Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Lunar Dust Mitigation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wear-Resistance Investigations on Ceramic Coatings for Lunar Dust Mitigation

Lunar dust has posed a major challenge to exploration efforts due to abrasion and impact. This work focuses on fundamental studies on ceramic coatings as candidates for enhanced resistance to impact and wear. As a first step, standard and modified approaches to the method of abrasion testing were explored for options to incorporate lunar regolith as wear media, the effects of which were presented for AL6061-T6 control samples. Following this, wear results for air plasma-sprayed (APS) alumina coatings were investigated due to their superior strength and surface hardness. In addition, APS 8 wt % yttria-stabilized zirconia (8YSZ) coatings were studied for their strength and martensitic transformation toughness. Measurements were made by assessing the mass loss, with a standard scale at various intervals. In addition, surface roughness was measured with a profilometer and features identified with a high-resolution microscope. The findings demonstrated that wear media has a distinct effect on the abrasion. The alumina coatings demonstrated improved wear over 8YSZ. However, the tailorability of 8YSZ makes it an attractive option to continue to modify as a wear-resistant coating to protect against lunar dust abrasion. The results of these measurements provide insight into the wear behavior of future directions in candidate ceramic coatings for the harsh lunar environment.

ceramic coatings↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wear-Resistance Investigations on Ceramic Coatings for Lunar Dust Mitigation

Lunar dust has posed a major challenge to exploration efforts due to abrasion and impact. This work focuses on fundamental studies on ceramic coatings as candidates for enhanced resistance to impact and wear. As a first step, standard and modified approaches to the method of abrasion testing were explored for options to incorporate lunar regolith as wear media, the effects of which were presented for AL6061-T6 control samples. Following this, wear results for air plasma-sprayed (APS) alumina coatings were investigated due to their superior strength and surface hardness. In addition, APS 8 wt % yttria-stabilized zirconia (8YSZ) coatings were studied for their strength and martensitic transformation toughness. Measurements were made by assessing the mass loss, with a standard scale at various intervals. In addition, surface roughness was measured with a profilometer and features identified with a high-resolution microscope. The findings demonstrated that wear media has a distinct effect on the abrasion. The alumina coatings demonstrated improved wear over 8YSZ. However, the tailorability of 8YSZ makes it an attractive option to continue to modify as a wear-resistant coating to protect against lunar dust abrasion. The results of these measurements provide insight into the wear behavior of future directions in candidate ceramic coatings for the harsh lunar environment.

ceramic coatings↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Advancements in Lunar Dust Mitigation and Leveraging the Contamination Control Community

Lunar Dust Contamination: As we get closer to putting landers, rovers, payloads, and astronauts on the Moon, dust mitigation is becoming more critical than ever. To address the many challenges of dust mitigation on the surface, engineers and scientists are looking at various technologies that may have relevance for the contamination control community. This includes active, passive, architectural, and operational solutions. There have been advances in coatings for dust mitigation at NASA and through commercial partnerships (see Wiesner, Wohl, et al). There have been advancements to previous solutions as well as novel solutions to address dust mitigation on the surface and on-orbit. There have been several efforts to better understand the effectiveness of various terrestrial and dust mitigation solutions with much of this data published in recent years. In the area of dust mitigation, dust contamination or infiltration refers to the impingement or contact of planetary dust with items not normally dusty and whose operation may therefore be compromised. Recent Advancements in Dust Mitigation: Dust mitigation strategies are becoming more common for hardware heading to the Moon, with most major programs implementing lunar dust contamination requirements for human health and equipment. In the last couple of years, NASA has created more guidance to assist hardware developers with dust mitigation. This includes NASA-STD-1008 (Classifications and Requirements for Testing Systems and Hardware to be Exposed to Dust in Planetary) and NASA TP 20220018746 (Lunar Dust Mitigation Guide and Reference). Several projects are testing hardware in relevant dusty environments to understand their tolerance to lunar dust. There has been a significant increase in the amount of testing with lunar simulants, with the NASA Simulant Advisory Committee serving a resource for NASA and our partners. There are new solutions for detecting and monitoring the dust internally and externally. Learning from the contamination control community: In addition to sharing potentially relevant solutions at the workshop, the dust mitigation community is also interested in learning from the contamination control community on ways to address lunar dust. For instance, a major aspect of managing the dust is monitoring and detection. This is critical for understanding when maintenance is needed and to inform future missions. Another challenge of working with lunar dust is quantifying and characterizing the smallest of particles. There are also challenges in modeling lunar dust and its behavior. The dust mitigation community can also leverage lessons learned from the planetary protection community.

dust mitagation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview of NASA Gateway Lunar Dust Mitigation and Contamination Modeling and Analysis

