Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Parallel LU factorization”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2017

Basker: Parallel sparse LU factorization utilizing hierarchical parallelism and data layouts

Transient simulation in circuit simulation tools, such as SPICE and Xyce, depend on scalable and robust sparse LU factorizations for efficient numerical simulation of circuits and power grids. As the need for simulations of very large circuits grow, the prevalence of multicore architectures enable us to use shared memory parallel algorithms for such simulations. A parallel factorization is a critical component of such shared memory parallel simulations. We develop a parallel sparse factorization algorithm that can solve problems from circuit simulations efficiently, and map well to architectural features. This new factorization algorithm exposes hierarchical parallelism to accommodate irregular structure that arise in our target problems. It also uses a hierarchical two-dimensional data layout which reduces synchronization costs and maps to memory hierarchy found in multicore processors. We present an OpenMP based implementation of the parallel algorithm in a new multithreaded solver called Basker in the Trilinos framework. Here, we present performance evaluations of Basker on the Intel SandyBridge and Xeon Phi platforms using circuit and power grid matrices taken from the University of Florida sparse matrix collection and from Xyce circuit simulation. Basker achieves a geometric mean speedup of 5.91× on CPU (16 cores) and 7.4× on Xeon Phi (32 cores) relative to state-of-the-art solver KLU. Basker outperforms Intel MKL Pardiso solver (PMKL) by as much as 30× on CPU (16 cores) and 7.5× on Xeon Phi (32 cores) for low fill-in circuit matrices. Furthermore, Basker provides 5.4× speedup on a challenging matrix sequence taken from an actual Xyce simulation.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2019

Distributed-memory lattice H-matrix factorization

We parallelize the LU factorization of a hierarchical low-rank matrix (H-matrix) on a distributed-memory computer. This is much more difficult than the H-matrix-vector multiplication due to the dataflow of the factorization, and it is much harder than the parallelization of a dense matrix factorization due to the irregular hierarchical block structure of the matrix. Block low-rank (BLR) format gets rid of the hierarchy and simplifies the parallelization, often increasing concurrency. However, this comes at a price of losing the near-linear complexity of the H-matrix factorization. In this work, we propose to factorize the matrix using a “lattice H-matrix” format that generalizes the BLR format by storing each of the blocks (both diagonals and off-diagonals) in the H-matrix format. These blocks stored in the H-matrix format are referred to as lattices. Thus, this lattice format aims to combine the parallel scalability of BLR factorization with the near-linear complexity of H-matrix factorization. We first compare factorization performances using the H-matrix, BLR, and lattice H-matrix formats under various conditions on a shared-memory computer. Our performance results show that the lattice format has storage and computational complexities similar to those of the H-matrix format, and hence a much lower cost of factorization than BLR. In conclusion, we then compare the BLR and lattice H-matrix factorization on distributed-memory computers. Our performance results demonstrate that compared with BLR, the lattice format with the lower cost of factorization may lead to faster factorization on the distributed-memory computer.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2023

Brief Announcement: Communication Optimal Sparse LU Factorization for Planar Matrices

We introduce a new parallel algorithm for solving sparse LU factorization of planar matrices, which commonly arise in the finite element method for 2D PDEs. Existing scalable methods, such as the multifrontal approach with subtree-to-subcube mapping by Gupta et al. [1] and right-looking with 3D mapping by Sao et al. [2] fail to achieve optimal communication costs for these matrices. Our new algorithm combines 3D mapping and subtree-to-subcube mapping to minimize communication costs while allowing trade-offs between extra memory and reduced communication. We demonstrate that our proposed algorithm attains the communication lower bound up to a factor of O(log log n) in the memory-optimal case and up to a factor of O(log P) in the memory-independent case for an n-dimensional planar sparse matrix on P processors.

Sao, Piyush↗
NASA NTRS1988

The ijk forms of factorization methods. II - Parallel systems

The paper considers the 'ijk forms' of LU and Cholesky factorization on certain parallel computers. This extends an earlier analysis for vector computers. Attention is restricted to local memory systems with processors that may or may not have vector capability. Special attention is given to bus architectures but qualitative analyses are given for other interconnection systems.

