Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “OAE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2020

Use of Otoacousticemission Phase Change to Evaluate Countermeasures for Spaceflight-Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome

Spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS) is a human spaceflight risk recognized by NASA. Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) has been implicated as a root cause of many SANS signs and symptoms, yet there is no reliable noninvasive means of monitoring ICP. We have developed a noninvasive method of monitoring ICP change that exploits ear canal acoustic and otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurements. Changed ICP alters pressure in the inner ear, leading to changes in the tension and position of middle ear (ME) components; tension of these components determines the phase of the stimulus in the ear canal and the OAE response sound transmission back through the ME. The OAE method has been validated in several studies, including our own experiments as part of the NASA Fluid Shifts study. Systematic OAE phase changes demonstrating increased ME tension (an ICP indicator) are observed as posture is changed from seated to supine to head-down tilt (HDT). This effect can be substantially mitigated by lower body negative pressure (LBNP). The OAE technique has also been used on International Space Station (ISS) crewmembers, providing evidence that ICP in microgravity is similar to that seen on the ground in the supine position. The OAE method is also a rapid and noninvasive means of assessing the effectiveness of SANS countermeasures. Here we report results from two studies which used OAEs. In the most recent study (Venous Congestion Countermeasures - VCCM), three promising countermeasures [LBNP, an impedance threshold device (ITD), and veno-occlusive thigh cuffs (VTC)] were applied individually and in combination. In our previous ITD-only study, ITD was investigated for its ability to reduce ICP and cephalic venous congestion in supine and various HDT postures. Internal jugular vein (IJV) ultrasound showed a clear decongestive effect at all postures, however OAE data showed that ITD only caused a phase decrease (tension decrease) in HDT postures. In supine, ITD appeared to INCREASE tension. This paradox leads us to hypothesize that the OAE method is not accurately representing ICP changes with countermeasures (CM), which can alter ME tension through other means, such as ME pressure (MEP) changes. More generally, the exact mechanism for observed OAE response and stimulus phase shifts are not clearly understood, specifically with regard to the effects of MEP. The VCCM study examined the effects of externally-applied MEP on OAE recordings to document the relationship between these parameters. Analysis of these data provide new insights to these OAE mechanisms, in addition to results on CM effectiveness.

Kemp, D.↗
NASA NTRS2016

Fluid Shifts: Otoacoustical Emission Changes in Response to Posture and Lower Body Negative Pressure

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the NASA Fluid Shifts Study is to characterize fluid distribution and compartmentalization associated with long-duration spaceflight and to correlate these findings with vision changes and other elements of the visual impairment and intracranial pressure (VIIP) syndrome. VIIP signs and symptoms, as well as postflight lumbar puncture data, suggest that elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) may be associated with spaceflight-induced cephalad fluid shifts, but this hypothesis has not been tested. Due to the invasive nature of direct measures of ICP, a noninvasive technique of monitoring ICP is desired for use during spaceflight. The phase angle and amplitude of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) have been shown to be sensitive to posture change and ICP (1, 2), therefore use of OAEs is an attractive option. OAEs are low-level sounds produced by the sensory cells of the cochlea in response to auditory stimulation. These sounds travel peripherally from the cochlea, through the oval window, to the ear canal where they can be recorded. OAE transmission is sensitive to changes in the stiffness of the oval window, occurring as a result of changes in cochlear pressure. Increased stiffness of the oval window largely affects the transmission of sound from the cochlea at frequencies between 800 Hz and 1600 Hz. OAEs can be self-recorded in the laboratory or on the ISS using a handheld device. Our primary objectives regarding OAE measures in this experiment were to 1) validate this method during preflight testing of each crewmember (while sitting, supine and in head-down tilt position), and 2) determine if OAE measures (and presumably ICP) are responsive to lower body negative pressure and to spaceflight. METHODS: Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) were recorded preflight using the Otoport Advance OAE system (Otodynamics Ltd., Hatfield, UK). Data were collected in four conditions (seated, supine, 15 degrees head down tilt (HDT), and 15 degrees HDT with lower body negative pressure (LBNP)) to produce a range of ICP in each subject and test the susceptibility of OAEs to LBNP. LBNP was induced using the Russian Chibis suit to produce the same fit and pressures that would be experienced inflight during Chibis LBNP trials. Similar trials have occurred inflight on the ISS. A comparative analysis of preflight and inflight phase measurements and magnitudes was completed in both broad and narrow band frequency ranges. RESULTS: TEOAE data demonstrated notable phase shifts from 859-1640 Hz when the seated baseline condition is compared to supine, HDT, and HDT plus Chibis conditions. Changes were particularly pronounced at low frequencies and were consistent with the expected ICP changes. Preflight DPOAE magnitude data revealed changes consistent with increased ICP in two conditions at 1414 Hz, where a magnitude change (relative to the seated condition) was seen in the HDT position and in HDT plus Chibis. DISCUSSION: OAEs revealed systematic changes in phase and magnitude throughout all test conditions (including use of Chibis LBNP) that were consistent with ICP changes. Results indicate that OAEs may provide a rapid noninvasive means of monitoring ICP changes. The first two subjects are projected to complete inflight testing on the ISS in early 2016, with the full complement of 10 subjects scheduled to be complete in 2018.

