocrystalline lithium microstructure can lead to a stable LiǀSE interface via Coble creep along with uniform stripping. Also, spatially resolved lithium deposition, i.e., at grain surface flaws, grain boundaries, and flaw‐free surfaces, indicates exceptionally high mechanical endurance of flaw‐free surfaces toward cathodic load (>150 mA cm −2 ). This highlights the prominent role of surface defects in dendrite growth.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Dimolybdenum Paddlewheel Complexes with Cation Binding Sites as Electrolyte Additives to Manipulate the Solid-Electrolyte Interphase at Lithium Metal Anodes

The use of electrolyte additives at millimolar loadings to control the surface chemistry of lithium metal anodes (LMAs) is a leading strategy to improve lithium metal batteries and promote electrosynthetic reactions. Whereas previous studies employed either inorganic or organic additives, in this study, we report the first organometallic additive, Mo 2 (mea) 4 [1, mea = 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)acetate], a dimolybdenum paddlewheel complex that is stable under Li plating conditions and features cation binding sites in the second coordination sphere that promote reversible Li + coordination. Binding of Li + ions to 1 induces immobilization of cationically charged aggregates (or products thereof) into the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), imparting multiple beneficial functions. The modified SEI was found to protect the LMA against parasitic side reactions, produce modest but measurable improvements to Li plating properties (e.g., overpotential, surface structure, and Coulombic efficiency), and improve interfacial charge transport properties. Furthermore, the most notable benefit to battery cycling performance appears in calendar aging tests, which show that the presence of the additive protects the LMA from parasitic side reactions that would otherwise decrease overall cell cycling efficiency over time. Collectively, these data disclose a tactic for designing electrolyte additives using principles of organometallic synthesis.

Additives↗

Crossover Effects of Transition‐Metal Ions on Lithium‐Metal Anode in Localized High Concentration Electrolytes

Abstract The stability of the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) is critical to the cycle life of lithium‐metal batteries (LMBs). While the crossover effect of transition‐metal ions from cathode to anode is extensively studied in lithium‐ion batteries with graphite anodes, its impact on LMBs remains largely unexplored. Herein, this study investigates the electrochemical and chemical properties of SEI layers formed on lithium‐metal anodes in localized high‐concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) containing dissolved transition‐metal ions (Ni 2+ , Mn 2+ , and Co 2+ ). It is demonstrated that transition‐metal ions in LHCEs reduce the coulombic efficiency (CE) and significantly degrade the cycle life of LMBs. Time‐of‐flight secondary‐ion mass spectrometry (ToF‐SIMS) reveals that SEI structures differ depending on the dissolved TM ion, with Mn 2+ and Co 2+ inducing severe destabilization, and Ni 2+ exhibiting a less severe impact. These findings underscore the detrimental effects of transition‐metal crossover effects in LMB systems.

Guo, Zezhou [Materials Science and Engineering Pro↗

Hyperconjugation-controlled molecular conformation weakens lithium-ion solvation and stabilizes lithium metal anodes

Tuning the solvation structure of lithium ions via electrolyte engineering has proven effective for lithium metal (Li) anodes. Further advancement that bypasses the trial-and-error practice relies on the establishment of molecular design principles. Expanding the scope of our previous work on solvent fluorination, we report here an alternative design principle for non-fluorinated solvents, which potentially have reduced cost, environmental impact, and toxicity. By studying non-fluorinated ethers systematically, we found that the short-chain acetals favor the [gauche, gauche] molecular conformation due to hyperconjugation, which leads to weakened monodentate coordination with Li + . The dimethoxymethane electrolyte showed fast activation to >99% coulombic efficiency (CE) and high ionic conductivity of 8.03 mS cm -1 . The electrolyte performance was demonstrated in anode-free Cu$∥$LFP pouch cells at current densities up to 4 mA cm -2 (70 to 100 cycles) and thin-Li$∥$high-loading-LFP coin cells (200–300 cycles). Overall, we demonstrated and rationalized the improvement in Li metal cyclability by the acetal structure compared to ethylene glycol ethers. We expect further improvement in performance by tuning the acetal structure.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Evaluation of Lithium Metal Anode Volumetric Expansion through Laser Plasma Focused Ion Beam Cross-Sectional Imaging

Lithium metal is an ideal anode for high energy density batteries, however the implementation of lithium metal anodes remains challenging. Beyond the development of highly efficient electrolytes, degradation processes restrict cycle life and reduce practical energy density. Herein lithium volumetric expansion and degradation pathways are studied in half cells through coupling electrochemical analysis with cross-sectional imaging of the intact electrode stack using a cryogenic laser plasma focused ion beam and scanning electron microscope. Here, we find that the volumetric capacity is compromised as early as the first cycle, at best reaching values only half the theoretical capacity (1033 vs 2045 mAh cm -3 ). By the 101st electrodeposition, the practical volumetric capacity decreases to values ranging from 143 to 343 mAh cm -3 .

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Carbon Scaffold Architectures for Stable Lithium Metal Anodes

In light of the skyrocketing demand for electric vehicles and consequent need for high-performing lithium-ion batteries, there has been significant research into the creation of a battery with a lithium metal anode due to its high theoretical capacity and energy density. Unfortunately, nonuniform lithium deposition and consequent dendrite growth diminish performance and pose a safety risk. To combat this, lightweight carbon scaffolds are being developed to stabilize the electric field of these batteries and induce uniform deposition through rational design at the nano-, micro-, and meso- scales. However, there is a paucity of research on the impacts of macroscale scaffold topology on lithium cycling performance. Here, we report the creation of two graphite-based scaffolds with distinct 3D topologies: one a series of triangular prisms and one a series of rectangular prisms. Coin cells were made using these scaffolds and cycled at a current of 1mA/cm2 for 50 cycles to test the performance. The triangular topology was found to outperform the rectangular topology in terms of both potential magnitude and stability during cycling. Disassembling the cells revealed more even lithium deposition on the rectangular scaffold; however, some of the rectangular prisms were broken while all the triangular prisms remained intact. Last, future experiments are proposed regarding the scaffold spacing and mass of the cells in order to isolate the topological impact.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