Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “RANS CFD”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2010

The Prediction of Broadband Shock-Associated Noise from Dualstream and Rectangular Jets Using RANS CFD

Supersonic jets operating off-design produce broadband shock-associated noise. Broadband shock-associated noise is characterized by multiple broadband peaks in the far-field and is often the dominant source of noise towards the sideline and upstream direction relative to the jet axis. It is due to large scale coherent turbulence structures in the jet shear layers interacting with the shock cell structure. A broadband shock-associated noise model recently developed by the authors predicts this noise component from solutions to the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations using a two-equation turbulence model. The broadband shock-associated noise model is applied to dualstream and rectangular nozzles operating supersonically, heated, and off-design. The dualstream jet broadband shock-associated noise predictions are conducted for cases when the core jet is supersonic and the fan jet is subsonic, the core jet is subsonic and the fan jet is supersonic, and when both jet streams operate supersonically. Rectangular jet predictions are shown for a convergent-divergent nozzle operating both over- and under-expanded for cold and heated conditions. The original model implementation has been heavily modified to make accurate predictions for the dualstream jets. It is also argued that for over-expanded jets the oblique shock wave attached to the nozzle lip contributes little to broadband shock-associated noise. All predictions are compared with experiments.

Miller, Steven A.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Understanding the Role of CFD, Including RANS, DES, LES and DNS, in Hypersonic Propulsion Design and Analysis

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has matured to the point where it is becoming ubiquitous in the design and analysis of aerospace vehicles and their propulsion systems. The current state-of-the-art of CFD in hypersonic propulsion design and analysis as well as a historical perspective of its development over the last 50 years is presented. The current state-of-the-art for the design of finite rate chemically reacting turbulent hypersonic flow is shown to currently be Reynolds averaged simulations (RAS) where the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RAS) equations are solved to obtain steady state solutions. An overview of the physical modeling techniques employed by RAS for the simulation of hypersonic chemically reacting flow are presented. However, scale resolving simulation techniques, such as detached eddy simulation (DES), large eddy simulations (LES), hybrid RAS/LES and direct numerical simulations (DNS), are becoming becoming powerful tools for point design analysis. One example of such a scale resolving technique, hybrid RAS/LES, will be briefly described as well as how it can be used to help address model form uncertainties in RAS.

Hypersonic↗
NASA NTRS2014

Turbulence Modeling Verification and Validation

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software that solves the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations has been in routine use for more than a quarter of a century. It is currently employed not only for basic research in fluid dynamics, but also for the analysis and design processes in many industries worldwide, including aerospace, automotive, power generation, chemical manufacturing, polymer processing, and petroleum exploration. A key feature of RANS CFD is the turbulence model. Because the RANS equations are unclosed, a model is necessary to describe the effects of the turbulence on the mean flow, through the Reynolds stress terms. The turbulence model is one of the largest sources of uncertainty in RANS CFD, and most models are known to be flawed in one way or another. Alternative methods such as direct numerical simulations (DNS) and large eddy simulations (LES) rely less on modeling and hence include more physics than RANS. In DNS all turbulent scales are resolved, and in LES the large scales are resolved and the effects of the smallest turbulence scales are modeled. However, both DNS and LES are too expensive for most routine industrial usage on today's computers. Hybrid RANS-LES, which blends RANS near walls with LES away from walls, helps to moderate the cost while still retaining some of the scale-resolving capability of LES, but for some applications it can still be too expensive. Even considering its associated uncertainties, RANS turbulence modeling has proved to be very useful for a wide variety of applications. For example, in the aerospace field, many RANS models are considered to be reliable for computing attached flows. However, existing turbulence models are known to be inaccurate for many flows involving separation. Research has been ongoing for decades in an attempt to improve turbulence models for separated and other nonequilibrium flows. When developing or improving turbulence models, both verification and validation are important steps in the process. Verification insures that the CFD code is solving the equations as intended (no errors in the implementation). This is typically done either through the method of manufactured solutions (MMS) or through careful step-by-step comparisons with other verified codes. After the verification step is concluded, validation is performed to document the ability of the turbulence model to represent different types of flow physics. Validation can involve a large number of test case comparisons with experiments, theory, or DNS. Organized workshops have proved to be valuable resources for the turbulence modeling community in its pursuit of turbulence modeling verification and validation. Workshop contributors using different CFD codes run the same cases, often according to strict guidelines, and compare results. Through these comparisons, it is often possible to (1) identify codes that have likely implementation errors, and (2) gain insight into the capabilities and shortcomings of different turbulence models to predict the flow physics associated with particular types of flows. These are valuable lessons because they help bring consistency to CFD codes by encouraging the correction of faulty programming and facilitating the adoption of better models. They also sometimes point to specific areas needed for improvement in the models. In this paper, several recent workshops are summarized primarily from the point of view of turbulence modeling verification and validation. Furthermore, the NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource website is described. The purpose of this site is to provide a central location where RANS turbulence models are documented, and test cases, grids, and data are provided. The goal of this paper is to provide an abbreviated survey of turbulence modeling verification and validation efforts, summarize some of the outcomes, and give some ideas for future endeavors in this area.

