SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Multirotor”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparing Simulation Results from CHARM and RotCFD to the Multirotor Test Bed Experimental Data

Advanced multirotor vertical flight aircraft concepts are emerging faster than rigorous individualized tests can investigate their utility and performance. There are several analysis tools that predict multirotor performance and flow characteristics, but the accuracy of these predictions is still being debated due to lack of experimental data from multirotor tests that are needed to validate the analyses. The objective of this paper is to simulate multirotor configurations using two different mid-fidelity rotorcraft analysis tools, Comprehensive Hierarchical Aeromechanics Rotorcraft Model (CHARM) and Rotorcraft Computational Fluid Dynamics (RotCFD), and compare the simulation results to experimental data from a wind tunnel test of the Multirotor Test Bed (MTB). The MTB, developed by NASA Ames Research Center, is a new capability for testing a wide array of advanced vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) rotor configurations, with a primary focus on testing in the U.S. Army 7-by 10-Foot Wind Tunnel at NASA Ames Research Center. The MTB was designed to allow adjustment of the vertical, lateral, and longitudinal placement of up to six rotors, as well as allow tilt adjustment of each rotor and pitch adjustment of the whole assembly. The six-axis load cells under each rotor give the MTB the capability of measuring the rotor performance in a wide array of configurations. The overall goal of the MTB project is to help gain a better understanding of the performance, control, interactional aerodynamics, and acoustics of multirotor and tilting-rotor systems. For the work presented here, the MTB data were used to validate RotCFD and CHARM results for several multirotor test configurations. With confidence in both analyses established by the validation exercise, additional simulations were performed to explore quadrotor configurations that will be tested during the MTB’s second wind tunnel entry planned for 2022. This second tunnel entry will examine quadrotor configurations that represent published NASA reference designs for urban air mobility concept vehicles. Results from this paper confirm the ability of RotCFD and CHARM to simulate multirotor aerodynamic interactions on individual rotor performance under edgewise forward-flight conditions.

CHARM↗

NASA NTRS2023

Multirotor Test Bed Load and Stress Analysis

The Multirotor Test Bed (MTB) is a new capability for testing a wide array of advanced vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) rotor configurations, with a primary focus on testing in the U.S. Army 7- by 10-Foot Subsonic Wind Tunnel at NASA Ames Research Center. The MTB was designed to allow adjustment of the vertical, lateral, and longitudinal placement of up to six rotors, as well as allow tilt adjustment of each rotor and pitch adjustment of the whole assembly. The six-axis load cells under each rotor give the MTB the capability of measuring the rotor performance in a wide array of configurations. The overall goal of the MTB project is to help gain a better understanding of the performance, control, interactional aerodynamics, and acoustics of multirotor and tilting-rotor systems. The MTB project was initiated to build upon the knowledge and capabilities developed during the multirotor unmanned aerial systems (MUAS) tests in 2015 and 2017. By measuring individual rotor loads and allowing for adjustments to individual rotor position and attitude, the MTB provides a wealth of data on the aeroperformance of arbitrary multirotor configurations. The flexibility in positioning up to six rotors allows the multirotor design space to be parametrically explored and potentially optimized. The MTB is also at a larger scale than the small unmanned aerial systems (UAS) tested before, which allows for testing at rotor tip Reynolds numbers more relevant to full-scale piloted electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft. This document contains the complete documentation of the design, loads, and stress analysis of the MTB.

Multirotor Test Bed↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparing RotCFD Predictions of the Multirotor Test Bed with Experimental Results

