Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SIMEX”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2017

Simulation–Extrapolation for Bias Correction with Exposure Uncertainty in Radiation Risk Analysis Utilizing Grouped Data

Summary In observational epidemiological studies, the exposure that is received by an individual often cannot be precisely observed, resulting in measurement error, and a common approach to dealing with measurement error is regression calibration (RC). Use of RC, which requires assumptions about the distribution of unknown error-free (true) variables, leads to concern about the possibility of bias due to misspecification of that distribution. The simulation–extrapolation (SIMEX) method, in contrast, does not require a distributional assumption. However, analyses of large cohorts may be performed by using grouped or person-year data, and application of SIMEX to grouped data is not straightforward, particularly when there is a mixture of classical and Berkson measurement errors. We compared RC and SIMEX with grouped data analyses to assess robustness of the RC method to misspecification of the true dose distribution. We also applied SIMEX assuming mixtures of classical and Berkson errors and compared the results with those obtained by using RC for classical error only. SIMEX had less bias than RC and performed well regardless of the true dose distribution, whereas RC based on a misspecified true dose distribution showed greater bias than when based on the correctly specified true dose distribution.

Misumi, Munechika↗
DOE OSTI2015

Transition redshift: new constraints from parametric and nonparametric methods

In this paper, we use the cosmokinematics approach to study the accelerated expansion of the Universe. This is a model independent approach and depends only on the assumption that the Universe is homogeneous and isotropic and is described by the FRW metric. We parametrize the deceleration parameter, q(z), to constrain the transition redshift (z{sub t}) at which the expansion of the Universe goes from a decelerating to an accelerating phase. We use three different parametrizations of q(z) namely, q{sub I}(z)=q{sub 1}+q{sub 2}z, q{sub II} (z) = q{sub 3} + q{sub 4} ln (1 + z) and q{sub III} (z)=½+q{sub 5}/(1+z){sup 2}. A joint analysis of the age of galaxies, strong lensing and supernovae Ia data indicates that the transition redshift is less than unity i.e. z{sub t} < 1. We also use a nonparametric approach (LOESS+SIMEX) to constrain z{sub t}. This too gives z{sub t} < 1 which is consistent with the value obtained by the parametric approach.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Revisiting the Distance Duality Relation using a non-parametric regression method

The interdependence of luminosity distance, D {sub L} and angular diameter distance, D {sub A} given by the distance duality relation (DDR) is very significant in observational cosmology. It is very closely tied with the temperature-redshift relation of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation. Any deviation from η( z )≡ D {sub L} / D {sub A} (1+ z ){sup 2} =1 indicates a possible emergence of new physics. Our aim in this work is to check the consistency of these relations using a non-parametric regression method namely, LOESS with SIMEX. This technique avoids dependency on the cosmological model and works with a minimal set of assumptions. Further, to analyze the efficiency of the methodology, we simulate a dataset of 020 points of η ( z ) data based on a phenomenological model η( z )= (1+ z ){sup ε}. The error on the simulated data points is obtained by using the temperature of CMB radiation at various redshifts. For testing the distance duality relation, we use the JLA SNe Ia data for luminosity distances, while the angular diameter distances are obtained from radio galaxies datasets. Since the DDR is linked with CMB temperature-redshift relation, therefore we also use the CMB temperature data to reconstruct η ( z ). It is important to note that with CMB data, we are able to study the evolution of DDR upto a very high redshift z = 2.418. In this analysis, we find no evidence of deviation from η=1 within a 1σ region in the entire redshift range used in this analysis (0 < z ≤ 2.418).

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Correction of confidence intervals in excess relative risk models using Monte Carlo dosimetry systems with shared errors

Introduction: Measurement errors are ubiquitous in epidemiological studies, especially for doses arising from environmental and occupational exposures, which are difficult to assess. Correction methods for independent measurement errors, have been comprehensively described elsewhere, including regression calibration, simulation extrapolation (SIMEX), etc. However, when exposure estimates are constructed using complicated physical and biological models, uncertainties in the dosimetry system can become very complex. In such systems, uncertainties in some parameters may affect a large group of study participants simultaneously, and hence are “shared” as opposed to independent dosimetric uncertainties. Representing the structure of the uncertainty in the dosimetry by providing multiple realizations of possible dose has been described for several studies. The goal of this paper is to implement, and explore the properties of, a generalized estimating equation-based approach to shared uncertainties based on principles described in an earlier paper. Methods: The effects of shared and unshared dosimetry error on parameter estimates and confidence intervals in a generalized excess relative risk model are examined. A post-hoc correction method is implemented that constructs corrected confidence intervals based on an underlying variance structure described in an earlier paper. In this correction method it is assumed that the estimated slope parameter in a linear excess relative risk model is distributed as a mixture of normal and lognormal components. A simulation study of the behavior of this correction was developed based on multiple realizations provided by the Monte Carlo dosimetry system used for the plutonium exposures in the Mayak Worker Cohort and a risk model with close similarity to that used in analyses of lung cancer data in that cohort. Results: In the simulation study we found that shared dose errors severely degraded the coverage probabilities of confidence limits for the slope parameter in the linear excess relative risk model relating uncertain exposure to lung cancer risk. Using our correction method to adjust the confidence intervals provided much improved coverage probabilities for this parameter. A smaller amount of degradation in confidence interval coverage for other parameters (e.g. those in the baseline and dose modification terms) was noted, and the proposed correction method also improved coverage for these parameters as well. Discussion: Compared to other recently described methods our proposed correction method relies on relatively familiar software to fit dose response models. The basic modeling philosophy described here first uses existing Poisson regression methods to estimate parameters in the excess relative risk model; in this first stage mean dose (computed from the multiple realizations) is used as the independent variable in the regression. Once the model is fit we then correct (widen) the standard errors for all parameters using the proposed correction method. The simulation studies indicate that the methods described here are an important contribution to the available tools for dealing with shared measurement errors in complex risk analysis.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