Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Lunar exploration”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1970

Antarctic research and lunar exploration

Lunar exploration program based on U.S. antarctic research experience, considering man role, environment, logistics, transportation, economics, etc

Johnson, R. W.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Measuring the Wear and Abrasive Resistance of Air Plasma Sprayed Aluminum Oxide for Lunar Exploration

Lunar regolith, especially finer dust particles traveling at high velocities, can cause significant wear and abrasive damage to structural components that ensure a prolongated presence on the surface of the Moon. With the absence of an atmosphere and lower gravity than on Earth, regolith particles maintain high velocities at large distances from where they were generated, for example next to lunar landers. Wear-resistant ceramic and ceramic composite materials can improve the durability of spacecraft components during long missions on the Moon’s surface. Aluminum oxide coatings are lightweight, have multifunctional properties, and have high strength including high hardness and wear resistance. These properties can help improve the durability of structures used in space exploration. Air plasma sprayed (APS) aluminum oxide coatings have demonstrated the potential to protect critical structures. This study investigated the abrasive wear resistance of APS aluminum oxide coatings via Taber abrasion experiments. Taber abrasion offers the advantage of quantifying the abrasive wear behavior of particles with different shapes on a surface. In this work, an abrasive wheel made of silicon carbide was utilized to evaluate wear properties of specimens progressively over 5000 cycles. This experiment focused on testing two series of specimens to determine whether a bond coat composed of nickel, chromium, aluminum, and yttrium (NiCrAlY) improved the protective behavior of the APS aluminum oxide coating. The specimens varied in topcoat thickness and were made with and without an approximately 100 µm bond coat layer. The mass of the specimens was measured at 400 cycles, 800 cycles, 3800 cycles, and 5000 cycles. Increasing thickness was found to result in higher wear for samples with and without a bond coat. Increased mass loss in samples with a bond coat was observed indicating a need for further studies on the overall impact of the use of a bond coat on the protective behavior of the coatings. To continue designing wear resistant coatings for structural protection in space missions, the multifunctional properties of the APS aluminum oxide coating will be studied. Future experiments will determine whether the APS aluminum oxide coating can protect the structures from other aspects of the harsh space environment, such as extreme temperature variations and ionizing radiation.

aluminum oxide↗
NASA NTRS1992

Electric propulsion for lunar exploration and lunar base development

Using electric propulsion to deliver materials to lunar orbit for the development and construction of a lunar base was investigated. Because the mass of the base and its life-cycle resupply mass are large, high specific impulse propulsion systems may significantly reduce the transportation system mass and cost. Three electric propulsion technologies (arcjet, ion, and magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD) propulsion) were compared with oxygen/hydrogen propulsion for a lunar base development scenario. Detailed estimates of the orbital transfer vehicles' (OTV's) masses and their propellant masses are presented. The fleet sizes for the chemical and electric propulsion systems are estimated. Ion and MPD propulsion systems enable significant launch mass savings over O2/H2 propulsion. Because of the longer trip time required for the low-thrust OTV's, more of them are required to perform the mission model. By offloading the lunar cargo from the manned O2/H2 OTV missions onto the electric propulsion OTV's, a significant reduction of the low Earth orbit (LEO) launch mass is possible over the 19-year base development period.

Palaszewski, Bryan↗
NASA NTRS1969

Lunar Explorer 35.

Lunar Explorer 35 measurements of lunar surface electromagnetic properties, magnetic fields and solar wind-moon interactions

Ness, N. F.↗
NASA NTRS1968

Lunar Explorer 35

Lunar Explorer 35 measurements of solar wind, interplanetary and lunar magnetic fields, cosmic dust, energetic particles, and electromagnetic properties of lunar surface

Ness, N. F.↗
NASA NTRS1971

Apollo lunar exploration

Apollo lunar explorations, reviewing landing, trajectories, hardware, mission problems and scientific studies

Low, G. M.↗
NASA NTRS2010

Correlation of Lunar South Polar Epithermal Neutron Maps: Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector and Lunar Prospector Neutron Detector

The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter's (LRO), Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector (LEND) was developed to refine the lunar surface hydrogen (H) measurements generated by the Lunar Prospector Neutron Spectrometer. LPNS measurements indicated a approx.4,6% decrease in polar epithermal fluxes equivalent to (1.5+/-0,8)% H concentration and are direct geochemical evidence indicating water /high H at the poles. Given the similar operational and instrumental objectives of the LEND and LPNS systems, an important science analysis step for LEND is to test correlation with existing research including LPNS measurements. In this analysis, we compare corrected low altitude epithermal rate data from LPNS available via NASA's Planetary Data System (PDS) with calibrated LEND epithermal maps using a cross-correlation technique

