Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “POSIX Semantics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

VerifyIO: Ensuring Correctness of Consistency Semantics in Parallel I/O

Abstract—High-performance computing (HPC) applications generate and consume substantial amounts of data, typically managed by parallel file systems. These applications access file systems either through the POSIX interface or by using highlevel I/O libraries. While the POSIX consistency model remains dominant in HPC, emerging file systems and popular I/O libraries increasingly adopt alternative consistency models that relax semantics in various ways, creating significant challenges for correctness and portability. This paper addresses these challenges by proposing a trace-driven I/O consistency verification workflow, implemented in our open-source tool, VerifyIO, which collects execution traces, detects data conflicts, and verifies proper synchronization against specified consistency models. Our extensive evaluation of 91 test case executions across three widely used I/O libraries with four I/O consistency models reveals critical consistency issues at both application and implementation levels.

Consistency Semantics↗
DOE OSTI2025

VerifyIO: Verifying Adherence to Parallel I/O Consistency Semantics

VerifyIO is a tool designed for verifying I/O consistency semantics in High-Performance Computing (HPC) applications. It addresses the challenges of ensuring correctness and portability across different I/O consistency models, such as POSIX, Commit, Session, and MPI-IO. By analyzing execution traces, detecting conflicts, and verifying synchronization adherence, VerifyIO provides actionable insights for both application developers and I/O library designers.

Wang, Chen [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory↗
DOE OSTI2024

Formal Definitions and Performance Comparison of Consistency Models for Parallel File Systems

The semantics of HPC storage systems are defined by the consistency models to which they abide. Storage consistency models have been less studied than their counterparts in memory systems, with the exception of the POSIX standard and its strict consistency model. The use of POSIX consistency imposes a performance penalty that becomes more significant as the scale of parallel file systems increases and the access time to storage devices, such as node-local solid storage devices, decreases. While some efforts have been made to adopt relaxed storage consistency models, these models are often defined informally and ambiguously as by-products of a particular implementation. Here in this work, we establish a connection between memory consistency models and storage consistency models and revisit the key design choices of storage consistency models from a high-level perspective. Further, we propose a formal and unified framework for defining storage consistency models and a layered implementation that can be used to easily evaluate their relative performance for different I/O workloads. Finally, we conduct a comprehensive performance comparison of two relaxed consistency models on a range of commonly seen parallel I/O workloads, such as checkpoint/restart of scientific applications and random reads of deep learning applications. We demonstrate that for certain I/O scenarios, a weaker consistency model can significantly improve the I/O performance. For instance, in small random reads that are typically found in deep learning applications, session consistency achieved a 5x improvement in I/O bandwidth compared to commit consistency, even at small scales.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2020

Analysis of Threading Libraries for High Performance Computing

With the appearance of multi-/many core machines, applications and runtime systems have evolved in order to exploit the new on-node concurrency brought by new software paradigms. POSIX threads (Pthreads) was widely-adopted for that purpose and it remains as the most used threading solution in current hardware. Lightweight thread (LWT) libraries emerged as an alternative offering lighter mechanisms to tackle the massive concurrency of current hardware. In this article, we analyze in detail the most representative threading libraries including Pthread- and LWT-based solutions. In addition, to examine the suitability of LWTs for different use cases, we develop a set of microbenchmarks consisting of OpenMP patterns commonly found in current parallel codes, and we compare the results using threading libraries and OpenMP implementations. Moreover, we study the semantics offered by threading libraries in order to expose the similarities among different LWT application programming interfaces and their advantages over Pthreads. This article exposes that LWT libraries outperform solutions based on operating system threads when tasks and nested parallelism are required.

GLT↗
DOE OSTI2020

Ad Hoc File Systems for High-Performance Computing

Storage backends of parallel compute clusters are still based mostly on magnetic disks, while newer and faster storage technologies such as flash-based SSDs or non-volatile random access memory (NVRAM) are deployed within compute nodes. Including these new storage technologies into scientific workflows is unfortunately today a mostly manual task, and most scientists therefore do not take advantage of the faster storage media. One approach to systematically include nodelocal SSDs or NVRAMs into scientific workflows is to deploy ad hoc file systems over a set of compute nodes, which serve as temporary storage systems for single applications or longer-running campaigns. This paper presents results from the Dagstuhl Seminar 17202 “Challenges and Opportunities of User-Level File Systems for HPC” and discusses application scenarios as well as design strategies for ad hoc file systems using node-local storage media. The discussion includes open research questions, such as how to couple ad hoc file systems with the batch scheduling environment and how to schedule stage-in and stage-out processes of data between the storage backend and the ad hoc file systems. Also presented are strategies to build ad hoc file systems by using reusable components for networking and how to improve storage device compatibility. Various interfaces and semantics are presented, for example those used by the three ad hoc file systems BeeOND, GekkoFS, and BurstFS. Their presentation covers a range from file systems running in production to cutting-edge research focusing on reaching the performance limits of the underlying devices.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