Advanced Reactor Fuels: Metallic Fuel Fabrication: Safeguards Gaps and Challenges
N/A
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Metal Fuel”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Metallic Fuels Beyond SFRs
Metallic nuclear fuels have traditionally been used for sodium cooled fast reactor applications, but recent work has been done in applying metal fuel technologies to the light water reactor and molten salt reactor spaces. This presentation offers a brief history of metallic fuel use in SFRs and an overview of metallic fuel uses in the LWR and MSR spaces.
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Recent Metallic Fuel Data Recovery in FIPD
The Metallic Fuels Irradiation and Physics Database (FIPD) [1] is an organized collection of metallic fuel test pin data (U-xPu-yZr, = 0 ~ 28; y = 2 ~ 10) and documentation available to industry. FIPD mainly contains three types of data: (1) Fuel pin fabrication data, including fuel slug diameter, fuel slug length, cladding diameter, smear density, etc. (2) Fuel pin operation conditions, including axial distributions for power, temperatures, fluences, burnup, and isotopic densities, etc. and (3) Fuel pin post-irradiation examination (PIE) data, including fission gas release and gas chemistry, profilometry, and neutron radiography, etc. The operating conditions for pins with PIE data available in FIPD span significant ranges across key parameters. The fuel peak burnup extends from less than 5% up to 20 at%. The cladding peak temperature varies from about 490°C to 660°C. Finally, the cladding peak DPA shows a wide range from less than 5 to 120. These broad ranges reflect the diverse testing conditions and operational parameters captured in the available PIE data. More detail about FIPD can be found in ref. [2]. The database development is an ongoing effort covering metallic fuel experiments from the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) and the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF). As reported in the ref. [3, 4], most of the PIE data generated during the IFR program [5] has been collected, reviewed, processed, and integrated into FIPD. The most recently added PIE data can be found in ref. [4], which shows the collection of over 95% of the PIE data by the time of this paper. The recent improvements to the database are summarized in this paper.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Identifying Challenges in Safeguards for Metallic Fuel Fabrication Facilities
As new advanced reactors gain popularity, there is an increasing interest in metallic fuel fabrication for fast reactors. While metallic fuels themselves are not a new idea, as many of the first reactors employed metallic fuels, new designs, compositions, and fabrication methods are appearing throughout the nuclear community. As the interest grows and facilities are constructed, both domestic and international safeguards will need to be heavily involved to support safeguards-by-design (SBD) measures from the start. This work compiles a review of historical and modern fuel types and fabrication methods, fabrication processes, safeguards gaps, and potential safeguards solutions. Metallic nuclear fuel types have been around for many decades and were included in some of the first reactors including the Experimental Breeder Reactor (EBR)-I and -II, the Fermi 1 reactor, the Integral Fast Reactor (IFR), and the Dounreay Fast Reactor (DFR). These reactors used various compositions including pure uranium (U) metal, U-zirconium (Zr) alloys, plutonium (Pu)-aluminum (Al) alloys, U-fissium (Fs) alloys, U-Pu-Zr alloys, and U-molybdenum (Mo) alloys [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. These small alloying additions are included to improve the material properties of the pure U metal. The alpha-phase U (stable below 661C) suffers elongation in one direction causing grain boundary cracking and increasing creep rate due to irradiation growth, thermal cycling, and preferential crystal orientation. It is ideal to utilize the gamma-phase U (typically stable above 769C) by adding small amounts of alloying elements such as Zr or Mo to stabilize this phase down to room temperature [3]. Additionally, some research has been focused on U with transuranic (TRU) elements present, typically coming from the used fuel recycling process. Including these elements in fast reactor fuel can aid in the reduction of nuclear waste by burning minor long-lived actinides. However, the additions of TRU elements can cause concerns to arise when trying to fabrication or safeguard metallic fuels. A typical metallic fuel element is shown in Figure 1. Sodium is added into the cladding to create a thermal bond