Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Long duration lander”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Status of Long-Duration Lander Capabilities Developed Under the LLISSE Project

- Long-duration Insitu measurements on Venus are necessary - The latest planetary decadal notes science needs for Insitu temporal measurements at the surface - LLISSE development is to: - Answer science questions - Mature technology for future missions - Key enabler is to address the life and durability impacting factors for landers (primarily surface temperature and reactive atmosphere) Approach to addressing challenges - Develop ability to operate at Venus temperatures for long durations- Use of only materials inert to reactive Venus surface atmosphere - Innovative concept of operations to enable temporal surface science and lander-to-orbiter communications for life of lander

Venus↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Capabilities for Long-Duration Landers on Mercury

Mercury surface assets will be exposed to extreme thermal swings over a Mercury day (-180 C to +430 C). Dayside operations, in particular, are challenging from a thermal control and power perspective. Consequently, the latest planetary decadal survey process included a Mercury lander concept that only operated during the night. Recent technology advancements in high and low temperature systems may enable new science over the entire Mercury day.

Mercury↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Capabilities for Long-Duration Landers in Extreme Environments

Missions to the surface of planets that experience high temperatures, like Venus or Mercury, have had limited consideration and development in recent decades partially because of the extreme temperatures and environments the planets experience. In the case of Mercury this is up to 430C for nearly 30 days and for Venus almost 60 days at 460C. Several landers have been sent to Venus many decades ago but 127 minutes was the longest any operated on the surface. Venus, and Mercury, hold many mysteries and successful surface missions will result in compelling new science that will have significant bearing on us here on Earth. To enable this compelling new science, NASA has been developing capabilities for a small lander that is designed to operate for months in the extreme temperatures found on Venus and Mercury. The capabilities promise to enable new missions not yet considered. This work summarizes technical advances that are preparing us for long-duration (months) operations in extreme environments on other planets.

Extreme Environment Lander↗
NASA NTRS2020

Long-duration Venus lander for seismic and atmospheric science

An exciting and novel science mission concept called Seismic and Atmospheric Exploration of Venus (SAEVe) has been developed which uses high-temperature electronics to enable a three-order magnitude increase in expected surface life (120 Earth days) over what has been achieved to date. This enables study of long-term, variable phenomena such as the seismicity of Venus and near surface weather, near surface energy balance and atmospheric chemical composition. SAEVe also serves as a critical pathfinder for more sophisticated landers in the future. For example, first order seismic measurements by SAEVe will allow future missions to deliver better seismometers and systems to support the yet unknown frequency and magnitude of Venus events. SAEVe is focused on science that can be realized with low data volume instruments and will most benefit for temporal operations. The entire mission architecture and operations maximize science while minimizing energy usage and physical size and mass. The entire SAEVe system including its protective entry system is estimated to be around 45 kg and approximately 0.6 m diameter. These features allow SAEVe to be relatively cost effective and be easily integrated onto a Venus orbiter mission. The technologies needed to implement SAEVe are currently in development by several funded activities. Component and system level work is ongoing under NASA’s HOTTech program and by the Long Lived Insitu Solar System Explorer (LLISSE) project. The SAEVe long duration Venus lander promises groundbreaking science and is an ideal complimentary element to many future Venus orbiter missions being proposed or planned today.

Venus↗
NASA NTRS2019

Long-Duration Venus Lander Development

One of the most intriguing planets in our solar system for both solar system and extra-solar system science is Venus. Venus is the planet most similar to Earth in several key ways and many believe Venus-like planets are more common around other suns than are Earth-like planets. Therefore scientific understanding of our sister planet is a high priority. However, the hostile environmental conditions at the surface coupled with thick acid clouds and dense atmosphere have made understanding this planet very challenging. Remote sensing of surface features and near surface environments is very limited. The hostile environment has also limited the ability of landers to survive, in fact the longest living asset survived just over two hours. Even after over 50 years of attempts to explore Venus, many key measurements, especially near the surface, are still in the future. NASA has begun to undertake steps to overcome the technical challenges and is developing the capability for sustained operations and science return from this important body. For example, recent technology advances in high temperature sensors, electronics, power, and other systems have been funded and this, combined with the new capabilities to replicate Venus conditions on Earth, are changing the outlook for Venus surface exploration.

