Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “MCNP Model”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2019

Experimental Validation of MCNP Models for PINS Shadow Shield Mockups

MCNP has been regarded as an indispensable tool in development of radiation detection systems, and it is cost effective, thanks to advances in computing power, to simulate various conceptual designs without even fabricating them. Development of various PINS systems have also benefited from MCNP modeling and simulation. MCNP models of PINS systems have been frequently used to understand detector responses and to fill the gap in experimental data. Recently, a backpack version PINS system was announced to be developed. When the neutron generator and the HPGe detector are built by external vendors, the shadow shield is the component to be designed to maximize the performance while meeting the sponsor’s requirements. In order to utilize MCNP modeling and simulation to find the best specification of the shadow shield, a campaign of PINS lab measurements with a few shadow shield mockups has been conducted to validate MCNP simulation results. This study is intended to validate MCNP simulations and models in preparation of another more extensive simulation study. Validation of neutron flux is also discussed later in this report even though neutron counts were not measured experimentally.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2024

Monte Carlo Perturbation Analysis of Fuel Temperature Variations in the MCNP Model of the Annular Core Research Reactor

The Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR) Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) model is used by ACRR reactor operators and experiment designers at Sandia National Laboratories for a variety of computational calculations ranging from reactor kinetics parameter estimates and safety analyses to experimental planning. To understand the dominant source of uncertainty within the MCNP model, perturbations in temperature were applied to individual ACRR MCNP fuel rods. Fuel rod temperatures were randomly sampled from a uniform distribution from operational temperatures to quantify temperature-related uncertainty effects. Stochastic mixing was used to blend the cross sections of the desired temperatures using the MCNP continuous and Thermal Neutron Scattering Treatment [S(α,β)] libraries in ENDF/B-VII.1. Furthermore, this uncertainty analysis produced a 640 row × 640 column correlation and covariance matrix of the neutron energy spectra. Positive covariance was produced around the 1-MeV region and the 0.2-eV region. Correlation was found in the thermal and fast energy regions, but no correlation was observed in the slowing-down energy region because interactions in this region are not dominated by fuel.

ACRR↗
DOE OSTI2023

Verifying MCNP Models of the TEX High 240 Plutonium Benchmark

Computational modeling programs are invaluable tools that allow us to understand systems, safely develop new processes, and make reliable predictions about future designs. However, the effectiveness of these codes is limited by the degree to which their parameters match the real world. In the field of nuclear engineering, cross section data is one of these vital parameters. Accurate cross section data on important fissile and fissionable isotopes promotes the design of safer and more efficient fabrication, transportation, storage, and stockpiling of nuclear fuel. Unfortunately, there are knowledge gaps in data on key isotopes. In 2011, a multinational meeting hosted by the US Department of Energy Nuclear Criticality Safety Program ranked the priority of certain cross section data needs. In response, Lawrence Livermore National Lab (LLNL) designed the Thermal and Epithermal eXperiment (TEX) series of benchmark experiments. Benchmark experiments are used to validate current cross section data. They validate data by comparing the results of an actual experiment to the predicted results from a computational model. The data a benchmark applies to depends on the isotope and energy range the experiment’s neutron multiplication factor ( k eff ) is most sensitive to. The development and testing of the TEX High 240 Plutonium Benchmark will help validate 240 Pu cross section data. The configuration and materials of this benchmark are designed to be most sensitive to 240 Pu's intermediate energy range (from 0.625 ev to 100 keV ). MCNP® models of the assembly have been developed by LLNL and the results have been written in the final design report. In order for the discrepancies between benchmark models and experiments to be attributed to cross section inaccuracies, the accuracy of the models needs to be verified. The goal of this project is to verify of the results of LLNL's modeling by creating a new set of MCNP models and comparing the results.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Verification of the 3-Region Advanced Test Reactor MCNP Model

The verification of the 3-region homogenized fuel Advanced Test Reactor MCNP model. The 3-region model was compared to the 19-plate model found in the 94-CIC report. Flux tallies, energy deposition tallies, and quarter core mesh tallies were used to compare the two models. The 3-region model needed updating in order to make good comparisons between the models. The percent error from the flux and energy deposition tallies data shows that experiment positions inside the flux trap have higher errors than positions outside the fuel ring. The standard deviation data obtained from the mesh tallies shows that the two models agree within two standard deviations throughout the reactor. It is concluded that the model works adequately for what it is used for.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Verification of the 3-Region Advanced Test Reactor MCNP Model

