Mesh generation and optimization from digital rock fractures based on neural style transfer
Not Available
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Not Available
Problem: Traditional mesh generation approaches are labor intensive and have limited robustness when applied to parametric design exploration and optimization of complex geometries. While automatic mesh generation approaches exist, they tend to generate tetrahedral or mixed-hybrid meshes which are generally unsuitable for physics applications with strong shock waves, thin boundary layers, and strong gradients. In addition, simulations sizes in the billions of cells are becoming more common with traditional mesh generation methods quickly reaching scalability limits. Solution: CrossLink offers a topology-based mesh generation approach with unstructured block-filling methods and a scalable mesh generation engine. In addition, CrossLink incorporates a python-based API for seamless workflow integration and robust repeatability of the geometry handling and mesh generation process. This makes it ideal for parametric design study and optimization of complex geometries. Finally, future versions of CrossLink will offer a parametric mesh capability that optimizes a high-order mesh and enables reconstruction of the final mesh in memory by the physics solver.
This paper presents a level-set topology optimization approach that uses conformal meshes for the analysis of the displacement field. The structure’s boundary is represented by the iso-contour of a level-set field discretized on a fixed background design mesh. The conformal mesh is updated for each design iteration via a PDE based mesh morphing process that identifies the set of facets in the background mesh that are homeomorphic to the boundary and relaxes the homeomorphic mesh to conform to the structure’s boundary and ensure high element quality. The conformal mesh allows for a more accurate computation of the response versus density and some level-set based methods which interpolate material properties using the volume fraction. Numerical examples illustrate the proposed approach by optimizing linear-elastic two- and three-dimensional structures, wherein insight into the performance of the mesh morphing process is provided. The examples also highlight the scalability of the approach.
Interval Assignment (IA) is the problem of selecting the number of mesh edges (intervals) for each curve for conforming quad and hex meshing. The intervals x is fundamentally integer-valued. Many other approaches perform numerical optimization then convert a floating-point solution into an integer solution, which is slow and error prone. We avoid such steps: we start integer, and stay integer. Incremental Interval Assignment (IIA) uses integer linear algebra (Hermite normal form) to find an initial solution to the meshing constraints, satisfying the integer matrix equation Solving for reduced row echelon form provides integer vectors spanning the nullspace of A. Here we add vectors from the nullspace to improve the initial solution, maintaining Ax = b Heuristics find good integer linear combinations of nullspace vectors that provide strict improvement towards variable bounds or goals. IIA always produces an integer solution if one exists. In practice we usually achieve solutions close to the user goals, but there is no guarantee that the solution is optimal, nor even satisfies variable bounds, e.g. has positive intervals. We describe several algorithmic changes since first publication that tend to improve the final solution. The software is freely available.
In this work, we perform analysis on the use of cell-based diffusion acceleration methodologies to accelerate the convergence of transport solutions discretized with the slice balance approach (SBA) on unstructured polygonal grids.We investigated both linear diffusion synthetic acceleration (DSA) and non linear diffusion acceleration (NDA), including its partial-current variant (pNDA). DSA and NDA were both shown to diverge for intermediate ranges of mesh optical thicknesses. However, pNDA and Krylov methods like GMRES and Broyden stabilized the acceleration schemes, including problems with degenerate cells formed by mesh refinement. (author)
This paper aims to provide a proof of concept for parallel transport sweeps on two-dimensional hexagonal grids for the discrete ordinates transport equation. While the method is an extension of the popular and well-established Koch-Baker-Alcoulffe (KBA) algorithm, there are significant differences between the cartesian and hexagonal grid and thereafter sweep. The most important is the three-way connectivity of hexagons within the grid which creates greater dependencies between the elements. The KBA method in structured orthogonal grids was first implemented in the DRAGON5 code and the method is first described here. The differences in implementation for the hexagonal grid are also described. Benchmark results are also presented, showing roughly 10 times speedup in computational times with roughly 100 processors, in both cases. (authors)
The Coarse-Mesh Finite Difference (CMFD) method has been used for over a decade to accelerate the convergence of the Method of Characteristics (MOC) solution to the two- dimensional particle transport equation in CASMO5. Numerical testing, along with widespread use in production-level calculations, have shown that the current CMFD implementation provides stability and robustness for a wide range of realistic reactor physics problems. However, the recent development of linear prolongation has attracted attention from the community as a way to further improve the performance and stability of CMFD. Two interpolation methods for linear prolongation are presented in this work and implemented into a test version of CASMO5. The performance of the proposed interpolations, referred to as the bilinear and linear directional schemes, is evaluated in terms of runtime relative to the default constant or uniform scaling update. Numerical results indicate that the use of linear prolongation can reduce the transport solver runtime on average by approximately 10% when tested with two hundred randomly selected cases. The new directional linear interpolation, combined with default constant boundary updates, is found to provide the highest reduction in runtime for the cases analyzed. (authors)
The nodes, edges, faces, and blocks that define the connectivity of a multi-block mesh. This is equivalent to a coarse unstructured mesh with global numbering. The topology is approximate.
