A survey of modern developments in the analysis of sandwich structures.
Sandwich structure theory surveyed including dynamic response, elastic buckling and transverse shear deformation during bending
SANDWICH CONSTRUCTION↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Sandwich structures”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Comparison of structural behavior of superplastically formed/diffusion-bonded sandwich structures and honeycomb core sandwich structures
A superplasticity formed/diffusion-bonded (SPF/DB) orthogonally corrugated core sandwich structure is discussed and its structural behavior is compared to that of a conventional honeycomb core sandwich structure. The stiffness and buckling characteristics of the two types of sandwich structures are compared under conditions of equal structural density. It is shown that under certain conditions, the SPF/DB orthogonally corrugated core sandwich structure is slightly more efficient than the optimum honeycomb core (square-cell core) sandwich structure. However, under different conditions, this effect can be reversed.
Ko, W. L.↗
Mode I Toughness Measurements of Core/Facesheet Bonds in Honeycomb Sandwich Structures
Composite sandwich structures will be used in many future applications in aerospace, marine and offshore industries due to the fact that the strength and stiffness to mass ratios surpass any other structural type. Sandwich structure also offers advantages over traditional stiffened panels such as ease of manufacturing and repair. During the last three decades, sandwich structure has been used extensively for secondary structure in aircraft (fuselage floors, rudders and radome structure). Sandwich structure is also used as primary structure in rotorcraft, the most common example being the trailing edge of rotor blades. As with other types of composite construction, sandwich structure exhibits several types of failure mode such as facesheet wrinkling, core crushing and sandwich buckling. Facesheet/core debonding has also been observed in the marine and aerospace industry. During this failure mode, peel stresses applied to an existing facesheet/core debond or an interface low in toughness, results in the facesheet being peeled from the core material, possibly leading to a significant loss in structural integrity of the sandwich panel. In an incident during a test on a liquid hydrogen fuel tank of the X-33 prototype vehicle, the outer graphite/epoxy facesheet and honeycomb core became debonded from the inner facesheet along significant areas, leading to failure of the tank. As a consequence of the accident; significant efforts were made to characterize the toughness of the facesheet/core bond. Currently, the only standardized method available for assessing the quality of the facesheet/core interface is the climbing drum peel test (ASTM D1781). During this test a sandwich beam is removed from a panel and the lip of one of the facesheets is attached to a drum, as shown in Fig. 1. The drum is then rotated along the sandwich beam, causing the facesheet to peel from the core. This method has two major drawbacks. First, it is not possible to obtain quantitative fracture data from the test and so the results can only be used in a qualitative manner. Second, only sandwich structure with thin facesheets can be tested (to facilitate wrapping of the facesheet around the climbing drum). In recognition of the need for a more quantitative facesheet/core fracture test, several workers have devised experimental techniques for characterizing the toughness of the facesheet/core interface. In all of these cases, the tests are designed to yield a mode I-dominated fracture toughness of the facesheet/core interface in a manner similar to that used to determine mode I fracture toughness of composite laminates. In the current work, a modified double cantilever beam is used to measure the mode I-dominated fracture toughness of the interface in a sandwich consisting of glass/phenolic honeycomb core reinforced with graphite epoxy facesheets. Two specimen configurations were tested as shown in Fig 2. The first configuration consisted of reinforcing the facesheets with aluminum blocks (Fig. 2a). In the second configuration unreinforced specimens were tested (Fig. 2b). Climbing drum peel tests were also conducted to compare the fracture behavior observed between this test and the modified double cantilever beam. This paper outlines the test procedures and data reduction strategies used to compute fracture toughness values from the tests. The effect of specimen reinforcement on fracture toughness of the facesheet/core interface is discussed.
Nettles, Alan T.↗
In situ processing methods for composite fuselage sandwich structures
Conventional sandwich structure fabrication methods are labor intensive and high in cost. A low cost method is needed to produce lightweight sandwich structures. Sundstrand has developed a series of in situ composite fabrication methods in which the raw materials (skin and core materials) are placed in a closed mold, and the component is produced in one heating cycle. Internal pressure is generated by chemical agents during the thermal cycles, which consolidates the skins and produces the foam core. The finished part is a net-shape composite sandwich structure with skins and a foamed core. The in situ process reduces cost by eliminating several secondary operations that are used in conventional fabrication methods. Further, a strong molecular bond is produced between the core and skin, which eliminates adhesive bonding and prevents a weak bond section in the sandwich structure. In this investigation, we evaluated the feasibility of the in situ process using thermoset materials currently under consideration for commercial airplane fuselage applications, such as keel sections. The materials used were Hercules 855340 toughened epoxy resin in both liquid and powder forms, and 3M Scotchply PR500 resin, manufactured by 3M Corporation, in powder form. We successfully foamed these resins and produced experimental panels with AS-4/855340 Hercules prepreg skins. Chopped fibers were added to the core to increase performance of the foam. Mechanical property testing on these panels showed properties competitive with other foams. Additional experiments are required to optimize the in situ foam core sandwiches for specific properties and applications.
