Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “RuC”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Sensitivity of Near-Surface Variables in the RUC Land Surface Model in the Weather Research and Forecasting Model

In this study, we investigate the parametric sensitivity of near-surface variables, such as sensible heat flux, latent heat flux, ground heat flux, hub-height wind speed and land surface temperature, to the parameters used in the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) land surface model (LSM) during a wintertime and summertime period. The model simulations are compared with observations collected from the second Wind Forecast Improvement Project (WFIP2) field campaign. The results suggest that parameters related to snow/ice and thermal processes can have significant impact on the simulated near-surface variables. Out of the 11 examined parameters, only 6 of them have considerable influences on the model behaviors and explain about 60 ~ 80 % of the estimated total variance of the simulated variables. In addition, the magnitude of the parametric sensitivity varies with season. For instance, parameters associated with snow/ice processes are dominant during the wintertime whereas those associated with thermal processes are more important during the summertime. Furthermore, the impact of the identified parameters on the simulated variables is highly related to the topography. There is a high degree of sensitivity to the parameter values over the slope region. This points out the importance of collecting field observations over steep areas to better quantity the appropriate values of key parameters. Overall, our findings provide a better understanding of the RUC LSM behavior associated with parameter uncertainties and can be used to improve the forecasting skill of land surface processes via calibration of the most uncertain model parameters.

17 WIND ENERGY↗

Materials Data on RuC by Materials Project

RuC is Tungsten Carbide structured and crystallizes in the hexagonal P-6m2 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Ru4+ is bonded to six equivalent C4- atoms to form a mixture of distorted corner, edge, and face-sharing RuC6 pentagonal pyramids. All Ru–C bond lengths are 2.16 Å. C4- is bonded to six equivalent Ru4+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted corner, edge, and face-sharing CRu6 pentagonal pyramids.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on RuC by Materials Project

RuC is Halite, Rock Salt structured and crystallizes in the cubic Fm-3m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Ru4+ is bonded to six equivalent C4- atoms to form a mixture of corner and edge-sharing RuC6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 0°. All Ru–C bond lengths are 2.16 Å. C4- is bonded to six equivalent Ru4+ atoms to form a mixture of corner and edge-sharing CRu6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 0°.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on RuC by Materials Project

RuC is Zincblende, Sphalerite structured and crystallizes in the cubic F-43m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Ru4+ is bonded to four equivalent C4- atoms to form corner-sharing RuC4 tetrahedra. All Ru–C bond lengths are 1.98 Å. C4- is bonded to four equivalent Ru4+ atoms to form corner-sharing CRu4 tetrahedra.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Materials Data on Ru3C10I2O9 by Materials Project

RuC(RuC2O2I)2(CO)5 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pna2_1 space group. The structure is two-dimensional and consists of twenty formaldehyde molecules; four RuC clusters; and two RuC2O2I sheets oriented in the (0, 0, 1) direction. In each RuC cluster, Ru4+ is bonded in a distorted single-bond geometry to one C+0.80+ atom. The Ru–C bond length is 1.77 Å. C+0.80+ is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one Ru4+ atom. In each RuC2O2I sheet, there are two inequivalent Ru4+ sites. In the first Ru4+ site, Ru4+ is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to two I1- atoms. There are one shorter (2.80 Å) and one longer (2.82 Å) Ru–I bond lengths. In the second Ru4+ site, Ru4+ is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to two I1- atoms. There are one shorter (2.81 Å) and one longer (2.83 Å) Ru–I bond lengths. There are four inequivalent C+0.80+ sites. In the first C+0.80+ site, C+0.80+ is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O2- atom. The C–O bond length is 1.16 Å. In the second C+0.80+ site, C+0.80+ is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O2- atom. The C–O bond length is 1.16 Å. In the third C+0.80+ site, C+0.80+ is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O2- atom. The C–O bond length is 1.16 Å. In the fourth C+0.80+ site, C+0.80+ is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O2- atom. The C–O bond length is 1.15 Å. There are four inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one C+0.80+ and one I1- atom. The O–I bond length is 3.82 Å. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one C+0.80+ and one I1- atom. The O–I bond length is 3.61 Å. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one C+0.80+ and two I1- atoms. There are one shorter (3.57 Å) and one longer (3.89 Å) O–I bond lengths. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one C+0.80+ and three I1- atoms. There are a spread of O–I bond distances ranging from 3.74–3.90 Å. There are two inequivalent I1- sites. In the first I1- site, I1- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to two Ru4+ and four O2- atoms. In the second I1- site, I1- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to two Ru4+ and three O2- atoms.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Evaluation of Extensional Stiffness Matrix [A]. of Braided Composite Tubes

A novel method for analyzing tubular textile composites was developed by obtaining a curved repeatable unit cell (RUC) from the transformation of a flat RUC. Periodic boundary conditions were imposed on the tubular RUC. The stiffness matrix of the composite was then evaluated using transversely isotropic yarn and isotropic matrix. It was found that the stiffness coefficients A11, A12 of the composite are more sensitive to a change in the radius of the composite compared to A22 and A66.

Thandaga Nagaraju, Hematnh↗

Evaluation of Model Summertime Boundary Layer Cloud Development over Complex Terrain in New York State

Weather forecasting over complex terrain with diverse land cover is challenging. Utilizing the high-resolution observations from New York State Mesonet (NYSM), we are able to evaluate the surface processes of the Weather Research Forecast (WRF) Model in a detailed, scale-dependent manner. Here, in the study, possible impacts of land–atmosphere interaction on surface meteorology and boundary layer cloud development are investigated with different model resolutions, land surface models (LSMs), and planetary boundary layer (PBL) physical parameterizations. The High-Resolution Rapid Refresh, version 3 (HRRR), forecasting model is used as a reference for the sensitivity evaluation. Results show that over complex terrain, the high-resolution simulations (1 km × 60 vertical levels) generally perform better compared to low-resolution (3 km × 50 levels) in both surface meteorology and cloud fields. LSMs play a more important role in surface meteorology compared to PBL schemes. The NoahMP land surface model exhibits daytime warmer and drier biases compared to the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) due to better prediction of the Bowen ratio in RUC. The PBL schemes would affect the convective strength in the boundary layer. The Shin–Hong (SH) scale-aware scheme tends to produce the strongest convective strength in the PBL, while the ACM2 PBL scheme rarely resolved convection even at 1-km resolution. By considering the radiation effect of subgrid-scale (SGS) clouds, the Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino eddy diffusivity mass flux (MYNN-EDMF) predicted the highest cloud coverage and lowest surface solar radiation bias. The configuration of SGS clouds in MYNN-EDMF would not only significantly reduce shortwave radiation bias, but also affect the convection behaviors through land surface–cloud–radiation interaction.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