SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “PROPELLANT BINDER”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 records

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2023

Swelling and permeability effects during propellant cookoff

Large rocket motors may violently explode when exposed to accidental fires. Even hot metal fragments from a nearby accident may penetrate the propellant and ultimately cause thermal ignition. A mechanistic understanding of heated propellants leading to thermal runaway is a major unsolved problem. Here we show that thermal ignition in propellants can be predicted using a universal cookoff model coupled to a micromechanics pressurization model. Our model predicts the time to thermal ignition in cookoff experiments with variable headspace volumes. Furthermore, we found that experiments with headspace volumes are more prone to deformation which distorts pores and causes increased permeability when the propellant expands into this headspace. Delayed ignition with larger headspace volume correlates with lower headspace pressures during decomposition. We found that our predictions matched experimental measurements best when the initial propellant was impermeable to gas flow rather than being permeable. Similar behavior is expected with other energetic materials with rubbery binders. Our model is validated using data from a separate laboratory. We also present an uncertainty analysis using Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) of thermal ignition caused by a steel fragment embedded in the propellant.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Exploring pressure-dependent inelastic deformation and failure in bonded granular composites: An energetic materials perspective

In polymer-filled granular composites, damage may develop in mechanical loading prior to material failure. Damage mechanisms such as microcracking or plastic deformation in the binder phase can substantially alter the material’s mesostructure. For energetic materials, such as solid propellants and plastic bonded explosives, these mesostructural changes can have far reaching effects including degraded mechanical properties, potentially increased sensitivity to further insults, and changes in expected performance. Unfortunately, predicting damage is nontrivial due to the complex nature of these composites and the entangled interactions between inelastic mechanisms. In this work, we assess the current literature of experimental knowledge, focusing on the pressure-dependent shear response, and propose a simple simulation framework of bonded particles to study four limiting-case material formulations at both meso- and macro-scales. Further, to construct the four cases, we systematically vary the relative interfacial strength between the polymer binder and granular filler phase and also vary the polymer’s glass transition temperature relative to operating temperature which determines how much the binder can plastically deform. These simulations identify key trends in global mechanical response, such as the emergence of strain hardening or softening regimes with increasing pressure which qualitatively resemble experimental results. By quantifying the activation of different inelastic mechanisms, such as bonds breaking and plastically straining, we identify when each mechanism becomes relevant and provide insight into potential origins for changes in mechanical responses. The locations of broken bonds are also used to define larger, mesoscopic cracks to test various metrics of damage. We primarily focus on triaxial compression, but also test the opposite case of triaxial extension to highlight the impact of Lode angle on mechanical behavior.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

DOE OSTI2022

Effect of void positioning on the detonation sensitivity of a heterogeneous energetic material

We show although it is well-established that voids profoundly influence the initiation and reaction behaviors of heterogeneous energetic materials such as polymer-bonded explosives (PBX) and propellants, there has been little study of how void location in different constituents in the microstructures of such materials affect the macroscale behavior. Here, we use three-dimensional (3D) mesoscale simulations to study how void placement within the reactive grains versus the polymer binder influences the shock-to-detonation transition (SDT) in a polymer-bonded explosive. The material studied here has a microstructure comprised of 75% PETN (pentaerythritol tetranitrate) grains and 25% HTPB (hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene) polymer binder by volume. Porosities up to 10% in the form of spherical voids distributed in both the grains and polymer are considered. An Arrhenius reactive burn relation is used to model the chemical kinetics of the PETN grains under shock loading, thereby resolving the heterogeneous detonation behavior of the PBX. The influence of void location on the shock initiation sensitivity of the material is quantitatively ranked by comparing the predicted run distance to detonation (RDD) for each sample. The analysis includes inherent quantification of uncertainties arising from the stochastic variations in the microstructure morphologies and void distributions by using statistically equivalent microstructure sample sets (SEMSS), leading to probabilistic formulations for the RDD as a function of shock pressure. The calculations reveal that the location of voids in the composite microstructure significantly affects the RDD. Specifically, voids exclusively within the grains cause the PBX to be more sensitive (having shorter RDD) than voids in the polymer binder. Unique probabilistic relationships are derived to map the probability of observing RDD for each void location material case, allowing for prediction of initiation behavior anywhere in the shock pressure – RDD space. These findings agree with trends reported in the literature.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