SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “REACTOR PHYSICS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2017

Overview of Experiments for Physics of Fast Reactors from the International Handbooks of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments and Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments

Overview of Experiments to Study the Physics of Fast Reactors Represented in the International Directories of Critical and Reactor Experiments John D. Bess Idaho National Laboratory Jim Gulliford, Tatiana Ivanova Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development E.V.Rozhikhin, M.Yu.Sem?nov, A.M.Tsibulya Institute of Physics and Power Engineering The study the physics of fast reactors traditionally used the experiments presented in the manual labor of the Working Group on Evaluation of sections CSEWG (ENDF-202) issued by the Brookhaven National Laboratory in 1974. This handbook presents simplified homogeneous model experiments with relevant experimental data, as amended. The Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development coordinates the activities of two international projects on the collection, evaluation and documentation of experimental data - the International Project on the assessment of critical experiments (1994) and the International Project on the assessment of reactor experiments (since 2005). The result of the activities of these projects are replenished every year, an international directory of critical (ICSBEP Handbook) and reactor (IRPhEP Handbook) experiments. The handbooks present detailed models of experiments with minimal amendments. Such models are of particular interest in terms of the settlements modern programs. The directories contain a large number of experiments which are suitable for the study of physics of fast reactors. Many of these experiments were performed at specialized critical stands, such as BFS (Russia), ZPR and ZPPR (USA), the ZEBRA (UK) and the experimental reactor JOYO (Japan), FFTF (USA). Other experiments, such as compact metal assembly, is also of interest in terms of the physics of fast reactors, they have been carried out on the universal critical stands in Russian institutes (VNIITF and VNIIEF) and the US (LANL, LLNL, and others.). Also worth mentioning is the critical experiments with fast reactor fuel rods in water, interesting in terms of justification of nuclear safety during transportation and storage of fresh and spent fuel. These reports provide a detailed review of the experiment, designate the area of their application and include results of calculations on modern systems of constants in comparison with the estimated experimental data.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Design of an experimental breeder reactor run 138B reactor physics benchmark evaluation management application

Reactor Monte Carlo simulations present numerous challenges including input file generation and processing output files for relevant results. Creating an input file for a heterogeneous core is further complicated when using depleted fuel. Performing perturbations to geometry and material characteristics exacerbates the challenge due to human errors if the input files are manually generated. The difficulty of generating input files is often encountered during the process of performing a reactor physics benchmark evaluation. These challenges were encountered in this study when performing a reactor physics benchmark evaluation for the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II), a sodium cooled fast reactor. The EBR-II Monte Carlo input file uses more than 1,000 unique material specifications and ~8,000 regions. To address the input file generation challenge, a computer application was designed to automate the input file generation process. The application utilizes user input from a graphical user interface in conjunction with spreadsheets containing material and geometric data to generate Monte Carlo input files. The application, called MICKA, was used to generate input files to support the reactor physics benchmark evaluation for EBR-II. This paper describes the reactor configuration and provides information about the application design and capabilities for addressing challenges often encountered in reactor physics benchmark evaluations.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Automated reactor physics analysis framework of High Flux Isotope Reactor low-enriched uranium silicide dispersion fuel designs

The High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) is a versatile research reactor that provides one of the highest steady-state neutron fluxes of any reactor in the world. The HFIR reactor physics team investigated the conversion of the current 93 wt% highly enriched uranium U 3 O 8 -Al dispersion fuel to a 19.75% low-enriched uranium (LEU) U 3 Si 2 -Al dispersion fuel. The team continuously develops a Python module to streamline the analysis steps required for an LEU core design to ensure reproducible and agile design iteration. The Python module automates the data processing between analysis steps and automates the input perturbation for branch calculations and design changes. The automated framework has proven to significantly increase the efficiency and reproducibility of the reactor physics team to design High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) LEU cores and thoroughly analyze performance metrics, safety metrics, and thermal safety margins. Consequently, the team can now respond rapidly to fuel fabrication engineer and thermal-hydraulic-structural analyst requests. Numerous combinations of LEU fuel designs are explored, of which two LEU fuel designs are presented here in this paper: a low density silicide design, and a high-density silicide design. Results show that both designs meet or exceed safety and performance metrics with exception for minor differences caused by the hardened spectrum from LEU.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2024

Griffin: A MOOSE-based reactor physics application for multiphysics simulation of advanced nuclear reactors