Saatchi, Hossein↗
Sandwiched structural panel having a bi-directional core structure
A structural panel assembly has a bi-directional core structure sandwiched between and secured to a pair of outer side wall members. The core structure is formed from first and second perpendicular series of elongated strip members having crenelated configurations. The strip members in the first series thereof are transversely interwoven with the strip members in the second series thereof in a manner such that crest portions of the strip members in the first series overlie and oppose trough portions of the strip members in the second series, and trough portions of the strip members in the first series underlie and oppose crest portions of the strip members in the second series. The crest portions of all of the strip members lie generally in a first plane and are secured to the inner side of one of the panel assembly outer side walls, and the trough portions of all of the strip members lie generally in a second plane and are secured to the inner side of the other panel assembly outer side wall.
Weddendorf, Bruce↗
Compression After Impact Strength Comparison of Rohacell Foam and Aluminum Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structure
This Technical Memorandum is a follow-on study to a previous one1 that examined the compression after impact (CAI) strength of carbon fiber sandwich structure with aluminum honeycomb core and Rohacell foam core with barely visible impact damage (BVID). In this current study a wider range of impact energies were utilized and the CAI strength assessed with these different damage severity levels. This was done to provide a more complete database for the two types of sandwich structure tested in these studies. In addition, the honeycomb sandwich specimens were tested with both the ‘L’ and ‘W’ directions aligned with the axis of compression loading. As in the study examining CAI strength with BVID1, the results were normalized by the mass of the sandwich structure. The results showed that the CAI strength did differ depending on the orientation of the core during testing and that when tested in the W-direction, the honeycomb core sandwich structure had about the same CAI strength as the foam core sandwich structure when normalized by the mass of the sandwich structures.
Sandwich Structure↗
Ultra-Lightweight Nanocomposite Foams and Sandwich Structures for Space Structure Applications
Microcellular nanocomposite foams and sandwich structures have been created to have excellent electrical conductivity and radiation-resistant properties using a new method that does not involve or release any toxicity. The nanocomposite structures have been scaled up in size to 12 X 12 in. (30 X 30 cm) for components fabrication. These sandwich materials were fabricated mainly from PE, CNF, and carbon fibers. Test results indicate that they have very good compression and compression-after-impact properties, excellent electrical conductivity, and superior space environment durability. Compression tests show that 1000 ESH (equivalent Sun hours) of UV exposure has no effect on the structural properties of the sandwich structures. The structures are considerably lighter than aluminum alloy (= 36 percent lighter), which translates to 36 percent weight savings of the electronic enclosure and its housing. The good mechanical properties of the materials may enable the electronic housing to be fabricated with a thinner structure that further reduces the weight. There was no difficulty in machining the sandwich specimens into electronic enclosure housing.
Tan, Seng↗
On the Effectiveness of Using Woven Outer Plies to Suppress Hole Drilling Face Sheet Damage in Honeycomb Sandwich Structure
A payload adaptor fitting (PAF) structure has been manufactured at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). The PAF structure is essentially a large cone made of carbon/epoxy sandwich structure. The PAF structure contains numerous (about 1000) holes at the top and bottom to secure the carbon/epoxy structure in aluminum rings with bolts. In an effort to obtain higher quality holes, both sides of the PAF structure are covered with an additional, non-structural, ply of woven carbon/epoxy placed at ±45⁰ to the vertical direction. This study evaluated the quality of the holes on sandwich structure both with and without the outer woven carbon/epoxy plies via open hole compression (OHC) strength testing. Results showed a 14% increase in strength of the cloth covered sandwich structure, which did not surpass the 18% added weight due to the outer woven plies.