The Multirotor Test Bed (MTB) is a new capability for testing a wide array of advanced vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) rotor configurations, with a primary focus on testing in the U.S. Army 7- by 10-ft Wind Tunnel at NASA Ames Research Center. The MTB was designed to allow adjustment of the vertical, lateral, and longitudinal placement of each rotor, as well as allow tilt adjustment of each rotor and pitch adjustment of the whole assembly. Each rotor can tilt forward 90 deg and backwards 5 deg. In addition, the entire MTB can tilt forward 20 deg and backwards 10 deg. This flexibility allows the system to be tested in many different configurations. There is a six-axis load cell under each rotor assembly, to measure both the steady and dynamic loads produced by each rotor. The wind tunnel scales can measure loads on the full assembly. The overall goal of the MTB project is to help gain a better understanding of the performance, control, interactional aerodynamics, and acoustics of multirotor systems. A hybrid CFD tool called RotCFD (Rotorcraft Computational Fluid Dynamics) was used to simulate the MTB in several testing configurations. This paper explains the method of running the RotCFD simulations and explores the results from the simulations. The objective of this paper is to compare the RotCFD simulation results with the MTB wind tunnel test data, seeking to further validate RotCFD for multirotor systems and assess the influence of aerodynamic interactions on individual rotor performance.

RotCFD↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of the CHARM Predictions of the Multirotor Test Bed with Wind Tunnel Experimental Results

Urban air mobility as a fast transportation solution has captured the attention of private companies and government aviation departments in the 21st century. New designs of aerial vehicles are being developed to meet industry needs but often neglect the aerodynamic characteristics and the effects of interacting rotors. This work focuses on predicting rotor behavior and understanding the importance of the rotor wake interaction for future urban air mobility (UAM) designs. The Multirotor Test Bed (MTB) project was initiated at NASA Ames Research center to support the NASA Revolutionary Vertical Lift Technology Project to study rotorcraft performance specifically for multirotor aircraft. The MTB is a modular multirotor test stand that makes testing feasible for up to six rotors at different angles and rotor arrangements, including Tall and Short configurations at different horizontal and vertical rotor separation distances. The MTB was tested in the U.S Army’s 7-by 10-Foot Wind Tunnel at NASA Ames Research Center in late 2019. This work focuses on exploring the impact of aerodynamic interactions between the MTB rotors using the Comprehensive Hierarchical Aeromechanics Rotorcraft Model (CHARM) software. The CHARM software is capable of modeling Vertical Take Off and Landing aircraft aerodynamics in maneuvering and steady flight conditions. CHARM allows the user to define flow and body characteristics, including the rotor geometry, aerodynamic conditions, wind tunnel speed, and airfoil tables as inputs. As the first step, a single MTB rotor was simulated in hover, and the results were compared with wind tunnel test data to confirm the CHARM parameters. Once the accurate performance was verified, the MTB rotors were simulated in forward flight, and each rotor was trimmed to the measured thrust. The simulation variables include one, two, four, and six rotors at the Short and Tall configurations, with MTB pitch angles of 0, -5, and -10 degrees. The MTB was simulated with and without wind tunnel walls. These results demonstrate the rotor wake interaction and its impact on rotor performance. This information also helps determine which configurations should be explored for future wind tunnel tests.

CHARM Predictions↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Multirotor Test Bed – A New NASA Test Capability for Advanced VTOL Rotorcraft Configurations

In November 2019, NASA completed the first wind tunnel test entry of the Multirotor Test Bed (MTB), a new test capability for advanced VTOL rotorcraft configurations. The MTB had been under development since 2017 when the need arose for an easily reconfigurable test stand for multirotor aircraft configurations. With the wide-ranging assortment of aircraft currently targeted at Urban Air Mobility and Unmanned Aircraft System applications, there is a need for validation data that will increase confidence in the computational modeling tools being used to develop these platforms. The MTB fills this need. This paper describes the key features of the MTB as well as its first wind tunnel test entry. A selection of results from the test is presented here, demonstrating the flexible configuration of the MTB and the types of data researchers can generate using this new test capability.