Rumsey, Christopher L.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Steady-state RANS Pretest CFD Comparisons for the SWiFT NTF Test

The NATO AVT-298 research program has been underway for seven years to improve the understanding of the full-scale aerodynamics for moderately-swept hybrid wing-bodies found on future civil and military configurations and how this differs from what is measured with low Reynolds number wind tunnel testing or predicted with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Toward this effort, a hybrid wing-body configuration, known as Swept Wing Flow Test (SWiFT), was designed and tested in the Aircraft Research Association (ARA) and NASA Langley National Transonic Facility (NTF) wind tunnels. This presentation summarizes comparisons between the NTF wind tunnel data and a series of pretest CFD computations generated using steady-state Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations from participants representing seven institutions using nine separate flow solvers. The objective of this research was to assess the effectiveness of state-of-practice CFD methods in predicting the aerodynamics of swept wing aircraft and identify recommended areas of improvement to the methods themselves. Computational force and moment data will be presented for a series of angle-of-attack and sideslip angle sweeps over a range of Reynolds numbers at both low-speed and near-cruise Mach numbers, as tested in the NTF experiment.

National Transonic Facility↗
NASA NTRS2013

Computational Study of the CC3 Impeller and Vaneless Diffuser Experiment

Centrifugal compressors are compatible with the low exit corrected flows found in the high pressure compressor of turboshaft engines and may play an increasing role in turbofan engines as engine overall pressure ratios increase. Centrifugal compressor stages are difficult to model accurately with RANS CFD solvers. A computational study of the CC3 centrifugal impeller in its vaneless diffuser configuration was undertaken as part of an effort to understand potential causes of RANS CFD mis-prediction in these types of geometries. Three steady, periodic cases of the impeller and diffuser were modeled using the TURBO Parallel Version 4 code: 1) a k-epsilon turbulence model computation on a 6.8 million point grid using wall functions, 2) a k-epsilon turbulence model computation on a 14 million point grid integrating to the wall, and 3) a k-omega turbulence model computation on the 14 million point grid integrating to the wall. It was found that all three cases compared favorably to data from inlet to impeller trailing edge, but the k-epsilon and k-omega computations had disparate results beyond the trailing edge and into the vaneless diffuser. A large region of reversed flow was observed in the k-epsilon computations which extended from 70% to 100% span at the exit rating plane, whereas the k-omega computation had reversed flow from 95% to 100% span. Compared to experimental data at near-peak-efficiency, the reversed flow region in the k-epsilon case resulted in an under-prediction in adiabatic efficiency of 8.3 points, whereas the k-omega case was 1.2 points lower in efficiency.

