Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “MRE11”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

COM1 , a factor of alternative non‐homologous end joining, lagging behind the classic non‐homologous end joining pathway in rice somatic cells

SUMMARY The role of rice ( Oryza sativa ) COM1 in meiotic homologous recombination (HR) is well understood, but its part in somatic double‐stranded break (DSB) repair remains unclear. Here, we show that for rice plants COM1 conferred tolerance against DNA damage caused by the chemicals bleomycin and mitomycin C, while the COM1 mutation did not compromise HR efficiencies and HR factor (RAD51 and RAD51 paralogues) localization to irradiation‐induced DSBs. Similar retarded growth at the post‐germination stage was observed in the com1‐2 mre11 double mutant and the mre11 single mutant, while combined mutations in COM1 with the HR pathway gene ( RAD51C ) or classic non‐homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway genes ( KU70 , KU80 , and LIG4 ) caused more phenotypic defects. In response to γ‐irradiation, COM1 was loaded normally onto DSBs in the ku70 mutant, but could not be properly loaded in the MRE11 RNAi plant and in the wortmannin‐treated wild‐type plant. Under non‐irradiated conditions, more DSB sites were occupied by factors (MRE11, COM1, and LIG4) than RAD51 paralogues (RAD51B, RAD51C, and XRCC3) in the nucleus of wild‐type; protein loading of COM1 and XRCC3 was increased in the ku70 mutant. Therefore, quite differently to its role for HR in meiocytes, rice COM1 specifically acts in an alternative NHEJ pathway in somatic cells, based on the Mre11–Rad50–Nbs1 (MRN) complex and facilitated by PI3K‐like kinases. NHEJ factors, not HR factors, preferentially load onto endogenous DSBs, with KU70 restricting DSB localization of COM1 and XRCC3 in plant somatic cells.

Xu, Zhan↗

EEPD1 evolved a unique DNA clamping dimer protecting reversed replication forks

Exonuclease/endonuclease/phosphatase (EEP)-fold hydrolases are canonically monomeric phosphodiesterases exemplified by APE1, DNase I, and TDP2 nucleases. While EEP family domain containing protein 1 (EEPD1) acts in DNA stress responses, its proposed nuclease activities are enigmatic. Here, we integrate hybrid structural methods, evolution, biochemistry, cancer genomics, plus molecular and cell biology to define EEPD1 structure, assembly, and function at stalled DNA replication forks. Results imply EEPD1 surprisingly requires both unique EEP domain dimer and distinctive tandem Helix-hairpin-Helix [(HhH) 2 ] domains to clamp double-stranded (ds) DNA at reversed DNA replication forks for fork protection. Small-angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS), crystal, and cryo-EM structures unveil an unprecedented tryptophan handshake dimer, conserved interface di-Trp-Pro pocket, and adjustable “wrist” enabling an open-closed conformational switch. EEPD1 dimer cooperatively binds complex dsDNA replication fork intermediates but alone lacks nuclease activity due to loss of key EEP catalytic residues during Metazoan evolution and atmospheric oxygen buildup. Instead, EEPD1 prevents nucleolytic degradation of reversed replication forks by MRE11. Furthermore, cancer bioinformatics support oxidative damage-dependent EEPD1 association as a significant modulator of overall patient survival. Collective findings uncover unexpected EEP dimer and fork protection function in clamping, not cleaving, reversed replication forks for metazoan oxidative stress responses controlling genome stability and cancer outcomes.

Shen, Runze [Univ. of Texas, Houston, TX (United S↗