sacrificial plies↗
Damage Tolerance of Candidate Sandwich Structure for the Space Launch System (SLS) Payload Adapter Fitting (PAF)
This Technical Memorandum presents results from a damage tolerance study undertaken in support of the payload adapter fitting (PAF) for the Space Launch System (SLS) program at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). The study consisted of determining the compression-after-impact (CAI) strength of candidate carbon/epoxy face sheet sandwich structure that has been identified for potential use to manufacture the PAF hardware. Two types of core material that have been considered for use on the PAF structure were used in this study. One was an aluminum honeycomb and the other was a Rohacell foam. Levels of barely visible impact damage (BVID) were determined for the types of sandwich structure tested in this study and this level of damage was used for CAI strength testing. It was found that the honeycomb core sandwich structure failed by face sheet failure and the foam core sandwich structure failed by core shear failure. CAI strength values were normalized by weight of the sandwich structure since lower mass is desirable for this structure.
sandwich structure↗
Hypervelocity Impact Evaluation of Metal Foam Core Sandwich Structures
A series of hypervelocity impact (HVI) tests were conducted by the NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) Hypervelocity Impact Technology Facility (HITF) [1], building 267 (Houston, Texas) between January 2003 and December 2005 to test the HVI performance of metal foams, as compared to the metal honeycomb panels currently in service. The HITF testing was conducted at the NASA JSC White Sands Testing Facility (WSTF) at Las Cruces, New Mexico. Eric L. Christiansen, Ph.D., and NASA Lead for Micro-Meteoroid Orbital Debris (MMOD) Protection requested these hypervelocity impact tests as part of shielding research conducted for the JSC Center Director Discretionary Fund (CDDF) project. The structure tested is a metal foam sandwich structure; a metal foam core between two metal facesheets. Aluminum and Titanium metals were tested for foam sandwich and honeycomb sandwich structures. Aluminum honeycomb core material is currently used in Orbiter Vehicle (OV) radiator panels and in other places in space structures. It has many desirable characteristics and performs well by many measures, especially when normalized by density. Aluminum honeycomb does not perform well in Hypervelocity Impact (HVI) Testing. This is a concern, as honeycomb panels are often exposed to space environments, and take on the role of Micrometeoroid / Orbital Debris (MMOD) shielding. Therefore, information on possible replacement core materials which perform adequately in all necessary functions of the material would be useful. In this report, HVI data is gathered for these two core materials in certain configurations and compared to gain understanding of the metal foam HVI performance.
Yasensky, John↗
A Quantitative Damage Tolerance Comparison of High Strength and High Modulus Carbon Fiber Sandwich Structure
This study presents experimental results of the compression after impact (CAI) testing of sandwich structure with face sheets made either with IM7/8552 high strength fiber or HM63/8552 high modulus fiber. While the HM63/8552 face sheet sandwich specimens would not be as damage tolerant as the IM7/8552 face sheet sandwich specimens, a quantitative measure of how much more damage tolerant the IM7/8552 face sheets were than the HM63/8552 face sheets was sought. Due to the IM7/8552 face sheets being 28% thicker than the HM63/8552 face sheets, the impact energies used needed to be adjusted for a fair comparison. The results show that the modulus is 35% lower for the IM7/8552 face sheet sandwich structure while the CAI strength
High modulus carbon fiber↗
The Effects of Off-Axis Loading on the Compression After Impact Strength of Quasi-Isotropic Face Sheet Honeycomb Core Sandwich Structure
This study presents experimental results of compression after impact (CAI) testing of aluminum honeycomb core sandwich structure with face sheets made of co-cured T1100/3960 quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy when tested at +22.5⁰ and -22.5⁰ with respect to the 0⁰ fibers. In a previous study examining the CAI strengths of honeycomb sandwich structure, it was found that specimens had different CAI strengths, based on a [-45/90/+45/0]s layup, depending on whether they were tested in the 0⁰ direction (face sheet layup of [-45/90/+45/0]s) or 90⁰ direction (face sheet layup of [+45/0/-45/90]s). The CAI strength results showed that the specimens tested in the 90⁰ direction had a 19% drop in CAI strength compared to specimens tested in the 0⁰ direction. This was attributed to the 0⁰ load bearing plies in the 0⁰ direction specimens being “tucked in” at the center of the specimen thus providing more stability against microbuckling. This raised the question as to what CAI strength would specimens tested at +22.5⁰ (face sheet layup of [-22.5/- 67.5/+67.6/+22.5]s) and -22.5⁰ (face sheet layup of [-67.5/+67.5/+22.5/-22.5]s) have compared to specimens tested in the 0⁰ and 90⁰ direction. Results presented in this study show that the specimens loaded at +22.5⁰ and -22.5⁰ have a similar average CAI strength compared to the specimens loaded in the 0⁰ direction. The specimens loaded in the 90⁰ direction exhibit 16% lower average CAI strength. Additional specimens were tested in the +45⁰ direction to put the 0⁰ load bearing fibers on the outside of the specimen to see if this would decrease the strength as has been documented for undamaged strength. These specimens have average CAI strength values between the 0⁰ direction average CAI strength values and the 90⁰ direction average CAI strength values.