Kulkarni, Sameer↗
NASA NTRS2013

Computational Study of the CC3 Impeller and Vaneless Diffuser Experiment

Centrifugal compressors are compatible with the low exit corrected flows found in the high pressure compressor of turboshaft engines and may play an increasing role in turbofan engines as engine overall pressure ratios increase. Centrifugal compressor stages are difficult to model accurately with RANS CFD solvers. A computational study of the CC3 centrifugal impeller in its vaneless diffuser configuration was undertaken as part of an effort to understand potential causes of RANS CFD mis-prediction in these types of geometries. Three steady, periodic cases of the impeller and diffuser were modeled using the TURBO Parallel Version 4 code: (1) a k-ε turbulence model computation on a 6.8 million point grid using wall functions, (2) a k-ε turbulence model computation on a 14 million point grid integrating to the wall, and (3) a k-ω turbulence model computation on the 14 million point grid integrating to the wall. It was found that all three cases compared favorably to data from inlet to impeller trailing edge, but the k-ε and k-ω computations had disparate results beyond the trailing edge and into the vaneless diffuser. A large region of reversed flow was observed in the k-ε computations which extended from 70 to 100 percent span at the exit rating plane, whereas the k-ω computation had reversed flow from 95 to 100 percent span. Compared to experimental data at near-peak-efficiency, the reversed flow region in the k-ε case resulted in an underprediction in adiabatic efficiency of 8.3 points, whereas the k-ω case was 1.2 points lower in efficiency.

Kulkarni, Sameer↗
NASA NTRS2019

Assessment of Mixer-Ejector Nozzle with Thermal Acoustic Shield for Jet Noise Reduction

A tendency for excessive exhaust jet mixing noise from low bypass ratio turbofan engines is recognized as a key challenge in the design of commercial supersonic aircraft. In this work we investigate a unique combination of two noise mitigation methods as a novel strategy to reduce jet mixing noise. First, a thermal acoustic shield (TAS) is used to reflect high frequency acoustic waves at small angles to the jet axis; second, a mixer-ejector (ME) nozzle is used to mechanically shield noise propagating at large angles to the axis. The ME shroud also provides a convenient location for a TAS nozzle and improves TAS effectiveness by limiting the downstream extent of high frequency noise generation. In an additional benefit for a velocity-matched TAS stream, the ME allows a reduction in strength of the TAS outer shear layer which could serve as a secondary noise source. The present work provides a quantitative assessment of the ME-TAS concept, using a combination of RANS CFD simulations, acoustic analogy calculations for the farfield Green's function, and surrogate-based modeling and parameter space exploration. We first evaluate a subscale configuration, then use scaling arguments to apply subscale results to the systems-level analysis of a flight configuration; the latter configuration includes a generic low bypass ratio turbofan engine with an engine-driven electric generator for supplementary heating of the TAS stream. Additional RANS CFD calculations are performed for a notional ME-TAS geometry based on the full scale configuration, and various modeling assumptions and operational characteristics are evaluated. The ME-TAS concept is shown to provide effective shielding for high frequency jet noise, and should enable comparable noise suppression to a stand-alone ME of considerably greater length, weight and drag. In addition to investigating the integrated ME-TAS system, the present work differs from previous research into TAS and related fluidic shield concepts through the inclusion of modern numerical analysis tools and the systematic numerical examination of various design parameters.

thermal acoustic shield↗
NASA NTRS2024

Measurements and Computational Analysis of the Turbulent Corner Flow on the NASA Juncture-Flow Model with a Symmetric Wing

The NASA Juncture Flow Experiment is designed to acquire high-quality flowfield data deep in the corner of a wing-fuselage junction for the purpose of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation and turbulence model improvement. This report presents and discusses the results of a recent experiment with the Juncture Flow Model in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel. The main objective of the test was to expand the existing juncture-flow dataset with a symmetric wing case that displays fully attached, incipient separation, and separated flow in the corner of the wing-fuselage junction, depending on the model angle of incidence. Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) measurements were made at three model angles of incidence (0° : fully attached, 1° : incipient separation, and 5° : separated flow) and for each angle, mean-flow and Reynolds-stress data were obtained on the fuselage and at several locations along the corner of the wing-fuselage junction. Supporting measurements were made during the test campaign and include model and tunnel wall static pressures, tunnel wall boundary-layer profiles, oil-flow visualizations, and laser-based measurements of the as-built model geometry and model position in the test section. A companion set of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) CFD simulations were also performed and those results were used to support the discussion of the experimental test results.