between the fuel slug and cladding wall. The fuel slug is then inserted and the end plug is welded on to the top of the fuel element. A gas plenum is left to create a headspace for gaseous fission products to escape rather than continue to build in the fuel itself [1, 5]. Other fuel element geometries exist as well, such as the Lightbridge twisted cruciform geometry shown in Figure 2 [6]. This design allows for better cooling performance and provides room for fuel rod swelling without impacting the fuel rod diameter. There are many different fabrication methods for metallic fuels, which is one of the many benefits of these fuel types. Many of these fabrication methods are relatively easy and cost-efficient. The most popular fabrication method is injection casting, sometimes called vacuum induction melting (VIM), shown in Figure 3 [4, 8, 9, 7, 10]. This method was largely used for EBR-II fuel fabrication. The injection casting system is contained inside of a vessel consisting of a Y2O3-coated graphite crucible surrounded by an induction coil with ZrO2-coated quartz molds suspended above the crucible. The fuel feedstock is placed inside of the graphite crucible and melted using the induction furnace. The induction furnace utilizes a dual frequency with the high frequency melting the feedstock and the low frequency causing stirring of the melted feedstock to form a homogeneous mixture. The mixture is heated to approximately 1600C in an argon environment. The vessel is evacuated and then the quartz molds are lowered into the graphite crucible containing the molten metal and the vessel is repressurized to inject the metal fuel upwards into the molds. The molds are removed and then shattered to release the fuel slugs. This fabrication method was used to fabricate 39,000 metallic fuel pins for EBR-II. While injection casting has been the most common metallic fuel fabrication method throughout the decades, many other methods have been explored including low-pressure gravity casting, microwave casting, continuous casting, centrifugal casting, coextrusion, and many others [11, 12, 8, 13, 14, 15]. Some of these methods aim to mitigate challenges that arise with americium (Am) volatilization during the casting process for TRU-containing fuel feedstocks, an issue with injection casting. Coextrusion is one of the methods explored at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and has been utilized for the initial fabrication tests of Lightbridge's unique fuels, as well as other metallic fuels with cladding coextruded. In this process, large billets are formed and machined and then inserted into a molten salt bath for approximately 30 minutes. The billets are then loaded into the extrusion press and extruded. This process can be seen in Figure 4 [15].
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
AFC Metal Fuel Workshop Presentations
Compilation of PowerPoint slide decks from presentations given at the 3rd Annual AFC Metal Fuels Workshop. The purpose of this workshop is to bring the national metallic fuel stakeholders together to discuss status and needs of metallic fuel and review the DOE AFC Metal Fuel R&D. Desired Outcomes - Advance Metallic Fuel Technology: 1. Stakeholder Community Building 2. National Program R&D Accountability, Planning Support, and Increased Stakeholder Advocation.
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Legacy Metallic Fuel U(Pu)Zr Data Qualification
The Metallic Fuels Irradiation and Physics Database (FIPD) is an organized collection of legacy metallic fuel U(Pu)Zr data, measurements, and reactor conditions from the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) and the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF). The database provides a wealth of information and is easily accessed and utilized by the U.S. nuclear industry and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The database contains three categories of data. The first category covers fuel pin fabrication specifications, including fuel slug diameter and length, cladding diameter, smeared density, etc. The second consists of operational conditions, which include axial distributions of power, temperature, fluence, burnup, isotopic density, etc. The third category contains post-irradiation examination (PIE) results, largely collected at facilities now part of the Idaho National Laboratory (INL), formerly part of Argonne National Laboratory -West (ANL-W) and at the Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility (AGHCF) at Argonne National Laboratory, comprising fission gas release and chemistry analysis, profilometry measurements, neutron radiography data, etc. All these data have been organized and preserved in FIPD.
