Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “MOSO”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Lignin structural changes and high p -coumaroylation in incipient lignification in moso bamboo

Lignification is a crucial process for strengthening plant tissues, facilitating water transport, and providing defense against pathogens. In the Poaceae family, p-hydroxycinnamic acids are commonly incorporated into lignin, with acylation by p-coumarate (pCA) occurring during lignification. In this study, we performed DFRC and 2D HSQC-NMR analyses to investigate changes in lignin substructures and the degree of lignin pCA-acylation throughout bamboo stem development. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis was conducted to elucidate the spatial distribution of lignin substructures within different cell types. Our results revealed that, in young tissues, β–O–4-linked lignin units are predominantly derived from monolignol-pCA conjugates, specifically coniferyl- and sinapyl-pCA. Both lignin structure and the pattern of pCA acylation varied depending on the stage of cell wall formation and the cell type, particularly between vascular fiber cells and parenchyma cells. Based on our results, moso bamboo culms exhibit a distinctive feature during incipient lignification, in which monolignols are predominantly acylated with pCA. As a result, this feature has not been reported in other grasses, suggesting that extensive p-coumaroylation of monolignols plays an important role in the rapid elongation of bamboo culms.

Munekata, Noriaki [Kyoto University (Japan); Unive↗

Designing a Framework for Solving Multiobjective Simulation Optimization Problems

Multiobjective simulation optimization (MOSO) problems are optimization problems with multiple conflicting objectives, where evaluation of at least one of the objectives depends on a black-box numerical code or real-world experiment, which we refer to as a simulation. Whereas an extensive body of research is dedicated to developing new algorithms and methods for solving these and related problems, it is challenging and time-consuming to integrate these techniques into real-world production-ready solvers. This is partly because of the diversity and complexity of modern state-of-the-art MOSO algorithms and methods and partly because of the complexity and specificity of many real-world problems and their corresponding computing environments. The complexity of this problem is only compounded when introducing potentially complex and/or domain-specific surrogate-modeling techniques, problem formulations, design spaces, and data acquisition functions. Here, this paper carefully surveys the current state of the art in MOSO algorithms, techniques, and solvers, as well as problem types and computational environments where MOSO is commonly applied. We then present several key challenges in the design of a parallel multiobjective simulation optimization framework (ParMOO) and how they have been addressed. Finally, we provide two case studies demonstrating how customized ParMOO solvers can be quickly built and deployed to solve real-world MOSO problems.

engineering design optimization↗