SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Prismatic modular reactor”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Effect of nonuniform isoflux heating on natural convection heat transfer in a prismatic modular reactor
Not provided.
Axial dispersion and mixing of coolant gas within a separate-effect prismatic modular reactor
Multiphase Reactors Engineering and Applications Laboratory performed gas phase dispersion experiments in a separate-effect cold-flow experimental setup for coolant flow within heated channels of the prismatic modular reactor under accident scenario using gaseous tracer technique. The separate-effect experimental setup was designed on light of local velocity measurements obtained by using hot wire anemometry. The measurements consist of pulse-response of gas tracer that is flowing through the mimicked riser channel using air as a carrier. The dispersion of the gas phase within the separate-effect riser channel was described using one-dimensional axial dispersion model. The axial dispersion coefficient and Peclet number of the coolant gas phase and their residence time distribution within were measured. Effect of heating intensities in terms of heat fluxes on the coolant gas dispersion along riser channels were mimicked in the current study by a certain range of volumetric air flow rate ranging from 0.0015 to 0.0034 m 3 /s which corresponding to heating intensity range from 200 to 1400 W/m 2 . Results confirm a reduction in the response curve spreads is achieved by increasing the volumetric air velocity (representing heating intensity). Also, the results reveal a reduction in values of axial dispersion coefficient with increasing the air volumetric flow rate.
Plenum-to-plenum natural convection heat transfer within a scaled-down prismatic modular reactor facility
Not Available
OECD/NEA COUPLED NEUTRONIC/THERMAL-FLUIDS BENCHMARK OF THE MHTGR-350 MW CORE DESIGN: RESULTS FOR PHASE-I EXERCISE 1
This report presents the results from code-to-code comparisons for a prismatic modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor 350-MW design for steady-state neutron transport calculations. Integral parameters as well as power and flux distributions are provided. Differences between solutions from diffusion and transport operators are analysed. Effects of control rod homogenization between full block and one sixth block are discussed.
Buoyancy-driven air flow within plenum-to-plenum facility down-comer channel
Reliable measurements of thermal and velocity fields were experimentally investigated under different natural circulation intensities in a dual channel facility designed and developed with a representative geometry of prismatic modular reactor core. Experiments were conducted under steady state conditions to obtain statistically stationary time series signals of temperature and velocity. Insignificant radial temperature variation was observed along the down-comer channel implying that the majority of supplied heat is removed through the upper plenum. Velocity results obtained emphasize the delicate nature of natural circulation phenomena in terms of flow destabilization, and recirculation penetration length. Observed air velocity distribution reveals that downward velocity is proportional to the extent of cooling applied to the setup. The calculated values of the dimensionless group Froude number ( Fr ) in the range of 2 to 10 indicate that air is dominated by momentum and is exiting the channel as a jet. Quantification of turbulent intensities implies that flow destabilization is noticeable along the down-comer channel particularly for the case of high cooling intensity. For 5 °C cooling water temperature, turbulent intensity ($v$ rms / $v$) peaks at the mid-channel (z/L = 0.5) reaching a value of 0.5. This value of turbulent intensity is much higher than the inlet (z/L = 0.96) and outlet (z/L = 0.04) turbulent intensities of 0.2 and 0.06 respectively. This destabilization is because of the flow reversal and heat conduction effects through stainless steel flanges connecting both channels. In conclusion, current results provide detailed velocity and temperature variation which can be useful for validating computational fluid dynamics codes.
