Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Reactor Physics Method”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Study on Reactor Physical Module Method Used in THR Simulator

In order to apply heat in winter 5 MW low temperature nuclear test heating reactor (THR) was designed by Institute of nuclear and new energy technology, Tsinghua University, China. This test reactor is a model for the large-scale nuclear heating reactor (NHR). The primary loop in NHR is integrated nature circulation. Integrated nature circulation improved the safety of the reactor. Under the serious environment problem, the nuclear heat is one of the means of solving the pollution problem in China. So, the study on NHR comes to be important and necessary. The simulator is a good tool to study the transient status and understand the feature in a reactor. There were many studies on the NHR simulator but the point physical model was always selected before. The aim of the work in this paper is to build three dimension reactor physical module which can be used in THR simulator. It is the base for the study on NHR simulator.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Embedding Neural Thermal Scattering (NeTS) Modules in SERPENT for Higher Fidelity Advanced Reactor Analysis

When a neutron born in fission thermalizes to the order of $k$ $B$ $T$, it’s de-Broglie wavelength and energy approach the order of inter-atomic spacing and elementary lattice oscillations, respectively. $S$($a,β,t$) or the scattering law, uuantify these temperature-dependent crystallographic contributions to total cross section (or reaction rate). In a Monte Carlo analysis, cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of $S$($a,β,t$) are loaded to memory from “A Compact ENDF” (ACE) files for stochastically selecting thermal scattered neutron trajectories. In this work, novel neural thermal scattering (NeTS) modules for $S$($a,β,t$) CDFs are designed, trained, serialized and embedded within SERPENT using Python’s limited C-API for on-the-fly deployment of crystalline graphite $S$($a,β,t$) sampling. Torchscript tracing and Numba just-in-time (JIT) compilation streamline neural inference on NVIDIA GPUs with CUDA libraries. Demonstrations of bare sphere thermalization of fast and thermal sources show excellent agreement between embedded NeTS in SERPENT and MCNP. With an explicit model of the reactor, NeTS can predict on-the-fly changes in TREAT neutron spectra as a function of local temperature, which can serve to improve transient and accident predictions in a multiphysics analysis framework. This framework can be further extended to account on-the-fly for changes in local graphitic microstructure to scattering cross sections, and outlines a novel coupling of modern machine learning with state-of-the-art reactor physics methods.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

GAMSOR: Gamma Source Preparation and DIF3D Flux Solution

Nuclear reactors that rely upon the fission reaction have two modes of thermal energy deposition in the reactor system: neutron absorption and gamma absorption. The gamma rays are typically generated by neutron capture reactions or during the fission process which means the primary driver of energy production is of course the neutron interaction. In conventional reactor physics methods, the gamma heating component is ignored such that the gamma absorption is forced to occur at the gamma emission site. For experimental reactor systems like EBR-II and FFTF, the placement of structural pins and assemblies internal to the core leads to problems with power heating predictions because there is no fission power source internal to the assembly to dictate a spatial distribution of the power. As part of the EBR-II support work in the 1980s, the GAMSOR code was developed to assist analysts in calculating the gamma heating. The GAMSOR code is a modified version of DIF3D and actually functions within a sequence of DIF3D calculations. The gamma flux in a conventional fission reactor system does not perturb the neutron flux and thus the gamma flux calculation can be cast as a fixed source problem given a solution to the steady state neutron flux equation. This leads to a sequence of DIF3D calculations, called the GAMSOR sequence, which involves solving the neutron flux, then the gamma flux, and then combining the results to do a summary edit. In this manuscript, we go over the GAMSOR code and detail how it is put together and functions. We also discuss how to setup the GAMSOR sequence and input for each DIF3D calculation in the GAMSOR sequence.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