Griffin is a Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) based reactor physics application for multiphysics simulations of advanced reactor designs jointly developed by Idaho National Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory. This paper summarizes the motivation, significance, architecture, design, and features of Griffin. Griffin offers flexible and extensible features to address the challenges associated with advanced reactor designs. These features range from fundamental particle transport to specific reactor physics tasks. The features cover a wide range including on-the-fly and traditional two-step cross-section generation methods, steady-state and transient transport solvers suitable for both heterogeneous and homogeneous models, high-fidelity depletion where thousands of isotopes can be tracked and low-fidelity depletion characterized by burnup, etc. The most fundamental aspect that sets Griffin apart from other reactor analysis codes is that it is developed based on the MOOSE framework. A modular development approach is strongly enforced, with multiphysics being an essential element considered since the beginning of Griffin’s development. Griffin links various MOOSE physics modules and couples to other MOOSE-based applications and non-MOOSE-based applications for multiphyiscs simulations. Griffin includes three modules: ISOXML for preparing and managing multigroup cross sections, radiation transport for solving the neutron transport equation, and reactor analysis for user-oriented reactor physics analysis functionalities. Griffin uses various finite element methods for spatial discretization, multigroup approximation for energy discretization and discrete ordinates method, spherical harmonics expansion method, and diffusion approximation for streaming direction discretization to solve the neutron transport equation. Griffin’s flexibility is evidenced through Griffin’s various applications to fast reactor, high-temperature reactor, pebble bed reactor, molten salt reactor, and microreactor designs. Griffin development follows the software quality assurance procedure for MOOSE-based applications and with software requirements consistent with the ASME NQA-1 standard. Griffin has been adopted into the reactor analysis system for the U.S. NRC and is in use at U.S. companies, universities and national laboratories.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2016

Status Report on Scoping Reactor Physics and Sensitivity/Uncertainty Analysis of LR-0 Reactor Molten Salt Experiments

Experiments are being planned at Research Centre Rež (RC Rež) to use the FLiBe (2 7 LiF-BeF 2 ) salt from the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) to perform reactor physics measurements in the LR-0 low power nuclear reactor. These experiments are intended to inform on neutron spectral effects and nuclear data uncertainties for advanced reactor systems utilizing FLiBe salt in a thermal neutron energy spectrum. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is performing sensitivity/uncertainty (S/U) analysis of these planned experiments as part of the ongoing collaboration between the United States and the Czech Republic on civilian nuclear energy research and development. The objective of these analyses is to produce the sensitivity of neutron multiplication to cross section data on an energy-dependent basis for specific nuclides. This report provides a status update on the S/U analyses of critical experiments at the LR-0 Reactor relevant to fluoride salt-cooled high temperature reactor (FHR) and liquid-fueled molten salt reactor (MSR) concepts. The S/U analyses will be used to inform design of FLiBe-based experiments using the salt from MSRE.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2025

Summary Report Of The FY25 Reactor Physics Verification And Validation Exercises In The Advanced Reactor Technologies - Gas-cooled Reactor Program

Valdiation and verification of numerical tools is critical for ensuring reasonable predictions for design scoping, licensing, and safety analsyis. In this report, two reactor physics verification and validation exercises are presented. The first of these exercises focuses on burnup analysis with data from the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) program. Simulations are performed with Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) and are compared with the experimental measurements for the AGR 1 and 2 experiments that utilize both UCO and UO2 fuel. The second exercises utilizes data from the HTR-Proteus experiments to perform reactor physics validation. Specifications of the experimental facility are provdied, along with a demonstration of initial modeling efforts in Serpent for one of the determistic packing experiments. Both cases are part of the Generation-IV international forum (GIF) Very High-Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Computational Methods, Validation, and Benchmarking (CMVB) program, an international collaborative organization dedicated to the verification and validation of High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) analysis. Participation in the CMVB allows the US Department of Energy (DOE) to leverage these existing validation activities to provide extra value through benchmarking activities with other CMVB members.

and Benchmarking (CMVB) program↗

DOE OSTI2022

Reactor Physics Simulations of the High Flux Isotope Reactor Permanent Beryllium Reflector Number 5 Design

This study evaluates reactor physics aspects of the proposed High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) permanent beryllium reflector number 5 design. HFIR is a pressurized, light water–cooled, and beryllium reflected research reactor that operates at 85 MW for cycle lengths of approximately 24 to 26 days. A new permanent reflector design is highly desirable for increased versatility in irradiation experiments, to arrange the vertical experiment facilities (VXFs) to minimize their impact on neutron scattering if loaded with neutronabsorbing experiments, to enhance reflector thermal-structural-hydraulic performance, and to simplify the complex fabrication process. The current number 4 and concept number 5 reflectors have 22 and 28 VXFs, respectively, and are modeled and analyzed in this study with the MCNP5 and SCALE 6.1.3 nuclear simulation codes.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2017