Kremic, Tibor↗
NASA NTRS1997

Lunar/Mars In-Situ Propellant Production (ISPP) Technology: Development Roadmap

The mission strategy used in the ISPP Roadmap for human exploration in the 21st Century is still very preliminary, but covers human exploration of both the Moon and Mars. The mission strategy for lunar exploration begins with a simple, short term lunar surface stay in 2003. The first mission would last only a few days and consist primarily of existing technology; however, long duration landers and habitats, and nuclear transfer stages would be demonstrated on other missions. For missions to Mars, human exploration would begin with the launch of an unmanned habitat and return stage in 2009 to support the first human mission to Mars in 2011. The 2009 return lander would include an ISPP plant to produce the propellant needed for ascent from the Mars surface before the first human crew left Earth in 2011. Robotic orbiters and landers to help define the environment and surface conditions as well as perform engineering demonstrations of key technologies are also an integral part of these mission strategies.

Sanders, J. B.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Robust and Mass Efficient Thermal Protection Systems for Future Venus Missions

Several international Venus missions, both orbiter, and in-situ probe are in the works after a prolonged absence. Future missions are expected to be long-duration lander missions and balloon missions to investigate the cloud layer. The entry mass for these in-situ missions will be significantly higher, and the aeroshell will be larger, than previous missions. Two cardinal requirements govern the selection and use of thermal protection systems (TPS), namely, robustness to assure mission safety during entry and mass efficiency so that the useful mass for science is maximized. One cannot trade mission safety for mass when it comes to TPS. The robustness of the TPS is a paramount requirement as it is a single point of system failure. At the same time, TPS mass is carried for the entire mission duration prior to entry, and any excess TPS mass is at the cost of science payload. Future missions will benefit enormously from TPS options with mass and performance benefits far beyond advanced carbon-carbon (ACC) that is currently proposed for the DAVINCI mission. NASA STMD, and SMD jointly invested in the development of 3-D woven thermal protection systems in the last decade, and as a result, the Heat-shield for Extreme Entry Environment Technology (HEEET) TPS has been matured to TRL 6. It is ready for future mission use including Venus. The HEEET project focused on developing a broad technology base, applicable for missions not only to Venus, but also to Saturn, the Ice Giants, and higher speed sample return missions such as Mars Sample Return requiring extreme robustness due to bio-hazards. The dual-layer HEEET (DL-HEEET) is proven to be extremely robust. DL-HEEET performed well in arc jet and laser testing conditions where heritage carbon-phenolic failed. HEEET also proved to be more mass efficient compared to Carbon-Phenolic. Recently, the principal author was invited to present his perspectives to the 2023-2032 Planetary Sciences Decadal Venus subcommittee on the current state of TPS for future Venus missions [1]. In addition to pointing out successful TPS and other developments in the last decade in support of entry systems, the principal author made two findings: 1) importance of and need to sustain TPS capabilities that took nearly a decade to develop and 2) the opportunity to further optimize TPS mass without sacrificing robustness to further enable future in-situ missions. This talk will focus on the above two recommendations and provide the rationale for them. The intent of the talk is to seek advocacy from the VEXAG community for the criticality of TPS sustainment and the benefits of 3D woven TPS optimization. TPS Capability Sustainment: HEEET development was necessitated by the atrophy of heritage carbon-phenolic. Atrophy has impacted other TPS materials as well. Avcoat, the TPS that successfully allowed astronauts to explore the Moon in the 1960s and 70s, took nearly a decade and $10’sM to recover in support of Orion/Artemis. One of the most used TPS materials, SLA 561V, had to be recovered prior to its use on Mars Pathfinder. Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA), the TPS that replaced SLA 561V on MSL, has undergone multiple replacements and recovery due to constituent rayon changes. Recently, NASA invested in a domestic rayon replacement program and also invested in FMI to consolidate PICA capability for NASA missions, as a result of FMI’s decision to discontinue commercial FiberForm, which is needed for PICA. TPS used for planetary missions are unique and have no other commercial or defense use. In addition, low mission cadence is also a driver for TPS atrophy. Hence, NASA, as the steward, must take steps to ensure and sustain TPS capabilities. In this talk, we outline steps NASA can take to keep abreast of emerging risks and target risk mitigation steps to ensure TPS capability sustainment for Venus and other extreme environment missions. Next Generation of Mass efficient and Robust TPS: NASA invested in an alternate TPS to PICA based on felt-technology called Conformal-PICA which has the potential to save 30% - 50% mass over PICA. The development was discontinued at a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of ~ 5. 3D Mid-Density Carbon Phenolic (3MDCP) is a single layer variant of HEEET, based on the insulating layer only (SL-HEEET) and currently baselined for the Mars Sample Return Mission Earth Entry System due to its mass efficiency (30% more mass efficient than DL- HEEET). Currently, SL-HEEET is limited to aeroshell diameters of < 1.3m. The SL-HEEET was compared to DL-HEEET in the recent ADVENT flag-ship class mission study in support of the Planetary Science Decadal. SL HEEET was the recommended TPS based on 30% mass savings for both the balloon and lander missions. Given C-PICA and SL-HEEET have superior reliability and mass efficiency, advocacy from VEXAG is sought for completing their further development to TRL 5/6 in this decade so as to enable TPS readiness for future missions.