GAMSOR: Gamma Source Preparation and DIF3D Flux Solution

Nuclear reactors that rely upon the fission reaction have two modes of thermal energy deposition in the reactor system: neutron absorption and gamma absorption. The gamma rays are typically generated by neutron absorption reactions or during the fission process which means the primary driver of energy production is of course the neutron interaction. In conventional reactor physics methods, the gamma heating component is ignored such that the gamma absorption is forced to occur at the gamma emission site. For experimental reactor systems like EBR-II and FFTF, the placement of structural pins and assemblies internal to the core leads to problems with power heating predictions because there is no fission power source internal to the assembly to dictate a spatial distribution of the power. As part of the EBR-II support work in the 1980s, the GAMSOR code was developed to assist analysts in calculating the gamma heating. The GAMSOR code is a modified version of DIF3D and actually functions within a sequence of DIF3D calculations. The gamma flux in a conventional fission reactor system does not perturb the neutron flux and thus the gamma flux calculation can be cast as a fixed source problem given a solution to the steady state neutron flux equation. This leads to a sequence of DIF3D calculations, called the GAMSOR sequence, which involves solving the neutron flux, then the gamma flux, then combining the results to do a summary edit. In this manuscript, we go over the GAMSOR code and detail how it is put together and functions. We also discuss how to setup the GAMSOR sequence and input for each DIF3D calculation in the GAMSOR sequence. With the GAMSOR capability, users can take any valid steady state DIF3D calculation and compute the power distribution due to neutron and gamma heating. The MC2-3 code is the preferable companion code to use for generating neutron and gamma cross section data, but the GAMSOR code can accept cross section data from other sources. To further this aspect, an additional utility code was created which demonstrates how to merge the neutron and gamma cross section data together to carry out a simultaneous solve of the two systems.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

GAMSOR: Gamma Source Preparation and DIF3D Flux Solution (Rev. 2)

Nuclear reactors that rely upon the fission reaction have two modes of thermal energy deposition in the reactor system: neutron absorption and gamma absorption. The gamma rays are typically generated by neutron capture reactions or during the fission process which means the primary driver of energy production is of course the neutron interaction. In conventional reactor physics methods, the gamma heating component is ignored such that the gamma absorption is forced to occur at the gamma emission site. For experimental reactor systems like EBR-II and FFTF, the placement of structural pins and assemblies internal to the core leads to problems with power heating predictions because there is no fission power source internal to the assembly to dictate a spatial distribution of the power.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Control rod treatment for FEM based radiation transport methods

This paper presents a novel control rod treatment for finite element method (FEM) based reactor physics simulations. The new method falls into the class of homogenization methods which treat material interfaces within mesh elements by defining a representative, homogenized nuclear cross section set. In contrast to existing homogenization based cusping treatments that attempt to approximate flux-volume weighting of the cross sections, we propose to exactly integrate terms appearing in the variational form of the transport or diffusion equation over mixed material elements. This goal is achieved by defining smoothly varying cross sections in elements that straddle material boundaries. It is shown that the smoothly varying cross sections can be obtained by projecting the piecewise set of cross sections onto the set of Legendre polynomials up to a finite order. Implementation of smoothly varying cross sections is supported within the Rattlesnake radiation multiphysics code that is currently under development at the Idaho National Laboratory. Homogenization methods traditionally suffer from cusping effects that originate from overestimation of absorption cross sections in strongly neutron-absorbing materials as found in control rods. We demonstrate that the presented method is (1) highly effective in removing cusping effects and (2) provides accurate results based on the C5G7-TD benchmark, a time-dependent version of the C5G7 benchmark.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

The international research reactor conversion effort and its contribution to the validation of reactor physics and thermal-hydraulics codes