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Progress Report on SFR Metallic Fuel Data Qualification
This report summarizes the progress of SFR metallic fuel qualification related activities, which are focused on providing quality assurance relevant information applicable to experiments irradiated during the Integral Fast Reactor (IFR) program. An overview of the metallic fuel performance data and the associated databases, including the EBR-II Fuels Irradiation & Physics Database (FIPD), Out-of-Pile Transient Database (OPTD), and TREAT Experimental Relational Database (TREXR) is included. The legacy data in the databases, including as-built, post-irradiation examination (PIE), operating parameters, and out-of-pile experiment post-test data are introduced. The SFR metallic fuel Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) and its implementation to qualify these legacy data is described in detail. Important PIE data QA documents and the specifications of seven types of PIE measurements (contact profilometry, laser profilometry, neutron radiography, gamma scan, fission gas release fission gas chemistry, and metallography) are provided. Examples of the implementation of the QAPP to qualify each of those types of PIE data are provided.
Mo, Kun [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonn↗
Metallic fuel transient fuel-cladding interface liquefaction model assessment platform enabled by integrating BISON with databases
A novel platform has been developed within the BISON fuel performance code to assess models of fuel-cladding interface liquefaction for sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) metallic fuels. Here, this platform is crucial because liquefaction at the fuel-cladding interface significantly impacts fuel performance and may compromise fuel pin integrity during transient events. To ensure accurate predictions, the platform integrates data collected during the Integral Fast Reactor (IFR) program, now archived in metallic fuel databases. This integration supports verification and validation (V&V) of the models in BISON. Leveraging the extensive US experience with metallic fuel liquefaction and the collections of preserved legacy data, the platform serves as a powerful tool for evaluating existing models and advancing the development of new ones.
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Fuel-Cladding Eutectic Study of Legacy Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) MFF HT9/U-10Zr Metallic Fuel
This report presents the first systematic investigation of fuel-cladding eutectic interaction (FCEI) in irradiated HT9/U-10Zr metallic fuel from the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) Materials Fuels Form (MFF) program, using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) coupled with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Two irradiated fuel cross-sections, MNT07H (9.5 at% burnup, x/L = 0.78) and MNT08H (7.0 at% burnup, x/L = 0.93), were subjected to three successive isothermal annealing rounds (R1–R3) at 820°C for 20 minutes each, yielding a cumulative transient duration of one hour. This study directly addresses a recognized gap in the existing FCEI database, which previously lacked irradiated HT9/U-10Zr data at burnup levels above 8 at%. Two principal findings emerge from the study. First, for both samples, FCEI remained spatially confined within the pre-existing fuel-cladding chemical interaction (FCCI) zone boundaries after R3, with no measurable eutectic penetration into unaffected cladding beyond the original FCCI layer. This self-limiting behavior is consistent with historical Fuel Behavior Test Apparatus (FBTA) results and is attributed to the near-eutectic phase composition of the FCCI zone, which rapidly absorb the available eutectic-forming constituents and then stall penetration once the FCCI zone is consumed. A comparison with unirradiated surrogate data further supports this mechanism: whereas a U–34 at.% Fe sample would be expected to show ~176 µm of iron penetration under comparable conditions, the irradiated samples exhibited only ~20 µm, a discrepancy attributed to irradiation-induced interfacial porosity and pre-existing FCCI composition gradients. Second, for MNT08H, FCEI was observed exclusively on the half of the cladding circumference where pre-existing steady-state FCCI was present, with no detectable FCEI on the opposite half. Three hypotheses are proposed to explain this asymmetry: the inhibiting role of a zirconium-rich rind at the fuel-cladding interface; the chemical sequestration of iron by redistributed zirconium within the fuel matrix; and the persistence of fuel-cladding gaps on the FCEI-free half that preclude direct contact. All three hypotheses require further experimental investigation. The results extend the empirical FCEI database into higher-burnup territory and demonstrate the viability of DSC-based testing as a substitute for the no-longer-available FBTA apparatus. Future work will include additional cross-section testing, compilation of the full FCEI dataset, model evaluation, and DSC testing of ternary fuel compositions to broaden the experimental basis for safety assessment of sodium-cooled fast reactor systems.
