Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Microchloropsis”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Persistence of bacterial-mediated anti-rotifer protection in preliminary outdoor cultivation trial for Microchloropsis salina

Outdoor algal cultivation systems are susceptible to a wide variety of deleterious species. In previously published studies, we observed protection using microbial consortia at laboratory scale cultures; Microchloropsis salina in the presence of microbial consortia were protected from grazing from the marine rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis. Our objective for the present work was to determine if this protection conferred by microbial consortia in controlled laboratory experiments would persist in an open, outdoor multi-liter cultivation system. We found that algal protection did persist as evidenced by the presence of fewer motile rotifers and decreased rotifer-associated egg counts for the consortia-treated outdoor cultures. Due to the low temperature and light conditions that reduced growth of the algae outdoors, we performed an indoor laboratory assay which also confirmed the persistence of algal protection. Lastly, the lower numbers of motile rotifers and fewer rotifer-associated eggs in the consortia-treated algal cultures suggests a possible protective mechanism by the consortia through interfering with the rotifer lifecycle or reproduction. Finally, these initial results support the possibility that low cost, prophylactic treatments with microbial consortia can protect algae from deleterious species in outdoor cultivation systems.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

Storage and Algal Association of Bacteria That Protect Microchloropsis salina from Grazing by Brachionus plicatilis

Loss of algal production from the crashes of algal mass cultivation systems represents a significant barrier to the economic production of microalgal-based biofuels. Current strategies for crash prevention can be too costly to apply broadly as prophylaxis. Bacteria are ubiquitous in microalgal mass production cultures, however few studies investigate their role and possible significance in this particular environment. Previously, we demonstrated the success of selected protective bacterial communities to save Microchloropsis salina cultures from grazing by the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. In the current study, these protective bacterial communities were further characterized by fractionation into rotifer-associated, algal-associated, and free-floating bacterial fractions. Small subunit ribosomal RNA amplicon sequencing was used to identify the bacterial genera present in each of the fractions. Here, we show that Marinobacter, Ruegeria, and Boseongicola in algae and rotifer fractions from rotifer-infected cultures likely play key roles in protecting algae from rotifers. Several other identified taxa likely play lesser roles in protective capability. The identification of bacterial community members demonstrating protective qualities will allow for the rational design of microbial communities grown in stable co-cultures with algal production strains in mass cultivation systems. Such a system would reduce the frequency of culture crashes and represent an essentially zero-cost form of algal crop protection.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

DISCOVR strain pipeline screening – Part I: Maximum specific growth rate as a function of temperature and salinity for 38 candidate microalgae for biofuels production

Here, to identify high productivity strains for microalgal biofuels generation, the maximum specific growth rate of 38 strains was measured as a function of salinity (i.e., 5, 15, and 35 PSU) and temperature (i.e., at 8 temperatures along a linear gradient from ca. 5 to 45°C) to determine the most suitable growth medium salinity and best growing season, respectively, for outdoor raceway pond cultivation. The following strains were evaluated: Agmenellum quadruplicatum UTEX 2268, Anabaena sp. ATCC 33081, Arthrospira fusiformis UTEX 2721, Arthrospira platensis UTEX 3086, Chlorella vulgaris NREL 4-C12, Chlorella autotrophica CCMP 243, Chlorella sorokiniana DOE1044, Chlorella sorokiniana DOE 1116, Chlorella sorokiniana DOE 1412 (UTEXB3016), Chlorella vulgaris LRB AZ-1201, Chlorococcum littorale UTEX 117, Chlorococcum sp. UTEX-B P7, Chloromonas reticulata CCALA 870, Coelastrella sp. DOE 0202, Cyanobacterium sp. AB1, Micractinium reisseri NREL 14-F2, Microchloropsis gaditana CCMP1894, Microchloropsis salina CCMP 1776, Monoraphidium sp. MONOR1, Monoraphidium minutum 26B-AM, Nannochloropsis oceanica CCAP 849/10, Oscillatoria cf. priestleyi CCMEE 5020.1-1, Picochlorum celeri TG2-WT-CSM/EMRE, Picochlorum oklahomensis CCMP 2329, Picochlorum renovo NREL 39-A8, Picochlorum soloecismus DOE 101, Porphyridium cruentum CCMP 675, Scenedesmus acutus LRB-AP-0401, Scenedesmus obliquus DOE 0152.z, Scenedesmus obliquus UTEX393,Scenedesmus rubescens NREL 46B-D3, Scenedesmus sp. IITRIND2, Stichococcus minor CCMP 819, Stichococcus minutus CCALA 727, Synechococcus elongatus UTEX2973.1, Tetraselmis striata LANL 1001, Tisochrysis lutea CCMP 1324, and Tribonema minus UTEXB3156. For each strain, the identity and the presence of bacterial cohorts was determined using 18S and 16S rDNA sequencing, respectively. The maximum specific growth rate versus temperature data were also used to determine the activation energies (Arrhenius equation) for most strains. For all strains, the measured salinity and temperature tolerance data were compared to those reported in the literature. The fastest growing strains were down-selected for subsequent biomass productivity measurements in climate-simulation photobioreactors, as reported in the next paper in the issue.

18S and 16S rDNA sequencing↗