Thermal Protection Systems↗
NASA NTRS2019

Long Duration Venus Probes and Landers

Planetary probes have long been a tool used by scientists to gain early clues on environments and systems of new planetary targets. This not only fueled the scientific process but also helped prepare for future missions, such as landers, and helped ensure their success. Venus, Earth's sister planet, has been the target of more probes and landers than any other body in our solar system except for Earth and yet many fundamental questions are unanswered. Challenge for Venus Surface Science: This lack of knowledge is a result of the challenging Venus environments. Remote sensing of the surface and portions of the atmosphere is difficult at best due to the thick layers of sulfuric acid clouds and the high pressure supercritical CO2 atmosphere below those clouds. This has hampered the ability of orbiting missions to provide us insight into surface features and processes and thus hides potential clues on interior process from our view. Surface probes and landers face an even more daunting challenge, which is the extreme temperature, pressure and unfriendly chemical composition of the near surface atmosphere. Over 10 assets have landed on the surface yet the longest surviving asset Venera-13 lasted only 127 minutes before succumbing to the extreme temperature. While this and other landers provided valuable new data, the short life impacted ability to understand any temporal processes, for example meteorology, seismic active, and therefore very little is known about the interior and surface atmosphere interactions. New Capability Offering Potential Solutions: Re-cent developments by NASA are offering hope of overcoming the technical challenges of surface operations and life with the use of high temperature electronics and systems. Wide band gap, SiC based electronics have been demonstrated to function successfully for extended periods of time both at 500C, Venus surface temperatures as well as when temperature is combined with the reactive chemistry of the surface atmosphere and the high pressures (over 90 bar pressure at the surface). In addition to electronics a number of other subsystems are in development including power in the form of high temperature batteries and power management devices, communications including antennas, transmitters and other components, materials, and structures and mechanisms. These are all activities under NASA's Long Lived In situ Solar System Exploration (LLISSE) project. Other activities are also funded under NASA's HOTTech program.

Kremic, T.↗
NASA NTRS2022

RHU-RPS Long Duration Mars Hard Lander: Meteorology and Seismology Enabled by Radioisotopes (MASER)

Compass Team was tasked by the RPS Project at the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) to create an independent concept design for a spacecraft (S/C) utilizing low power radioisotope power. A list of candidate missions enabled by milliwatt class radioisotope power was evaluated and thus resulted in the selection of a Mars polar region seismology network of four hard landers. A science rational and science operations plan was developed to establish mission design requirements and S/C subsystem concept designs described herein.

RPS↗
NASA NTRS2018

A Potential Venera-D Element: SAEVe (Seismic and Atmospheric Exploration of Venus)

The Seismic and Atmospheric Exploration of Venus (SAEVe) mission concept study developed a long duration Venus lander concept that addressed high priority Venus science that includes seismology as well and long duration atmospheric measurements. SAEVe is a compact lander concept based on LLISSE (Long-Life In-situ Solar System Explorer) developments and capability.

