Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “PROPELLERS - FLIGHT TESTS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Shake Test of a Propeller Test Rig in the 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel

A shake test was conducted to determine the dynamic characteristics of a propeller test rig in the Ames 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel. The rotor off hub transfer function (acceleration per unit force as a function of frequency) was measured in the longitudinal, lateral, and vertical directions for shaft angles of 0 and 90 deg corresponding to propeller and helicopter operation, respectively. The dynamic data are summarized for the configurations tested, giving the following properties for each mode identified: the natural frequency, the hub response at resonance, the damping coefficient, the damping ratio, and the modal mass. The complete transfer functions are presented, and the detailed test results are included.

Johnson, W.↗

NASA Plum Brook's B-2 Test Facility: Thermal Vacuum and Propellant Test Facility

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Glenn Research Center (GRC) Plum Brook Station (PBS) Spacecraft Propulsion Research Facility, commonly referred to as B-2, is NASA's third largest thermal vacuum facility. It is the largest designed to store and transfer large quantities of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen, and is perfectly suited to support developmental testing of upper stage chemical propulsion systems as well as fully integrated stages. The facility is also capable of providing thermal-vacuum simulation services to support testing of large lightweight structures, Cryogenic Fluid Management (CFM) systems, electric propulsion test programs, and other In-Space propulsion programs. A recently completed integrated system test demonstrated the refurbished thermal vacuum capabilities of the facility. The test used the modernized data acquisition and control system to monitor the facility. The heat sink provided a uniform temperature environment of approximately 77 K. The modernized infrared lamp array produced a nominal heat flux of 1.4 kW/sq m. With the lamp array and heat sink operating simultaneously, the thermal systems produced a heat flux pattern simulating radiation to space on one surface and solar exposure on the other surface.

Kudlac, Maureen T.↗

Representative operating charts of propellers tested in the NACA 20-foot propeller-research tunnel

Report presents the results of tests of full-scale propellers made in the 20-foot propeller-research tunnel (PRT) at the Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory. The power coefficients of all dual-rotating propellers in the report represent the sum of the power coefficients of the front and rear propellers and are for the test conditions in which blade angles of the front and rear propellers were set to absorb approximately equal power at peak efficiency only.

Gray, W H↗

Welcome to the Saclay Propeller Testing Center

The history, organization, purpose, and activities of the Saclay Propeller Testing Center is described. A list is provided of all facilities, current and planned, and the types of tests done in each facility are summarized.

Source record↗

Porous wind tunnel corrections for counterrotation propeller testing

Wind tunnel interference corrections have direct impact on measured propeller efficiency. A systematic series of wind tunnel tests was done in the porous-wall NASA Lewis 8- by 6-Foot Wind Tunnel to determine the wind tunnel interference corrections to the NASA Lewis counterrotation propeller test data. The test results were compared with calculations from a potential flow code to determine the interference corrections. At a Mach number of 0.8, the interference corrections resulted in a -0.008 Mach number correction which reduced the counterrotation propeller net efficiency data by 0.46 percent at the reduced Mach number. Additional wind tunnel tests were done to measure the effect of propeller thrust on wind tunnel wall interference. No wall interference corrections due to propeller thrust were found necessary for the high speed counterrotation propeller data obtained in the porous wall NASA Lewis 8- by 6-Foot Wind Tunnel.

Stefko, George L.↗

Porous wind tunnel corrections for counterrotation propeller testing

Wind tunnel interference corrections have direct impact on measured propeller efficiency. A systematic series of wind tunnel tests was done in the porous-wall NASA Lewis 8- by 6-Foot Wind Tunnel to determine the wind tunnel interference corrections to the NASA Lewis counterrotation propeller test data. The test results were compared with calculations from a potential flow code to determine the interference corrections. At a Mach number of 0.8, the interference corrections resulted in a -0.008 Mach number correction which reduced the counterrotation propeller net efficiency data by 0.46 percent at the reduced Mach number. Additional wind tunnel tests were done to measure the effect of propeller thrust on wind tunnel wall interference. No wall interference corrections due to propeller thrust were found necessary for the high speed counterrotation propeller data obtained in the porous wall NASA Lewis 8- by 6-Foot Wind Tunnel.

Stefko, George L.↗

Simulations of the Mars Helicopter Test Propeller in Hover Configuration at Martian Pressure and Air Density

In order to properly validate experimental data, a theoretical model must be generated and converge with the results. Providing possible results for future testing can help experimenters better understand the results they are getting. Certain effects cannot be shown during experimentation, and must therefore be quantified through another means. The Mars Helicopter is currently being tested in the N242 wind tunnel at NASA Ames Research Center, which can reach a density and pressure similar to Mars. A test propeller was analyzed in a computational fluid dynamics solver. The propeller blades were previously modeled, and were simulated in the full experimental setup, which includes the blast shields, rotor stand and tunnel walls, to thoroughly generate the effects of the true testing conditions. Simulations were run using both an isolated hover condition and with the full setup, and results for thrust and total power were quantified. The data generated was used to quantify the impact of the facility on the propeller. These calculations will ultimately be used to help separate these effects from the actual thrust the propeller will generate, this making the data more accurate.

