SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Generalized random forces for rectangular panels under subsonic and supersonic boundary-layer turbulence are studied in time domain by a Monte Carlo approach. Panels with simple, fixed, elastic-free, and periodic elastic boundary conditions are considered. The nature of probability structure, peak distribution, threshold crossing, and cross spectral density is investigated.
A solution is presented for the problem of the buckling of curved rectangular panels subjected to combined shear and direct axial stress. Charts giving theoretical critical combinations of shear and direct axial stress are presented for panels having five different length-width ratios. Because the actual critical compressive stress of rectangular panels having substantial curvature is known to be much lower than the theoretical value, a semiempirical method of analysis of curved panels subjected to combined shear and direct axial stress is presented for use in design. (author
Flutter of flat rectangular panels based on three-dimensional supersonic potential flow
The response of a rectangular panel under the excitation of a turbulent boundary layer with a zero longitudinal mean pressure gradient in a subsonic flow was studied in detail. The method of normal mode was used together with the technique of spectral analysis. Both simply supported and clamped edge conditions of a panel were considered, and the displacement power spectral density of the panel response was computed. The results for the clamped edge panel compare favorably with existing data. Charts of structural acceptance, which provide a framework for estimating the response of other rectangular panels, are presented, and the physical significances of structural acceptances discussed.
Acoustic damping of clamped and hinged rectangular panel at natural frequency, noting dependence on aspect ratio
Flutter analysis on buckled supported rectangular panels under supersonic surface flow
The acoustic damping for single modes of a finite rectangular panel, simply supported in an infinite baffle, is theoretically determined from the ratio of the acoustic energy radiated per cycle to the vibratory energy of the panel. Asymptotic solutions for the low-frequency region are presented for a panel mode driven at an arbitrary frequency and for a panel mode vibrating at its natural frequency. Curves of acoustic damping for a panel mode vibrating at resonance, as a function of the panel thickness-to-length ratio, are presented for various panel aspect ratios. For panels vibrating below the critical frequency, the damping depends on the aspect ratio with square panels developing the smallest value. For panels vibrating above the critical frequency, the damping is nearly independent of the aspect ratio.
Flutter analysis of multiple streamwise bay rectangular panel at low supersonic flow
Responses of rectangular panels to random acoustic excitations by mechanical impedance measurement techniques
The radiation resistance corresponding to the natural modes of a finite rectangular panel is theoretically determined from the total energy radiated to the farfield. The panel is assumed to be simply supported in an infinite baffle. Asymptotic solutions for the low-frequency region are derived, and curves covering the entire frequency range for various mode shapes and aspect ratios are obtained through numerical integration. When the ratio of the acoustic wavenumber to the panel wavenumber is a constant much less than unity, the radiation resistance for all modes is a minimum if the intranodal area (the area between adjacent node lines) is square, and increases with the aspect ratio of the intranodal area.
Analysis of flutter of flat rectangular panels at low supersonic mach numbers using air forces from exact linearized potential-flow theory
Flutter analysis of flat rectangular panels based on three-dimensional supersonic unsteady potential flow
This research investigates thermal buckling characteristics of rectangular panels subjected to different types of humped temperature profile heating. Minimum potential energy and finite-element methods are used to calculate the panel buckling temperatures. The two methods give fairly close thermal buckling solutions. 'Buckling temperature magnification factor of the first kind, eta' is established for the fixed panel edges to scale up the buckling solution of uniform temperature loading case to give the buckling solution of the humped temperature profile loading cases. Also, 'buckling temperature magnification factor of the second kind, xi' is established for the free panel edges to scale up the buckling solution of humped temperature profile loading cases with unheated boundary heat sinks to give the buckling solutions when the boundary heat sinks are heated up.