The planned NASA Artemis campaign has several lunar surface missions in which the NASA Gateway is the waypoint between lunar orbit and the lunar surface for Human Lander System (HLS). Each of these missions is an opportunity for lunar dust to be introduced into the Gateway environment, post surface mission, potentially causing end of life (EOL) performance degradation due to lunar dust contamination of sensitive hardware and systems on the exterior of Gateway and Visiting Vehicles. The Gateway Systems Engineering and Integration (SE&I) and Induced Environments teams are addressing the challenge of lunar dust with a two-pronged approach. Characterization of the lunar dust induced environment around Gateway and contamination risk is accomplished with a comprehensive physics-based framework, the Gateway On-orbit Lunar Dust Modeling and Analysis Program (GOLDMAP), which is currently in development. Analysis results from GOLDMAP define Gateway-level induced environments requirements and are flowed to elements and subsystems. In parallel, a dust mitigation strategy is being developed with a focus on lunar dust protection, dust mitigation technologies, mitigation and testing guidance, and cross-program coordination and is informed by outputs from GOLDMAP analyses. Activities supporting both components include hardware susceptibility assessments and testing, and scientific experiments on lunar regolith.

Gateway↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Protective Coatings for Mitigating Lunar Dust Abrasion and Adhesion

Materials resistant to the harsh lunar environment are needed to support long duration, sustainable missions on the Moon’s surface. Lunar dust poses a significant threat to the durability of components and vehicles due to its fine, jagged morphology and highly abrasive nature. These characteristics result in particles eroding, adhering and/or embedding onto component surfaces and into device confined geometries (e.g., gear housing, interlocking systems, etc.) potentially leading to premature failure. The aim of this work is to identify and characterize wear-resistant materials, including advanced ceramics, for use as protective coatings to minimize abrasion and adhesion caused by lunar dust. Results from testing and evaluation methods devised to elucidate and mimic aspects of lunar dust degradation, including adhesion, abrasion and erosion, as well as the lunar environment, will be presented. Discussion on balancing the need for dust management and tolerance versus dust adhesion mitigation will be shared in context of relevant lunar applications within the NASA Lunar Occupancy Dust Surface Separation Technologies effort, which is part of a NASA-wide effort to enable a sustained lunar presence through the Lunar Surface Innovation Initiative.

lunar dust mitigation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Work Function Matching Passive Lunar Dust Mitigation Coating Preparation for Lunar Flight Opportunity

With the Artemis program, NASA isplanning longer stays on the surface, with more activities that have the potential to put the astronauts and equipment in contact with greater quantities of lunar dust. The success of these missions will depend on our understanding of material interactions with lunar dust and the development of ways to mitigate dust effects. This is particularly truein cases where exposure to dust will lead to failure of components, unacceptable loss of power or thermal control, unacceptable loss of visibility, or health issues.Optically transparent, sputter deposited,work function matching coatings are being developed at NASA Glenn Research Center to reduce adhesion of dust to windows, lenses and display panels by matching the minimum energy to remove an electron from the surface to that oflunar dust in order to reduce adhesion due to charge transfer. One of these work function matching coatings will be tested as part of Aegis Aerospace Inc.’s Regolith Adherence Characterization experiment going to the lunar surface on a Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) lander in 2023. Preparation of the work function matching coating and initial characterization prior to delivery for flight integration will be discussed.

Lunar dust, passive mitigation, CLPS demonstration↗
NASA NTRS2008

Lunar Dust Mitigation Technology Development

NASA s plans for implementing the Vision for Space Exploration include returning to the moon as a stepping stone for further exploration of Mars, and beyond. Dust on the lunar surface has a ubiquitous presence which must be explicitly addressed during upcoming human lunar exploration missions. While the operational challenges attributable to dust during the Apollo missions did not prove critical, the comparatively long duration of impending missions presents a different challenge. Near term plans to revisit the moon places a primary emphasis on characterization and mitigation of lunar dust. Comprised of regolith particles ranging in size from tens of nanometers to microns, lunar dust is a manifestation of the complex interaction of the lunar soil with multiple mechanical, electrical, and gravitational effects. The environmental and anthropogenic factors effecting the perturbation, transport, and deposition of lunar dust must be studied in order to mitigate it s potentially harmful effects on exploration systems. This paper presents the current perspective and implementation of dust knowledge management and integration, and mitigation technology development activities within NASA s Exploration Technology Development Program. This work is presented within the context of the Constellation Program s Integrated Lunar Dust Management Strategy. The Lunar Dust Mitigation Technology Development project has been implemented within the ETDP. Project scope and plans will be presented, along with a a perspective on lessons learned from Apollo and forensics engineering studies of Apollo hardware. This paper further outlines the scientific basis for lunar dust behavior, it s characteristics and potential effects, and surveys several potential strategies for its control and mitigation both for lunar surface operations and within the working volumes of a lunar outpost.