Traditional mesh generation approaches are labor intensive and have limited robustness when applied to parametric design exploration and optimization of complex geometries. While automatic mesh generation approaches exist, they tend to generate tetrahedral or mixed-hybrid meshes which are generally unsuitable for physics applications with strong shock waves, thin boundary layers, and strong gradients. In addition, simulations sizes in the billions of cells are becoming more common with traditional mesh generation methods quickly reaching scalability limits. CrossLink offers a topology-based mesh generation approach with unstructured block-filling methods and a scalable mesh generation engine. In addition, CrossLink incorporates a python based API for seamless workflow integration and robust repeatability of the geometry handling and mesh generation process. This makes it ideal for parametric design study and optimization of complex geometries. Finally, future versions of CrossLink will offer a parametric mesh capability that optimizes a high-order mesh and enables reconstruction of the final mesh in memory by the physics solver.
This work presents a method to control the discretization error in multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization using output-based adapted meshes. The meshes are adapted via adjoint-based error estimates, taking into account both the objective and constraint output errors. A multi-fidelity optimization framework is then developed by taking advantage of the variable fidelity offered by adaptive meshes. The objective functional and its sensitivity at each design point (operating condition) are first evaluated on the same initial coarse mesh, which is then subsequently adapted for each design point individually as the shape optimization proceeds. The effort to set up the optimization is minimal since the initial mesh can be fairly coarse and easy to generate. As the shape approaches the optimal design, the mesh at each design point becomes finer, in regions necessary for that particular operating condition. The multi-fidelity framework is tightly coupled with the objective error estimation to ensure the optimization accuracy at each fidelity. Computational savings arise from a reduction of the mesh size when the design is far from optimal and avoiding an exhaustive search on low-fidelity meshes. The proposed method is demonstrated on multipoint drag minimization problems of a transonic airfoil with lift and area constraints. Improved accuracy and efficiency are shown compared to traditional fixed-fidelity optimization with a fixed computational mesh.
This report describes the results for a coupled target-beam-moderator optimization analysis for the Second Target Station (STS) at ORNL's Spallation Neutron Source. This study is a continuation of the optimization analysis for the moderators in the preliminary design of STS performed in 2022. In the 2022 analysis the dimensions of the moderators are parameterized, while the target and the proton beam profile are kept constant. In this analysis the target height and the proton beam profile are added as parameters. This allows to study the coupled effects of changing target, moderator and beam dimensions. Similar to the 2022 analysis, this work is performed with an automated optimization workflow that uses the optimization toolbox DAKOTA, parameterized geometries in CREO and SpaceClaim, the unstructured mesh generation in Attila4MC, and the particle transport code MCNP6.2©. This workflow enables an efficient optimization using high-fidelity geometries. The main conclusions of this analysis are the following: • Coupled beam-target-moderator optimization provides a few additional percent performance gain over stand-alone moderator optimization. • The moderator performance is not very sensitive to the target height (between ≈60 and ≈80 mm) as long as the beam profile is chosen adequately. • The moderator performance is sensitive to the choice of beam spatial standard deviations, even when the footprint is kept constant. • The optimal moderator radius is the same for a beam footprint of 30 cm 2 , 62.5 cm 2 , and 90 cm 2 . Also the slope of the super-gaussian beam profile does not significantly impact the optimal moderator radius. • The optimal parameters and sensitivities are very similar to the 2022 optimization analysis. These results only indicate a a difference in the optimal radius of the cylindrical moderator, however, this has been corrected in the final design moderator optimization. The main purpose of this report is to document the simulations, results and lessons learned. The most impactful results are summarized in. We also note that the target geometry used in this work is not the final design.