High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors: Core Design
General Attributes of Modular Prismatic and Pebble Bed HTGRs Common features and physics Neutronics Thermal-Fluidics Plant Systems and Power Conversion Instrumentation and Control Normal Operation and Power Maneuvers
Issue Summary of INL Phase IV Transient Results for IAEA CRP on HTGR UAM Benchmark
This report details the Parallel and Highly Innovative Simulation for Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Code System (PHISICS)/Reactor Excursions and Leak Analysis Program (RELAP5)-3D results obtained for the transient core exercises defined for Phase IV of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Coordinated Research Project (CRP) on high-temperature gas cooled reactor (HTGR) uncertainty analysis in modeling (UAM). The Phase III models and results are linked to the earlier Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation (SCALE)/Sampler/New ESC-based Weighting Transport (NEWT) data generated for the lattice physics (lattice) stage Phase I of the CRP. The focus of this report is the Uncertainty/Sensitivity Assessment (U/SA) of the prismatic modular high-temperature gas cooled reactor (MHTGR)-350 design, and specifically for Exercises IV-1 and IV-2 of the benchmark: the Control Rod Withdrawal (CRW) and Pressurised Loss of Cooling (PLOFC) events. The statistical U/SA methodology is implemented and demonstrated using the RAVEN code, based on perturbed cross-section libraries obtained from the SCALE/Sampler sequence. Uncertainties in nuclear data (cross-sections and the average number of neutrons produced per fission, 235U[¯v ]) lead to standard deviations (uncertainties of one s) of approximately 0.5% in the core eigenvalues of the MHTGR-350 and core models. For the coupled neutronics/thermal fluid model, local power density uncertainties up to 3.6% were observed in the colder regions of the core, while the local maximum fuel temperature uncertainties reached 1.5% for the models that included thermal fluid uncertainties. The addition of thermal fluid uncertainties dominated the impacts of nuclear data uncertainties in all cases. The main contributors to uncertainties in the power density and fuel temperatures during the transients were uncertainties in the reactor operating conditions (total power, inlet mass flow rate and inlet gas temperature). Variations in the bypass flows did not have significant impact on any of the output variables. For the nuclear data uncertainties it was found that the 235U(¯v ) / 235U(¯v ) covariance produced the largest sensitivities in terms of its impact on the eigenvalue and peak reactor power. It was also observed that the impact of any nuclear data uncertainties on the maximum fuel temperature was much less significant that the impact on eigenvalue and power. Another important finding was that although the use of eight or more energy groups is recommended for best-estimate HTGR simulation, two-group models produced acceptable uncertainty and sensitivity results for most FOMs. Since the statistical U/SA methodology is computationally expensive, and most transient solver requirements will scale directly with the number of energy groups, two energy groups could be used by HTGR developers during the early stages of design when larger uncertainty margins can be tolerated.
IAEA CRP on HTGR UAM: Propagation of Phase I cross section uncertainties to Phase II neutronics steady state using SCALE/SAMPLER and PHISICS/RELAP5-3D
The IAEA Coordinated Research Project (CRP) on High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor (HTGR) Uncertainties in Modeling (UAM) has been actively supported by the HTGR Methods group at Idaho National Laboratory since 2013. The INL team is responsible for the development of the prismatic reactor design exercises, based on the 350 MW General Atomics Modular HTGR (MHTGR). The focus of this paper is the reporting of the INL results obtained for the propagation of the lattice cross section uncertainties to the stand-alone neutronics simulation of the full MHTGR-350 core. For the nominal (i.e. best-estimate) model, a series of fresh and depleted single block and super cell SCALE/KENO and SCALE/NEWT models were developed at INL to assess spectral effects in the MHTGR-350, and a combination of these lattice cells were used to construct 8-group cross section libraries for use in the INL-developed PHISICS/RELAP5-3D code suite. The block-level homogenized libraries were assigned to the 220 fuel zones utilized in the MHTGR-350 PHISICS core model, according to the fresh and mixed fresh/depleted core loading pattern. A set of 1,000 perturbed NEWT lattice and PHISICS/RELAP5-3D core calculations were performed using the stochastic sampling module SAMPLER in SCALE 6.2. The paper discusses the mean and standard deviation values obtained for the eigenvalue, power offset and peak axial power density uncertainty results for this sequence of 1,000 lattice-to-core MHTGR-350 simulations.
RELAP5-3D Capabilities for High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Analysis
RELAP5-3D is the premier systems thermal-hydraulic code in the world. The code has been used significantly for high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) analyses over the last 10 years, but there has not been a comprehensive summary of RELAP5-3D capabilities and methods for HTGR modeling. In this paper, we provide a guide for how novice users can build models for prismatic HTGRs. This guide includes best practices for developing heat structures and setting up radiation and conduction heat transfer. We also provide a summary of relevant validation studies. These studies are divided into three categories: separate effects tests, integral effects tests, and nuclear reactor studies. We present a comprehensive review of RELAP5-3D HTGR applications for reactor modeling over the last 10 years. These applications include work for the Modular High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor benchmark, design activities for a prismatic HTGR as part of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Advanced Demonstration and Test Reactor Options Study, and studies performed to design gas-cooled microreactors. Following the comprehensive literature review, we present a gap analysis highlighting capabilities of RELAP5-3D that are available and missing for a complete analysis of HTGR thermal hydraulics. We also discuss the limitations of existing code capabilities and potential improvements that could improve analyses. Current research efforts have yet to fully validate RELAP5-3D for a prismatic HTGR analysis; however, some of this is attributable to confounding factors in the available experimental data as opposed to code capabilities. In conclusion, this paper presents the most comprehensive review to date on RELAP5-3D capabilities, limitations, and applications for HTGR analysis.