McClanahan, Timothy P.↗
NASA NTRS2010

An International Strategy for Human Exploration of the Moon: The International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) Reference Architecture for Human Lunar Exploration

The International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) was established in response to The Global Exploration Strategy: The Framework for Coordination developed by fourteen space agencies and released in May 2007. Several ISECG participating space agencies have been studying concepts for human exploration of the moon that allow individual and collective goals and objectives to be met. This 18 month study activity culminated with the development of the ISECG Reference Architecture for Human Lunar Exploration. The reference architecture is a series of elements delivered over time in a flexible and evolvable campaign. This paper will describe the reference architecture and how it will inform near-term and long-term programmatic planning within interested agencies. The reference architecture is intended to serve as a global point of departure conceptual architecture that enables individual agency investments in technology development and demonstration, International Space Station research and technology demonstration, terrestrial analog studies, and robotic precursor missions to contribute towards the eventual implementation of a human lunar exploration scenario which reflects the concepts and priorities established to date. It also serves to create opportunities for partnerships that will support evolution of this concept and its eventual realization. The ISECG Reference Architecture for Human Lunar Exploration (commonly referred to as the lunar gPoD) reflects the agency commitments to finding an effective balance between conducting important scientific investigations of and from the moon, as well as demonstrating and mastering the technologies and capabilities to send humans farther into the Solar System. The lunar gPoD begins with a robust robotic precursor phase that demonstrates technologies and capabilities considered important for the success of the campaign. Robotic missions will inform the human missions and buy down risks. Human exploration will start with a thorough scientific investigation of the polar region while allowing the ability to demonstrate and validate the systems needed to take humans on more ambitious lunar exploration excursions. The ISECG Reference Architecture for Human Lunar Exploration serves as a model for future cooperation and is documented in a summary report and a comprehensive document that also describes the collaborative international process that led to its development. ISECG plans to continue with architecture studies such as this to examine an open transportation architecture and other destinations, with expanded participation from ISECG agencies, as it works to inform international partnerships and advance the Global Exploration Strategy.

Laurini, Kathleen C.↗
NASA NTRS1966

The extended stay lunar exploration mission.

Extended stay lunar exploration mission in terms of lunar landing site with relaxation of certain Apollo constraints and ground rules

LUNAR EXPLORATION SYSTEM FOR APOLLO /LESA/↗
NASA NTRS2024

Digital Lunar Exploration Sites (DLES) Terrain Crafting

Humans will soon be returning to the surface of the Moon with NASA’s Artemis program. The Artemis program is an international collaboration that will consist of a complex series of space systems and missions to explore the lunar surface and pave the way for the future exploration of Mars. NASA and its partners rely heavily on simulation for lighting and navigation studies as well as training astronauts, flight controllers, and mission support staff. The NASA Exploration Systems Simulations (NExSyS) team in the Simulation and Graphics Branch (ER7) in the Engineering Directorate at NASA’s Johnson Space Center has built up many simulation products to support this effort, one of which is the Digital Lunar Exploration Sites (DLES). DLES is a collection of products used to simulate and render the lunar surface in a digital environment. We discussed and presented an overview of the DLES products at the 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference in Big Sky, MT with a paper titled "Digital Lunar Exploration Sites". This “DLES Terrain Crafting” paper will expand on the information previously provided in “DLES” paper and dive deeper into the details of the terrain crafting process and the toolsets used to support this task. The best digital data currently available of the lunar surface is provided by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). Its Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) achieves an impressive resolution of 5m per pixel at the Lunar South Pole (LSP) and can generate datasets covering a large continuous region near the LSP. There are a few additional methods, such as Shape from Shading which can infer higher resolution data (up to 1m per pixel) from the LRO Narrow Angle Camera (NAC) images. However, surface-based simulations require higher-resolution data, and this paper will discuss the process of enhancing the terrain to meet that need. The process begins with capturing statistical data of craters in the regions of interest using images provided by the LRO NAC. This data is then used to scatter artificial features which are not captured in the truth data, resulting in an enhanced DEM with a much higher resolution of 20cm per pixel. Many tools were built up to assist in the creation of these artificial Digital Elevation Models (DEM), which this paper will discuss in detail. DEMs themselves are a very powerful representation of a planetary surface, and many operations and tools can utilize the data they contain. This paper includes a description of the rendering of the lunar surface in a graphics engine, generation of contact patches to simulate tire to ground interaction, and ray tracing utilities to model Line of Sight (LOS) interactions with the terrain. This paper will also explore some new tool sets currently under development which aim to utilize Machine Learning (ML) to assist in the identification of craters from LRO NAC imagery. While this is not a novel idea, the NExSyS team is developing a unique approach which may result in more robust identification of crater characteristics.

Artemis↗