Full text of publication follows. With about 200 reactors in operation, civilian Research and Test Reactors (RTRs) represent approximately a third of the global nuclear fleet. RTRs make use of core designs that are drastically different from commercial power plants to perform a wide variety of non-power applications that greatly benefit society. Because they often rely on high neutron fluxes, RTRs are designed with relatively compact cores and as a result, prior to the 1980's, were often deployed using Highly Enriched Uranium fuel (HEU, {sup 235}U/U = 20 wt. %). Due to proliferation concerns, the international community aims at eliminating the use of HEU in civilian facilities and favor instead the use of Low Enriched Uranium fuel (LEU, {sup 235}U/U < 20 wt. %). A program to support conversion of the world's RTRs to LEU fuel has been initiated in 1978 by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). This program is still alive today and has achieved more than 103 conversion metrics. Today, the program focuses heavily on the conversion of so-called high-performance RTRs, which are far more challenging than previous conversions as they require new fuel element designs and the use of new, higher density LEU fuel forms. Development and qualification of new LEU fuel elements is ongoing and requires extensive engineering analysis and testing. Both activities require the development and validation of codes and methods for reactor physics, thermal-hydraulics, and multi-physics, which in turn rely on experiments performed in RTRs or other experimental facilities. This talk will present the collection of RTR experimental data and benchmark analyses from the international conversion program that contribute to the validation of computer codes and methods.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Inter-Disciplinary Collaboration in Support of the Post-Standby TREAT Mission

Although analysis methods have advanced significantly in the last two decades, high fidelity multi- physics methods for reactors systems have been under development for only a few years and are not presently mature nor deployed. Furthermore, very few methods provide the ability to simulate rapid transients in three dimensions. Data for validation of advanced time-dependent multi- physics is sparse; at TREAT, historical data were not collected for the purpose of validating three-dimensional methods, let alone multi-physics simulations. Existing data continues to be collected to attempt to simulate the behavior of experiments and calibration transients, but it will be insufficient for the complete validation of analysis methods used for TREAT transient simulations. Hence, a 2018 restart will most likely occur without the direct application of advanced modeling and simulation methods. At present, the current INL modeling and simulation team plans to work with TREAT operations staff in performing reactor simulations with MAMMOTH, in parallel with the software packages currently being used in preparation for core restart (e.g., MCNP5, RELAP5, ABAQUS). The TREAT team has also requested specific measurements to be performed during startup testing, currently scheduled to run from February to August of 2018. These startup measurements will be crucial in validating the new analysis methods in preparation for ultimate application for TREAT operations and experiment design. This document describes the collaboration between modeling and simulation staff and restart, operations, instrumentation and experiment development teams to be able to effectively interact and achieve successful validation work during restart testing.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Extension of the Advanced Test Reactor Operating Envelope Via Enhanced Reactor Physics Validation Techniques

The Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute is currently in the process of qualifying a low-enriched-uranium fuel element design for the new Ki-Jang Research Reactor (KJRR). As part of this effort, a prototype KJRR fuel element was irradiated in this paper for several operating cycles in the northeast flux trap of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory. The KJRR fuel element contained a very large quantity of fissile material (618 g 235 U) in comparison with historical ATR experiment standards (<1 g 235 U), and its presence in the ATR flux trap was expected to create a neutronic configuration that would be well outside of the approved validation envelope for the reactor physics analysis methods used to support ATR operations. Accordingly, it was necessary to conduct an extensive set of new low-power physics measurements in the ATR Critical Facility (ATRC), a companion facility to the ATR, located in an immediately adjacent building and sharing the same fuel storage canal. The new measurements included fission power distributions, reactivity, and measurements related to the calibration of the in-core online instrumentation. The effort was focused on the objective of expanding the validation envelope for the computational reactor physics tools used to support ATR operations and safety analysis to include the planned KJRR irradiation in the ATR and similar experiments that are anticipated in the future. The computational and experimental results have demonstrated that the neutronic behavior of the KJRR fuel element in the ATRC is well understood in terms of its general effects on ATRC core reactivity and fission power distributions and its effects on the calibration of the ATR Lobe Power Calculation and Indication System, as well as in terms of its own internal fission rate distribution and total fission power per unit ATRC core power. Finally, taken as a whole, these results have significantly extended the ATR physics validation envelope, thereby enabling an entire new class of irradiation experiments.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Validation of High-Fidelity Reactor Physics Models for Support of the KJRR Experimental Campaign in the Advanced Test Reactor

The Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute is currently in the process of qualifying a Low-Enriched Uranium fuel element design for the new Ki-Jang Research Reactor (KJRR). As part of this effort, a prototype KJRR fuel element was irradiated for several operating cycles in the Northeast Flux Trap of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory. The KJRR fuel element contained a very large quantity of fissile material (618g 235U) in comparison with historical ATR experiment standards (<1g 235U), and its presence in the ATR flux trap was expected to create a neutronic configuration that would be well outside of the approved validation envelope for the reactor physics analysis methods used to support ATR operations. Accordingly it was necessary, prior to high-power irradiation of the KJRR fuel element in the ATR, to conduct an extensive set of new low-power physics measurements with the KJRR fuel element installed in the ATR Critical Facility (ATRC), a companion facility to the ATR that is located in an immediately adjacent building, sharing the same fuel handling and storage canal. The new measurements had the objective of expanding the validation envelope for the computational reactor physics tools used to support ATR operations and safety analysis to include the planned KJRR irradiation in the ATR and similar experiments that are anticipated in the future. The computational and experimental results demonstrated that the neutronic behavior of the KJRR fuel element in the ATRC is well-understood, both in terms of its general effects on core excess reactivity and fission power distributions, its effects on the calibration of the core lobe power measurement system, as well as in terms of its own internal fission rate distribution and total fission power per unit ATRC core power. Taken as a whole, these results have significantly extended the ATR physics validation envelope, thereby enabling an entire new class of irradiation experiments.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Performance-based ECCS cladding acceptance criteria: A new simulation approach

The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is currently proposing rulemaking to revise the Loss Of Coolant Accident (LOCA) and therefore the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) acceptance criteria, to include the effects of higher burnup on cladding performance as well as to address other technical issues. As motivated by the new rule, the need to use advanced cladding designs may be a result. A loss of operational margin may result due to the more restrictive cladding embrittlement criteria. Initial and future compliance with the rule may significantly increase vendor workload and licensee cost, as a spectrum of fuel rod initial burnup states may need to be analyzed to demonstrate compliance. Consequently, there will be an increased focus on licensee decision making related to LOCA analysis to minimize cost and impact, and to manage margin. The study here presented has been part of a big project used to investigate technical issues and approaches for future industrial applications within the Risk-Informed Safety Margin Characterization (RISMC) Pathway. Specifically, the primary aim of this study is to lay out a roadmap to demonstrate the application of the new methodology. Furthermore, the present analysis shows a simplified version of the methodology of an industrial application on the Core Design and the Multi-Cycle Analysis.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Advancements in NEAMS Tool Capabilities for Multiphysics Simulation of Fast Reactor Core Bowing and Identification of Validation Test Data

Under the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Program, an integrated multiphysics approach is being developed to model the core bowing phenomena important to liquid metal-cooled fast reactors. Core bowing is an important passive safety mechanism in liquid metal-cooled fast reactors and involves Multiphysics effects including radiation transport, fluid flow, heat transfer, and mechanical response to temperature and flux gradients. This report summarizes recent progress on developing a multiphysics, MOOSE-based workflow to predict core bowing and associated reactivity feedback. Last year, thermal fluids and mechanics were coupled on a multi-assembly benchmark problem based on ABR-1000 design. This year, the reactor physics code Griffin was assessed for readiness of core bowing calculations. Preliminary integration of Griffin’s ring-heterogeneous model with thermal fluids and thermal mechanics solvers was performed. Specifically, thermal-mechanics and reactor physics were coupled for single- and multi-assembly problems, and reactor physics and subchannel methods were coupled for a single assembly model. Finally, the workflow of all three physics was preliminarily demonstrated on a single assembly model. Caveats and future development needed have been identified. To supplement the multiphysics demonstration, verification and assessment efforts of thermos-mechanical capabilities for modeling thermo-mechanical core bowing behavior were continued by analyzing IAEA Verification Problem 5 which includes radiation swelling and creep. Additionally, a small core reactor physics benchmark defined by Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) was performed to assess neutronics models for estimating reactivity feedback. Finally, Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) validation test data for core bowing phenomena has been identified and summarized, with a recommended path forward for validation once this capability is mature.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Data from Rossi-alpha and pulsed neutron prompt neutron time decay measurements at the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility

This report briefly describes the Rossi-alpha and pulsed neutron prompt neutron time decay measurements performed at the Oak Ridge Critical Experiments Facility. This description includes the measurement equipment, type of data, and how to access the actual data from Records Management Services at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the Nuclear Criticality Safety Benchmark Program (NCSBEP) of the Idaho National Laboratory. Most of the data were acquired between 1960 and 1975 on weapons-grade enriched uranium metal assemblies. Also included are measurements of the same type performed at Los Alamos National Laboratory by Oak Ridge National Laboratory with the JEZEBEL and FLATTOP criticality assemblies and other plutonium metal parts. The purpose of this report is to allow future mining of the data for publication of additional information that can be used to verify calculational methods and nuclear cross sections. These data can be used to create reactor physics benchmarks for the Nuclear Energy Agency’s International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Experiments. Present calculational methods can be used to directly calculate the measured data. The prompt neutron decay is more neutron spectrum sensitive than other measured quantities, particularly for interacting fissile metal systems where the flight time of neutrons between interacting sections is a large part of the neutron lifetime.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗

Physics-informed neural network with transfer learning (TL-PINN) based on domain similarity measure for prediction of nuclear reactor transients

Nuclear reactor safety and efficiency can be enhanced through the development of accurate and fast methods for prediction of reactor transient (RT) states. Physics informed neural networks (PINNs) leverage deep learning methods to provide an alternative approach to RT modeling. Applications of PINNs in monitoring of RTs for operator support requires near real-time model performance. However, as with all machine learning models, development of a PINN involves time-consuming model training. Here, we show that a transfer learning (TL-PINN) approach achieves significant performance gain, as measured by reduction of the number of iterations for model training. Using point kinetic equations (PKEs) model with six neutron precursor groups, constructed with experimental parameters of the Purdue University Reactor One (PUR-1) research reactor, we generated different RTs with experimentally relevant range of variables. The RTs were characterized using Hausdorff and Fréchet distance. We have demonstrated that pre-training TL-PINN on one RT results in up to two orders of magnitude acceleration in prediction of a different RT. The mean error for conventional PINN and TL-PINN models prediction of neutron densities is smaller than 1%. We have developed a correlation between TL-PINN performance acceleration and similarity measure of RTs, which can be used as a guide for application of TL-PINNs.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Sensitivity Coefficients for Diffusion Coefficients and Other Reactor Physics Parameters using CE TSUNAMI-3D

The TSUNAMI (Tools for Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Methodology Implementation) capabilities within the SCALE code system leverage sensitivity coefficients for many criticality safety applications, including quantifying the data-induced uncertainty in the eigenvalue of critical systems, quantifying computational biases, and selecting applicable benchmark experiments. TSUNAMI sensitivity and uncertainty analysis tools have traditionally been limited to criticality safety application spaces, but the introduction of Generalized Perturbation Theory (GPT) sensitivity methods by Jessee in 2009 and Perfetti in 2013 has extended the scope of SCALE adjoint-weighted sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to include reactor physics applications. The continuous-energy (CE) TSUNAMI-3D GPT sensitivity analysis methods were originally developed to calculate sensitivity coefficients for a limited number of reaction-rate responses using CE Monte Carlo methods. These tools were recently applied in an Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)-directed research and development project to improve the efficiency of {sup 252}Cf production in the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) by understanding the sensitivity of key heavy actinide capture-to- fission ratios to potential system design changes. This work further extends the applicability of the CE TSUNAMI- 3D GPT methods to reactor physics applications by enabling the calculation of sensitivity coefficients for an expanded set of reaction rate responses-including a first-ever capability for conducting sensitivity analysis of neutron diffusion coefficients.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Analysis of the VERA Core Physics Benchmark Problems using cosRMC Code