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Metal Fuel for Fast Reactors: A Review of Recent Experience
Summary of US fast reactor metal fuel experience at EBR-II and FFTF, drawn from published literature, as attributed on indiividual slides. Presented to a visit of Japanese technologists (from JAEA, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, and CRIEPI) at INL-MFC on Oct 30, 2025
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
A Multiphysics Evaluation of Annular Uranium-Zirconium Metallic Fuels [Poster]
This study examines the performance of U-10Zr annular metallic fuel rodlets which were experimentally evaluated as part of the Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC). The AFC mission is to develop novel fuel technologies and facilitate the implementation of those technologies by industry partners. A key objective is to improve steady-state and transient performance over current fuel types. The experiments of interest in this study included annular metallic U-Zr fuel rodlets within HT-9 cladding which were placed in SS-316 capsules and inserted in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). Certain mechanical and thermal conditions cannot be directly evaluated through experiments and fuel performance modeling is used to shed light on this evolution over time. In this study, BISON Multiphysics simulations are leveraged to investigate the state of the fuel system throughout and after the experimental conditions.
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Quality Assurance of Legacy Post-Irradiation Examination Data for Metallic Fuels
The U.S. DOE-NE’s Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) Fast Reactor Program (FRP) and the NE-4 Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) have jointly undertaken the qualification of the legacy post-irradiation examination (PIE) data held in the Fuels Irradiation & Physics Database (FIPD), covering metallic fuel experiments conducted in the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) and the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF). In FY26 this effort reached a milestone: six major types of PIE data—contact profilometry, isotopic gamma scan, fission gas chemistry, fission gas release, laser profilometry, and neutron radiography—have been qualified for all available experiments in FIPD, and the U.S. nuclear industry can now draw on them with confidence in licensing activities for metallic fuel-based advanced fast reactors. This report documents the qualification process and the resulting status of the PIE data.
Mo, Kun↗
Quality Assurance of the Irradiated EBR-II Metallic Fuels Data
The U.S. DOE-NE’s Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) Fast Reactor Program (FRP) and the NE-4 Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) have jointly undertaken efforts to qualify post-irradiation examination (PIE) data for Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) and Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) metallic fuels. Among the thousands of PIE datasets in the Metallic Fuels Irradiation & Physics Database (FIPD), data from selected EBR-II experiments have been prioritized as the most valuable to the U.S. nuclear industry for licensing activities related to metallic fuel-based advanced fast reactors. This report summarizes the general data qualification progress of the EBR-II and FFTF experiments, with focus on the selected EBR-II experiments.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Plutonium migration and phase evolution in irradiated U-Pu-Zr metallic fuels: An integrated EPMA-SEM-TEM study
Constituent redistribution is a defining feature of irradiated U-Pu-Zr metallic fuels, yet its mechanisms and effects on fuel performance are not sufficiently resolved to guide model development. Although decades of irradiation testing have established broad trends, a true mechanistic understanding of constituent redistribution has not been achieved. Here, in this study, we use electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy-based (TEM) selective area electron diffraction (SAED) on a EBR-II irradiated U-19 wt.% Pu-6 wt.% Zr fuel pin cross-section to correlate the composition, porosity, and crystallographic phases formed after irradiation. Constituent redistribution is thought to consist of three distinct zones, in which uranium and zirconium migrate while plutonium remains relatively unchanged. Our EPMA results resolve eight distinct compositional regions, and more importantly, show that plutonium redistributes alongside zirconium, contrary to historical assumptions. The distribution of fission products was highly asymmetric with a few large lanthanide precipitates observed at isolated sites on the pin periphery instead of a uniform distribution of smaller precipitates around the periphery. Using thermodynamic data from TAF-ID and the measured EPMA compositions, matrix phase fractions were predicted across the fuel radius. Phase predictions based on composition did not match TEM/SAED results, which revealed a much higher fraction of α−U phase than would be expected if phases were retained from reactor temperatures. These findings highlight the need for expanded SAED phase identification to capture post-irradiation and storage effects, as well as rigorous uncertainty quantification in fuel performance and phase diagram modeling to better constrain predictions from compositional data.