Wagner, Lauren N.↗

Comparison of model propeller tests with airfoil theory

The purpose of the investigation covered by this report was the examination of the degree of approach which may be anticipated between laboratory tests on model airplane propellers and results computed by the airfoil theory, based on tests of airfoils representative of successive blade sections. It is known that the corrections of angles of attack and for aspect ratio, speed, and interference rest either on experimental data or on somewhat uncertain theoretical assumptions. The general situation as regards these four sets of corrections is far from satisfactory, and while it is recognized that occasion exists for the consideration of such corrections, their determination in any given case is a matter of considerable uncertainty. There exists at the present time no theory generally accepted and sufficiently comprehensive to indicate the amount of such corrections, and the application to individual cases of the experimental data available is, at best, uncertain. While the results of this first phase of the investigation are less positive than had been hoped might be the case, the establishment of the general degree of approach between the two sets of results which might be anticipated on the basis of this simpler mode of application seems to have been desirable.

Durand, William F↗

Green Propellant Test Capabilities of the Altitude Combustion Stand at the NASA Glenn Research Center

The NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) is committed to providing simulated altitude rocket test capabilities to NASA programs, other government agencies, private industry partners, and academic partners. A primary facility to support those needs is the Altitude Combustion Stand (ACS). ACS provides the capability to test combustion components at a simulated altitude up to 100,000 ft. (approx.0.2 psia/10 Torr) through a nitrogen-driven ejector system. The facility is equipped with an axial thrust stand, gaseous and cryogenic liquid propellant feed systems, data acquisition system with up to 1000 Hz recording, and automated facility control system. Propellant capabilities include gaseous and liquid hydrogen, gaseous and liquid oxygen, and liquid methane. A water-cooled diffuser, exhaust spray cooling chamber, and multi-stage ejector systems can enable run times up to 180 seconds to 16 minutes. The system can accommodate engines up to 2000-lbf thrust, liquid propellant supply pressures up to 1800 psia, and test at the component level. Engines can also be fired at sea level if needed. The NASA GRC is in the process of modifying ACS capabilities to enable the testing of green propellant (GP) thrusters and components. Green propellants are actively being explored throughout government and industry as a non-toxic replacement to hydrazine monopropellants for applications such as reaction control systems or small spacecraft main propulsion systems. These propellants offer increased performance and cost savings over hydrazine. The modification of ACS is intended to enable testing of a wide range of green propellant engines for research and qualification-like testing applications. Once complete, ACS will have the capability to test green propellant engines up to 880 N in thrust, thermally condition the green propellants, provide test durations up to 60 minutes depending on thrust class, provide high speed control and data acquisition, as well as provide advanced imaging and diagnostics such as infrared (IR) imaging.

Testing↗

Propeller Tests to Determine the Effect of Number of Blades at Two Typical Solidities

Propellers with equal total blade area, but with different numbers, were tested at Stanford University. The tests show generally that, for equal total blade area, propellers with the larger number of blades absorb the greater power and, provided hubs have equal drag, develop the higher efficiency. It is shown that the differences found are in agreement, qualitatively, with what might be predicted from simple blade-element theory.

Lesley, E P↗

The application of propeller test data to design and performance calculations

This report is a study of a test data on a family of Durand's propellers (nos. 3, 7, 11, 82, 113, 139), which is fairly representative of conventional design. The test data are so plotted that the proper pitch and diameters for any given set of conditions are readily obtained. The same data are plotted in other forms which may be used for calculating performance when the ratio of pitch to diameter is known. These new plots supply a means for calculating the performance, at any altitude, of airplanes equipped with normal or supercharged engines. The coefficients used and the methods of plotting adopted in this report coordinate the results of a few tests into complete families of curves covering the entire range of p/d ordinarily used. This method of analyzing test data enables an investigator to plan tests systematically and leads to useful application of test data.

Diehl, Walter S↗

Propeller design - a simple system based on model propeller test data III

This report, the third of a series of four, describes a simple system for designing propellers of a standard form. In this report, the system is based on tests of a family of model propellers of standard Navy form, the data from which have been extended by means of calculations to cover the complete range likely to be found in practice. However, it can be worked out for any family having propellers of one general form.

Wieck, Fred E↗

Rocket Sled Propelled Testing of a Supersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator

Decelerators (IADs) have traditionally been tested in wind tunnels. As the limitations of these test facilities are reached, other avenues must be pursued. The IAD being tested is a Supersonic IAD (SIAD), which attaches just aft of the heatshield around the perimeter of an entry body. This 'attached torus' SIAD is meant to improve the accuracy of landing for robotic class missions to Mars and allow for potentially increased payloads. The SIAD Design Verification (SDV) test aims to qualify the SIAD by applying a targeted aerodynamic load to the vehicle. While many test architectures were researched, a rocket sled track was ultimately chosen to be the most cost effective way to achieve the desired dynamic pressures. The Supersonic Naval Ordnance Research Track (SNORT) at the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division (NAWCWD) China Lake is a four mile test track, traditionally used for warhead and ejection seat testing. Prior to SDV, inflatable drag bodies have been tested on this particular track. Teams at Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and NAWCWD collaborate together to design and fabricate one of the largest sleds ever built. The SDV sled is comprised of three individual sleds: a Pusher Sled which holds the solid booster rockets, an Item Sled which supports the test vehicle, and a Camera Sled that is pushed in front for in-situ footage and measurements. The JPL-designed Test Vehicle has a full-scale heatshield shape and contains all instrumentation and inflation systems necessary to inflate and test a SIAD. The first campaign that is run at SNORT tested all hardware and instrumentation before the SIAD was ready to be tested. For each of the three tests in this campaign, the number of rockets and top speed was increased and the data analyzed to ensure the hardware is safe at the necessary accelerations and aerodynamic loads.

Supersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerators (SI↗