Selection of an electrical power system for the earth orbital space station
Earth orbital space station electrical power systems, discussing power sources, effect on structural configuration, environmental control and launch and resupply operations
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Earth orbital space station electrical power systems, discussing power sources, effect on structural configuration, environmental control and launch and resupply operations
Orbital space station utilization planning as international laboratory, discussing industry role, experiment program goals, etc
Multipurpose, manned orbital space station, discussing operational, configurational and human factors as well as necessary launch vehicle
The orbit maintenance problem is examined for two low-earth-orbiting space station concepts - the large, manned Space Operations Center (SOC) and the smaller, unmanned Science and Applications Space Platform (SASP). Atmospheric drag forces are calculated, and circular orbit altitudes are selected to assure a 90 day decay period in the event of catastrophic propulsion system failure. Several thrusting strategies for orbit maintenance are discussed. Various chemical and electric propulsion systems for orbit maintenance are compared on the basis of propellant resupply requirements, power requirements, Shuttle launch costs, and technology readiness.
Manned earth orbital space station systems, noting ground fitted S-4B station for transitional and intermediate stations and space missions
The International Space Station (ISS) is now a reality with the start of a permanent human presence on board. Radiation presents a serious risk to the health and safety of the astronauts, and there is a clear requirement for estimating their exposures prior to and after flights. Predictions of the dose rate at times other than solar minimum or solar maximum have not been possible, because there has been no method to calculate the trapped-particle spectrum at intermediate times. Over the last few years, a tissue-equivalent proportional counter (TEPC) has been flown at a fixed mid-deck location on board the Space Shuttle in 51.65 degrees inclination flights. These flights have provided data that cover the expected changes in the dose rates due to changes in altitude and changes in solar activity from the solar minimum to the solar maximum of the current 23rd solar cycle. Based on these data, a simple function of the solar deceleration potential has been derived that can be used to predict the galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) dose rates to within +/-10%. For altitudes to be covered by the ISS, the dose rate due to the trapped particles is found to be a power-law function, rho(-2/3), of the atmospheric density, rho. This relationship can be used to predict trapped dose rates inside these spacecraft to +/-10% throughout the solar cycle. Thus, given the shielding distribution for a location inside the Space Shuttle or inside an ISS module, this approach can be used to predict the combined GCR + trapped dose rate to better than +/-15% for quiet solar conditions.
In using the Space Station as a point of departure for interplanetary missions, the precission of its orbit complicates the process of determining the available departure period. The constantly changing ascending node of the Space Station orbit defines the departure geometry. Severe Delta V penalties occur if favorable departure opportunities are missed and a plane change is required at departure. This paper compares two strategies to reduce the cost of the plane change maneuver, and increase the available departure opportunities. A 3-impulse injection strategy is compared to a deep space plane change for two asteroid rendezvous missions. Results indicate that the deep space plane change strategy has lower propellant mass requirements for the two missions studied. The difference in propellant requirements for the two strategies is a function of the departure geometry.
Orbital space station design for permanent residence within earth-orbital payload capacity of Saturn V launch vehicle
Nuclear power for manned orbital space stations
Representative space based orbital transfer vehicles (OTV), ground based vehicle turnaround assessment, functional operational requirements and facilities, mission turnaround operations, a comparison of ground based versus space based tasks, activation of servicing facilities prior to IOC, fleet operations requirements, maintenance facilities, OTV servicing facilities, space station support requirements, and packaging for delivery are discussed.
Design configurations for orbiting space stations
Flight control system for manned orbital space station using momentum storage devices and reaction control to counteract gravity effects and aerodynamic disturbances
Maximum noise levels for manned orbiting space stations
Nuclear power systems for manned orbiting space stations, noting Brayton aggregate and NASA objectives
Nuclear power systems for manned orbiting space stations, noting Brayton aggregate and NASA objectives
Logistic systems for orbiting space stations based on apollo spacecraft
Analog study of passive thermal behavior of orbiting space station
Space radiation protection system for near earth manned orbital space stations