Ortega, J. M.↗
DOE OSTI2025

A two-level GPU-accelerated incomplete LU preconditioner for general sparse linear systems

This paper presents a parallel preconditioning approach based on incomplete LU (ILU) factorizations in the framework of Domain Decomposition (DD) for general sparse linear systems. We focus on distributed memory parallel architectures, specifically, those that are equipped with graphic processing units (GPUs). In addition to block-Jacobi, we present general purpose two-level ILU Schur complement-based approaches, where different strategies are presented to solve the coarse-level reduced system. These strategies are combined with modified ILU methods in the construction of the coarse-level operator, in order to effectively remove smooth errors by targeting an algebraically smooth vector. We leverage available GPU-based sparse matrix kernels to accelerate the setup and the solve phases of the proposed ILU preconditioner. We evaluate the efficiency of the proposed methods as a smoother for algebraic multigrid (AMG) and as a preconditioner for Krylov subspace methods on challenging anisotropic diffusion problems and a collection of general sparse matrices.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
NASA NTRS1994

Parallel Preconditioning for CFD Problems on the CM-5

Up to today, preconditioning methods on massively parallel systems have faced a major difficulty. The most successful preconditioning methods in terms of accelerating the convergence of the iterative solver such as incomplete LU factorizations are notoriously difficult to implement on parallel machines for two reasons: (1) the actual computation of the preconditioner is not very floating-point intensive, but requires a large amount of unstructured communication, and (2) the application of the preconditioning matrix in the iteration phase (i.e. triangular solves) are difficult to parallelize because of the recursive nature of the computation. Here we present a new approach to preconditioning for very large, sparse, unsymmetric, linear systems, which avoids both difficulties. We explicitly compute an approximate inverse to our original matrix. This new preconditioning matrix can be applied most efficiently for iterative methods on massively parallel machines, since the preconditioning phase involves only a matrix-vector multiplication, with possibly a dense matrix. Furthermore the actual computation of the preconditioning matrix has natural parallelism. For a problem of size n, the preconditioning matrix can be computed by solving n independent small least squares problems. The algorithm and its implementation on the Connection Machine CM-5 are discussed in detail and supported by extensive timings obtained from real problem data.

Simon, Horst D.↗
DOE OSTI2024

Impact of Reordering on the LU Factorization Performance of Bordered Block-Diagonal Sparse Matrix

Power engineers rely on computer-based simulation tools to assess grid performance and ensure security. At the core of these tools are solvers for sparse linear equations. When transformed into a bordered block-diagonal (BBD) structure, part of the sparse linear equation solving can be parallelized. This work focuses on using the Schur-complement-based method for LU factorization on BBD matrices, specifically, Jacobian matrices from large-scale systems. Our findings show that the natural ordering method outperforms the default ordering method in computational performance for each block of the BBD matrix. This observation is validated using synthetic 25k-bus and 70k-bus cases, showing a speedup of up to 38% when using natural ordering without permutation. Additionally, the impact of the number of partitions is studied, and the result shows that computational performance improves with more, smaller partitions in the BBD matrices.

BBD matrix↗
DOE OSTI2017

Low-Rank Correction Methods for Algebraic Domain Decomposition Preconditioners

This study presents a parallel preconditioning method for distributed sparse linear systems, based on an approximate inverse of the original matrix, that adopts a general framework of distributed sparse matrices and exploits domain decomposition (DD) and low-rank corrections. The DD approach decouples the matrix and, once inverted, a low-rank approximation is applied by exploiting the Sherman--Morrison--Woodbury formula, which yields two variants of the preconditioning methods. The low-rank expansion is computed by the Lanczos procedure with reorthogonalizations. Numerical experiments indicate that, when combined with Krylov subspace accelerators, this preconditioner can be efficient and robust for solving symmetric sparse linear systems. Comparisons with pARMS, a DD-based parallel incomplete LU (ILU) preconditioning method, are presented for solving Poisson's equation and linear elasticity problems.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2017

Incomplete Sparse Approximate Inverses for Parallel Preconditioning

In this study, we propose a new preconditioning method that can be seen as a generalization of block-Jacobi methods, or as a simplification of the sparse approximate inverse (SAI) preconditioners. The “Incomplete Sparse Approximate Inverses” (ISAI) is in particular efficient in the solution of sparse triangular linear systems of equations. Those arise, for example, in the context of incomplete factorization preconditioning. ISAI preconditioners can be generated via an algorithm providing fine-grained parallelism, which makes them attractive for hardware with a high concurrency level. Finally, in a study covering a large number of matrices, we identify the ISAI preconditioner as an attractive alternative to exact triangular solves in the context of incomplete factorization preconditioning.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2020

