Search NASASearch

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “PANEL FLUTTER”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

A finite element method for nonlinear panel flutter

Panel flutter is the self excited oscillations of a plate in supersonic flow. Linear theory gives no information about the panel's deflections and stresses. Hence, the service life of the panel cannot be predicted by linear methods. Nonlinear structural theory determines the limit cycle oscillating frequency, and also panel deflections and stresses. Panel fatigue life, therefore, can be predicted. For a more thorough understanding of panel flutter behavior, the geometric nonlinearity effects due to large deflections must be considered in the formulation. The Galerkin's method was used in the investigation of limit cycle oscillations of panels in supersonic flow in the spatial domain, and the panel deflections. All nonlinear flutter methods and results presently available were limited to a linear or linearized aerodynamic theory. Extension of the finite element flutter formulation to include nonlinear hypersonic aerodynamic loading and finite element nonlinear panel flutter results are presented.

Mei, Chuh

Temperature and initial curvature effects in low-density panel flutter

The panel flutter phenomenon is studied assuming free-molecule flow. This kind of analysis is relevant in the case of hypersonic flight vehicles traveling at high altitudes, especially in the leeward portion of the vehicle. In these conditions the aerodynamic shear can be expected to be considerably larger than the pressure at a given point, so that the effects of such a loading are incorporated into the structural model. Both the pressure and shear loadings are functions of the panel temperature, which can lead to great variations on the location of the stability boundaries for parametric studies. Different locations can, however, be 'collapsed' onto one another by using as ordinate an appropriately normalized dynamic pressure parameter. This procedure works better for higher values of the panel temperature for a fixed undisturbed flow temperature. Finally, the behavior of the system is studied when the panel has some initial curvature. This leads to the conclusion that it may be unrealistic to try to distinguish between a parabolic or sinusoidal initial shape.

Resende, Hugo B.

Hypersonic panel flutter in a rarefied atmosphere

Panel flutter is a form of dynamic aeroelastic instability resulting from the interaction between motion of an aircraft structural panel and the aerodynamic loads exerted on that panel by air flowing past one of the faces. It differs from lifting surface flutter in the sense that it is not usually catastrophic, the panel's motion being limited by nonlinear membrane stresses produced by the transverse displacement. Above some critical airflow condition, the linear instability grows to a limit cycle . The present investigation studies panel flutter in an aerodynamic regime known as 'free molecule flow', wherein intermolecular collisions can be neglected and loads are caused by interactions between individual molecules and the bounding surface. After collision with the panel, molecules may be reflected specularly or reemitted in diffuse fashion. Two parameters characterize this process: the 'momentum accommodation coefficient', which is the fraction of the specularly reflected molecules; and the ratio between the panel temperature and that of the free airstream. This model is relevant to the case of hypersonic flight vehicles traveling at very high altitudes and especially for panels oriented parallel to the airstream or in the vehicle's lee. Under these conditions the aerodynamic shear stress turns out to be considerably larger than the surface pressures, and shear effects must be included in the model. This is accomplished by means of distributed longitudinal and bending loads. The former can cause the panel to buckle. In the example of a simply-supported panel, it turns out that the second mode of free vibration tends to dominate the flutter solution, which is carried out by a Galerkin analysis. Several parametric studies are presented. They include the effects of (1) temperature ratio; (2) momentum accommodation coefficient; (3) spring parameters, which are associated with how the panel is connected to adjacent structures; (4) a parameter which relates compressive end load to its value which would cause classical column buckling; (5) a parameter proportional to the pressure differential between the front and back faces; and (6) initial curvature. The research is completed by an investigation into the possibility of accounting for molecular collisions, which proves to be infeasible given the speeds of current mainframe supercomputers.

Resende, Hugo B.

Some Experimental Studies of Panel Flutter at Mach Number 1.3

Experimental studies of panel flutter using thin metal plates were conducted at a Mach number of 1.3 to verify its existence and to study the effects of some structural parameters on the flutter characteristics. The effects of tensile forces and buckling were studied on panels clamped front and rear, in addition to initially buckled panels clamped on all four edges. Panel flutter was obtained under controlled laboratory conditions and it was found that tensile forces, shortening the panels, and increasing the bending stiffness were effective means for eliminating flutter. Buckled panels were more susceptible to flutter than unbuckled panels. No apparent systematic trends in the flutter modes or frequencies could be observed.

VIBRATION AND FLUTTER

Panel flutter

Criteria are presented for the prediction of panel flutter, determination of its occurrence, design for its prevention, and evaluation of its severity. Theoretical analyses recommended for the prediction of flutter stability boundaries, vibration amplitudes, and frequencies for several types of panels are described. Vibration tests and wind tunnel tests are recommended for certain panels and environmental flow conditions to provide information for design of verification analysis. Appropriate design margins on flutter stability boundaries are given and general criteria are presented for evaluating the severity of possible short-duration, limited-amplitude panel flutter on nonreusable vehicles.

Dowell, E. H.

Finite element two-dimensional panel flutter at high supersonic speeds and elevated temperature

A consistent finite element formulation for flutter of two-dimensional panels including effects of temperature variation along panel length is presented. The von Karman nonlinear strain-displacement relation is used to account for the large-deflections, and the quasi-steady first-order piston theory is employed for aerodynamic loading in the finite-element formulation. The panel flutter under combined thermal/aerodynamic loading can be separated into solving two problems in sequence. They are: (1) postbuckling deflection, stresses and buckling stability boundary, and (2) critical dynamic pressure and linear flutter boundary. The solution procedures in solving these problems are presented in detail. Finite element results of two-dimensional panels with uniform temperature change are compared with classic analytical solutions. Influence of nonuniform temperature distributions on critical buckling temperature, flutter deflection and stresses, and flutter boundary is also given.

Xue, David Y.