Validation of High-Fidelity Reactor Physics Models for Support of the KJRR Experimental Campaign in the Advanced Test Reactor

The Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute is currently in the process of qualifying a Low-Enriched Uranium fuel element design for the new Ki-Jang Research Reactor (KJRR). As part of this effort, a prototype KJRR fuel element was irradiated for several operating cycles in the Northeast Flux Trap of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory. The KJRR fuel element contained a very large quantity of fissile material (618g 235U) in comparison with historical ATR experiment standards (<1g 235U), and its presence in the ATR flux trap was expected to create a neutronic configuration that would be well outside of the approved validation envelope for the reactor physics analysis methods used to support ATR operations. Accordingly it was necessary, prior to high-power irradiation of the KJRR fuel element in the ATR, to conduct an extensive set of new low-power physics measurements with the KJRR fuel element installed in the ATR Critical Facility (ATRC), a companion facility to the ATR that is located in an immediately adjacent building, sharing the same fuel handling and storage canal. The new measurements had the objective of expanding the validation envelope for the computational reactor physics tools used to support ATR operations and safety analysis to include the planned KJRR irradiation in the ATR and similar experiments that are anticipated in the future. The computational and experimental results demonstrated that the neutronic behavior of the KJRR fuel element in the ATRC is well-understood, both in terms of its general effects on core excess reactivity and fission power distributions, its effects on the calibration of the core lobe power measurement system, as well as in terms of its own internal fission rate distribution and total fission power per unit ATRC core power. Taken as a whole, these results have significantly extended the ATR physics validation envelope, thereby enabling an entire new class of irradiation experiments.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Data Testing with Zero Power Reactor (ZPR), Zero Power Physics Reactor (ZPPR), and New Thermal Epithermal eXperiments (TEX) Plutonium Benchmarks [Slides]

This presentation states that new TSLs in ENDF/B-VIII.0 will reduce the overprediction of the library for the most moderated cases. The differences between VII.1 and VIII.0 are driven by the 239 Pu changes and are consistently higher for all configurations. The VIII.0 239 Pu thermal cross sections were specifically adjusted lower to better predict plutonium thermal solutions criticality benchmarks, yet they overpredict the TEX thermal configurations, moderated by PE. Other, smaller differences have been seen for 240 Pu and 56 Fe. PMM-002 has shown utility in testing cross sections over a wide range of neutron energies.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Reactor physics benchmark experiments at the JSI TRIGA MARK II reactor - Current status and future outlook

Full text of publication follows. With the development of new high-fidelity computational methods, improvement of nuclear data, and multiphysics modelling, there is an increased need for benchmark experiments to experimentally validate the models, methods and input data. Many of the nuclear facilities designed to perform reactor physics benchmark experiments have been shut down. Therefore, research reactors offer a great opportunity for benchmark experiments, if they are well designed and performed with great care and accuracy. In this presentation we provide an overview of the past and ongoing activities related to benchmark experiments at the Jozef Stefan Institute TRIGA Mark II research reactor. The following experiments have been performed: criticality with fresh fuel, {sup 197}Au(n,γ) and {sup 27}Al(n,α) reaction rates in irradiation channels, absolute and relative {sup 197}Au(n,γ), {sup 235}U(n,f) and {sup 238}U(n,f) reaction rates in the core, burnup, kinetic parameters, control rod worth, isothermal reactivity coefficient, self-shielding, slow and fast (pulse) transients, nuclear heating, delayed and prompt gamma ray production, temperature profiles for multi-physics. Since the existing fleet of research reactors is ageing very rapidly and new experiments are needed, new research reactors should be designed and built to meet the needs of future advanced reactors, education and training, and other technologies in the coming years. We will review planned activities at the JSI TRIGA reactors and plans for the new research reactor in Slovenia. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Demonstration of MOOSE-based Griffin reactor physics, code for heterogeneous lead-cooled fast reactor analysis