Venus↗
NASA NTRS2022

A Long-Lived Lander for Venus Surface Insitu Science

Earth’s sister planet, Venus, continues to hide important scientific clues about our solar system, terrestrial planets around other stars, and about our home planet as well. Venus was the first planet human-built spacecraft have flown by, several missions have orbited around it and many short-duration landers operated have landed on it, yet there are still many important and basic science questions that need answering about this mysterious body. This fact exists because the planet poses significant challenges to acquiring the needed data when relying on tradition planetary spacecraft design approaches. This presentation will provide a short background, description, and status of a project that is taking a novel approach to meet some of the Venus challenges and prepare NASA to address the key science questions about its climate, surface, and eventually interior.

Venus↗
NASA NTRS2017

SAEVe: A Long Duration Small Sat Class Venus Lander - Seismic and Atmospheric Exploration of Venus

NASA's science mission directorate has put increasing emphasis on innovative, smaller, and lower cost missions to achieve their science objectives. One example of this was the recent call by the Planetary Science Division for cube and small satellite concepts expected to cost $100M or less, not including launch and weighing less than 180kg. Over 100 proposals were submitted suggesting that indeed this is a size of mission worthy of being considered in future planning. Nineteen missions were selected for study, one being a long-lived Venus mission called SAEVe, for Seismic and Atmospheric Exploration of Venus. The science objectives and relevance of SAEVe include: Is Venus seismically active? What can we learn about its crust (thickness and composition) and its interior (lithosphere, mantle, and core)? What can be learned about its evolutionary history or about the planet / atmosphere interactions? SAEVe begins to address these science questions with simple, but capable, instrumented probes that can survive on the surface of Venus and take temporal measurements over months something never attempted before. The data returned will further our understanding of the solar system and Earth, and aid in meeting the NASA Science Plan goal to ascertain the content, origin, and evolution of the solar system and the chemical and physical processes in our solar system. SAEVe is delivered to Venus as a ride-along on another mission to Venus. Its two small probes are placed into the Venus atmosphere via a single Stardust-like entry capsule, are ejected at different times, free fall, and decelerate in the thickening atmosphere to touchdown under 8 m/s2 or less. The probes will begin taking measurements and transmitting important parameters at or near the surface and will focus on measurements like seismic activity, heat flux, wind speed and direction, basic chemical abundances, temperature, and pressure. At preset intervals, the probes acquire the science measurements and beam the data to the orbiting host spacecraft. SAEVe will serve as a highly capable precursor and pave the way for larger and more complex lander missions to explore Venus.

lander↗
NASA NTRS2005

A Reusable Design for Precision Lunar Landing Systems

The top-level architecture to accomplish NASA's Vision for Space Exploration is to use Lunar missions and systems not just as an end in themselves, but also as testbeds for the more ambitious goals of Human Mars Exploration (HME). This approach means that Lunar missions and systems are most likely going to be targeted for (Lunar) polar missions, and also for long-duration (months) surface stays. This overacting theme creates basic top-level requirements for any next-generation lander system: 1) Long duration stays: a) Multiple landers in close proximity; b) Pinpoint landings for "surface rendezvous"; c) Autonomous landing of pre-positioned assets; and d) Autonomous Hazard Detection and Avoidance. 2) Polar and deep-crater landings (dark); 3) Common/extensible systems for Moon and Mars, crew and cargo. These requirements pose challenging technology and capability needs. Compare and contrast: 4) Apollo: a) 1 km landing accuracy; b) Lunar near-side (well imaged and direct-to-Earth com. possible); c) Lunar equatorial (landing trajectories offer best navigation support from Earth); d) Limited lighting conditions; e) Significant ground-in-the-loop operations; 5) Lunar Access: a) 10-100m landing precision; b) "Anywhere" access includes polar (potentially poor nav. support from Earth) and far side (poor gravity and imaging; no direct-to-Earth com); c) "Anytime" access includes any lighting condition (including dark); d) Full autonomous landing capability; e) Extensible design for tele-operation or operator-in-the-loop; and f) Minimal ground support to reduce operations costs. The Lunar Access program objectives, therefore, are to: a) Develop a baseline Lunar Precision Landing System (PLS) design to enable pinpoint "anywhere, anytime" landings; b) landing precision 10m-100m; c) Any LAT, LON; and d) Any lighting condition; This paper will characterize basic features of the next generation Lunar landing system, including trajectory types, sensor suite options and a reference system architecture.

Fuhrman, Linda↗