Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SNIC”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Cybersecurity Platform and Certification Framework Development for Extreme Fast Charging (XFC)-Integrated Charging Ecosystem (Final Project Report)

This report summarizes a pioneering effort in Electric Vehicle charging infrastructure ecosystem cybersecurity requirements, assessment methodologies, functional verification, as well as embodiment of the key technologies in the form of hardware and software tools being made available to the public. EPRI led a team of experts, as well as a stakeholder coalition encompassing all key actors in the EV charging infrastructure ecosystem that includes eXtreme Fast Charging (XFC) equipment (defined as 200kW or above). EV charging infrastructure in the United States is a patchwork of networks that have continued to grow organically and have been designed to serve the charging needs of the EV owners, who are their customers. In doing so, each network provider, as well as their connected entities such as the cloud Electric Vehicle Service Providers or EVSPs, utility back office, utility AMI networks, payment networks, as well as Original Equipment Manufacturer (EV manufacturer) telematics networks, have designed systems that may work well individually, but no single entity is responsible for the entire ecosystem to be secure in terms of data exchange. Furthermore, there is no uniformity in how each actor has implemented the cybersecurity requirements since no system-wide cybersecurity requirements existed prior to this project. The final project report describes the technical approach guided by the EV charging infrastructure cybersecurity working group, convened specifically for this project. The technical approach included definition of requirements at the ecosystem level, treated as a ‘system of systems’, and then passed down to individual systems (EVSE, EV, cloud EVSP, utility, and the payment networks), followed by developing the cybersecurity risk and vulnerability assessment methods, that were later applied to real-world cyber-physical systems at EPRI, ANL, and NREL laboratories, to validate both the process and the results. Finally, in a spotlight over the most vulnerable equipment, which is the EV charge station (AC or DC), the team developed a multi-layer cybersecurity implementation in the embedded domain embodied by the open-source Secure Network Interface Card (SNIC) demonstrating the various ways in which the infrastructure can be secured protecting against the identified attack surfaces. Finally, the entire process of EV infrastructure cybersecurity assessment was encapsulated in the Electric Vehicle Charging Cybersecurity Management (EVC2M) online GUI-based tool, that is expected to be released to the public. The report presents the objectives, the technical approach, the key results, and recommendations for future work.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

Cross-sections for 43 Sc, 44 m Sc, and 44 g Sc from two heavy ion reactions

Two different heavy ion reactions were used to produce 43 Sc (t$_{\frac12}$ = 3.891 h), 44g Sc (t$_{\frac12}$ = 4.042 h), and 44m Sc (t$_{\frac12}$ = 58.61 h) among other stable or long-lived chemically separable products. Production cross sections for 19 F + 27 Al and the reverse kinematic reaction 35 Cl + nat B were measured using an MC-SNICS ion source and the Notre Dame FN Tandem Accelerator. 19 F beams from 35 to 60 MeV were produced with beam currents between 40–80 pnA and 35 Cl beams were produced at six entrance energies with comparable beam currents. This work reports nuclear reaction cross sections 27 Al ( 19 F, x) 43 Sc, 27 Al ( 19 F, pn) 44g Sc, and 27 Al ( 19 F, pn) 44m Sc at six energies between 35 and 60 MeV lab energy. Cross sections within the same energy range were measured for 27 Al ( 19 F, 3pn) 42 K and 27 Al ( 19 F, 3p) 43 K. Comparative measurements were performed for the same compound nucleus produced from nat B( 35 Cl, x) 43 Sc, nat B( 35 Cl, pn) 44g Sc, and nat B( 35 Cl, pn) 44m Sc. The measured thin target cross sections show an overestimation by several statistical models for the scandium radioisotopes. This is corroborated by the measured thick target production rates for both entrance channels. This may be due to angular momentum effects of a heavy ion entrance channel compared to light-ion production, but additional work is required to understand this discrepancy. Finally, these measurements demonstrate that the medically useful 43 Sc, 44g Sc, and 44m Sc radioisotopes can be free of the long-lived contaminant 46 Sc without the use of enriched targets, using heavy ion beams and robust target materials.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