SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Proprotor”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS2024

Fundamental Proprotor Design Considerations

The purpose of this technical memorandum is to document some of the fundamental considerations in the aerodynamic design of a proprotor blade, which include distributions of twist, chord, and thickness. A proprotor is expected to operate efficiently in different speed regimes, such as hover and forward flight, which presents challenges that are unique from designing either rotors or propellers. Operating in hover and at high advance ratios in cruise present conflicting design requirements on the blade's geometry that must be reconciled with the vehicle's mission. Though a proprotor must also fly in edgewise and other non-axial flight phases, these portions of the mission do not typically drive the proprotor's aerodynamic design. This memorandum describes an approach to integrate a blade's twist and chord distributions to provide an aerodynamic performance estimate that could be coupled with other design considerations, such as acoustics or structures. The intended audience for this memorandum is engineers beginning to work in this discipline who are looking for a primer on the behavior of proprotor performance and design considerations. The memorandum is not intended as a step-by-step guide to designing proprotors, nor does it provide insight into more advanced proprotor design/analysis tools.

Rotor Aerodynamics↗

NASA NTRS1995

Wingtip mounted, counter-rotating proprotor for tiltwing aircraft

A tiltwing aircraft, capable of in-flight conversion between a hover and forward cruise mode, employs a counter-rotating proprotor arrangement which permits a significantly increased cruise efficiency without sacrificing either the size of the conversion envelope or the wing efficiency. A benefit in hover is also provided because of the lower effective disk loading for the counter-rotating proprotor, as opposed to a single rotation proprotor of the same diameter. At least one proprotor is provided on each wing section, preferably mounted on the wingtip, with each proprotor having two counter-rotating blade rows. Each blade row has a plurality of blades which are relatively stiff-in-plane and are mounted such that cyclic pitch adjustments may be made for hover control during flight.

Wechsler, James K.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Analyses and tests confirm design of proprotor aircraft.

Discussion of the design features of a 300-knot tilt-proprotor VTOL aircraft having proprotors 25 ft in diameter, an empty weight of 7390 pounds, a maximum VTOL gross weight of 12,400 pounds, and a design dive speed of 300 knots. Proprotor stability analysis covering aeroelastic stability characteristics and flight mode stability characteristics is included. An evaluation of the proprotor design is made on the basis of aerodynamic and aeroelastic model tests and full-scale performance tests. The test results and other obtained research data suggest the readiness of this aircraft design for construction and flight tests.

Edenborough, H. K.↗

NASA NTRS1969

Advancement of proprotor technology. Task 1: Design study summary

A tilt-proprotor proof-of-concept aircraft design study has been conducted. The results are presented. The ojective of the contract is to advance the state of proprotor technology through design studies and full-scale wind-tunnel tests. The specific objective is to conduct preliminary design studies to define a minimum-size tilt-proprotor research aircraft that can perform proof-of-concept flight research. The aircraft that results from these studies is a twin-engine, high-wing aircraft with 25-foot, three-bladed tilt proprotors mounted on pylons at the wingtips. Each pylon houses a Pratt and Whitney PT6C-40 engine with a takeoff rating of 1150 horsepower. Empty weight is estimated at 6876 pounds. The normal gross weight is 9500 pounds, and the maximum gross weight is 12,400 pounds.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1975

Analytical modeling requirements for tilting proprotor aircraft dynamics

Proprotor and cantilever wing aeroelastic behavior is applied to a gimballed rotor and a hingeless rotor to develop an analytical model for prediction of tilting proprotor aircraft dynamics. Particular attention is given to: the influence of coupled flap/lag bending modes; the influence of rotor blade torsion degrees of freedom on proprotor dynamics; and, to a constant coefficient approximation representing the dynamics in nonaxial flow through the rotor. The following are also examined: the number of blade bending and torsion modes required; the influence of the rotor aerodynamic model; the influence of the blade trim bending deflection; the importance of the rotor rotational speed degree of freedom; and the effect of the wing aerodynamic forces. The origin of the significant influence of the blade pitch motion on the proprotor dynamics is discussed.

Johnson, W.↗

NASA NTRS1975

The influence of engine/transmission/governor on tilting proprotor aircraft dynamics

An analytical model is developed for the dynamics of a tilting proprotor aircraft engine and drive train, including a rotor speed governor and interconnect shaft. The dynamic stability of a proprotor and cantilever wing is calculated, including the engine-transmission-governor model. It is concluded that the rotor behaves much as if windmilling as far as its dynamic behavior is concerned, with some influence of the turboshaft engine inertia and damping. The interconnect shaft has a significant influence on the antisymmetric dynamics of proprotor aircraft. The proprotor aerodynamics model is extended to include reverse flow, and a refinement on the method used to calculate the kinematic pitch-bending coupling of the blade is developed.

