Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera Particle Analysis”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

A Comparative Evaluation of Snowflake Particle Shape Estimation Techniques Used By the Precipitation Imaging Package (PIP), Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera (MASC), and Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometer (2DVD)

Measurements of snowflake particle shape are important for studying snow microphysics. While a number of instruments exist that are capable of measuring particle shape, this study focuses on the measurement techniques of three digital video disdrometers: the Precipitation Imaging Package (PIP), the Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera (MASC), and the Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometer (2DVD). To gain a better understanding of the relative strengths and weaknesses of these instruments and to provide a foundation upon which comparisons can be made between studies using data from different instruments, we perform a comparative analysis of the shape measurement algorithms employed by each of the three instruments by applying the algorithms to snowflake images captured by PIP during the ICE-POP 2018 field campaign. Our analysis primarily focuses on the measurement of the aspect ratio of either the particle itself, in the case of PIP and MASC, or of the particle bounding box, in the case of PIP and 2DVD. Both PIP and MASC use shape-fitting algorithms to measure aspect ratio. While our analysis of the MASC aspect ratio suggests that the measurements are reliable, our findings indicate that both the ellipse and rectangle aspect ratios produced by PIP underperformed considerably due to the shortcomings of the PIP shape-fitting techniques. We also demonstrate that reliable measurements of aspect ratio can be retrieved from PIP by reprocessing the raw PIP images using either the MASC ellipse-fitting algorithm or a tensor-based ellipse-fitting algorithm. Because of differences in instrument design, 2DVD produces measurements of particle horizontal and vertical extent rather than length and width. Furthermore, the 2DVD measurements of particle horizontal extent can be contaminated by horizontal particle motion. Our findings indicate that, although the correction technique used to remove the horizontal motion contamination performs remarkably well with snowflakes despite being designed for use with raindrops, the 2DVD measurements of particle horizontal extent are less reliable than those measured by PIP.

Charles N Helms↗

Understanding PIP Measurements of Particle Shape via Image Analysis

A number of instruments exist to measure the size, shape and orientation angle of precipitation particles near the surface; this study will specifically focus on three of them: the precipitation imaging package (PIP), the multi-angle snowflake camera (MASC), and the two-dimensional video distrometer (2DVD). The measurements of particular interest for developing precipitation microphysical retrievals from polarimetric radar and satellite-based microwave data are of the particle size, aspect ratio, and orientation angle. Due to differences in instrument design and processing software, however, the measurements made by PIP, MASC, and 2DVD are not in agreement on these key measurements. The aim of the present study is to understand how the differences between these three instruments impact their measurements of the size, aspect ratio, and orientation angle of winter precipitation particles. To this end, we have reprocessed the video files produced by PIP in a manner that replicates how the MASC and 2DVD instruments operate and process their respective data. Our findings suggest that the MASC processing software results in superior particle characteristic measurements in comparison to the other instruments, although a cursory comparison of measurements from the actual instruments suggests the PIP captures the largest number of particles of the three instruments, making PIP potentially better for computing distributions.

Charles N. Helms↗