Multirotor Test Bed↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wind-Optimal Cruise Airspeed for a Multirotor Aircraft in Urban Air Mobility

This paper first investigates the effect of wind on the wind-optimal (minimum-energy) cruise airspeed for a NASA-proposed conceptual multirotor aircraft for the urban air mobility environment. Next, energy consumption and flight duration results are compared for flying at the wind-optimal airspeed and best-range airspeed on a great-circle cruise segment under different wind conditions. Finally, the difference in energy consumption when flying to meet the assigned required time of arrival based on actual wind conditions vs. predicted wind conditions are examined and compared for the two airspeed modes (wind-optimal and best-range) for different values of wind magnitude uncertainty. The results show operational benefits of flying at the wind-optimal cruise airspeed compared to the best-range airspeed, especially understrong headwind conditions from both an energy consumption and flight duration perspective.The results also show that flying at wind-optimal airspeed under wind magnitude uncertainty has lower variability and higher predictability of energy consumption than flying at best-range airspeed.

Urban Air Mobility↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wind-Optimal Trajectories for Multirotor eVTOL Aircraft on UAM Missions

Distributed electric propulsion powered electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft are expected to enable urban air mobility. Low specific energy of onboard lithium-ion polymer batteries and wind conditions impose constraints on flight endurance. Therefore, from the safety and efficiency perspective, planning and flying minimum energy trajectories are important.The primary motivation for this paper is to determine if there is an operational benefit to flying wind-optimal trajectories for short flights (less than 60 miles) in the urban environment. This study employs wind-optimal trajectories for a NASA-proposed conceptual multirotor aircraft flight in the urban environment. The optimal control model presented includes a wind model for quantifying the effect of wind on the trajectory. The optimal control problem is numerically solved using the direct method. Energy consumption and flight duration flying wind-optimal trajectories between origins and destinations in a metropolitan area are compared with energy consumption and flight duration flying on the great-circle paths between the same origin and destination pairs to determine the operational benefit of wind-optimal routing for short flights.The flight duration results for different scenarios are validated using a simulation tool designed and developed by NASA for exploring advanced air traffic management concepts. In summary,this research study suggests that for short flights in an urban environment, the wind-optimal trajectories have a very slight (insignificant) operational advantage over the great-circle trajectories in terms of energy consumption and flight duration. As expected, headwinds and tailwinds along the route of flight have a significant impact on energy consumption and flight duration.

Urban Air Mobility↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Trajectory Simulation for Air Traffic Management Employing a Multirotor Urban Air Mobility Aircraft Model

This paper describes a point-mass model of a multirotor electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft designed to carry up to five passengers and a pilot. The model employs thrust, thrust vector angle and bank angle as controls, which are computed in part using the acceleration, heading-angle rate, and flight-path-angle rate generated by control systems in response to speed, heading angle, and flight-path angle commands. The equations of motion are integrated forward in time using the controls needed for following the desired vertical climb/descent and speed profiles, and horizontal path and cruise speed in the presence of wind to generate the flight trajectory.

trajectory simulation, urban air mobility aircraft↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Prediction-Based Auralization of a Multirotor Urban Air Mobility Vehicle

Recent advances in auralization methods applicable to rotary wing vehicles have made it possible to undertake a prediction-based auralization of a representative multirotor urban air mobility vehicle. These advances include a new capability for synthesizing loading and thickness noise directly from the prediction method and a new capability for predicting and synthesizing modulating broadband self noise within a unified system noise prediction-auralization framework. These capabilities are demonstrated for a six passenger quadrotor reference vehicle design using collective-pitch control. Propagation of the source noise to a ground observer completes the auralization process. The demonstrated capability serves as the basis for future work directed at perception-influenced design of low noise urban air mobility vehicles.

Auralization↗

NASA NTRS2022

Multi-Fidelity CFD Simulation of the Multirotor Test Bed

The high-fidelity and reduced order CFD method's validation and analysis are presented for the Multirotor Test Bed. The reduced-order method uses a rotor-disk model in the OVERFLOW CFD code and is an important aspect of this study. A rotor-trim option loosely coupling the Comprehensive code CAMRAD II with the OVERFLOW CFD code is included in the simulation that captures rotor blade aerodynamics, blade and rotor performance, rotor-rotor, and rotor-body interactions. Detailed comparison and validation were performed for both higher-fidelity full rotor unsteady flows and reduced-order rotor-disk methods. The tunnel geometry is included in the detailed computational effort. Computations of the low-Reynolds number flows were performed for a different number of in-plane rotors as well as for a single rotor modeled inside the tunnel.