Hyatt, Mark J.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lunar Dust and Dust Mitigation Testing

Lunar dust was one of the most persistent problems for the Apollo astronauts due to its’ abrasiveness and strong adherence to surfaces. With the Artemis program, NASA is planning longer stays on the lunar surface, with more activities that have the potential to put the astronauts and equipment in contact with greater quantities of lunar dust. The success of these missions will depend on our understanding of material interactions with lunar dust and the development of ways to mitigate dust effects. This is particularly true in cases where exposure to dust will lead to failure of components, unacceptable loss of power or thermal control, unacceptable loss of visibility, or health issues. Lunar dust, issues with lunar dust, and ground testing with lunar simulant will be discussed as well as the development of and planned flight testing of optically transparent work function matching coatings to reduce adhesion of dust on the lunar surface.

Lunar dust↗
NASA NTRS2007

Lunar Dust: Characterization and Mitigation

Lunar dust is a ubiquitous phenomenon which must be explicitly addressed during upcoming human lunar exploration missions. Near term plans to revisit the moon as a stepping stone for further exploration of Mars, and beyond, places a primary emphasis on characterization and mitigation of lunar dust. Comprised of regolith particles ranging in size from tens of nanometers to microns, lunar dust is a manifestation of the complex interaction of the lunar soil with multiple mechanical, electrical, and gravitational effects. The environmental and anthropogenic factors effecting the perturbation, transport, and deposition of lunar dust must be studied in order to mitigate it's potentially harmful effects on exploration systems. The same hold true for assessing the risk it may pose for toxicological health problems if inhaled. This paper presents the current perspective and implementation of dust knowledge management and integration, and mitigation technology development activities within NASA's Exploration Technology Development Program. This work is presented within the context of the Constellation Program's Integrated Lunar Dust Management Strategy. This work further outlines the scientific basis for lunar dust behavior, it's characteristics and potential effects, and surveys several potential strategies for its control and mitigation both for lunar surface operations and within the working volumes of a lunar outpost. The paper also presents a perspective on lessons learned from Apollo and forensics engineering studies of Apollo hardware.

Hyatt. Mark J.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Advancing xEMU Lunar Dust Mitigation Devices

Fine, electrically charged, glass like dust particles caused significant damage to the Apollo EMU9 during lunar EVAs, identified as one of the greatest challenges to future exploration. Passive Lunar Dust Mitigation Devices (LDMD) were developed, within a SBIR Phase II, to prohibit this dust from interrupting venting space suit component operation. A Computational Fluid-Dynamics and Discrete Element Method (CFD-DEM) Simulation Tool was developed at the University of Colorado, Boulder to predict venting gas flow ability to self-clean adhered dust particles from LDMD surfaces. Lunar dust properties (i.e., adhesion and cohesion strengths) required to complete Simulation Tool analysis are relatively unknown due to considerable differences between the Earth and the Moon (i.e., gravity, humidity) and due to an absence of dust particles in their native state. Analytically determining gas flow velocity, density and direction within the fluid Boundary Layer, microns from LDMD surfaces presented a second challenge. Dusty Plasma Chamber testing is being performed at Auburn University, Auburn to observe electrostatically charged dust behavior as it adheres to LDMD prototypes and specific geometry and is then blown away by metered gas flow. Test articles were developed to offer insight into the impact of different flow geometries, surface roughness and dust removal within the gas Boundary-Layer. Observed dust behavior is currently being developed to support the CFD-DEM analysis. Many Simulation Tool analytical cases have been processed to support the intention of completing sensitivity studies to assess how different dust adherence values and Boundary Layer fluid properties impact LDMD self-cleaning effectivity.

Thomas J Stapleton↗
NASA NTRS2023

Lunar Dust Mitigation: A Guide and Reference: First Edition (2021)