Multifrontal Non-negative Matrix Factorization

Non-negative matrix factorization (Nmf) is an important tool in high-performance large scale data analytics with applications ranging from community detection, recommender system, feature detection and linear and non-linear unmixing. While traditional Nmf works well when the data set is relatively dense, however, it may not extract sufficient structure when the data is extremely sparse. Specifically, traditional Nmf fails to exploit the structured sparsity of the large and sparse data sets resulting in dense factors. We propose a new algorithm for performing Nmf on sparse data that we call multifrontal Nmf (Mf-Nmf) since it borrows several ideas from the multifrontal method for unconstrained factorization (e.g. LU and QR). We also present an efficient shared memory parallel implementation of Mf-Nmf and discuss its performance and scalability. We conduct several experiments on synthetic and realworld datasets and demonstrate the usefulness of the algorithm by comparing it against standard baselines. We obtain a speedup of 1.2x to 19.5x on 24 cores with an average speed up of 10.3x across all the real world datasets.

Sao, Piyush↗
DOE OSTI2018

A Communication-Avoiding 3D LU Factorization Algorithm for Sparse Matrices

We propose a new algorithm to improve the strong scalability of right-looking sparse LU factorization on distributed memory systems. Our 3D sparse LU algorithm uses a three-dimensional MPI process grid, aggressively exploits elimination tree parallelism and trades off increased memory for reduced per-process communication. We also analyze the asymptotic improvements for planar graphs (e.g., from 2D grid or mesh domains) and certain non-planar graphs (specifically for 3D grids and meshes). For planar graphs with n vertices, our algorithm reduces communication volume asymptotically in n by a factor of O{log n} and latency by a factor of O{log n}. For non-planar cases, our algorithm can reduce the per-process communication volume by 3× and latency by O{n^1/3} times. In all cases, the memory needed to achieve these gains is a constant factor. We implemented our algorithm by extending the 2D data structure used in superLU. Our new 3D code achieves speedups up to 27× for planar graphs and up to 3.3× for non-planar graphs over the baseline 2D superLU when run on 24,000 cores of a Cray XC30.

Sao, Piyush↗
DOE OSTI2019

A communication-avoiding 3D algorithm for sparse LU factorization on heterogeneous systems

We propose a new algorithm to improve the strong scalability of right-looking sparse LU factorization on distributed memory systems. Our 3D algorithm for sparse LU uses a three-dimensional MPI process grid, exploits elimination tree parallelism, and trades off increased memory for reduced per-process communication. We also analyze the asymptotic improvements for planar graphs (e.g., those arising from 2D grid or mesh discretizations) and certain non-planar graphs (specifically for 3D grids and meshes). For a planar graph with $n$ vertices, our algorithm reduces communication volume asymptotically in $n$ by a factor of $\mathscr{O}$ $\Big(\sqrt{log \ n}\Big)$ and latency by a factor of $\mathscr{O}$ $(log \ n)$. For nonplanar cases, our algorithm can reduce the per-process communication volume by 3× and latency by $\mathscr{O}$ $\Big(n^\frac13\Big)$ times. In all cases, the memory needed to achieve these gains is a constant factor. We implemented our algorithm by extending the 2D data structure used in SuperLU_DIST. Our new 3D code achieves empirical speedups up to 27× for planar graphs and up to 3.3× for non-planar graphs over the baseline 2D SuperLU_DIST when run on 24,000 cores of a Cray XC30. We extend the 3D algorithm for heterogeneous architectures by adding the Highly Asynchronous Lazy Offload (Halo) algorithm for co-processor offload. On 4096 nodes of a Cray XK7 with 32,768 CPU cores and 4096 Nvidia K20x GPUs, the 3D algorithm achieves empirical speedups up to 24× for planar graphs and 3.5× for non-planar graphs over the baseline 2D SuperLU_DIST with co-processor acceleration.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

