Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “RBWR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2015

Self-Sustaining Thorium Boiling Water Reactors

The primary objectives of this project are to: Perform a pre-conceptual design of a core for an alternative to the Hitachi proposed fuel-self- sustaining RBWR-AC, to be referred to as a RBWR-Th. The use of thorium fuel is expected to assure negative void coefficient of reactivity (versus positive of the RBWR-AC) and improve reactor safety; Perform a pre-conceptual design of an alternative core to the Hitachi proposed LWR TRU transmuting RBWR-TB2, to be referred to as the RBWR-TR. In addition to improved safety, use of thorium for the fertile fuel is expected to improve the TRU transmutation effectiveness; Compare the RBWR-Th and RBWR-TR performance against that of the Hitachi RBWR core designs and sodium cooled fast reactor counterparts - the ARR and ABR; and, Perform a viability assessment of the thorium-based RBWR design concepts to be identified along with their associated fuel cycle, a technology gap analysis, and a technology development roadmap. A description of the work performed and of the results obtained is provided in this Overview Report and, in more detail, in the Attachments. The major findings of the study are summarized.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Transient Safety Analysis of Fast Spectrum TRU Burning LWRs with Internal Blankets

The objective of this proposal was to perform a detailed transient safety analysis of the Resource-Renewable BWR (RBWR) core designs using the U.S. NRC TRACE/PARCS code system. This project involved the same joint team that has performed the RBWR design evaluation for EPRI and therefore be able to leverage that previous work. And because of their extensive experience with fast spectrum reactors and parfait core designs, ANL was also part the project team. The principal outcome of this project was the development of a state-of-the-art transient analysis capability for GEN-IV reactors based on Monte Carlo generated cross sections and the US NRC coupled code system TRACE/PARCS, and a state-of-the-art coupled code assessment of the transient safety performance of the RBWR.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2013

Transmutation, Burn-Up and Fuel Fabrication Trade-Offs in Reduced-Moderation Water Reactor Thorium Fuel Cycles - 13502

Multiple recycle of long-lived actinides has the potential to greatly reduce the required storage time for spent nuclear fuel or high level nuclear waste. This is generally thought to require fast reactors as most transuranic (TRU) isotopes have low fission probabilities in thermal reactors. Reduced-moderation LWRs are a potential alternative to fast reactors with reduced time to deployment as they are based on commercially mature LWR technology. Thorium (Th) fuel is neutronically advantageous for TRU multiple recycle in LWRs due to a large improvement in the void coefficient. If Th fuel is used in reduced-moderation LWRs, it appears neutronically feasible to achieve full actinide recycle while burning an external supply of TRU, with related potential improvements in waste management and fuel utilization. In this paper, the fuel cycle of TRU-bearing Th fuel is analysed for reduced-moderation PWRs and BWRs (RMPWRs and RBWRs). RMPWRs have the advantage of relatively rapid implementation and intrinsically low conversion ratios. However, it is challenging to simultaneously satisfy operational and fuel cycle constraints. An RBWR may potentially take longer to implement than an RMPWR due to more extensive changes from current BWR technology. However, the harder neutron spectrum can lead to favourable fuel cycle performance. A two-stage fuel cycle, where the first pass is Th-Pu MOX, is a technically reasonable implementation of either concept. The first stage of the fuel cycle can therefore be implemented at relatively low cost as a Pu disposal option, with a further policy option of full recycle in the medium term. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Transition to a Thorium-based Fuel Cycle - Choices, Challenges, and Options

The Charter for the Evaluation and Screening (E and S) of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options requested by the US Department of Energy calls for the identification of promising fuel cycle options to help guide the future directions of research and development in this area. The final report for this study, which was produced by various national laboratory and industry experts, collected the expansive set of fuel cycle options into 40 evaluation groups (EGs). In support of this study, detailed steady-state physics and mass flow data for each of these groups were compiled into a set of Fuel Cycle Data Packages (FCDPs). The data in the FCDPs were then used to quantify the nine criteria detailed in the study to identify the most promising EGs. In addition to supporting the E and S study, data from these FCDPs can be used to benchmark fuel cycle simulation tools for equilibrium calculations. Once benchmarked, their dynamic modeling capabilities can support the continuing effort to determine the most effective approaches for transitioning to proposed advanced future fuel cycles. While steady-state conditions can be calculated directly in some cases, fuel cycle simulation tools allow for the transition scenarios to be simultaneously optimized on multiple parameters such as the fissile material availability, the amount of desirable material in storage, and the time required for transition. In addition to fuel cycle simulations where material availability is considered and is often a constraint to achieving transition, determining the technology needs to enable a transition to take place is also a key consideration (e.g., what technology is needed, when it is needed, and whether it is needed only during the transition and not for the equilibrium fuel cycle). This paper evaluates the material and technology issues and challenges associated with a transition from a uranium-based fuel cycle (such as that operating in the US today, represented by EG01) to a thorium-based fuel cycle, recognizing that thorium requires fissile material to start up. Based on the findings of the E and S report, the two most promising thorium fuel cycle options are considered in this report: (1) EG26, a thermal spectrum molten salt reactor (MSR), and (2) EG28, represented by a sodium fast reactor (SFR, fast spectrum) and a resource-renewable boiling water reactor (RBWR, intermediate spectrum). (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