Active control of sound radiation from a rectangular panel by two different methods has been experimentally studied and compared. In the first method a single control force applied directly to the structure is used with a single error microphone located in the radiated acoustic field. Global attenuation of radiated sound was observed to occur by two main mechanisms. For 'on-resonance' excitation, the control force had the effect of increasing the total panel input impedance presented to the nosie source, thus reducing all radiated sound. For 'off-resonance' excitation, the control force tends not significantly to modify the panel total response amplitude but rather to restructure the relative phases of the modes leading to a more complex vibration pattern and a decrease in radiation efficiency. For acoustic control, the second method, the number of acoustic sources required for global reduction was seen to increase with panel modal order. The mechanism in this case was that the acoustic sources tended to create an inverse pressure distribution at the panel surface and thus 'unload' the panel by reducing the panel radiation impedance. In general, control by structural inputs appears more effective than control by acoustic sources for structurally radiated noise.
Analysis of flutter of flat rectangular panels at low supersonic mach numbers using air forces from exact linearized potential-flow theory
Jet plume impingement forces acting on large flexible space structures may precipitate dynamically unstable behavior during space flights. Typical operating conditions in space involve rarefied gas flow regimes which are intrinsically distinct from continuum gas flow and are normally modeled using the kinetic theory of gas flow. Docking and undocking operations of the Space Shuttle with the Russian Mir space laboratory represent a scenario in which the stability boundaries of solar panels may be of interest. Extensive literature review of research work on the dynamic stability of rectangular panels in rarefied gas flow conditions indicated the lack of published reports dealing with this phenomenon. A recently completed preliminary study for NASA JSC dealing with the mathematical analysis of the stability of two-degree-of-freedom elastically supported rigid panels under the effect of rarefied gas flow was reviewed. A test plan outline is prepared for the purpose of conducting a series of experiments on four rectangular rigid test articles in a vacuum chamber under the effect of continuous and pulsating Nitrogen jet plumes. The purpose of the test plan is to gather enough data related to a number of key parameters to allow the validation of the two-degree-of-freedom mathematical model. The hardware required careful design to select a very lightweight material while satisfying rigidity and frequency requirements within the constraints of the test environment. The data to be obtained from the vacuum chamber tests can be compared with the predicted behavior of the theoretical two-degree-of-freedom model. Using the data obtained in this study, further research can identify the limitations of the mathematical model. In addition modifications to the mathematical model can be made, if warranted, to accurately predict the behavior of rigid panels under rarefied gas flow regimes.
Experimental panel flutter data have been obtained at Mach numbers from 1.2 to 3.0 for buckled rectangular panels and the effect of a pressure differential has been determined. Increasing the pressure differential was effective in eliminating flutter on most of the panels tested. The effects of the variables in the panel flutter parameter ((square root of m(exp 2) -1) * (E/q))(exp 1/3) t/l (where M is the Mach number, q is the dynamic pressure, E is Young's modulus, and t and l are the panel thickness and length, respectively) were investigated for buckled panels clamped on the front and rear edges and a critical value of this parameter of 0.44 is indicated at zero pressure differential when the panel width-length ratio is 0.69. An estimated flutter boundary is presented for buckled panels clamped on four edges, with width-length ratios of 0.21 to 4.0. This boundary shows that the panel width is more significant than the panel length when the ratio of width to length is less than approximately 0.5. Panels clamped on four edges and buckled in two half waves in the direction of flow were found to be particularly susceptible to flutter. The results of limited tests on panels with applied damping, curvature, and lengthwise stiffeners are also presented and discussed.
The objective of the research described in this paper is to assess the accuracy of classical linear acceleration/strain prediction theory for flat, rectangular panels excited by low level, acoustic plane waves. Predictions for both aluminum and laminated composite panels were based on the Ritz method using an orthotropic, multi-mode analysis with rotational springs on the boundaries. The measured natural frequencies and critical damping ratio of the panels were empirial inputs to the model. The comparison between measured and predicted acceleration was very good. Although a factor of three bias error was found between measured and predicted strains, the model was good for predicting the trends in the spatial variation in strain across the panel.