The verification of the 3-region homogenized fuel Advanced Test Reactor MCNP model. The 3-region model was compared to the 19-plate model found in the 94-CIC report. Flux tallies, energy deposition tallies, and quarter core mesh tallies were used to compare the two models. The 3-region model needed updating in order to make good comparisons between the models. The percent error from the flux and energy deposition tallies data shows that experiment positions inside the flux trap have higher errors than positions outside the fuel ring. The standard deviation data obtained from the mesh tallies shows that the two models agree within two standard deviations throughout the reactor. It is concluded that the model works adequately for what it is used for.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2012

MCNP modeling of the Swiss LWRs for the calculation of the in- and ex-vessel neutron flux distributions

MCNP models of all Swiss Nuclear Power Plants have been developed by the National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste (Nagra), in collaboration with the utilities and ETH Zurich, for the 2011 decommissioning cost study. The estimation of the residual radionuclide inventories and corresponding activity levels of irradiated structures and components following the NPP shut-down is of crucial importance for the planning of the dismantling process, the waste packaging concept and, consequently, for the estimation of the decommissioning costs. Based on NPP specific data, the neutron transport simulations lead to the best yet knowledge of the neutron spectra necessary for the ensuing activation calculations. In this paper, the modeling concept towards the MCNP-NPPs is outlined and the resulting flux distribution maps are presented. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Two MCNP Models for Computational Performance Benchmarking

The purpose of this report is to describe two non-trivial MCNP models and execution configurations that are suitable to characterizing computational performance. To that end, this report uses a constructive solid geometry (CSG) representation of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Pool Critical Assembly (PCA) [1–3] to perform a k-eigenvalue calculation and an unstructured mesh (UM) representation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) publication 145 (ICRP145) male human phantom [4, 5] to perform a fixed-source calculation assuming that a 1 MeV photon source is distributed throughout the phantom’s liver.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2019

MCNP Models for Tokamak Cooling Water System Equipment Evaluations

Heat generated in the ITER fusion reactor is deposited in the tokamak vacuum vessel, in-vessel components, and in the components of the neutral beam injector during plasma operations and during subsequent decay of activation products. This heat is managed by the tokamak cooling water system (TCWS). The stainless steel material in the integrated loop of blanket edge-localized mode vertical stabilization coils and divertor (IBED) components (e.g., piping, heat exchangers (HXs), and pumps) contains activation sources because of its exposure primarily to neutron radiation from the decay of 17 N, which is a short-lived radionuclide produced by neutron capture reactions with oxygen nuclei in the IBED primary heat transfer system (PHTS) cooling water during plasma operations. A detailed geometry model of the IBED stainless steel components and neutron radiation sources is required for an accurate assessment of the gamma activation sources on level 3 of the tokamak building. In the baseline design, each of the eight IBED PHTS cooling trains has two shell-and-tube heat exchangers (HXs) connected in series. Because these HXs are very large and contain a large amount of radioactive water, the possibility of using compact HXs of the welded shell-and-plate type is under investigation. This paper presents two Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) TCWS geometry models, one model for each HX type, along with the associated piping. These models were obtained by automatic geometry conversion from TCWS computer-aided design models. In conclusion, the TCWS geometry models and neutron source definitions were incorporated into a baseline MCNP model of the Tokamak Complex.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
NASA NTRS2008

Gas Core Reactor Numerical Simulation Using a Coupled MHD-MCNP Model

Analysis is provided in this report of using two head-on magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) shocks to achieve supercritical nuclear fission in an axially elongated cylinder filled with UF4 gas as an energy source for deep space missions. The motivation for each aspect of the design is explained and supported by theory and numerical simulations. A subsequent report will provide detail on relevant experimental work to validate the concept. Here the focus is on the theory of and simulations for the proposed gas core reactor conceptual design from the onset of shock generations to the supercritical state achieved when the shocks collide. The MHD model is coupled to a standard nuclear code (MCNP) to observe the neutron flux and fission power attributed to the supercritical state brought about by the shock collisions. Throughout the modeling, realistic parameters are used for the initial ambient gaseous state and currents to ensure a resulting supercritical state upon shock collisions.

Kazeminezhad, F.↗
DOE OSTI2020

MCNP modelling of the Thermo SPA3 with Tungsten (Rees model) collimator

A Thermo Model SPA3 2”x2” NaI probe fitted with a Tungsten collimator has been modelled using MCNP6. The collimator was assumed to be machinable Tungsten which typically includes Ni and Fe. Various ratios of these additives are used in industry and for the purposes of these calculations the collimator was assumed to contain 7% Ni and 3% Fe with a density of 17.0 g/cm 3 . The dimensions of the collimator were based on measurements taken by Mike Fanning. The above detector model was used, in a manner similar to the approach described in LA-UR-19-32358, to calculate photopeak count rates per unit activity per unit area (i.e. cpm per pCi/cm 2 ) conversion factors for various contamination scenarios.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