Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SOLID PROPELLANT IGNITION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

The Alamo multiphysics solver for phase field simulations with strong-form mechanics and block structured adaptive mesh refinement

Alamo is a high-performance scientific code that uses block-structured adaptive mesh refinement to solve such problems as: the ignition and burn of solid rocket propellant, plasticity, damage and fracture in materials undergoing loading, and the interaction of compressible flow with eroding solid materials. Alamo is powered by AMReX, and provides a set of unique methods, models, and algorithms that enable it to solve solid-mechanics problems (coupled to other physical behavior such as fluid flow or thermal diffusion) using the power of block-structured adaptive mesh refinement.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Fabrication and characterization of nanoscale magnesium diboride and tetraboride for propulsion and hydrogen storage applications

Abstract: Boron-loaded propellants have the potential to dramatically increase the performance of solid fuel ramjets, ducted rockets, and hybrid rocket engines. However, difficult ignition of boron decreases the combustion efficiency of these propellants. One approach to solving this problem involves the use of magnesium diboride, MgB2, which ignites easier than boron. Magnesium tetraboride, MgB4, potentially offers greater energetic performance as B has a higher energy density than Mg. However, the effect of the higher boron/metal ratio on the ignition and combustion is unclear. Nanoscale MgB2 particles and quasi 2D structures are promising propellant ingredients, but the oxidation and combustion properties of nanoscale MgB4 remain unknown. Nanoscale magnesium borides are also of interest as precursors for the synthesis of magnesium borohydride, Mg(BH4)2, a promising hydrogen storage material, but hydrogenation of MgB4 has not been studied yet. The objectives of the present work included synthesis, purification, and high-energy ball milling of MgB2 and MgB4 powders as well as investigation of their hydrogen uptake, thermal decomposition, oxidation, and combustion. The powders were fabricated by combustion synthesis and by heating in a tube furnace. The latter method was superior in the synthesis of MgB4. Oxide impurities in the synthesized powders were removed by acid leaching. Nanoscale powders were obtained by ball-mill exfoliation. The hydrogen intake of the obtained magnesium borides was examined at 700 bar and 300 ℃ and did not reveal any advantage of MgB4 over MgB2. Their thermal decomposition and oxidation were investigated with thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), while their combustion was studied using laser ignition and high-speed video recording. TGA has confirmed prior observations of multistep decomposition of magnesium borides, where each step involves formation of a boride with a higher B/Mg ratio and evaporation of formed magnesium. The oxidation rates of the borides are much higher than that of boron at temperatures over 1200 °C for MgB2 and over 900 °C for MgB4. The burning rates of non-milled MgB₂ and MgB₄ powders were much higher than for the used submicron boron. Milling the MgB₂ and MgB₄ powders further increased their burning rates. The milled MgB4 burned 7.5 times faster than submicron boron.

Combustion of metals, Solid fuels, Propellants, Hy↗
DOE OSTI2026

Fabrication, oxidation, and combustion of nanoscale magnesium diboride and tetraboride

The difficult ignition and low combustion efficiency of boron particles decrease the performance of boron-loaded, fuel-rich propellants for solid fuel ramjets and ducted rockets. One approach to solving this problem involves the use of magnesium diboride (MgB 2 ), which ignites easier than boron. Magnesium tetraboride (MgB 4 ) offers greater energy density owing to its higher boron content. However, the effect of B/Mg ratio on the ignition and combustion is unknown. Additionally, while nanoscale MgB₂ particles and quasi-2D structures are promising energetic additives, the oxidation and combustion properties of nanoscale MgB₄ have not been explored. To address these knowledge gaps, the present work included synthesis and high-energy ball milling of MgB 2 and MgB 4 powders, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of their oxidation, and combustion experiments with thin layers of the obtained powders. Comparison of two synthesis routes (a solid-state reaction in a tube furnace and combustion synthesis) has shown that the former is the superior method for producing magnesium borides. TGA has revealed that oxidation of both MgB 2 and MgB 4 results in a high conversion into the oxides (88–91 %), far exceeding the low conversion of boron (62.5 %). MgB 4 begins to oxidize rapidly at a much lower temperature (∼900 °C) than MgB 2 (∼1200 °C). The burning rates of milled MgB 2 and MgB 4 are about eight and five times, respectively, faster than that of submicron boron. Magnesium borides exhibit a stable, sustained boron flame, needed for high combustion efficiency, whereas physical Mg/B mixtures undergo Mg-driven "flash" combustion.

Boron↗
DOE OSTI2026

Deflagration to Detonation Transition Update: XDDT Code Modularization

A legacy FORTRAN 77 implementation of the Baer–Nunziato two-phase mixture theory for deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) in reactive granular materials—hereafter the XDDT (eXplosive DDT) code—has been modularized to Fortran 90 with modular structure, external input files, and adaptive mesh capability. During validation, two code defects were identified and corrected: an inconsistency in the nodal solid pressure evaluation and a nonphysical burn-front tracking criterion. The ignition criterion was also corrected to use the granular surface temperature from the interface heat transfer model, matching the original Baer implementation. An initial attempt to validate against Figure 3 of the original Baer and Nunziato (1986) paper revealed that the code’s detonation velocity on a 201-node mesh (5.5 km/s) was approximately 21% below the expected Chapman–Jouguet value for 70% TMD HMX (∼7 km/s). Validation was redirected to the piston-driven DDT experiments of McAfee et al. (1989), Shot B-9036, for which well-characterized ionization-pin data are available. With the compaction-burn coefficient calibrated to 𝐶 𝛼 = 75, the XDDT code reproduces the DDT transition time to within 0.4% and produces a steady-state detonation velocity within 4% of the McAfee experimental value of 6.36 km/s. The burn model was generalized to support pressure-dependent exponents, enabling application to nitrocellulose-based ball propellants (TS3659) with a cube-root pressure dependence. Validation against the Sandusky/Baer PDC82 piston-impact experiment yielded a reactive wave velocity of 2.3–2.8 km/s, in good agreement with the experimental value of ∼2.2 km/s, and wave coalescence within 5% of the experimental timing. The mathematical model, input parameter requirements, and a roadmap for extending XDDT to PETN with an autocatalytic burn model are presented.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