ARMD↗

NASA NTRS2024

Inexpensive Multirotor Platform for Advanced Controls Testing (IMPACT): Development, Integration, and Experimentation

A comprehensive framework was explored and validated for rapid deployment and testing of custom flight control logic using the Inexpensive Multirotor Platform for Advanced Controls Testing (IMPACT). This vehicle facilitated the efficient validation and refinement of a custom flight control algorithm, which was designed using Simulink and deployed onto a Pixhawk flight computer running PX4 firmware through the utilization of the MathWorks UAV Toolbox. The robust and cost-effective design of IMPACT provides the groundwork for future flight testing of flight controls and model development research for electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft.

flight testing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Robust Path-following Controller for Multirotor Vehicles in Uncertain Wind Conditions

This paper presents simulations of L1 adaptive controller on a multirotor vehicle for compensation of convective winds. There are increasing efforts to utilize unmanned vehicles for fighting wildfires, but such vehicles need to be able to compensate for convective updrafts and other uncertainties (e.g., wind shear and turbulence) caused by the wildfire. Other application domains, such as urban air mobility, also must account for convective or uncertain winds present in urban microclimates. Geometric controllers have great tracking performance properties in environments without uncertainties, but the tracking performance degrades when wind disturbances and external loads are present in the environment. Introducing L1 adaptive control into the controller architecture compensates for these wind disturbances and reduces the tracking error caused by such disturbances. The controller architecture is implemented on a small quadrotor. The simulations demonstrate the advantages of the L1 adaptive augmentation for a sample figure-eight trajectory while encountering unknown variable wind conditions with an external load.

John L Bullock↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Robust Path-following Controller for Multirotor Vehicles in Uncertain Wind Conditions

John Bullock↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Multirotor Configuration Trades Informed by Handling Qualities for Urban Air Mobility Application

Many contemporary Advanced Air Mobility (AAM), and more specifically, urban air mobility (UAM) vehicle designers are attracted to variable rotor speed-controlled designs with multiple rotors because of the great potential for mass savings compared to more traditional, variable blade pitch-controlled vehicles. These designs are based on the assumption that the stability and control of recreation or basic utility-sized drones can be scaled to larger passenger-sized vehicles. Previous work had shown the challenges in stabilizing passenger-sized quadcopters. In this study, power constraints were made less restrictive and varied, allowing more control power. Motor parameters such as efficiency, nominal voltage and current operating point, and rise time of the rotor speed controller step response were studied. By fixing the efficiency of the motor to 95% and assuming a motor voltage to current ratio of 2.0 (previously, assumed to be 1.0), the authors were able to stabilize the quadcopter in the roll axis because this allowed the vehicle to achieve adequate rise times between 0.4 and 0.8 s. This motor optimization was extended to a hexacopter and octocopter designed to the same payload size and mission as the quadcopter. The three vehicle configurations and their motor speed controllers were compared. It was found that while hexacopter and octocopter required more mass and overall power; all three configurations had similar margins required for control. However, the hexacopter and octocopter were able to use this power margin to achieve lower rise times (i.e. the vehicle responded more quickly to pilot inputs) than the quadcopter, with the octocopter having the lowest rotor response rise time of the three vehicle configurations studied.

Multirotor↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Impact of Handling Qualities on Motor Sizing for Multirotor Aircraft with Urban Air Mobility Missions

Control models of three NASA Urban Air Mobility (UAM) reference vehicles (the quadrotor, octocopter, and Lift+Cruise (LPC)) were created and compared to determine the effect of rotor number and disk loading on control margin and design. The heave and yaw axes demand more actuator usage than the roll and pitch axes. Between heave and yaw, heave was the more demanding of the two because of the dependence of heave on the engine speed controller (ESC). When the feedback gains for all three vehicles were optimized to Level 1 handling qualities (HQs) specifications using CONDUIT, the ESC for the octocopter was the most stable and had the highest rise time (time for the rotor to respond to an input), while the LPC ESC was the least stable and had the smallest rise time. Rise time corresponds to the time required for rotor response. When actuator usage was translated to current margin, torque margin, and power margin, heave was the most demanding axis, followed by yaw, roll, and then pitch for all three vehicles. The results emphasize the importance of an accurate motor model within the control system architecture.

