Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Radiation Dosage”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Solar Energetic Particle Radiation Dosage Near a Simple Lunar Crater

The Moon has a harsh radiation environment that poses significant challenges to future science and exploration activities. Exposure hazards from space radiation are primarily due to galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) and solar energetic particles (SEPs) that are incident at the lunar surface from all directions. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter’s (LRO) Cosmic Ray Telescope for Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) instrument has been observing space radiation around the Moon since 2009 [1].The CRaTER observations show as teady GCR flux with intermittent SEP events that have much higher fluxes. During solar minimum GCR shave a higher flux, while SEP events are less common. On the other hand, during solar maximum the SEP events have a higher rate, but the GCR flux is lower. This is due to variations in solar activity. GCR shave characteristic energies spanning from1 MeV to 10s of GeV[2]. SEPs, however, have much lower energy ranges of 50 keV to 100sof MeV. The level of exposure at a given location on the Moon is dependent on the amount of space radiation incident from above the local horizon(Figure 1). This means that radiation dosage depends on the surrounding terrain for any location on the surface, so it can vary substantially from point to point. Here we consider the radiation exposure around simple lunar craters that are representative of the types of landforms that will be encountered by future landed missions(e.g., the Artemis program)[3]. Of particular concern will be radiation exposure to biological targets, such as astronauts, and to critical electronic systems

P H Phipps↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Galactic Cosmic Ray Proton Radiation Dosage Near a Simple Lunar Crater

The Moon has a harsh radiation environment that poses significant challenges to future science and exploration activities. Exposure hazards from space radiation are primarily due to galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) and solar energetic particles (SEPs) that are incident at the lunar surface from all directions. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter’s (LRO) Cosmic Ray Telescope for Effects of Radiation (CRaTER)instrument has been observing space radiation around the Moon since 2009 [1].The CRaTER observations show a steady rate of GCR flux with intermittent SEP events that have much higher fluxes. During solar minimum the GCR have a higher flux rate while the SEP events are less common. On the other hand, during solar maximum the SEP events have a higher rate but the GCR flux is lower. This is due to variations in solar activity. GCR shave characteristic energies spanning from 1 MeV to 10s of GeV[2]. SEPs, however, have much lower energy ranges of 50 keV to 10 GeV. The level of exposure at a given location on the Moon is dependent on the amount of space radiation incident from above the local horizon(Figure 1). This means that, radiation dosage depends on the surrounding terrain for any location on the surface, so it can vary substantially from point to point. Here we consider the radiation exposure around simple lunar craters that are representative of the types of landforms that will be encountered by future landed missions(e.g., the Artemis program)[3]. Of particular concern will be radiation exposure to biological targets, such as astronauts, and to critical electronic systems.

P H Phipps↗
NASA NTRS2023

Space-Shielding Radiation Dosage Code Evaluation - Phase 1: SHIELDOSE-2 Radiation-Assessment Code

Radiation-transport codes or radiation-analysis tools are used in the spacecraft-design community to define and assess the local radiation levels. Among various radiation-transport/analysis tools available, SHIELDOSE-2 is commonly used in the early spacecraft-design phases because it has been established that it provides reasonably reliable results with relatively rapid computation time. The NASA Engineering and Safety Center initiated a two-phased study: (1) to better understand and document the SHIELDOSE-2 code capabilities and limitations, and (2) to recommend alternative tools to use for cases where SHIELDOSE-2 is not applicable. This report provides a summary of the Phase 1 study.

SHIELDOSE-2↗
NASA NTRS2024

Space-Shielding Radiation Dosage Code Evaluation Phase 2: SHIELDOSE-2 Radiation-Assessment Code

Radiation-transport codes or radiation-analysis tools are used in the spacecraft-design community to define and assess the local radiation levels. Among various radiation-transport/analysis tools available, SHIELDOSE-2 is commonly used in the early spacecraft-design phases because it has been established that it provides reasonably reliable results with relatively rapid computation time. The NASA Engineering and Safety Center initiated a two-phased study: (1) to better understand and document the SHIELDOSE-2 code capabilities and limitations, and (2) to identify alternative tools to use for cases where SHIELDOSE-2 is not applicable. This report provides a summary of the Phase 2 study.