Johnson, W.↗

NASA NTRS2019

Correlation of Full-Scale Isolated Proprotor Performance and Loads

A full-scale isolated proprotor test is currently being conducted in the USAF National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (NFAC) 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel at NASA Ames. The test article is a 3-bladed research rotor derived from the right-hand rotor of the AW609; this rotor was manufactured by Bell Helicopter under contract to NASA. In this paper, this research rotor is referred to as "699". The test, nearly completed, is an integral part of the initial checkout test of the newly developed Tiltrotor Test Rig (TTR), whose purpose is to test advanced, full-scale proprotors in the NFAC. Figure 1 shows the TTR/699 installed in the 40- by 80-Foot test section. The TTR rotor axis is horizontal and the rig rotates in yaw on the wind tunnel turntable for conversion (transition) and helicopter mode testing. To date, a substantial amount of wind tunnel test data has already been acquired. The completed operational conditions include hover, airplane mode (cruise, wind tunnel airspeed V=61 to 267 knots), and the helicopter and conversion conditions (with a comprehensive sweep of the TTR yaw angle ranging, to date, from 90-deg yaw helicopter mode to 30-deg yaw conversion mode, at varying airspeeds). This 699 proprotor performance and loads correlation study uses these newly acquired wind tunnel test data. This paper represents the third analytical study, coming after two earlier analytical studies on the TTR/699; that is, a 2018 paper on pre-test predictions of 699 performance and loads, Ref. 1, and an upcoming January 2019 paper on aeroelastic stability analysis of the TTR/699 installed in the 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel, Ref. 2. Reference 8 will present an overview of the entire TTR/699 test program. For completeness, Ref. 3 addresses the development and initial testing of the TTR. Background information on the TTR effort at NASA Ames can be found at the Aeromechanics website: https://rotorcraft.arc.nasa.gov/Research/Facilities/ttr.html. To the authors' knowledge, the full-scale results presented in this paper are the first of their kind. A literature survey brought up several existing correlation studies, but these were either based on small-scale test data (for example, the studies performed by the University of Maryland) or full-scale aircraft flight test data (for example, flight tests conducted by Bell Helicopter). Separately, the 2009 NASA study involving the JVX rotor is relevant (see Ref.4). The JVX is closely similar to the 699 in size and aerodynamics, and is accordingly a good reference for performance calculations. In Ref. 1 (as mentioned above), pre-test reality checks of the current analytical model were made by comparing JVX and 699 predictions in hover and forward flight (airplane mode).

Isolated Proprotor Performance↗

NASA NTRS2019

High-Speed Wind Tunnel Tests of a Full-Scale Proprotor on the Tiltrotor Test Rig

The Tiltrotor Test Rig (TTR) is a NASA project, joint with the U.S. Army and Air Force, to develop a new, large scale proprotor test system for the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (NFAC). The first wind-tunnel entry was completed in November 2018 with a modern, 26-ft diameter proprotor. The primary purpose was to complete the development of the TTR, including systems integration with the NFAC. The TTR and rotor were tested up to 273 knots in axial flow. This is the highest airspeed ever achieved by a full-scale proprotor in any wind tunnel. Extensive conversion-mode data were also acquired, and hover/climb conditions were explored. Additional testing included aerodynamic tares, motor tests, thermal tests, modal vibration tests, and other checkout activities. This paper summarizes the results of the test, including examples of the most significant data.

Wind Tunnel Tests↗

NASA NTRS2022

Wind Tunnel Performance Tests of a Full-Scale Proprotor on the Tiltrotor Test Rig

The Tiltrotor Test Rig (TTR) is a new, large-scale proprotor test system for the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (NFAC). The TTR was jointly developed by NASA, the U. S. Army and the U. S. Air Force. The first wind-tunnel entry was completed in November 2018 with a modern, 26-ft diameter proprotor. The primary purpose was to complete the development of the TTR, including systems integration with the NFAC. The TTR and rotor were tested up to 273 knots in axial flow, which is the highest airspeed ever achieved by a full-scale proprotor in any wind tunnel. The entry constitutes the first full-scale wind-tunnel test of a gimballed, coning-flexure rotor. Extensive conversion-mode data were also acquired, and hover/climb conditions were explored. Additional testing included aerodynamic tares, motor tests, thermal tests, modal vibration tests, and other checkout activities. This report summarizes the results of the test, including examples of the most significant data.

Tiltrotor Test Rig↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An Overview of the Proprotor Performance Test in the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel

This work experimentally investigates the aerodynamic behavior of proprotors across a wide range of angles of attack. These flight conditions are intended to be representative of Urban Air Mobility (UAM) vehicle platforms that utilize articulating propulsors to transition from a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) phase typical of a conventional rotorcraft, to an axial mode of forward flight typical of a fixed-wing aircraft. These data are used to identify the potential limits of lower fidelity aerodynamic modeling tools, as well as to inform future acoustic phases of testing. Tests were conducted on two proprotor designs in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel using an articulating propeller test stand. Hover results identified unique flow physics on one of the proprotors, including severe outboard flow separation and perpendicular blade vortex interactions on the outboard portions of the blades. Transition and forward flight conditions yielded very informative trends in terms of both on- and off-axis forces and moments against which low-fidelity prediction models were compared.

aerodynamics↗

NASA NTRS1974

Dynamics of tilting proprotor aircraft in cruise flight

A nine degree-of-freedom theoretical model is developed for investigations of the dynamics of a proprotor operating in high inflow axial flight on a cantilever wing. The basic characteristics of the rotor high inflow aerodynamics and the resulting rotor aeroelastic behavior are discussed. The problems of classical whirl flutter, the two-bladed rotor, and the influence of the proprotor on the stability derivatives of the aircraft are treated briefly. The influence of various elements of the theoretical model is discussed, including the modeling used for the blade and wing aerodynamics, and the influence of the rotor lag degree of freedom. The results from tests of two full-scale proprotors - a gimballed, stiff-inplane rotor and a hingeless, soft-inplane rotor - are presented; comparisons with the theoretical results show good correlation.