Impact↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Handling Qualities of Multirotor RPM-Controlled Electric-Vertical Take-Off and Landing (eVTOL) Aircraft for Urban Air Mobility (UAM)

A paradigm shift in rotorcraft design is being led by the prospect of propulsive forces being distributed across multiple rotors, such that each rotor can be directly driven by a dedicated electric motor. Crucially, some designers attempt to utilize these direct-drive mechanisms as the sole form of primary flight control. The feasibility of this design choice remains to be proven at the scales required for passenger transport. The paper presents a preliminary handling qualities analysis, for a six-passenger (1,200 lb payload) electric Hexacopter conceptual design, which shows that Level 1 handling qualities for limited agility operations are possible, provided that electric powertrains can deliver transient peak torques twice as high as the rated continuous torque of the conceptual design. Preliminary predictions are then substantiated by the results from a piloted handling qualities evaluation conducted in the NASA-Ames Vertical Motion Simulator (VMS). Three eVTOL configurations (a quadrotor, a hexacopter and a lift+cruise) with flight control laws implementing different levels of stability augmentation (Attitude Command-Attitude Hold and Translational Rate Command response types) were evaluated in four low speed and hover tasks requiring various levels of agility and precision.

UAM↗

NASA NTRS2024

Distributed Sensor Fusion of Ground and Air Nodes Using Vision and Radar Modalities for Tracking Multirotor Small Uncrewed Air Systems and Birds

High-density airspace operations with multiple aircraft type and potentially noncooperative aircraft require distributed sensor detection and tracking systems to monitor airspace for safe, autonomous flight operations for advanced air mobility, urban air mobility, and high density small uncrewed air systems (SUAS) flight concepts. This work collected data using a distributed radar and camera sensor framework during the NASA Advanced Air Mobility High Density Vertiplex project SUAS flight operation. Node locations include on an onboard SUAS, affixed to the Landing and Impact Research Facility with approximate 200ft elevation, on a tripod on first-floor roof with an approximate elevation of 20 ft, and on a tripod on a concrete pad that is approximately 4 ft above sea level. Each node includes camera, radar, and GPS.

Beyond Visual Line of Sight↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flight Dynamics Conceptual Design Exploration of Multirotor eVTOL

The advent of electric propulsion is revolutionizing the paradigm of rotorcraft design, leading to new electric Vertical Take-Off and Landing (eVTOL) aircraft. Direct drive topologies are common within these new designs, and some designers have chosen to utilize this mechanism for Primary Flight Control (PFC), effectively utilizing the aircraft engines as PFC actuators to control the speed of the rotors. This decision integrates the propulsion and flight control systems, and intrinsically couples the aircraft sizing and control. Four separate tools were exercised throughout this study to conduct a conceptual design exploration of eVTOL aircraft handling qualities. The main tasks for these tools were: 1) aircraft sizing and performance analysis, including the calculation of trim; 2) flight dynamics modeling and analysis; 3) handling qualities-centric control law optimization; and 4) electric motor sizing. Sizing of an RPM- controlled Hexacopter concept explored the dependency of aircraft size to fundamental design parameters: 1) disk loading and 2) blade loading coefficient. Increasing the design disk loading resulted in designs with high agility, but at the cost of significant growth in the design gross weight. Finally, Categories II and III pilot-induced-oscillation (PIO) are known potentially-catastrophic handling qualities deficiencies of fly-by-wire flight control systems such as those expected of eVTOL aircraft. Consideration of PIO predictive metrics in conceptual design control synthesis led to increased PIO robustness.

Flight Dynamics↗