The MOOSE-based reactor physics code Griffin was assessed on a heterogeneous pin-resolved model of a prototype lead-cooled fast reactor assembly. This model was developed in preparation for future use in MOOSE-based multiphysics calculations for computing hot channel factors. Heterogeneous multigroup cross sections were prepared using the fast reactor multi-group cross section processing code MC{sup 2}-3 using a two-step method. Griffin simulations were performed using the DFEM-SN solver on 576 cores on Argonne's LCRC cluster. Diffusion-based acceleration methods were applied (NDA and CMFD). Reference solutions were generated with continuous energy MCNP and the hybrid MOC/finite element solver PROTEUS-MOC for code-to-code comparison. Space-angle convergence studies were conducted to observe convergence in k-eigenvalue and axial pin power distributions. The fully resolved Griffin calculation was within 68 pcm of the MCNP eigenvalue and exhibited max 1.2% relative error in the axial pin power distribution. Griffin produced nearly identical results to PROTEUS-MOC when using the same 9-group multigroup cross-section set. Griffin demonstrated favorable scaling in wall-clock time and memory usage when using diffusion-based acceleration methods. Griffin is capable of simulating the pin-resolved heterogeneous LFR assembly with good accuracy and performance, and is suitable for future use in coupled high-fidelity hot channel factor simulations. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Reactor Physics Experiment NEA Benchmark Possibilities for Measurements at ORCEF and Other DOE Facilities

This report documents a wide variety of critical and subcritical reactor physics measurements that could be included in the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments. The experiments were performed by John T. Mihalczo and coworkers at many (8) DOE facilities including the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Critical Experiments Facility (ORCEF between 1958 and 1975), Los Alamos National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and Babcock and Wilcox at Lynchburg, Virginia, and the Y-12 National Security Complex (the latter between 1975 and up to 2006). This report lists the various measurement programs and a limited description of the reactor physics measurement that were performed in each that could be benchmarks. Some criticality safety measurements at these facilities have already been documented in the NEA International Handbook of evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments. Some of these reactor physics measurements have also been documented in the literature and this document give a complete list of references for which John T. Mihalczo was an author or co-author. The experiments are divided into four classes: critical experiments only, critical and subsequent subcritical experiments, subcritical experiments at critical facilities, and subcritical measurements performed in material balance areas of the Y-12 National Security Complex (NSC) and other facilities. Because of the high cost and large amount of facility time related to these measurements, it is very cost-effective to mine the existing data to produce NEA reactor physics benchmarks. The information for many of these measurements is documented in critical experiment and subcritical experiment logbooks at the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Program at Idaho National Laboratory and in Laboratory Records at Oak Ridge National laboratory.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Sensitivity Studies, Gap Analysis, and Benchmark Experiment Optimization for Reactor Physics and Criticality Safety Applications

Many new reactor designs, such as advanced reactors and micro reactors, have materials that lack nuclear data validation. This is also true for many other applications in criticality safety and global security. Both differential and integral experiments are needed to validate cross-section data. Without this, a user cannot have confidence in the predicted results of a radiation-transport code. This work describes an approach called ARCHIMEDES (Application Relevant Critical/Subcritical HEU/Pu-based Integral Measurements for Enhancing Data and Evaluating Sensitivities) to design new criticality experiments that have similar k eff cross-section sensitivities to an application of interest. This process involves simulations to generate cross-section sensitivities to a parameter of interest (such as k eff ), a gap analysis to determine which existing benchmarks are most similar to the application, and an experiment optimization. Recently, there has been a great deal of interest in the reactor physics community on advanced reactors, micro reactors, and accelerator driven systems (ADS). This work will apply the described method to specific examples in this area. The focus of this work will be on the sensitivity study and gap analysis, while future work will include experiment design.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Update on the International Reactor Physics Evaluation Project (IRPhEP) for EGPRS

This set of slides provides an overview of benchmarking work for the International Reactor Physics Evaluation (IRPhE) project, to be presented to the Expert Group on Physics of Reactor Systems (EGPRS), which is an expert group within the OECD/NEA Working Party on Scientific Issues and Uncertainty Analysis of Reactor Systems (WPRS).

