Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SAT solver”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Applying Incremental, Inductive Model Checking to the Modal Mu Calculus

This work aims to demonstrate that an incremental inductive model checking algorithm built on top of Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solvers can be extended to support modal mu calculus (MMC) formulas. The resulting algorithm, called modal mu calculus model checking using myopic constraints (MC3), solves MMC model checking problems over Boolean labeled transition systems (LTSs). MMC subsumes simple invariance/reachability (as solved by the IC3 algorithm), linear temporal logic (LTL, as solved by the fair algorithm), computation tree logic (CTL, as solved by IICTL), and CTL* (which in turn subsumes LTL and CTL, but was not previously supported by any incremental inductive algorithm). The algorithm is implemented in a prototype solver, mc3.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2023

A Probabilistic Approach To Selecting Build Configurations in Package Managers

In the past decade software has grown significantly in complexity and scale. Likewise the number of dependencies for most software has increased with typical software packages depending on tens to hundreds of other packages. Such large numbers of dependencies place a significant burden on package managers to correctly maintain dependency lists and constraints between them. Due to this package managers have incorporated sophisticated tooling such as SAT solvers into their dependency management mechanisms. Despite these tools package managers still rely on many human annotated constraints for dependency and version selection. These are error-prone and require a significant amount of labor to constantly update and test. In this paper we propose a methodology to make use of historical build results in selecting the version for package dependencies. Our method utilizes the flexibility of the Spack package manager’s heavily parameterized package configurations to incorporate a machine learning model trained to predict the probability of build outcomes. This work is able to build and install packages with a 13% higher success rate than the default version selection mechanism in Spack.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2023

Sampling frequency thresholds for the quantum advantage of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm

We compare the performance of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) with state-of-the-art classical solvers Gurobi and MQLib to solve the MaxCut problem on 3-regular graphs. We identify the minimum noiseless sampling frequency and depth p required for a quantum device to outperform classical algorithms. There is potential for quantum advantage on hundreds of qubits and moderate depth with a sampling frequency of 10 kHz. We observe, however, that classical heuristic solvers are capable of producing high-quality approximate solutions in linear time complexity. In order to match this quality for large graph sizes N, a quantum device must support depth p > 11. Additionally, multi-shot QAOA is not efficient on large graphs, indicating that QAOA p ≤ 11 does not scale with N. These results limit achieving quantum advantage for QAOA MaxCut on 3-regular graphs. Other problems, such as different graphs, weighted MaxCut, and 3-SAT, may be better suited for achieving quantum advantage on near-term quantum devices.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Scheduling Position, Navigation and Time Service Requests from Non-dedicated Lunar Constellations

This paper presents a centralized scheduler that satisfies user requests for Position, Navigation, and Time (PNT) services from an ad-hoc, non-dedicated orbital constellation around the Moon. Traditional, dedicated GNSS networks provide service 24/7, which allows users to acquire localization services at-will. For ad-hoc networks, a coordinated schedule is needed to ensure Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees for user localization, while satisfying non-dedicated assets’ usage constraints. This scheduler bridges this coordination gap by leveraging Mixed Integer-Linear Programming (MILP) to schedule this “as-needed” localization service while respecting the constraints on each asset. In upcoming decades there is expected to be a substantial increase in Lunar missions. Many of these missions will feature low-cost surface assets near the moon’s polar regions and small-sat science missions in orbit. Most missions need PNT capabilities to ensure safe operations and meet their science objectives, but low-cost missions may not be able to support the large power, mass, and weight that a weak GNSS or DSN based navigation solution would entail. Asset localization has been demonstrated using a decentralized extended Kalman Filter (DEKF) in the previously presented Lunar Autonomous PNT System (LAPS). Within the LAPS simulation environment, a module has been developed to generate the coordinated user-asset schedules described above; this Service Scheduler Module (SSM) allows for complete end-to-end testing of the entire system. Within SSM, a user service request consists of a location on the Lunar surface, a cumulative service duration, and a window in which service must occur. SSM takes as input these requests and the LAPS-predicted positional degree of precision as the QoS for each available set of orbital assets. A simple, baseline MILP model is formulated to provide the highest-precision service balanced across all requests. To reflect the non-dedicated nature of the constellation, this baseline model is augmented with additional asset-specific load capacity constraints or availability constraints. The load capacity constraints limit total time spent providing service, and the availability constraints reflect blockout times or availability windows when the assets are not otherwise occupied. SSM outputs two schedules: the user schedule to indicate their service times and expected QoS, and a satellite schedule to be transmitted to the orbiting constellation, describing when each non-dedicated asset provides PNT service. SSM is predominantly implemented in MATLAB and allows the use of any MILP solver to generate the resulting schedules. This paper describes the SSM - LAPS interface, how the output of LAPS is used to construct the MILP, and how SSM provides user localization service while satisfying constraints. It will also demonstrate the tool’s flexibility for formulating schedules for the end user and the constellation, focusing on scenarios that match real-world proposed missions. It will detail how SSM can be used to compare the addition of load capacity constraints, satellite availability constraints, and QoS guarantees for the users. Finally, we describe how SSM can be used to support the design of the ad-hoc constellation itself. The resulting integrated capability will support the design of future ad-hoc Lunar PNT networks, enabling high-quality, low-cost Lunar exploration

Swarm↗