Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SURFplus”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Comments on the SURFplus reactive burn model

The SURFplus reactive burn model is intended for heterogeneous solid HE that produce an excess amount of carbon. It utilizes a fast hotspot reaction (SURF model) plus a second slow reaction for the energy release from carbon clustering. The fast reaction dominates shock initiation, though the fast rate parameters are slightly affected by the late energy release from the slow reaction. The slow reaction has a significant affect on propagating detonation waves. Propagating detonation waves are characterized by the curvature effect; i.e., detonation speed $D_n$ as function of the local front curvature κ. The $D_n(κ)$ curves have a qualitative different shape. This results from the sensitivity of the slope of the $D_n(κ)$ curve to the reaction-zone width up to the sonic point, and the sonic point moving as κ increases from the end of the slow reaction to the neighborhood of the end of the fast reaction. For PBX 9502, the steep slope for small curvature is determined by the slow reaction, while the lower slope for larger curvature is determined by the fast reaction rate in the high detonation pressure regime. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we review the assumptions of the Shaw and Johnson carbon cluster model used by the SURFplus model for the slow reaction. Section 3 describes in detail the mixture model for a partly burned HE. The form of the slow rate used by the SURFplus model is described in section 4. We conclude with a brief discussion of applying a burn model with 2 rates to either a metalized or a composite PBX.

42 ENGINEERING↗

SURFplus Model Calibration for PBX 9502

The SURFplus reactive burn model is calibrated for the TATB based explosive PBX 9502 at three initial temperatures; hot (75 C), ambient (23 C) and cold (-55 C). The CJ state depends on the initial temperature due to the variation in the initial density and initial specific energy of the PBX reactants. For the reactants, a porosity model for full density TATB is used. This allows the initial PBX density to be set to its measured value even though the coeffcient of thermal expansion for the TATB and the PBX differ. The PBX products EOS is taken as independent of the initial PBX state. The initial temperature also affects the sensitivity to shock initiation. The model rate parameters are calibrated to Pop plot data, the failure diameter, the limiting detonation speed just above the failure diameters, and curvature effect data for small curvature.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗

SURFplus model calibration for PBX 9012

PBX 9012 is a plastic bonded explosive composed of 90.2 wt % HMX (cyclo-tetramethylene-tetranitramine) and 9.8 % Viton A (vinylidene-hexafluoropropylene copolymer). It has nearly the same composition as LX-07 (90% HMX and 10% Viton A) but with a slightly lower density. Hence it has a higher porosity and is slightly more shock sensitive. Here we describe the SURFplus model calibration for PBX 9012 using data from five shock-to-detonation transition (SDT) gas gun experiments by Burns and Chiquete, detonation front shape data from rate stick experiments and cylinder test experiment reported in Anderson et al., Jackson et al. The SDT experiments provide Pop plot data points (run distance-to-detonation) which characterize shock initiation, Lagrangian velocity time histories from embedded magnetic velocity gauges which give information on the reaction behind the lead shock, and Hugoniot data points for the reactants EOS. The rate stick experiments provide data on the curvature effect which characterize propagating detonation waves. The cylinder test experiments provide data on the detonation release isentrope used to calibrate the products EOS. The HE model uses a Davis reactants EOS with parameters that Burns and Chiquete [2020] fit to Hugoniot data, and Davis products EOS with parameters that Anderson et al. [2020] fit to cylinder test data.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗

Synopsis of SURF and SURFplus

Developed by Menikoff and Shaw, the SURF reactive burn model builds on the Ignition and Growth concept by incorporating the lead shock pressure directly into the volumetric hot-spot burn rate. The plus-extension augments the model with a late time surface burn rate due to carbon clustering. Together, SURF and SURFplus allow for robust modeling of both conventional and insensitive high explosives. Practically, the SURF burn models require shock detection and the advection of the lead shock pressure as an additional material field. Calibrated parameters for given equations of state and thermodynamic closure are dependent on initial temperature and density. An implementation in Python is given.

42 ENGINEERING↗

ZND Verification Tests for Reactive Burn Models in FLAG

The ZND theory, named after Zeldovich, von Neumann, and Doering, provides a simple model for one-dimensional ideal steady-state detonation. It assumes that the detonation wave front starts with a shock that is a discontinuous jump and is followed by a finite-length reaction zone. Reactive burn (also called reactive flow) models are based on ZND theory, as they model the shock initiation and detonation process with a finite reaction rate. The ZND wave propagation test is essentially the only available test case where an analytic solution exists for verification of reactive burn models in numerical codes. However, there are extensions and variants of the ZND test that have been devised for verification of multidimensional flows. The objective of this work is to provide verification of the reactive burn models currently implemented in the Lagrangian hydrocode FLAG and investigate the influence of mesh resolution, artificial viscosity models, and the Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) Euler relaxer on the simulation results. The burn models of interest are the Wescott-Stewart-Davis (WSD) model, the Scaled Uniform Reactive Flow (SURF) model (specifically with the SURFplus model extension), and the Arrhenius shock temperature state dependent WSD (AWSD) model. Previously, Ralph Menikoff has used ZND tests for verification of the SURF and SURFplus models in the Eulerian hydrocode xRAGE. The ZND tests here are somewhat different than the approach by Menikoff. In particular, we use a piston-driven ZND detonation wave (via a prescribed constant velocity boundary condition) in a Lagrangian framework whereas Menikoff had a ZND wave followed by a invariant rarefaction wave. The xRAGE simulations were carried out on uniform grids and adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) grids. Although AMR was recently implemented in FLAG and now fully functional for 2D simulations, it will not be evaluated with ZND tests at this time. Some work has been done previously for validating the reactive burn models in FLAG. For example, the validation studies of SURF with shock-to-detonation (SDT) tests, cylinder tests, and gap-stick tests. Further validation of the AWSD, WSD, and SURF models is described in for SDT, multi-shock, cylinder, and corner-turning tests. Recently, a large parameter study with approximately twenty SDT tests was performed to validate the AWSD, WSD, SURF, and SURFplus models while also investigating mesh resolution and artificial viscosity settings. To the best of our knowledge, the current work represents the first documented verification of these burn models in FLAG. The reader should note that many of the tables and figures in this report use units of cm/g/µs, which are the default units for FLAG. However, some lengths and velocities are expressed in µm and mm/µs, respectively, which are typical units for detonation analyses.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗

