Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SRAT”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Mercury Testing with Sludge Batch 10 Tank 40 Simulant

Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) requested that researchers at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) perform testing designed to examine why the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) is not collecting elemental mercury in the Mercury Water Wash Tank (MWWT). In order for DWPF to recover mercury, mercuric oxide must first be reduced to elemental mercury. The elemental mercury must then be steam stripped, condense, and coalesce in the Mercury Water Wash Tank (MWWT) during chemical processing in the Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT). The efficiency of these steps was investigated in a series of laboratory scale SRAT experiments under the nitric-glycolic and nitric-formic flowsheets utilizing Momentive Y-17112 and Antifoam 747. Mercury speciation in the Slurry Mix Evaporator Condensate Tank (SMECT) and condensate streams was also examined. The key conclusions from these experiments are as follows: Mercury II Oxide may not be fully reduced to elemental mercury during acid addition at 93°C. Higher temperatures, i.e., boiling may be necessary to fully reduce Mercury II Oxide. The highest percent mercury recovery (71 %) in the MWWT was observed in the MS-NGA-17112 experiment (nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet with Momentive Y-17112), which is how DWPF is currently operating the SRAT.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Low Purge and Mercury Recovery Testing with Sludge Batch 10 Tank 40 Simulant

Researchers at the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) have completed testing as requested by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) to perform experiments to determine the impact of using a lower or inert purge in Sludge Batch (SB) 10 processing under the Nitric-Glycolic Acid (NGA) flowsheet. A key objective of this testing was also to determine the mercury speciation and recovery during each experiment. The testing was performed as part of the SB10 Technical Task Request (TTR) and Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP). Two sets of tests were performed, and a Run Plan was approved prior to each set of experiments to document the planned testing. Three initial experiments were completed to determine whether a low air purge would be beneficial to CPC processing at higher acid stoichiometry (110%) based on the Koopman minimum acid (KMA) equation (116% Hsu). One of the tests, an inert nitrogen purge experiment, was also completed to demonstrate that excluding oxygen did not introduce any new hazards. The experiments were designed to be identical except for the change in purge gas and purge flowrate from run to run. After reviewing the results from the initial three experiments, six additional tests were proposed by SRNL to support the lower purge study and to look for processing alternatives for improving mercury recovery. These additional six tests were all completed at a very low acid stoichiometry to mimic the pH experienced during processing in DWPF (~7). DWPF is processing SB10 sludge at an acid stoichiometry of 90% based on the Hsu equation. The additional SRNL experiments were performed at an acid stoichiometry of 62.5% KMA stoichiometry (66.3% Hsu) to produce a Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) product with a pH of about 7. All experiments used simulants of both SWPF streams, although no entrained solvent was added during any of the experiments

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