Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “STORABLE PROPELLANT”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1965

Earth-storable propellants for spacecraft.

Earth storable propellants exist in liquid phase in near-Earth temperatures at vapor pressure below 100 psi and hypergolic, yielding simple, reliable and predictable systems

LIQUID PROPELLANT↗
NASA NTRS2016

In-Space Production of Storable Propellants

Our exploration of the feasibility of in-space production of storable propellants from resourcesavailable on asteroids, and also on Mars and the Moon, has considered the process of sampleacquisition; the energy requirements for heating and volatile release; the thermodynamic behaviorof gas release from minerals and organic polymers containing hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, sulfur,and nitrogen; purification of the released water and carbon dioxide; the storage and transportation of these materials in the condensed state; synthesis of fuels including methanol and dimethyl ether(DME); and the co-production, concentration, stability, and storage of the complementary oxidizer high-test hydrogen peroxide (HTP). We call attention to the ability of the storable propellant/oxidizer combination of DME and HTP to carry out deep-space missions and to perform retrieval and relocation of any and all space-derived resources, such as retrieving asteroidal metal to high Earth orbit. This study's analyses are based on returning resources to a storage/processing/dispensing facility in a Highly Eccentric Earth Orbit (HEEO) with a perigee above geosynchronous orbit and an apogee approach or beyond the Moon's orbit.The methane/LOX option, notable for good engine performance, has not been included in this study because our scope includes only fully storable propellants.

Lewis, John S.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Human Landing System Storable Propellant Architecture: Mission Design, Guidance, Navigation, and Control

In preparation of the NextSTEP-2 Appendix H awards, NASA’s Human Landing System (HLS) Program (HLSP) went through an abbreviated Design Analysis Cycle (DAC), or miniDAC, to characterize and quantify how a storable propellant design would affect and improve overall system performance of the Government reference design. As part of that miniDAC, HLSP ran multiple trade studies and assessments, including aspects of Mission Design, Flight Mechanics (FM), and Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GN\&C). The storable propellant designs were assessed through the baseline mission targeting the Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) and several alternate staging orbits. This paper focuses on the FM and GN\&C trades and assessments completed as part of the miniDAC as well as the GN\&C elements of the miniDAC Master Equipment List (MEL) developed for the storable propellant lander configurations.

A S Craig↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Human Landing System Storable Propellant Architecture: Mission Design, Guidance, Navigation, and Control

In preparation of the NextSTEP-2 Appendix H awards, NASA’s Human Landing System (HLS) Program (HLSP) went through an abbreviated Design Analysis Cycle (DAC), or miniDAC, to characterize and quantify how a storable propellant design would affect and improve overall system performance of the Government reference design. As part of that miniDAC, HLSP ran multiple trade studies and assessments, including aspects of Mission Design, Flight Mechanics (FM), and Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GN&C). The storable propellant designs were assessed through the baseline mission targeting the Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) and several alternate staging orbits. This paper focuses on the FM and GN&C trades and assessments completed as part of the miniDAC as well as the GN\&C elements of the miniDAC Master Equipment List (MEL) developed for the storable propellant lander configurations.

Landers↗
NASA NTRS2004

Advanced space storable propellants for outer planet exploration

An evaluation of the feasibility and mission performance benefits of using advanced space storable propellants for outer planet exploration was performed. For the purpose of this study, space storable propellants are defined to be propellants which can be passively stored without the need for active cooling.

exploration↗
NASA NTRS1982

Effect of storable propellants on single-stage earth-to-orbit vehicles

A comparison is made between the storable-propellant engine and an equivalent dual-expander engine using oxygen, propane, and hydrogen propellants. The propane and hydrogen dual-expander engine is then compared with previous results with separate propane and hydrocarbon engines. It is shown that the dual-expander reduces vehicle dry mass from 94 to 89 Mg, or 5%. The hydrogen-only thrust of the dual-expander is 0.4 MN, while the separate hydrogen engines have a thrust of 2.3 MN. The low thrust level increases the difficulty of cooling the dual-expander engine, and additional hydrogen flow is added for transpirational cooling. This additional hydrogen flow leads to an increase in the hydrogen tank size. It is also shown that storable propellants increase the dry mass of single-stage earth-to-orbit vehicles by about 20% and the gross mass by about 54%. It is concluded that dual-expander engines should be studied with several thrust splits and thrust levels.

Martin, J. A.↗
NASA NTRS1989

A Perspective on the Use of Storable Propellants for Future Space Vehicle Propulsion

Propulsion system configurations for future NASA and DOD space initiatives are driven by the continually emerging new mission requirements. These initiatives cover an extremely wide range of mission scenarios, from unmanned planetary programs, to manned lunar and planetary programs, to earth-oriented (Mission to Planet Earth) programs, and they are in addition to existing and future requirements for near-earth missions such as to geosynchronous earth orbit (GEO). Increasing space transportation costs, and anticipated high costs associated with space-basing of future vehicles, necessitate consideration of cost-effective and easily maintainable configurations which maximize the use of existing technologies and assets, and use budgetary resources effectively. System design considerations associated with the use of storable propellants to fill these needs are presented. Comparisons in areas such as complexity, performance, flexibility, maintainability, and technology status are made for earth and space storable propellants, including nitrogen tetroxide/monomethylhydrazine and LOX/monomethylhydrazine.

Boyd, William C.↗