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
NDMAS Data Management Capabilities for Metallic Fuels
This poster summarizes the capabilities of the Nuclear Data Management and Analysis System and its applicability to the Metallic Fuels program in the Advanced Fuel Campaign.
22 - GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
High resolution microstructural, chemical studies and localized burnup analysis in an irradiated U–10Zr metallic fuel
This study involves high resolution characterization of a sodium bonded solid uranium (U)-10 wt% zirconium (Zr) metallic fuel irradiated in Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF). The fuel centerline temperature during irradiation was estimated to be around 675 °C with the peak burnup 13.1 atomic percent. Samples for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atom probe tomography (APT) were prepared from different regions/zones in the fuel cross section radially to elucidate the microstructural changes and chemical redistribution of solute elements as well as fission products during irradiation experiment. TEM results indicate the irradiation in fast flux testing leads to the formation of extensive Zr-rich precipitates with varying sizes in the U–Zr fuel matrix. APT analysis performed to investigate redistribution of Zr, U and fission products along the radial direction of fuel pin showed Zr-rich precipitates entrapping the fission products in higher concentration as compared to the α-U phases. Here, the local burnup ( 235 U depletion) is found to be consistent, calculated by quantification of 235 U, 236 U and 238 U isotopes from mass spectrum obtained from APT along the radial direction. Zr-rich precipitation and its implication on fuel constitutional redistribution are discussed based on SEM, TEM and APT results.
APT↗
Multi-scale modeling of wastage layer formation in metallic fuel cladding
Fuel-cladding chemical interaction (FCCI) is a major concern for U-Zr metallic fuels' performance, primarily due to the formation of a brittle layer (wastage) in the cladding. This brittle layer, resulting from intermetallic compounds between cladding constituents Fe, Cr, and lanthanide fission products, significantly impacts the cladding's mechanical integrity. Recent efforts focus on developing a mechanistic modeling framework to understand lanthanide production, transport to the fuel-cladding interface, and phase transformation to intermetallic phases. A multi-scale computational approach has been used to calculate lanthanide transport rates, with atomistic calculations determining Nd diffusivities through the solid fuel matrix and along pore surfaces. These diffusivities inform a mesoscale model to determine an effective diffusion coefficient, accounting for porosity and infiltration with bond sodium. This effective diffusivity is used in engineering-scale simulations via the BISON fuel performance code, which has been validated against EBR-II and FFTF reactor experiments.
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Elucidating the effect of minor-actinide addition on fuel-cladding chemical interaction in an HT-9 clad U-Pu-Zr metallic fuel irradiated to 6.15 at.% burnup in EBR-II
Scanning and transmission electron microscopy (S/TEM) were used to characterize the local fuel-cladding chemical interaction (FCCI) in one cross-section taken from a HT-9 clad U-20.3Pu-10Zr-1.2Am-1.3Np (in wt.%) fuel irradiated to 6.15 at.% burnup with inner cladding temperatures ranging between 460–490 °C. Results showed that the total interaction thickness between fuel and cladding was <10 µm. Fe infiltrated the fuel to form U-Zr-Fe phases while fuel elements or lanthanides did not infiltrate into the cladding. Np was not involved in the formation of any phases in the examined locations; however, Am played a role by forming a ∼2 µm thick homogeneous Fe-Pu-Am planar front at the inner cladding wall. An oxidized Na layer existed in the fuel-cladding gap with Fe and lanthanide particles dispersed within, suggesting Na could facilitate the transport of fuel and cladding constituents. Secondary phases, including an FCC Zr-rich phase, lanthanide phases, and α’-Cr(Fe) were identified in the outer fuel and FCCI regions. Furthermore, this study suggests that, for the irradiation conditions specific to this cross-section, minor actinides have little impact on FCCI behavior beyond what would be observed in typical HT-9 clad U-Pu-Zr fuel pins systems.
11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