Timeline and the Timeline Exchange Infrastructure: A Framework for Exchanging Temporal Information
No abstract available
Timeline eXchange Infrastructure (TXI)↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “SMAP power analysis”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Study of a Strong L-Band RFI Source
CN006 is the name given by the European Space Agency (ESA) in their reports on radio frequency interference (RFI) to an instance of RFI in the L-band spectral window at 1.413 GHz protected for passive use only. The source of the interference is located east of the Chinese city of Hangzhou in an area with radar installations. Its effect was initially indistinguishable from that of many such RFI sources observed by the ESA's SMOS and NASA's Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) radiometers over China. However, in July 2020, the level of radiation increased dramatically reaching levels exceeding 1700000 K as reported by Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) becoming the strongest source observed by SMOS. This article describes an analysis of this very strong source (a radar). It provides information to provide insight into an example of a well-defined source of RFI and illustrates the powerful capability of the SMAP radiometer receiver and RFI processing incorporated in it for identifying and understanding interference.
Radio Frequency Interface↗
Comparison of high-resolution airborne soil moisture retrievals to SMAP soil moisture during the SMAP validation experiment 2016 (SMAPVEX16)
The NASA's Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission conducted a field experiment with its partners over two 40-km agricultural domains in Iowa and Manitoba in the summer of 2016 to address concerns observed in SMAP soil moisture (SM) retrievals over agricultural areas. The experiment featured airborne Passive Active L-band System (PALS) flights over each domain with intensive ground measurements and dense networks of SM monitoring stations. With two intensive observation periods separated in time (May 28–June 20 and July 14–August 16), the flights captured both early-season/low vegetation and later-season/high-vegetation conditions. The comparison of the PALS brightness temperature (TB) measurements to the SMAP TB observed over the sites resulted in root mean square difference (RMSD) of 2.8 K and 4.0 K for vertical and horizontal polarizations, respectively. The subsequent SM analysis rescaled the PALS TB with the SMAP TB to allow equitable comparisons between the SM retrievals from the two instruments. The PALS SM retrieval algorithm used the SM sampled by the ground teams during the overpass days for tuning, and was parameterized by a high-resolution vegetation water content product calibrated using vegetation samples collected during the experiment. The tuning process was not able to find a satisfactory result with a temporally constant set of parameters in the single channel algorithm for the two intensive observation periods of the experiment. This result indicated that the rapid change in the vegetation structure during the growth stages and likely variation in the surface roughness conditions were not compatible with rigid parameterization over the entire period. However, using seasonally variable parameters we found that it was possible to retrieve soil moisture with satisfactory accuracy. Comparative analysis with the SMAP SM product included aggregation of the PALS SM to the SMAP pixel-scale. The RMSD between the PALS SM and the aggregated manual field samples was <0.04 m3/m3 with Pearson correlation >0.85 for both sites. The comparison between different in situ sources indicated that the soil moisture network measurements were not the source of the large biases observed for SMAP over the sites reported in earlier studies. Therefore, the results suggested the rapidly growing vegetation and the early-season surface condition changes not captured by the SMAP algorithm caused the SMAP retrieval errors. In addition, the significant deviations of the vegetation water content used by the SMAP product from the calibrated vegetation water content obtained during the experiment compounds the problem.
Andreas Colliander↗
Analysis of Soil Freeze/Thaw Signatures During Slapex F/T Campaign
Permanently frozen and seasonally frozen soils occur over a large portion of the Earth's land surface. Changes in the freeze/thaw state of the land surface reflects major changes in thermal and hydraulic properties as well as acting as a "switch" for many ecological processes. In short, soil freeze/thaw state is a fundamental land surface variable in the water and energy cycles, and it connects to the carbon cycle. Surface freeze/thaw state is observable by passive and active microwave sensors. For example, NASA's Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission includes a freeze/thaw data product. Such satellite sensing offers routine all-season and all-weather global observations of soil freeze/thaw state with the application of suitable algorithms. We describe early finding from the SLAPex Freeze/Thaw campaign, believed to be the first airborne campaign of its type, focusing on soil freeze/thaw.
SLAPex↗