Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “MnFeP”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Materials Data on MnFeP by Materials Project

FeMnP crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pnma space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Mn is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to five equivalent P atoms. There are a spread of Mn–P bond distances ranging from 2.40–2.50 Å. Fe is bonded to four equivalent P atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing FeP4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Fe–P bond distances ranging from 2.19–2.23 Å. P is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to five equivalent Mn and four equivalent Fe atoms.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Using numerical methods to screen magnetocaloric materials in an active magnetic regenerative cycle

A 2-dimensional numerical model of a room temperature operating Active Magnetic Regenerator (AMR) that comprises of a regenerator, hot and cold heat exchangers, heat transfer fluid is developed. The regenerator is made of a magnetocaloric material (MCM) which heats up upon applying a magnetic field, H, and cools down when the field is removed; thus, making it the most essential part of an AMR. The model takes experimentally measured ΔT ad (H,T) and the C p (H,T) data as input and provides quantitative performance metrics of the magnetic cooling system, such as ΔT span and the cooling load, as output. With this model, it is possible to assess a wide range of MCMs in an AMR. 4 different MCMs were investigated using this model in terms of their ΔT span and the cooling loads—LaFe 10.96 Co 0.97 Si 1.07 , MnFeP (1-x) As (x) and AlFe 2 B 2 and Gd. During the screening of MCMs, all the important operating conditions of the device were fixed such as the fluid flow rate, ambient temperature, cycle duration, magnetic field strength. Our results indicate that Gd exhibits the maximum ΔT span with respectable cooling load, while AlFe 2 B 2 generates the lowest ΔT span . Even though LaFeCoSi compound did not perform as well as Gd, it could be the MCM choice for the realization of magnetic refrigeration on a global scale due to its much lower cost.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