Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “RENDEZVOUS TRAJECTORY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1962

Optimum Interplanetary Rendezvous Trajectories With Powerlimited Vehicles

The optimum-thrust equations for both variable and constant thrust are presented. These thrust programs are used to generate rendezvous trajectories from the Earth to Mars for various flight times and launch dates during the years 1968-71. The manner in which the propulsion requirements vary with flight time and launch date are considered, and a comparison of vehicle performance using the variable- and constant-thrust programs is presented. The optimization of the pro- pulsion system parameters is discussed, and the existence of optimum launch dates is interpreted in terms of certain transversality conditions derivable from the calculus of variations. A brief comparison of the advanced propulsion vehicle and the ballistic vehicle propulsion requirements is made for Earth-Mars rendezvous trajectories. An appendix considering the analytical basis for this work is included.

INTERPLANETARY TRAJECTORY↗
NASA NTRS1977

Ion Drive multi-asteroid rendezvous trajectories

The general characteristics of multiasteroid rendezvous missions are examined, taking into account a use of an improved solar electric propulsion system, called Ion Drive. The improvements are related to the development of light-weight solar cells, extensions to high thruster power levels with high exhaust velocity, and the attachment of solar concentrators to increase the power available beyond 1.5 AU. Flight times on the order of 500-800 days are generally required. It is assumed that a stay time of about 60 days at each asteroid is adequate. Attention is given to launch and spacecraft parameters, the search technique, and multiasteroid tours involving Ceres and Vesta. It is found that at least four asteroids in the main belt, generally selected from those with known characteristics, may be reached on a single mission with a 100-kg separable probe landed on each one.

Bender, D. F.↗
NASA NTRS2008

Lunar Ascent and Rendezvous Trajectory Design

The Lunar Lander Ascent Module (LLAM) will leave the lunar surface and actively rendezvous in lunar orbit with the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV). For initial LLAM vehicle sizing efforts, a nominal trajectory, along with required delta-V and a few key sensitivities, is very useful. A nominal lunar ascent and rendezvous trajectory is shown, along with rationale and discussion of the trajectory shaping. Also included are ascent delta-V sensitivities to changes in target orbit and design thrust-to-weight of the vehicle. A sample launch window for a particular launch site has been completed and is included. The launch window shows that budgeting enough delta-V for two missed launch opportunities may be reasonable. A comparison between yaw steering and on-orbit plane change maneuvers is included. The comparison shows that for large plane changes, which are potentially necessary for an anytime return from mid-latitude locations, an on-orbit maneuver is much more efficient than ascent yaw steering. For a planned return, small amounts of yaw steering may be necessary during ascent and must be accounted for in the ascent delta-V budget. The delta-V cost of ascent yaw steering is shown, along with sensitivity to launch site latitude. Some discussion of off-nominal scenarios is also included. In particular, in the case of a failed Powered Descent Initiation burn, the requirements for subsequent rendezvous with the Orion vehicle are outlined.

Sostaric, Ronald R.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Use of automated rendezvous trajectory planning to improve spacecraft operations efficiency

The current planning process for space shuttle rendezvous with a second Earth-orbiting vehicle is time consuming and costly. It is a labor-intensive, manual process performed pre-mission with the aid of specialized maneuver processing tools. Real-time execution of a rendezvous plan must closely follow a predicted trajectory, and targeted solutions leading up to the terminal phase are computed on the ground. Despite over 25 years of Gemini, Apollo, Skylab, and shuttle vehicle-to-vehicle rendezvous missions flown to date, rendezvous in Earth orbit still requires careful monitoring and cannot be taken for granted. For example, a significant trajectory offset was experienced during terminal phase rendezvous of the STS-32 Long Duration Exposure Facility retrieval mission. Several improvements can be introduced to the present rendezvous planning process to reduce costs, produce more fuel-efficient profiles, and increase the probability of mission success.

Mulder, Tom A.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Some impulsive rendezvous trajectories and their possible optimality.

Two- and three-impulse trajectories are investigated for fixed-time, fixed-angle rendezvous between vacant circular coplanar orbits, for trip angles less than, or equal to 2 pi in magnitude. For two-impulse trajectories, general features of the characteristic velocity function are outlined. Parameters of the intermediate orbit are reviewed. Attention is given to limiting cases. Computation of the adjoint system helps to define the domain of possible optimality foajectories: it is a closed domain in the trip time, trip angle plane. Waiting periods on terminal orbits are considered. The domain of possible optimality is defined using Lawden's primer vrtory. This domain extends to infinity if the radius ratio of terminal orbits is less than 15.6. Three-impulse trajectories are tried in cases where two-impulse trajectories, with or without cost, have been found nonoptimal. Improvements on the characteristic velocity are thus obtained.