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2017

EBR-II Reactor Physics Benchmark Evaluation Report

This report provides a reactor physics benchmark evaluation with associated uncertainty quantification for the critical configuration of the April 1986 Experimental Breeder Reactor II Run 138B core configuration.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Resonance Self-Shielding Using Deterministic Transport Methods with Pointwise Cross Sections (Invited) - Eugene P. Wigner Reactor Physics Award

The difficulty of predicting resonance absorption has been recognized since the birth of reactor physics. A paper published by Wigner, et al. in 1955 describes pioneering theoretical work done in 1941 to provide an estimate for the resonance absorption in heterogeneous uranium lattices. This work introduced many fundamental concepts, including the narrow resonance (NR) approximation and the Wigner rational expression for the escape probability from a fuel lump, and it established an equivalence relation for resonance absorption in homogeneous and heterogeneous systems. During the 1960's, Bondarenko proposed an approach in which resonance shielding factors are precomputed and parametrized as a function of the background cross section by using the NR approximation and equivalence theory. This provided an efficient technique for treating resonance absorption in reactor lattices. The Bondarenko method and its modern variations (e.g., certain subgroup techniques) have become the predominate method for resonance shielding calculations in reactor physics. However, this approach has several limitations, most of which are well known, such as the treatment of resonance interference effects and its reliance on homogeneous-heterogeneous equivalence theory relationships. Other limitations are more subtle and less generally recognized, such as neglecting the impact of self-shielding the multigroup (MG) elastic removal cross section and the effects of directionally dependent shielding on the total cross section. This paper and the accompanying presentation apply deterministic solutions of the continuous energy (CE) neutron transport equation to examine common approximations made in resonance methods for a uniform lattice. The calculated fine-structure spectra are used to calibrate the impact of the approximations and describe how results from CE flux solution can be incorporated in the Bondarenko self-shielding method to improve the accuracy. (authors)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Summary of ORSphere Critical and Reactor Physics Measurements

In the early 1970s Dr. John T. Mihalczo (team leader), J. J. Lynn, and J. R. Taylor performed experiments at the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility (ORCEF) with highly enriched uranium (HEU) metal (called Oak Ridge Alloy or ORALLOY) to recreate GODIVA I results with greater accuracy than those performed at Los Alamos National Laboratory in the 1950s. The purpose of the Oak Ridge ORALLOY Sphere (ORSphere) experiments was to estimate the unreflected and unmoderated critical mass of an idealized sphere of uranium metal corrected to a density, purity, and enrichment such that it could be compared with the GODIVA I experiments. This critical configuration has been evaluated. Preliminary results were presented at ND2013. Since then, the evaluation was finalized and judged to be an acceptable benchmark experiment for the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiment Project (ICSBEP). Additionally, reactor physics measurements were performed to determine surface button worths, central void worth, delayed neutron fraction, prompt neutron decay constant, fission density and neutron importance. These measurements have been evaluated and found to be acceptable experiments and are discussed in full detail in the International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments. The purpose of this paper is summary summarize all the critical and reactor physics measurements evaluations and, when possible, to compare them to GODIVA experiment results.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Reactor Physics Analysis of Transitioning to a Thorium Fuel Cycle with Molten Salt Reactors

Commercial power reactors operating in the United States are light-water reactors (LWRs) fueled with low-enriched uranium (LEU) in a once-through fuel cycle; the important fissile isotopes are {sup 235}U, {sup 239}Pu, and {sup 241}Pu. In a thorium fuel cycle, the fertile isotope {sup 232}Th is converted into {sup 233}U, a fissile isotope that is not naturally occurring. In transitioning from the once-through fuel cycle to the thorium fuel cycle, the availability of man-made {sup 233}U presents a challenge: without it, the initial fissile material fueling the first reactors built in this transition is not the fissile isotope that the reactor is breeding. The transition requires an alternate fissile material until enough surplus {sup 233}U is available to start up additional reactors. In liquid-fueled molten salt reactors (MSRs), the fuel is dissolved into molten salt, which is continuously circulated through the core, simultaneously undergoing irradiation, chemical treatments and separations, and feeds. MSRs are an attractive technology in which the thorium fuel cycle can be deployed, as the {sup 233}U bred from {sup 232}Th is continuously being recycled back through the core. The bred fissile material is immediately available to fuel the core without processing or fuel fabrication. After start-up, only a fertile {sup 232}Th feed is necessary to sustain criticality in the MSR. But, in single-fluid MSRs, the initial fissile and fertile materials are mixed into the same molten fuel salt, complicating separations of initial and bred fissile materials. In solid-fuel systems, these materials are often separate. This analysis herein builds on previous work modeling thorium-fueled MSR start-up. It is based on unit cell representations of the graphite-moderated, 2250 MWt Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Molten Salt Breeder Reactor (MSBR). This paper discusses the start-up of the first MSR in the transition to a thorium fuel cycle and identifies challenges and limitations of fuel cycle deployment with this reactor technology. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