SHIELDOSE-2↗
NASA NTRS1972

A simple code for use in shielding and radiation dosage analyses

A simple code for use in analyses of gamma radiation effects in laminated materials is described. Simple and good geometry is assumed so that all multiple collision and scattering events are excluded from consideration. The code is capable of handling laminates up to six layers. However, for laminates of more than six layers, the same code may be used to incorporate two additional layers at a time, making use of punch-tape outputs from previous computation on all preceding layers. Spectrum of attenuated radiation are obtained as both printed output and punch tape output as desired.

Wan, C. C.↗
NASA NTRS2003

Correlation of Radiation Dosage With Mechanical Properties of Thin Films

The objective of this investigation was to examine the relationship between irradiation level (proton dose), microstructure, and stress levels in chemical vapor deposited diamond and polysilicon film using crosssectioned specimens. However, the emphasis was placed on the diamond specimen because diamond holds much promise for use in advanced technologies. The use of protons allows not only the study of the charged particle that may cause the most microstructural damage in Earth-orbit microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) devices, but also allows the study of relatively deeply buried damage inside the diamond material. Using protons allows these studies without having to resort to megaelectronvolt implant energies that may create extensive damage due to the high energy that is needed for the implantation process. Since 1 MEMS devices operating in space will not have an opportunity to reverse radiation damage via annealing, only nonannealed specimens were investigated. The following three high spatial resolution techniques were used to examine these relationships: (I) Scanning electron microscopy, (2) micro-Raman spectroscopy, and (3) micro x-ray diffraction.

Newton, R. L.↗
NASA NTRS2004

Space Radiation Hazards and Countermeasures: 1990-2004

Contents include the folowing: radiation environments, tools and techniques for measuring radiation dosage, effects of radiation on humans and animal models, methods for strengthening biological resistance to radiation, and radiation shielding.

Source record↗
DOE OSTI2026

Measuring changes in environmental radiological background from construction of an advanced nuclear reactor testing facility

We present a method to survey and track changes in the environmental radiological background during the construction and operation of advanced nuclear reactor facilities. We discuss the results of two surveys of the environmental gamma-radiation background at NEXT Lab, an advanced nuclear reactor research facility on the campus of Abilene Christian University, prior to the introduction of radioactive material. In both surveys, the observed radiation dosage rates are low, with the highest rates at 15% of the average total radiation dosage rate for the United States. We observe ≈20% changes in the radiological background of the property in locations where the environment was changed by construction and ≈20% variations within the facilities correlated with variations in building materials.

Environment↗
NASA NTRS1977

Provisional standards of radiation safety during flights

Radiation effects during space flights are discussed in the context of the sources and dangers of such radiation and the radiobiological prerequisites for establishing safe levels of radiation dosage. Standard safe levels of radiation during space flight are established.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2015

Evidence Report: Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Other Degenerative Tissue Effects from Radiation Exposure

Occupational radiation exposure from the space environment may result in non-cancer or non-CNS degenerative tissue diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, cataracts, and respiratory or digestive diseases. However, the magnitude of influence and mechanisms of action of radiation leading to these diseases are not well characterized. Radiation and synergistic effects of radiation cause DNA damage, persistent oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, and accelerated tissue aging and degeneration, which may lead to acute or chronic disease of susceptible organ tissues. In particular, cardiovascular pathologies such as atherosclerosis are of major concern following gamma-ray exposure. This provides evidence for possible degenerative tissue effects following exposures to ionizing radiation in the form of the GCR or SPEs expected during long-duration spaceflight. However, the existence of low dose thresholds and dose-rate and radiation quality effects, as well as mechanisms and major risk pathways, are not well-characterized. Degenerative disease risks are difficult to assess because multiple factors, including radiation, are believed to play a role in the etiology of the diseases. As additional evidence is pointing to lower, space-relevant thresholds for these degenerative effects, particularly for cardiovascular disease, additional research with cell and animal studies is required to quantify the magnitude of this risk, understand mechanisms, and determine if additional protection strategies are required.The NASA PEL (Permissive Exposure Limit)s for cataract and cardiovascular risks are based on existing human epidemiology data. Although animal and clinical astronaut data show a significant increase in cataracts following exposure and a reassessment of atomic bomb (A-bomb) data suggests an increase in cardiovascular disease from radiation exposure, additional research is required to fully understand and quantify these adverse outcomes at lower doses (less than 0.5 gray (SI unit for ionizing radiation dosage, i.e. one joule of radiation energy per one kilogram of matter)) to facilitate risk prediction. This risk has considerable uncertainty associated with it, and no acceptable model for projecting degenerative tissue risk is currently available. In particular, risk factors such as obesity, alcohol, and tobacco use can act as confounding factors that contribute to the large uncertainties. The PELs could be violated under certain scenarios, including following a large SPE (solar proton event) or long-term GCR (galactic cosmic ray) exposure. Specifically, for a Mars mission, the accumulated dose is sufficiently high that epidemiology data and preliminary risk estimates suggest a significant risk for cardiovascular disease. Ongoing research in this area is intended to provide the evidence base for accurate risk quantification to determine criticality for extended duration missions. Data specific to the space radiation environment must be compiled to quantify the magnitude of this risk to decrease the uncertainty in current PELs and to determine if additional protection strategies are required. New research results could lead to estimates of cumulative radiation risk from CNS and degenerative tissue diseases that, when combined with the cancer risk, may have major negative impacts on mission design, costs, schedule, and crew selection. The current report amends an earlier report (Human Research Program Requirements Document, HRP-47052, Rev. C, dated Jan 2009) in order to provide an update of evidence since 2009.