Failure Diameter Resolution Study

Previously the SURFplus reactive burn model was calibrated for the TATB based explosive PBX 9502. The calibration was based on fitting Pop plot data, the failure diameter and the limiting detonation speed, and curvature effect data for small curvature. The model failure diameter is determined utilizing 2-D simulations of an unconfined rate stick to find the minimum diameter for which a detonation wave propagates. Here we examine the effect of mesh resolution on an unconfined rate stick with a diameter (10mm) slightly greater than the measured failure diameter (8 to 9 mm).

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗

A study of shock initiation experiments for the explosive PBX 9502 using three reactive burn models

Shock to detonation transition (SDT) experiments are essential in calibrating and validating reactive burn models for explosives. This work investigates the large collection of SDT test data for the explosive PBX 9502 at ambient temperature that was presented by Gustavsen, Sheffield, and Alcon [Journal of Applied Physics, 99, 114907 (2006)]. We first analyze the experimental data and compare two different methods of determining the shock transition time/distance (namely, the bilinear method and the single-curve method). This reveals some of the uncertainty in estimating shock transition points, which contributes to scatter in Pop-plot data. Next, we compare the WSD, AWSD, and SURFplus reactive burn models for a collection of approximately 20 experimental shots using the FLAG hydrocode. Error estimates are used to quantify how well each reactive burn model (and their respective parameter calibrations) performs at predicting the SDT process for a range of loading conditions. Additionally, the importance of mesh resolution and numerical dissipation in SDT simulations will be assessed.

75 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND↗

PBX 9502 Failure Diameter: Addendum

In previous reports, the SURFplus reactive burn model was used to study a propagating detonation wave for PBX 9502 in an unconfined rate stick just above the failure diameter. Simulations showed that the sonic boundary condition at the HE interface leads to a boundary layer. Here we provide additional details on the steady-state flow with emphasis on the boundary layer. This confirms the previous conclusion that within the boundary layer the lead shock, which initiates the hot-spot reaction, is largely supported by transverse energy flow in the reaction zone from the interior towards the boundary. Consequently, the reactive wave along a boundary layer streamline does not correspond to a 1-D detonation wave in the sense of detonation shock dynamics; i.e. , the lead shock which initiates the reaction is not driven by the reaction energy along the streamline.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗

Approach of a planar detonation to a steady CJ detonation wave

Generating a planar steady detonation wave in a high explosive is important for accurately measuring key parameters such as the CJ detonation state and the reaction-zone width. A detonation wave can be promptly shock initiated in the TATB based explosive PBX 9502 due to a fast hotspot reaction. However, a slow carbon clustering reaction causes the detonation wave to have a slow approach to steady state. Here we study the approach of the reaction zone of a planar detonation to the steady ZND profile of an underdriven detonation wave. For PBX 9502 simulations were run with the SURFplus reactive burn model. For comparison, simulations were also run with the HMX based PBX 9501. The SURF reactive model is used for PBX 9501 since it has only a fast hotspot reaction.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗

SURF Model Resolution in xRage Code

A key issue for detonation wave simulations with a reactive burn model is the resolution needed for the reaction zone. The reaction-zone width is a physical length scale. For plastic-bonded explosives, it is small (on the order of 100 microns) but affects important detonation properties such as the detonation speed. Even with adaptive mesh refinement, a well resolved reaction zone is computationally expensive. Here we consider the trade-off between computational expense and accuracy when the resolution of the reaction zone is varied for simulations with the xRage code of PBX 9501 with the SURF burn model and of PBX 9502 with the SURFplus burn model. For assessing shock initiation, the numerical Pop plot is simulated, and for assessing propagating detonation waves, the cylinder test is used as a test problem. The reaction-zone resolution is varied from a cell size of 6.25 to 200 microns, and key properties of the solutions are compared. With 6 micron resolution, the numerical solution is near mesh converged and can be used to judge the accuracy of the coarser resolution simulations. For the propagating detonation wave in the cylinder test, at 200 microns the detonation speed is low by a couple of per cent. In terms of cpu-hours, the finest resolution is about a factor of 100 more expensive than the coarsest resolution.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