Juncture Flow↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

CFD-Based Frequency Domain Method for Dynamic Stability Derivative Estimation with Application to Transonic Truss-Braced Wing

This paper presents a dynamic stability estimation technique obtained from high-fidelity CFD simulations of the Mach 0.8 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW). A series of unsteady RANS CFD simulations in FUN3D is performed on the TTBW in pitch and plunge oscillations at various reduced frequencies. The time-domain data are transformed into the frequency-domain data by Fourier series. Transfer functions of the dynamic stability derivatives are then estimated by a frequency-domain regression. The dynamic stability derivatives with respect to the angle of attack are determined by the regression of the unsteady aerodynamic coefficients for the plunge motion. The dynamic stability derivatives with respect to the pitch rate are deter-mined by the regression of the differential unsteady aerodynamic coefficients for the pitch motion upon the removal of the angle of attack contribution by the plunge motion. The steady-state stability derivatives are then compared to the results obtained from a stability analysis code VSPAERO as well as steady-state FUN3D simulations. The comparison of the steady-state stability derivatives shows excellent agreement.

Dynamic Stability Derivatives↗
NASA NTRS2016

Global Comparison of CFD and Wind-Tunnel-Derived Force and Moment Databases for the Space Launch System

Recently a very large (739 runs) collection of high-fidelity RANS CFD solutions was obtained for Space Launch System ascent aerodynamics for the vehicle to be used for the first exploratory (unmanned) mission (EM-1). The extensive computations, at full-scale conditions, were originally developed to obtain detailed line and protuberance loads and surface pressures for venting analyses. The line loads were eventually integrated for comparison of the resulting forces and moments to the database that was derived from wind tunnel tests conducted at sub-scale conditions. The comparisons presented herein cover the ranges 0.5 < or = M(infinity) < or = 5, −6deg < or = alpha < or = 6deg, and −6deg < or = beta < or = 6deg. For detailed comparisons, slender-body-theory-based component build-up aero models from missile aerodynamics are used. The differences in the model fit coefficients are shown to be relatively small except for the low supersonic Mach number range, 1.1 < or = M(infinity) < or = 2.0. The analysis is intended to support process improvement and development of uncertainty models.

Hemsch, Michael J.↗
NASA NTRS2002

Statistical Analysis of CFD Solutions from the Drag Prediction Workshop

A simple, graphical framework is presented for robust statistical evaluation of results obtained from N-Version testing of a series of RANS CFD codes. The solutions were obtained by a variety of code developers and users for the June 2001 Drag Prediction Workshop sponsored by the AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Technical Committee. The aerodynamic configuration used for the computational tests is the DLR-F4 wing-body combination previously tested in several European wind tunnels and for which a previous N-Version test had been conducted. The statistical framework is used to evaluate code results for (1) a single cruise design point, (2) drag polars and (3) drag rise. The paper concludes with a discussion of the meaning of the results, especially with respect to predictability, Validation, and reporting of solutions.