Patel, Zarana↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Phase-Free Orbital Element Model Designed to Enable Rapid Assessment of Eclipse and Radiation Profiles for Low-Thrust Spiral Transfers Around the Earth

The Gateway Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) will be the first low-thrust solar electric ion propulsion mission to transfer from a highly elliptical Earth-bound orbit to a southern near-rectilinear halo orbit (NRHO) at the Earth-Moon L2 point. Due to the low thrust nature of the transfer orbit, it is desirable to locate viable trajectories that minimize the time spent in the Van Allen radiation belts to reduce solar array degradation and keep radiation dosages below design limits. In addition to radiation, low thrust trajectories which spiral around the Earth will pass through at least one or more seasons of Earth eclipses. The solar electric propulsion system relies on sunlight to generate the power necessary to operate the ion thrusters. Therefore, it is advantageous to find trajectories which also minimize the amount of time spent in eclipse and avoid excessive battery draw-down periods. We present an analytical method which rapidly approximates low-thrust spiral trajectories, fit to high-fidelity simulated data and parameterized to allow for changes in vehicle thrust characteristics, that is post-processed to determine eclipse profiles and time spent in the belts using a novel approach that estimates the geometry of the belts using a first-order dipole approximation of the Earth’s magnetic field. This method can be used to find satisfactory launch dates and orbit orientations that can serve as initial guesses when optimizing such missions in high-fidelity software.

low thrust trajectory design↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Phase-Free Orbital Element Model Designed to Enable Rapid Assessment of Eclipse and Radiation Profiles for Low-Thrust Spiral Transfers Around the Earth

The Gateway Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) will be the first low-thrust solar electric ion propulsion mission to transfer from a highly elliptical Earth-bound orbit to a southern near-rectilinear halo orbit (NRHO) at the Earth-Moon L2 point. Due to the low thrust nature of the transfer orbit, it is desirable to locate viable trajectories that minimize the time spent in the Van Allen radiation belts to reduce solar array degradation and keep radiation dosages below design limits. In addition to radiation, low thrust trajectories which spiral around the Earth will pass through at least one or more seasons of Earth eclipses. The solar electric propulsion system relies on sunlight to generate the power necessary to operate the ion thrusters. Therefore, it is advantageous to find trajectories which also minimize the amount of time spent in eclipse and avoid excessive battery draw-down periods. We present an analytical method which rapidly approximates low-thrust spiral trajectories, fit to high-fidelity simulated data and parameterized to allow for changes in vehicle thrust characteristics, that is post-processed to determine eclipse profiles and time spent in the belts using a novel approach that estimates the geometry of the belts using a first-order dipole approximation of the Earth’s magnetic field. This method can be used to find satisfactory launch dates and orbit orientations that can serve as initial guesses when optimizing such missions in high-fidelity software.