RELAP5-3D Modeling of High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF)
HTTF at Oregon State University (OSU) Reference: General Atomics? modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor Helium cooled, electrically heated Prismatic graphite blocks in the core and reflectors Alumina ceramic blocks are used to simulate the core and top and bottom reflectors One-fourth scale in length and diameter Most of the coolant channels in the core are full scale Lower pressure compared to the prototype reactor Over 500 instruments Designed primarily to investigate depressurized conduction cooldown (DCC) transients
Identification and Characterization of Thermal Fluid Phenomena Associated with Selected Operating/Accident Scenarios in Modular High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors
Dominant phenomena are identified and characterized for the loss-of-forced-convection (LOFC) scenario, the depressurized loss-of-forced-convection (DLOFC) scenario, and the moisture ingress scenario with relief valves available scenario. These scenarios are considered for the modular high temperature gas-cooled reactor (MHTGR) baseline design—with both a prismatic core and a pebble-bed core. The objectives of this effort, described in the above paragraph, were achieved by following a methodology identified by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and recommended in their Regulatory Guide 1.203. The methodology employed is described. For the above scenarios, baseline phenomena identification and ranking tables (PIRTs) generated by a NRC-sponsored effort in 2008 for the LOFC and DLOFC scenarios and a baseline PIRT generated by a Department of Energy-sponsored effort in 2011 by their Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) Moisture Ingress Assessment Committee were used to identify the dominant phenomena and existing levels-of-knowledge. Ten dominant phenomena (with only medium or low levels-of-knowledge) were identified for the LOFC and DLOFC scenarios including: (1) Inlet plenum stratification and plumes, (2) core coolant flow distribution, (3) radiant heat transfer from the top of the core to the upper vessel head, (4) reactor cavity air circulation and heat transfer, (5) reactor cavity cooling system behavior, (6) decay heat distributions, (7) core effective thermal conductivity, (8) molecular diffusion in air ingress DLOFC, (9) duct exchange flow, (10) phenomena that affect cavity gas composition for air-ingress. Five dominant phenomena, with high levels of knowledge, were identified for the moisture-ingress scenario with relief valves available including: (1) flow through break, (2) moisture level in the primary, (3) transport to moisture monitor, (4) moisture monitor instrument response, and (5) heat removal by shutdown cooling system. These phenomena are discussed and characterized. A listing of experiments—both completed and ongoing—is given with a view toward including data useful for further more detailed examination of the dominant phenomena listed in the previous paragraph. Note that only data for the LOFC and DLOFC scenarios are listed—since the moisture ingress scenario with relief valves available –have been identified as having adequate levels-of-knowledge by the PIRT committee. Finally, a preliminary computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculation of inlet plenum stratification and plumes is described. Techniques employed for this calculation are typical for preliminary scoping calculations performed to validate numeric tools.
RELAP5-3D Modeling of the OECD-NEA HTTF Benchmark
HTTF at Oregon State University (OSU) Reference: General Atomics’ modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor Helium cooled, electrically heated (2.2 MW) Prismatic graphite blocks in the core and reflectors Alumina ceramic blocks are used to simulate the core and top and bottom reflectors One-fourth scale in length and diameter Most of the coolant channels in the core are full scale Lower pressure compared to the prototype reactor (0.7 MPa) Over 500 instruments Designed primarily to investigate depressurized (DCC) and pressurized (PCC) conduction cooldown transients
Modular high temperature gas reactor core modeling with RELAP5-3D/PHISICS – Optimization schemes for load following
The objective of this study is to develop a 3D/NK model to study the load following operation of a Modular High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (MHTGR). The selected design is the 350 MW prismatic, graphite moderated, helium cooled thermal reactor based on the MHTGR-350 transient benchmark led by the High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) Methods Core Simulation Group at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) in the framework of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA). This kind of reactor usually reacts very slowly to the perturbation of the core parameters due to the large amount of graphite in the core. This kind of behavior promotes the reactor stability but on the other hand limits the reactor load-following operability. Recently advances in gas reactor designs have made load-following in gas reactors a feasible and achievable goal. Modern nuclear reactors (such as the MHTGR-350) are designed to withstand the structural stresses associated with load-following. Operating the reactor in load-following mode will inevitably reduce the load factor. Although a higher load factor means more revenue and the best usage of the fuel, following the variable energy demand will increase the maximum achievable fraction of generated nuclear power, being no more limited to the base load power generation. In general, if low impact on material aging and the safe operability are demonstrated the plant economics will be minimally affected. In order to ensure that the system can be safely operated in a load-following mode an extensively study has been carried out. Some tests with linear coolant mass flow rate change demonstrated that the reactor behavior is suitable for operation in load following mode. This assumption has been confirmed by a 4 days load following transient test in which the reactor supplied the requested power with a negligible error.