Hemsch, Michael J.↗
NASA NTRS2004

Statistical Analysis of CFD Solutions from 2nd Drag Prediction Workshop

In June 2001, the first AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop was held to evaluate results obtained from extensive N-Version testing of a series of RANS CFD codes. The geometry used for the computations was the DLR-F4 wing-body combination which resembles a medium-range subsonic transport. The cases reported include the design cruise point, drag polars at eight Mach numbers, and drag rise at three values of lift. Although comparisons of the code-to-code medians with available experimental data were similar to those obtained in previous studies, the code-to-code scatter was more than an order-of-magnitude larger than expected and far larger than desired for design and for experimental validation. The second Drag Prediction Workshop was held in June 2003 with emphasis on the determination of installed pylon-nacelle drag increments and on grid refinement studies. The geometry used was the DLR-F6 wing-body-pylon-nacelle combination for which the design cruise point and the cases run were similar to the first workshop except for additional runs on coarse and fine grids to complement the runs on medium grids. The code-to-code scatter was significantly reduced for the wing-body configuration compared to the first workshop, although still much larger than desired. However, the grid refinement studies showed no sign$cant improvement in code-to-code scatter with increasing grid refinement.

Hemsch, M. J.↗
NASA NTRS2004

The Acoustic Analogy: A Powerful Tool in Aeroacoustics with Emphasis on Jet Noise Prediction

The acoustic analogy introduced by Lighthill to study jet noise is now over 50 years old. In the present paper, Lighthill s Acoustic Analogy is revisited together with a brief evaluation of the state-of-the-art of the subject and an exploration of the possibility of further improvements in jet noise prediction from analytical methods, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions, and measurement techniques. Experimental Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) data is used both to evaluate turbulent statistics from Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) CFD and to propose correlation models for the Lighthill stress tensor. The NASA Langley Jet3D code is used to study the effect of these models on jet noise prediction. From the analytical investigation, a retarded time correction is shown that improves, by approximately 8 dB, the over-prediction of aft-arc jet noise by Jet3D. In experimental investigation, the PIV data agree well with the CFD mean flow predictions, with room for improvement in Reynolds stress predictions. Initial modifications, suggested by the PIV data, to the form of the Jet3D correlation model showed no noticeable improvements in jet noise prediction.

Farassat, F.↗
DOE OSTI2024

CFD simulations of Molten Salt Fast Reactor core cavity flows

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has become increasingly important in the research and development of advanced nuclear reactors. Here, in the current study, extensive CFD simulations were conducted for the coolant flow in Molten Salt Fast Reactor (MSFR) core models using the state-of-the-art spectral element flow solver Nek5000 and multiscale coarse-mesh thermal-hydraulic software Pronghorn. The underlying motivation is to seek an in-depth understanding of how the internal velocity distribution can be influenced by the MSFR core cavity shape, the Reynolds number, turbulence modeling options and the inlet boundary conditions. The CFD techniques involved in this investigation range from coarse-mesh CFD, RANS modeling, to the high-fidelity LES calculations. Specifically, a series of RANS simulations were performed for the 2-D axisymmetric core model and 3-D wedge domains to study the flow distribution inside the MSFR core. It is observed that a proper representation of the MSFR inlet channel duct is important for the prediction of internal flow distribution. It is also showcased here how researchers can leverage the Nek5000 CFD results to calibrate more efficient coarse-mesh CFD tools, like Pronghorn, for the actual MSFR design needs. Moreover, this paper highlights a 3-D LES model for an entire MSFR core using the spectral element method and demonstrates the feasibility of this modeling approach. The readiness and potential limitations of the RANS approach are examined with respect to the high-fidelity LES simulations. The present investigation lays a solid foundation as we are leveraging the high-fidelity CFD capabilities to inform MSFR design efforts.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
NASA NTRS2018

PIV and Rotational Raman-Based Temperature Measurements for CFD Validation in a Single Injector Cooling Flow