This report details the results for an optimization of the dimensions of the moderators in the preliminary design of the Spallation Neutron Source Second Target Station (STS). This study uses the optimization algorithms of Dakota and an unstructured mesh model for the moderators in MCNP. More details on the unstructured mesh model and the automated mesh generation can be found in [3]. Parallel to this effort, the same moderator geometries have been optimized using a constructive solid geometry (CSG) MCNP model. More details on this model and its results can be found in [4]. Three optimal designs are selected for each moderator: one that is optimized for maximum peak brightness, one for maximum time-integrated brightness, and one for a combination of peak and time-integrated brightness. The backbone of the optimization work flow is provided by Dakota. For each set of design parameters requested by Dakota, a new solid geometry is automatically built in Creo and SpaceClaim, and subsequently exported to Attila4MC to generate an unstructured mesh geometry for MCNP. After the MCNP calculation is finished, the objective function (e.g., brightness metric) is returned to Dakota. After the new design has been evaluated, a result-file is written, and Dakota proposes the next set of design parameters to be evaluated. The loop continues until a specified convergence criterion has been met. The design parameters of the cylindrical (upper) moderator include the hydrogen radius, the premoderator thickness (top, bottom, radial), the beryllium radius and the horizontal position of the moderator. The crucial design choice is the hydrogen radius. A radius of 62 mm is shown to provide the maximum time-integrated brightness. The maximum peak brightness occurs with a radius of 40 mm. A combined (middle) design, which balances peak and time-integrated brightnesses, is obtained with a hydrogen radius of 50 mm. The premoderator thicknesses and the beryllium radius are slightly larger in the design optimized for time-integrated brightness than in the design optimized for peak brightness. The sensitivity to these two parameters is relatively small close to the optimal configurations. The hydrogen vessel and vacuum vessel wall thicknesses are dependent on the radius of the liquid hydrogen due to structural integrity requirements. The increased wall thicknesses for larger vessels significantly penalize the time-integrated brightness, with the maximum obtainable value reduced by more than 10% relative to earlier studies which used fixed vessel wall thicknesses. The impact of the variable wall thicknesses is much less for the peak brightness and combined brightness designs. The design parameters of the tube (lower) moderator selected for the optimization are the tube length, the annular premoderator thickness, the beryllium radius and the horizontal position of the moderator. The tube length is the crucial parameter and is chosen large (210 mm) and small (125 mm) in the designs optimized for time-integrated and peak brightness respectively. A combined optimal design has a tube length of 170 mm. The premoderator thickness and the beryllium radius are chosen larger in the design optimized for time-integrated brightness.
With the Second Target Station approaching its final design phase, a detailed neutronics evaluation of its critical components is necessary. Optimizing the dimensions of the two cold-source moderators that are at the heart of this facility presents a multi-objective optimization problem for which an accurate geometric description is crucial. We have applied a fully automated optimization workflow in which a detailed unstructured mesh geometry is automatically generated with Attila4MC, starting from a parametrized CREO geometry followed by preprocessing with SpaceClaim. With this geometry, a MCNP run is performed to calculate the brightness metrics, which are subsequently provided to the optimization algorithm in DAKOTA that provides new parameters and drives the optimization loop until convergence. In this paper, we show the results of the analysis that are used for the final design of the cylindrical and tube moderator. The optimization simulations provide a refinement to and confirmation of the conclusions of the previous design iteration. Additional to the optimization, a sensitivity study is performed to study the effect of minor geometry changes, which is important for the final engineering design. In conclusion, with these studies, we demonstrate that the automated workflow and high-fidelity unstructured mesh modeling are efficient tools for a thorough design evaluation.