On the surface of the Moon, lunar dust specifically presents unique challenges to operations long-term due to regolith particles’ ubiquitous presence in the lunar environment, potential to electrostatically charge and possible chemical reactivity. Whether to avoid exposure, try to remove or simply to tolerate lunar dust infiltrating a system becomes a complex question involving length of required service life, dust effects and critical risks, mass and complexity trades for the entire system. This publication provides a snapshot of advice from topical experts for specific areas of concern to systems targeted for deployment on the lunar surface. Following introductory overview commentary, dust mitigation approaches appropriate to the lunar surface are first addressed for typically static structures such as optical surfaces, radiators, and other thermal control surfaces, followed by regolith exposure concerns for communications equipment and non-optical sensors. The broad topic of mechanisms and mechanical assemblies is broken down to address relevant component level concerns, such as for bearings and for seals. “Soft goods” components of space suits (fabric) specific concerns are discussed, followed finally by brief coverage of human health issues and concerns, though the emphasis of this publication remains with components directly exposed to the harsh lunar surface environment. A description of some lunar surface hazard details, in particular characteristics of lunar surface dust, follows in Appendix A, and more detailed explanations of quantification issues for particulates are in Appendix B. The simple inertial removal of particles from a surface is discussed in Appendix C, followed by a summary of terrestrial best practices for dust mitigation recommended within select industries in Appendix D. The aggregated bibliography of references, while extensive and very useful, should not be construed to be exhaustive and can serve as a constructive start.

dust↗
NASA NTRS2005

Regolith Sintering: A Solution to Lunar Dust Mitigation?

The prospect for a human outpost or permanent lunar base conducting exploration science on the Moon has been discussed in a number of different venues [1-4]. Of all the technological difficulties that confront observatory science on the Moon, dust mitigation remains a serious issue that is either discussed candidly or is oversimplified. In view of the fact that fundamental physics and astronomy research continues to be proposed for a lunar base, the problem of lunar dust must be confronted. In particular, the recent suggestion to place a 20-meter liquid mirror telescope (LMT) on the Moon because "the Moon and liquid mirrors were made for each other" [5-6] shows that the technical readiness level for any new vision of returning to the Moon with such grand-scale ideas is immature. Dust mitigation needs to be addressed, and we present a conceptual strategy for providing a clean area for observational science on a return-to-flight basis using existing technology rather than an evolutionary one that remains undeveloped. Under certain assumptions and caveats, we believe it addresses the problem.

Wilson, T. L.↗
NASA NTRS2020

An Update on NASA's Lunar Dust Mitigation Strategy

It is well known that the Apollo lu-nar surface missions experienced a number of issues related to dust – which are sometimes referred to as “The Dust Problem”. The jagged, electrostatically charged lunar dust particles can foul mechanisms and alter thermal properties. They tend to abrade textiles and scratch surfaces. NASA and other interested par-ties require an integrated, end-to-end dust mitigation strategy to enable sustainable lunar architectures.

Johansen, M. R.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Evaluation of Brushing as a Lunar Dust Mitigation Strategy for Thermal Control Surfaces

Evaluation of brushing to remove lunar simulant dust from thermal control surfaces is described. First, strip brushes made with nylon, PTFE, or Thunderon bristles were used to remove JSC-1AF dust from AZ93 thermal control paint or aluminized FEP (AlFEP) thermal control surface under ambient laboratory conditions. Nylon and PTFE bristles removed a promising amount of dust from AZ93, and nylon and Thunderon bristles from AlFEP. But when these were tested under simulated lunar conditions in the lunar dust adhesion bell jar (LDAB), they were not effective. In a third effort, seven brushes made up of three different materials, two different geometries, and different bristle lengths and thicknesses were tested under laboratory conditions against AZ93 and AlFEP. Two of these brushes, the Zephyr fiberglass fingerprint brush and the Escoda nylon fan brush, removed over 90 percent of the dust, and so were tested in the fourth effort in the LDAB. They also performed well under these conditions recovering 80 percent or more of the original thermal performance (solar absorptance/thermal emittance) of both AZ93 and AgFEP after 20 strokes, and 90 or more percent after 200 strokes.

Gaier, James R.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Evaluation of Brushing as a Lunar Dust Mitigation Strategy for Thermal Control Surfaces

Evaluation of brushing to remove lunar simulant dust from thermal control surfaces is described. First, strip brushes made with nylon, PTFE, or Thunderon (Nihon Sanmo Dyeing Company Ltd.) bristles were used to remove JSC-1AF dust from AZ93 thermal control paint or aluminized FEP (AlFEP) thermal control surface under ambient laboratory conditions. Nylon and PTFE bristles removed a promising amount of dust from AZ93, and nylon and Thunderon bristles from AlFEP. But when these were tested under simulated lunar conditions in the lunar dust adhesion bell jar (LDAB), they were not effective. In a third effort, seven brushes made up of three different materials, two different geometries, and different bristle lengths and thicknesses were tested under laboratory conditions against AZ93 and AlFEP. Two of these brushes, the Zephyr fiberglass fingerprint brush and the Escoda nylon fan brush, removed over 90 percent of the dust, and so were tested in the fourth effort in the LDAB. They also performed well under these conditions recovering 80 percent or more of the original thermal performance (solar absorptance/thermal emittance) of both AZ93 and AgFEP after 20 strokes, and 90 or more percent after 200 strokes

Gaier, James R.↗