Johnson, W.↗

NASA NTRS1974

Theory and comparison with tests of two full-scale proprotors

A nine degrees-of-freedom theoretical model was developed for investigations of the dynamics of a proprotor operating in high inflow axial flight on a cantilever wing. The theory is described, and the results of the analysis are presented for two proprotor configurations: a gimballed, stiff-inplane rotor, and a hingeless, soft-inplane rotor. The influence of various elements of the theory are discussed, including the modeling used for the blade and wing aerodynamics, and the influence of the rotor lag degree of freedom. The results from full-scale tests of the two proprotors are presented and compared with the theoretical results.

Johnson, W.↗

NASA NTRS1977

An experimental and analytical investigation of proprotor whirl flutter

The results of an experimental parametric investigation of whirl flutter are presented for a model consisting of a windmilling propeller-rotor, or proprotor, having blades with offset flapping hinges mounted on a rigid pylon with flexibility in pitch and yaw. The investigation was motivated by the need to establish a large data base from which to assess the predictability of whirl flutter for a proprotor since some question has been raised as to whether flutter in the forward whirl mode could be predicted with confidence. To provide the necessary data base, the parametric study included variation in the pylon pitch and yaw stiffnesses, flapping hinge offset, and blade kinematic pitch-flap coupling over a large range of advance ratios. Cases of forward whirl flutter and of backward whirl flutter are documented. Measured whirl flutter characteristics were shown to be in good agreement with predictions from two different linear stability analyses which employed simple, two dimensional, quasi-steady aerodynamics for the blade loading. On the basis of these results, it appears that proprotor whirl flutter, both forward and backward, can be predicted.

Kvaternik, R. G.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Optimizing Proprotor Blades Using Coupled Aeroacoustic and Aerodynamic Sensitivities

A quieter and aerodynamically more efficient proprotor design requires high-fidelity and well-integrated optimization and analysis tools. To fulfill that requirement, the present paper delivers a methodology based on multidisciplinary, adjoint-based, discrete optimization. SU2-based code development involves the implementation of aeroacoustic analysis, adjoint computations, and integrations into a multidisciplinary rotorcraft optimization suite. Submodules utilized in the optimization are verified with wind tunnel data to demonstrate the accuracy of aerodynamic and aeroacoustic analyses. The developed code is used for NASA's helically twisted proprotor to maximize the aeroacoustic performance of the proprotor while holding thrust constant. The optimization process considers multiple flight conditions (hence, multipoint), which are forward flight and hovering. As an outcome of the analyses, the optimized blade design propagates lower noise as perceived by multiple observers in both flight conditions

R Omur Icke↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An Overview of the Proprotor Performance Test in the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel

Nikolas Zawodny↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Towards Low-Noise Design of a Proprotor with the Vortex Lattice Method and Gradient-Based Optimization

This work aims to combine an aerodynamic model based on the unsteady vortex lattice method with an acoustic model provided by Farassat's formulation 1A to perform gradient-based optimizations of a proprotor with aerodynamic and acoustic constraints. The resulting combination of tools is applied to the problem of designing a single proprotor operating at a cruise condition, with and without an acoustic constraint and wing placed downstream of the proprotor rotation plane. Results are compared to a baseline design studied previously, and to similar optimizations performed with a simpler blade element momentum theory aerodynamic model. Each optimization case achieved feasibility and made significant improvements in the objective function, but the optimality criterion was not satisfied. Overall the designs the optimizer found roughly comported with our previous experience with similar problems, with some discrepancies that are discussed.

Aerodynamics↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Towards Low-Noise Design of a Proprotor with the Vortex Lattice Method and Gradient-Based Optimization

Aerodynamics↗

NASA NTRS2017

Hover Performance of Isolated Proprotors and Propellers - Experimental Data

The use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is gaining momentum within the aeronautical community. A relatively small segment of this community is applying CFD technology in the prediction of VSTOL aircraft performance. An even smaller group of engineers are refining and applying fluid dynamics solvers to the problem of predicting hover performance of helicopter rotors and proprotors designed by rotorcraft advocates. This small group of CFD engineers who are attacking the hover performance problem have, today, been using a quite limited experimental data base upon which to demonstrate their progress. This is because their concentration has been on only two successful tiltrotor flying; namely the XV-15 and the MV-22B. No attention appears (as yet) to be directed at the CL-84 or the XC-142A. The purpose of this report is to expand the experimental data base of both proprotors and propellers so that comparisons of test and various theories can be made to several more configurations of these propulsive devices used by VSTOL aircraft.

Hover↗