In reactor physics, two kinds of numerical methods are generally employed to solve the neutron transport equations, one of which is the deterministic method and the other one is the Monte Carlo method. Monte Carlo is widely used to provide reference solution because of its ability to deal with continuous energy cross sections and complex geometry. Just like any statistical process, the Monte Carlo method requires repetition to achieve a small relative uncertainty, and therefore may inevitably have larger simulation times than deterministic method. Fortunately, the great advancements of computer technology make it possible to apply Monte Carlo method in reactor core analysis. To promote nuclear power plant system design and simulation software self-reliance development, a Monte Carlo neutron/photon transport code cosRMC has been developed jointly by State Nuclear Power Software Development Center (SNPSDC) and Tsinghua University. The cosRMC is aimed at achieving full core calculations and analysis with high fidelity and efficiency by means of advanced methodologies and algorithms as well as high performance computing techniques. The cosRMC has many functions as criticality calculation, fixed-source calculation, burnup calculation, etc. In order to ensure its reliability, several types of verification and validation (V and V) work have been and are being carried out for cosRMC. The simulation results of cosRMC based on Problem 1 to 3 of VERA Core Physics Benchmark showed its good capability of 2D lattice and 3D assembly modeling. In this paper, some progressive verification results of multi-assembly and full core problems are presented.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Machine learning application to single channel design of molten salt reactor

This study proposes a robust approach to quickly design a nuclear reactor core and explores the best performing machine learning (ML) technique for predicting feature parameters of the core. Here we implemented the approach into a hypothetical channel of molten salt reactors to demonstrate the applicability of the method. We prepared a Python tool, named Plankton, which couples to a reactor physics code and an optimization tool, and imports ML methods. The tool performs three consecutive phases: reactor database generation, machine learning application, and design optimization. We identified the extra trees method as the best performing estimator. With the estimator, we found nine optimum designs in total, one for each fuel-salt pair, and estimated all the performance metrics of the designs with a <5% prediction error compared to their actual values. U-Pu-NaCl fuel-salt gave promising results with the highest conversion ratio, the most negative feedback coefficient, and the lowest fast flux.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Enabling a Physical Twin for Control Methods Evaluation

Advanced nuclear reactors play an important role in the energy future of the United States and the rest of the world. They are designed and operated based on a different model than that of the current operating fleet, thus enabling deployment in remote locations and allowing for safe semi-autonomous or autonomous operations. Such characteristics require the development of a new reactor control paradigm. A significant factor in the development of control technologies and methods is integration of the various technologies and methods with each other and with hardware (both reactor system hardware and control hardware). A recent workshop on control of advanced reactors identified the lack of a flexible, expandable software/hardware infrastructure to enable such integration as a key gap. A previous phase of the current effort involved developing and demonstrating the Control and Optimization Modular Modeling Application for Nuclear Deployment (COMMAND) platform, which is capable of integrating autonomous-control-enabling technologies and methods, without the constraints imposed by existing software solutions. This platform will enable advanced reactor developers to deploy and test any developed technologies and methods by employing a common framework, and to couple them with their own models and hardware. The present phase of this effort entails using the Microreactor Automated Control System (MACS) platform, which was developed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Microreactor Program, to serve as a control method testbed. MACS can be used by advanced reactor developers to integrate their control related research activities with any reactor system. For the present effort, MACS was customized to mirror Idaho National Laboratory (INL)’s Microreactor Applications Research Validation and Evaluation (MARVEL) microreactor, and COMMAND was leveraged to enable MACS to emulate the physics of MARVEL, thus positioning MACS as a physical twin of MARVEL.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