NASA's Turbulent Heat Flux (THX) task under the Transformational Tools & Technologies project is focused on acquiring benchmark temperature and velocity data in turbulent shear layers for validation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes. Standard CFD turbulence models lack the ability to accurately calculate a number of fundamental flow phenomena, including the turbulent transport of heat. In nearly all production class Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) CFD codes, a gradient-diffusion approximation is used whereby a constant turbulent Prantdl number, Prt, is used to relate an eddy viscosity calculated for the momentum terms, to the turbulent heat flux terms. The default in most CFD codes is Prt = 0.9, however this is not representative of all flows. As discussed in Yoder et al. (2015) and Reynolds (1974), Prt = 0.7 is felt to be more appropriate for jets. Recent work, as discussed in Yoder (2016a), has explored more complex formulations including variable turbulent Prantdl number models. PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY; TEMPERATURE MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; FILM COOLING; HIGH TEMPERATURE GASES; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; PREDICTION ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; TURBULENCE MODELS; RAMAN SPECTRA; VELOCITY; MACH NUMBER; GAS TURBINE ENGINES; NOZZLE FLOW; THERMOCOUPLES; LASER INDUCED FLUORESCENCE; COOLING FLOWS (ASTROPHYSICS); RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY; HEAT FLUX

Wernet, Mark P.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Deep Neural Network Based Convergence Classification for Computational Fluid Dynamics

A supervised deep learning approach is coupled with heuristic convergence criteria to construct a classification model for detecting the completion (convergence) of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Heuristic convergence criteria alone are not always sufficient and more complex decisions are often left to a human analyst. The proposed approach leverages heuristic convergence criteria as well as two deep neural network (DNN) models, one binary and one multi-class, to improve the efficiency and consistency of convergence classification across a wide range of flight regimes. The DNN models presented are each trained on a subset of ascent aerodynamic CFD simulations for NASA’s Space Launch System and were produced using NASA’s unstructured Navier-Stokes solver FUN3D. Individual solutions are analyzed intermittently and are classified as sufficiently converged, further iterations required, or switch from steady Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) to unsteady RANS CFD based on the iterative histories of four aerodynamic coefficients. The implemented classification model is shown to produce solutions that closely correlate to solutions produced by a human analyst. This work lays groundwork for expanding the capabilities of DNNs for automating and improving more of the CFD process.

SLS↗
NASA NTRS2019

Overflow Juncture Flow Computations Compared with Experimental Data

NASA’s Transformational Tools and Technologies Project (T(cu.) is supporting a substantial effort to investigate the formation and origin of separation bubbles found on wing-body juncture zones: the Juncture Flow experiment. The first phase of the Juncture Flow experiment, performed in NASA Langley’s 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel, has been completed. This paper documents the CFD analysis done in conjunction with the experiment. Comparisons between CFD simulations and wind tunnel experimental results will be shown. Oil flow results, surface pressure cuts, velocity profiles, and Reynolds stress profiles will be compared. Preliminary results analyzing the effect of grid resolution, wind tunnel walls, and turbulence models on the above data will be presented. The results are not meant to be a validation study, but more as an evaluation of the current status of Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) CFD simulations.

Lee, Henry C.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Classical Flutter Analysis of X-57 Aircraft Mod II, III, and IV Configurations

To support airworthiness assessment of the X-57 electric propulsion demonstrator aircraft, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) completed classical flutter analysis of the Mod II, Mod III, and Mod IV aircraft configurations. Aeroelastic analysis was primarily performed using the ZAERO analysis code developed by Zona Technology. Supplemental computational fluid dynamics (CFD) flutter analysis for the Mod III and Mod IV configurations was performed using NASA’s FUN3D software to verify the aeroelastic behavior at deployed flaps conditions. The NASTRAN finite element models (FEMs) used for aeroelastic analysis were developed by NASA. The final Mod II FEM utilized shell elements for the wing and fuselage, and beam elements for the tail and wing control surfaces. For Mod III and Mod IV aircraft models, shell element wing FEMs developed throughout the Mod III/IV wing design cycle were utilized. The fuselage and empennage FEM components were shared between the Mod II, III, and IV aircraft models. ZAERO analyses predicted flutter boundaries were >60% beyond the X-57 flight-test envelope never exceed airspeed (V NE ) for all configurations. Aeroelastic Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) CFD simulations using FUN3D of the Mod III/IV configurations predicted flap mode instability did not occur until at least speeds of 60% higher than the Mod III/IV maximum flap deployment airspeed (V FE ).

Keerti K. Bhamidipati↗