Modeling of Prismatic High Temperature Reactors in Pronghorn
Pronghorn is a Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) based thermal-hydraulics code developed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) for advanced reactor analysis. It has been previously applied to model Pebble-Bed High Temperature Reactors (High Temperature Reactor (HTR)s), Liquid-Metal Cooled Reactors, and Molten Salt Reactors, among others. This work applies the coarse-mesh thermal hydraulics capabilities in Pronghorn to model Prismatic-Core HTRs. In particular, the Oregon State University (OSU)’s High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) is modeled with Pronghorn. The HTTF is a 1:4 height scaled-down facility of General Atomics’ Modular High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor.
IAEA Coordinated Research Project on HTGR Physics, Thermal Hydraulics, and Depletion Uncertainty Analysis: PHISICS/RELAP5-3D Results for the Phase III Coupled Core Exercises
This report details the Parallel and Highly Innovative Simulation for INL Code System (PHISICS)/Reactor Excursions and Leak Analysis Program (RELAP5)-3D results obtained for the neutronics stand-alone core exercises defined for Phase II of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Coordinated Research Project (CRP) on high-temperature gas cooled reactor (HTGR) uncertainty analysis in modeling (UAM). The Phase II models and results are linked to the earlier Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation (SCALE)/Sampler/New ESC-based Weighting Transport (NEWT) data generated for the lattice physics (lattice) stage Phase I of the CRP. The focus of this report is the propagation of cross-section uncertainties from the lattice to the core calculation (core) phase of the prismatic 350 megawatt (MW) General Atomics (GA) Modular HTGR (MHTGR). The Phase II neutronics exercises consist of two sub-cases (II-2a and II-2b) specified for the fresh and mixed core loading of the MHTGR-350 prismatic high-temperature reactor design. Exercises II-2a and II-2b are performed without temperature feedback using isothermal temperature profiles. For the nominal lattice physics (i.e., best-estimate) model, a series of fresh and depleted single block and super cell SCALE/KENO and SCALE/NEWT models were developed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to assess the impact of spectral effects on the few-group cross sections. A combination of these lattice cells were used in a super cell calculation to construct 8-group cross-section libraries for use in the INL-developed PHISICS/RELAP5-3D code suite. The block-level homogenized libraries were assigned to the 220 fuel zones utilized in the MHTGR-350 PHISICS core model, according to the fresh and mixed fresh/depleted core loading pattern. In order to evaluate the effect of uncertainty propagation, several sets consisting of 1,000 perturbed NEWT lattice and PHISICS/RELAP5-3D core calculations were performed using the SCALE 6.2 ENDF/B-VII.1 cross-section co-variance data and the stochastic sampling module Sampler in SCALE 6.2.0. The Figures of Merit (FOM) investigated include the mean and standard deviation uncertainty values obtained for the eigenvalues, control rod worth values, block-averaged power profiles, power axial offsets, and isothermal temperature feedback coefficients. A sensitivity study on the main nuclide reaction contributors to the FOM uncertainties has not yet been performed since the SCALE/PHISICS/RAVEN coupling with ENDF/B-VII co-variance data is still being developed. It was found that uncertainties in the cross sections lead to uncertainties in the local power values of up to 1.5%. The variances between the fresh and mixed/depleted core models are not as large as the axial variations between the top and bottom within each core model. The core eigenvalue uncertainty is approximately 0.5%, which is significant in comparison to typical eigenvalue difference targets (less than ~0.1% for LWRs). The power peaking and axial offset uncertainties are smaller (0.10% – 0.15%) and probably below the level of significance in typical core design metrics. The use of an 8-group energy structure slightly under-estimates some of the uncertainties, but in absolute terms, the uncertainty results are reasonably close to the 26-group results. The 26- and 8-group mean and nominal results differ by a larger degree, and if it can be afforded in terms of calculation resources, the 26-group structure should be used for HTGR calculations. The 8-group structure can, however, still be useful for reasonably accurate uncertainty assessments of transient cases where computational time is important. It was furthermore found that the use of a super cell during the cross-section generation process for better representation of the spectral environment at the core periphery did not lead to significant changes in the core eigenvalues, axial offset, and power peaking uncertainties. The impact of the super cell cross sections on the nominal and mean eigenvalues is, however, important enough (0.6% – 1.1% lower) to justify the use of these super cells for HTGR core simulation to represent the softer spectral environment in the core peripheral regions for nominal best-estimate calculations. The use of super cells for HTGR uncertainty studies is, therefore, not strictly necessary, but the improvements in nominal results could justify their use.