Peltier, J. P.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Robust Trajectory Optimization and GN&C Performance Analysis for NRHO Rendezvous

This paper evaluates several candidate Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbits (NRHO) rendezvous trajectory designs using linear covariance (LinCov) analysis and determines the optimal locations for NRHO rendezvous translational maneuver locations. The performance of several candidate relative trajectory designs are determined as a function of relative navigation accuracy (angles only), inertial optical navigation (OpNav), range observability maneuvers, maneuver execution errors, relative maneuver targeting, and environment uncertainties. Further, the optimal locations of rendezvous maneuvers are determined for each of the candidate reference trajectories. The long-term goal of this research is to utilize LinCov and a genetic optimization algorithm (GA) to determine a complete end-to-end optimal NRHO trajectory design that is robust to navigation errors, maneuver execution errors, and environment uncertainties. This paper represents a first step toward this goal. Three candidate rendezvous trajectories with varying numbers of range-observability maneuvers are evaluated for their robustness to uncertainties, errors, and total trajectory correction delta-v performance. Some key elements of this analysis include relative navigation performance in an NRHO, relative trajectory dispersion performance, and total 3-sigma delta-v performance. This development provides the foundation to then determine an optimal and robust end-to-end NRHO rendezvous trajectory, including the determination of the optimal locations of range observability maneuvers, if needed.

Linear Covariance Analysis↗
NASA NTRS1986

Trajectory shaping rendezvous guidance

The Space Station will bring a great increase in rendezvous traffic. Formerly, rendezvous has been expensive in terms of time and crew involvement. Multiple trajectory adjustments on separate orbits have been required to meet safety, lighting, and geometry requirements. This paper describes a new guidance technique in which the approach trajectory is shaped by a sequence of velocity increments in order to satisfy multiple constraints within a single orbit. The approach phase is planned before the mission, leaving a group of free parameters that are optimized by onboard guidance. Fuel penalties are typically a few percent, compared to unshaped Hohmann transfers, and total fuel costs can be less than those of more time-consuming ways of meeting the same requirements.

Klumpp, A. R.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Modular Active Self-Assembling Space Telescope Swarms

The Phase I study included a detailed exploration of a specific mission concept based on this architecture - a 31-meter diameter version of the LUVOIR (Large Ultraviolet Optical Infrared Surveyor) mission concept with the same wavelength coverage and wave-front quality requirements. The study focused on establishing the feasibility of the proposed concept with respect to what were identified as the most challenging aspects of the mission: the ability to find orbital solutions using solar sail propulsion for both the initial transfers and subsequent rendezvous trajectories; and the ability to generate the required final primary mirror surface out of uniformly polished individual module mirrors using deformation via mechanical degrees of freedom. As a result of the Phase I work it was shown that both orbital and optical solutions are feasible, but will require technology advancement in multiple key areas. In particular, improvements to solar sail areal densities and loading factors will allow us to more easily find fully general solutions for the transfer trajectories, while lower mass, ultra-precise cryogenic linear actuators will likely be needed to form the final mirror shape. However, it was found that current state of the art in solar sails was sufficient for rendezvous trajectories once on-orbit, that the requisite wave-front quality could be achieved with actuation requirements not more stringent than those being carried by LUVOIR, and that there exists a well-defined design space in which the module spacecraft designs can be optimized. The technology development required to progress this work overlaps significantly with numerous NASA technology roadmaps, as well as the Exoplanet Exploration Program's technologies gap list, meaning that continued development of this concept would directly benefit a variety of NASA programs, as well as enabling the completely unique capabilities provided by a 31-meter optical space telescope...Our architecture requires only a single module type allowing us to directly leverage the cost and efficiency benefits of true mass production, in direct contrast to previously explored self-assembling swarm concepts, which typically include multiple module types.

Astronomy↗
NASA NTRS2021

OSIRIS-REx Extended Mission Trajectory Design & Target Search

After jettisoning its Sample Return Capsule (SRC) containing regolith samples from the near-Earth asteroid (101955) Bennu to Earth in September 2023, the Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, and Security–Regolith Explorer (OSIRIS-REx) spacecraft will perform a divert maneuver and safely fly by Earth at an altitude of 250 km. SRC return and the divert maneuver officially mark the completion of the spacecraft’s primary mission; however, it will continue on in heliocentric orbit with a nearly fully-functional instrument suite and enough propellant for nearly 600 m/s Delta-V. The post-Earth flyby trajectory fortuitously enables an exciting extended mission opportunity: rendezvous with the near-Earth asteroid (99942)Apophis immediately following its historic Earth close approach in April 2029. In this paper, we detail the discovery, optimization, and analysis of the Apophis rendezvous trajectory for an extended OSIRIS-REx mission. We also present the technical approach for an alternate target search and corresponding results, assessing the alternate trajectories compared to the baseline Apophis rendezvous from a trajectory design standpoint.

Brian Sutter↗