GSoFa: Scalable Sparse Symbolic LU Factorization on GPUs

Decomposing a matrix $\mathbf {A}$ into a lower matrix $\mathbf {L}$ and an upper matrix $\mathbf {U}$, which is also known as LU decomposition, is an essential operation in numerical linear algebra. For a sparse matrix, LU decomposition often introduces more nonzero entries in the $\mathbf {L}$ and $\mathbf {U}$ factors than in the original matrix. A symbolic factorization step is needed to identify the nonzero structures of $\mathbf {L}$ and $\mathbf {U}$ matrices. Attracted by the enormous potentials of the Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), an array of efforts have surged to deploy various LU factorization steps except for the symbolic factorization, to the best of our knowledge, on GPUs. This article introduces gSoFa, the first GPU-based symbolic factorization design with the following three optimizations to enable scalable LU symbolic factorization for nonsymmetric pattern sparse matrices on GPUs. First, here we introduce a novel fine-grained parallel symbolic factorization algorithm that is well suited for the Single Instruction Multiple Thread (SIMT) architecture of GPUs. Second, we tailor supernode detection into a SIMT friendly process and strive to balance the workload, minimize the communication and saturate the GPU computing resources during supernode detection. Third, we introduce a three-pronged optimization to reduce the excessive space consumption problem faced by multi-source concurrent symbolic factorization. Taken together, gSoFa achieves up to 31× speedup from 1 to 44 Summit nodes (6 to 264 GPUs) and outperforms the state-of-the-art CPU project, on average, by 5×. Notably, gSoFa also achieves up to 47 percent of the peak memory throughput of a V100 GPU in the Summit Supercomputer.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
NASA NTRS1990

Preconditioned conjugate gradient methods for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations

The compressible Navier-Stokes equations are solved for a variety of two-dimensional inviscid and viscous problems by preconditioned conjugate gradient-like algorithms. Roe's flux difference splitting technique is used to discretize the inviscid fluxes. The viscous terms are discretized by using central differences. An algebraic turbulence model is also incorporated. The system of linear equations which arises out of the linearization of a fully implicit scheme is solved iteratively by the well known methods of GMRES (Generalized Minimum Residual technique) and Chebyschev iteration. Incomplete LU factorization and block diagonal factorization are used as preconditioners. The resulting algorithm is competitive with the best current schemes, but has wide applications in parallel computing and unstructured mesh computations.

Venkatakrishnan, V.↗
NASA NTRS1998

A Parallel Non-Overlapping Domain-Decomposition Algorithm for Compressible Fluid Flow Problems on Triangulated Domains

This paper considers an algebraic preconditioning algorithm for hyperbolic-elliptic fluid flow problems. The algorithm is based on a parallel non-overlapping Schur complement domain-decomposition technique for triangulated domains. In the Schur complement technique, the triangulation is first partitioned into a number of non-overlapping subdomains and interfaces. This suggests a reordering of triangulation vertices which separates subdomain and interface solution unknowns. The reordering induces a natural 2 x 2 block partitioning of the discretization matrix. Exact LU factorization of this block system yields a Schur complement matrix which couples subdomains and the interface together. The remaining sections of this paper present a family of approximate techniques for both constructing and applying the Schur complement as a domain-decomposition preconditioner. The approximate Schur complement serves as an algebraic coarse space operator, thus avoiding the known difficulties associated with the direct formation of a coarse space discretization. In developing Schur complement approximations, particular attention has been given to improving sequential and parallel efficiency of implementations without significantly degrading the quality of the preconditioner. A computer code based on these developments has been tested on the IBM SP2 using MPI message passing protocol. A number of 2-D calculations are presented for both scalar advection-diffusion equations as well as the Euler equations governing compressible fluid flow to demonstrate performance of the preconditioning algorithm.

Barth, Timothy J.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Newly Released Capabilities in the Distributed-Memory SuperLU Sparse Direct Solver

We present the new features available in the recent release of SuperLU_DIST, Version 8.1.1. SuperLU_DIST is a distributed-memory parallel sparse direct solver. The new features include (1) a 3D communication-avoiding algorithm framework that trades off inter-process communication for selective memory duplication, (2) multi-GPU support for both NVIDIA GPUs and AMD GPUs, and (3) mixed-precision routines that perform single-precision LU factorization and double-precision iterative refinement. Apart from the algorithm improvements, we also modernized the software build system to use CMake and Spack package installation tools to simplify the installation procedure. Throughout the article, we describe in detail the pertinent performance-sensitive parameters associated with each new algorithmic feature, show how they are exposed to the users, and give general guidance of how to set these parameters. We illustrate that the solver’s performance both in time and memory can be greatly improved after systematic tuning of the parameters, depending on the input sparse matrix and underlying hardware.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