Melgoza, R.↗
NASA NTRS2022

Noninvasive Indicators of Intracranial Pressure Before, During, and After Long-Duration Spaceflight

Weightlessness induces a cephalad shift of blood and cerebrospinal fluid that may increase intracranial pressure (ICP) during spaceflight, while lower body negative pressure (LBNP) may provide an opportunity to caudally redistribute fluids and lower ICP. To investigate the effects of spaceflight and LBNP on noninvasive indicators of ICP (nICP), we studied thirteen crewmembers before and after spaceflight in seated, supine, and 15° head-down tilt postures, and at ~45 and ~150 days of spaceflight with and without 25 mmHg LBNP. We used 4 techniques to quantify nICP: cerebral and cochlear fluid pressure (CCFP), otoacoustic emissions (OAE), ultrasound measures of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), and ultrasound-based internal jugular vein pressure (IJVp). On flight day 45, two nICP measures were lower than preflight supine posture (CCFP: mean difference -98.5 -nl [CI: -190.8 to -6.1 -nl], p = 0.037]; OAE: -19.7 degrees [CI: -10.4 to -29.1 degrees], p < 0.001), but not significantly different from preflight seated measures. Conversely, ONSD was not different than any preflight posture, whereas IJVp was significantly greater than preflight seated measures (14.3 mmHg [CI: 10.1 to 18.5mmHg], p < 0.001), but not significantly different than preflight supine measures. During spaceflight, acute LBNP application did not cause a significant change in nICP indicators. These data suggest that during spaceflight nICP is not elevated above values observed in the seated posture on Earth. Invasive measures would be needed to provide absolute ICP values and more precise indications of ICP change during various phases of spaceflight.

Jessica V. Jasien↗
NASA NTRS2001

Acoustic Issues in Human Spaceflight

NASA is concerned about acute effect of sound on crew performance on International Space Station (ISS), and is developing strategies to assess and reduce acute, chronic, and delayed effects of sound. High noise levels can cause headaches, irritation, fatigue, impaired sleep, headache, and tinnitus and have resulted in an inability to hear alarms. Speech intelligibility may be more impaired for crew understanding non-native language in a noisy environment. No hearing loss occurred, but significant effects on crew performance and communication occurred. Permanent Threshold Shifts (PTS) have not been observed in the US shuttle program. Russian specification for noise in spacecraft is 60 dBA (awake) and 50 dBA (asleep) while the U.S. noise specification on ISS is NC 50 (awake) and NC 40 (asleep) with a 85 dBA hazard limit. Background noise levels of ISS modules have measured 56-69 dBA. Treadmill exercise operations measure 77 dBA. Alarms are required to be 20 dBA above ambient. Hearing protection is recommended when noise exceeds 60 dB 24 hour Leq. Countermeasures include hearing protection and design/ engineering controls. Advanced composite materials with excellent low frequency attenuation properties could be applied as a barrier protection around noisy equipment, or used on personal protective equipment worn by the crew. Hearing protection countermeasures include foam ear inserts, passive muff headsets, and active noise reduction headsets. Oto-acoustic emissions (OAE) could be used to monitor effectiveness of hearing protection countermeasures and tailor hearing protection countermeasures to individual crewmembers. Micro-gravity, vibration, toxic fumes, air quality/composition, stress, temperature, physical exertion or some combination of the above factors may have interacted with moderate long-term noise exposure to cause significant hearing loss. Longitudinal studies will need to address what co-morbidity factors, such as radiation, toxicology, microgravity effects (fluid shift), aging, are involved with hearing loss.

Clark, Jonathan B.↗