low thrust trajectory design↗
NASA NTRS2000

Project Galileo: completing Europa, preparing for Io

Galileo has completed the Europa leg of the Galileo Europa Mission, and is now pumping down the apojove in each succeeding orbit in preparation for the Io phase. Including three encounters earlier in the primary mission, the total of ten close passes by Europa have provided a wealth of interesting and provocative information about this intriguing body. The results presented include new and exciting information about Europa's interactions with Jupiter's magnetosphere, its interior structure, and its tantalizing surface features, which strongly hint at a watery subsurface layer. Additional data concerning Callisto, and its own outlook for a subsurface ocean are also presented. In addition the engineering aspects of operating the spacecraft during the past year are explored, as well as a brief examination of what will be the challenges to prepare for the Io encounters. The steadily increasing radiation dosage that the spacecraft is experiencing is well beyond the original design parameters, and is contributing to a number of spacecraft problems and concerns. The ability of the flight team to analyze and solve these problems, even at the reduced staffing levels of an extended mission, is a testament to their tenacity and loyalty to the mission. The engineering data being generated by these continuing radiation-induced anomalies will prove invaluable to designers of future spacecraft to Jupiter and its satellites. The lessons learned during this arduous process are presented. c 2000 International Astronautical Federation. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

long duration↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lunar Base Construction Overview

Previous lunar missions and campaigns have been restricted to using robotic landers and lunar orbiting satellites as well as sortie type of operations using astronaut crews (NASA Apollo program). Now, the next phase of lunar exploration has begun under NASA’s Artemis program and there has been an international response where other nations such as China, Russia, India, Canada, Japan and the European Union of nations, have all expressed interest in either collaborating or competing with NASA on the Moon. This next phase has an over arching goal of achieving a permanent human presence on the Moon via sustainable methods. A lunar base with human occupancy will require infrastructure to provide shelter, utilities, landing/launch pads, roads, communications, power and all the other necessities to sustain human life and protect equipment. Since human biology is not well suited for surviving in the lunar environment, there will be many forms of automated equipment, autonomy and robotic helpers that will minimize the amount of Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA) required by the crew. This will mean that the radiation dosage received by the crew will stay within acceptable and safe career doses. Radiation shielding via the use of regolith can also mitigate radiation dangers. The required infrastructure must be constructed, but the mass and logistics of bringing all the construction materials from Earth are prohibitive, which makes the necessary construction difficult to achieve. In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) aims to solve this challenge by sourcing construction materials locally or “in-situ”. This means that their transportation can be completely eliminated, resulting in large cost savings by avoiding the launch out of Earth’s deep gravity well and subsequent trans lunar injection, lunar orbit capture and landing. This paper will give an overview of the required construction tasks and related equipment that will be required to robotically build a lunar base using in-situ resources. It will also organize these tasks into logical groupings so that technology development and implementation can be pursued within a framework that can be referenced by all involved.

Lunar Base↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lunar Base Construction Planning

Previous lunar missions and campaigns have been restricted to using robotic landers and lunar orbiting satellites as well as sortie type of operations using astronaut crews(NASA Apollo program).Now, the next phase of lunar exploration has begun under NASA’s Artemis program and there has been an international response where other nations such as China, Russia, India, Canada, Japan and theEuropean Union of nations, have all expressed interest in either collaborating or competing with NASA on theMoon. This next phase has an overarching goal of achieving a permanent human presence on theMoon via sustainable methods. A lunar base with human occupancy will require infrastructure to provide shelter, utilities, landing/launch pads, roads, communications, power and all the other necessities to sustain human life and protect equipment.Since human biology is not well suited for surviving in the lunar environment, there will be many forms of automated equipment, autonomy and robotic helpers that will minimize the amount of Extra-Vehicular Activity(EVA) required by the crew. This will mean that the radiation dosage received by the crew will stay within acceptable and safe career doses. Radiation shielding via the use of regolith can also mitigate radiation dangers.The required infrastructure must be constructed, but the mass and logistics of bringing all the construction materials from Earth are prohibitive, which makes the necessary construction difficult to achieve.In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) aims to solve this challenge by sourcing construction materials locally or “in-situ”. This means that their transportation can be completely eliminated, resulting in large cost savings by avoiding the launch out of Earth’s deep gravity well and subsequent trans lunar injection, lunar orbit capture and landing. This paper will give ahistorical review and current status of lunar construction planning and a high level introduction to the required infrastructure and construction equipment that will be required to robotically build a lunar base using in-situ resources.It will also organize these tasks into logical groupings so that technology development and implementation can be pursued within a framework that can be referenced by all involved.

Lunar↗
NASA NTRS1971

Microwave dosimeter - A concept

Dosimeter determines time-integrated radiation dosage to which an individual is exposed. Integration is measured chemically in proportion to radiation detected. Wearer receives an exposure measurement representing an average of the dose over the entire body.

Bartlett, R. G.↗