A fast-running, eighth-core solution technique has been developed for the quick core calculations in ANC, the Westinghouse core analysis code based on the nodal expansion method, and the BEACON{sup TM} Core Monitoring System (BEACON). This technique, referred to as 'Fast Eighth' (Fast8), enables users to obtain satisfactory macroscopic core calculation results such as reactivity, axial offset and assembly power much more quickly than calculations performed in the standard full-core or quarter-core geometry. Fast8 uses three techniques: folding the radial geometry into eighth-core geometry, reducing the axial geometry into a coarse axial mesh geometry, and smearing the spacer grids into nodes on-the-fly after the first calculation in the standard geometry. These geometry adjustments in Fast8 contribute to the reduction of the number of neutronic and material nodes while maintaining the reaction rates in each node. The axial mesh condition dependency in Fast8 is investigated in a xenon transient calculation in single assembly geometry, and the Fast8 maximum axial mesh size is determined based on these results. Fast8 is then applied to the load swing calculation, and the results are compared with the reference, full-core geometry, solution. The critical boron concentration and axial offset of Fast8 show good agreement with the reference solutions, and that Fast8 is a good technique for obtaining macroscopic core calculation results in significantly shorter time. (authors)
As the nuclear industry's use of computational tool increases, the need for increased fidelity and computational efficiency is well known. While most approaches to increased fidelity rely on applying a fine mesh over the problem domain, a more efficient method is to apply an adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) algorithm to the mesh definition. In the field of nuclear engineering, AMR has previously been used in conjunction with deterministic methods, including: S{sub N} transport methods, Lattice Boltzmann Methods, and COMSOL. The future of AMR in nuclear engineering is to couple it to a Monte Carlo code with the goal of reducing calculation time. A proof-of-concept example yielded positive results for using the gradient of the flux as a refinement criteria. The refinement criteria was varied from 0.01 to 0.10, which yielded a recommended range of 0.01 to 0.04, and the number of refinement iterations was varied from 0 to 7, with diminishing returns seen after 5 iterations. After the success of the proof-of-concept exercise, work began on creating a full program coupling MCNP6.2 and the AMR algorithm in the deal.II library. (authors)
The design of divertor targets and baffles for optimal heat and particle exhaust from magnetically confined fusion plasmas requires a combination of fast, low-fidelity models (such as EMC3-Lite (Feng 2022 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 64 125012)) for scoping studies and high-fidelity ones (such as EMC3-EIRENE (Feng et al 2014 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 54 426–31)) for verification. Both of those approaches benefit from a magnetic flux tube mesh for fast interpolation and mapping of field line segments (Feng et al 2005 Phys. Plasmas 12 052505). A new automated mesh generator for unstructured quadrilateral flux tubes with adaptive refinement is presented and integrated into FLARE (Frerichs 2024 Nucl. Fusion 64 106034). For HSX with an extended first wall, it is found that several layers of flux tubes can span the entire half field period before splitting is required. This is an advantage over the traditional setup of the EMC3-EIRENE mesh where careful construction of several sub- domains is required already for the much tighter present first wall. In particular, there is no longer the need to manually construct a suitable outer boundary for the mesh. The divide and conquer paradigm with unstructured mesh layout offers a powerful alternative for fast head load approximation that is suitable for integration into optimization workflows. Further examples for W7-X and CTH demonstrate the versatile application range.
To support the design of the Second Target Station, that aims to provide the world’s highest peak brightness of cold neutrons, studies that optimize the dimensions of the target and moderators are invaluable. In this work, we investigate the influence of the target dimensions and beam profile on the performance and optimal size of the moderators. We perform optimization runs with detailed MCNP6.2 simulations using high-fidelity unstructured mesh geometries generated from parametrized CAD models. We demonstrate that small changes in target height do not influence the moderator performance if the beam dimensions are chosen adequately. We quantify the effect of beam footprint and target width on the moderator performance and show that the optimal moderator dimensions are insensitive to limited changes in target and beam profile.