Sandwich structure↗
Water intrusion in thin-skinned composite honeycomb sandwich structures
Thin-skinned composite honeycomb sandwich structures from the trailing edge of the U.S. Army's Apache and Chinook helicopters have been tested to ascertain their susceptibility to water intrusion as well as such intrusions' effects on impact damage and cyclic loading. Minimum-impact and fatigue conditions were determined which would create microcracks sufficiently large to allow the passage of water through the skins; damage sufficient for this to occur was for some skins undetectable under a 40X-magnification optical microscope. Flow rate was a function of moisture content, damage, applied strain, and pressure differences.
Jackson, Wade C.↗
Stiff, Strong Splice For A Composite Sandwich Structure
New type of splice for composite sandwich structure reduces peak shear stress in structure. Layers of alternating fiber orientation interposed between thin ears in adhesive joint. Developed for structural joint in spar of helicopter rotor blade, increases precision of control over thickness of adhesive at joint. Joint easy to make, requires no additional pieces, and adds little weight.
Schmaling, D.↗
Thermographic Inspection of Metallic Honeycomb Sandwich Structures
The X-33/VentureStar has a Thermal Protection System (TPS) consisting mainly of brazed metallic honeycomb sandwich structures. Inspection of these structures is changing as a result of the extremely thin (less than 200 microns) skins, the small critical defect size (less than 2 mm long by 100 microns wide) and the large number (more than 1000) of parts to be inspected. Pulsed Infrared Thermography has been determined to be the most appropriate inspection method for manufacturing inspection based on performance comparison with other methods, cost, schedule and other factors. The results of the assessment of the different methods will be summarized and data on the performance of the final production inspection system will be given. Finite difference thermal methods have been used to model the whole inspection process. Details of correlation between the models and experimental data will be given and data on the use of pulsed infrared thermography on other metallic honeycomb sandwich structures will be given.
Taylor, John O.↗
Damage Tolerance Study of Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Sandwich Structure in Support of the SLS Payload Adapter Fitting (PAF)
This study presents experimental results of impact and subsequent compression after impact (CAI) strength testing of sandwich structure representative of most of the acreage of a Payload Adaptor Fitting (PAF) that has been built at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). An instrumented drop weight tower was used to inflict different levels of impact damage to specimens. Load versus deflection of impact curves, visual damage, dent depth, damage as ascertained by thermography and cross-sectional microscopy were evaluated as part of the damage resistance of the structure. Compression After Impact (CAI) was performed to assess damage tolerance. The results show that at the amount of visual damage was highly dependent on whether the peel ply was present on the surface of the structure. The peel ply had some effect on the CAI strength values since the specimens with peel ply showed a 14% higher average CAI strength value. For all specimens tested in this study, CAI versus damage and CAI versus impact energy curves were plotted and it was found that damage size was a good indicator of CAI strength. It is suggested to use a b-basis damage tolerance curve based on damage size as a conservative measure of the load carrying capability of the sandwich structure with impact damage.
T1100/3960↗
A Damage Tolerance Comparison of Composite Hat-Stiffened and Honeycomb Sandwich Structure for Launch Vehicle Interstage Applications
In this study, a direct comparison of the compression-after-impact (CAI) strength of impact-damaged, hat-stiffened and honeycomb sandwich structure for launch vehicle use was made. The specimens used consisted of small substructure designed to carry a line load of approx..3,000 lb/in. Damage was inflicted upon the specimens via drop weight impact. Infrared thermography was used to examine the extent of planar damage in the specimens. The specimens were prepared for compression testing to obtain residual compression strength versus damage severity curves. Results show that when weight of the structure is factored in, both types of structure had about the same CAI strength for a given damage level. The main difference was that the hat-stiffened specimens exhibited a multiphase failure whereas the honeycomb sandwich structure failed catastrophically.
Nettles, A. T.↗
Compression After Impact Testing of Sandwich Structures Using the Four Point Bend Test
For many composite laminated structures, the design is driven by data obtained from Compression after Impact (CAI) testing. There currently is no standard for CAI testing of sandwich structures although there is one for solid laminates of a certain thickness and lay-up configuration. Most sandwich CAI testing has followed the basic technique of this standard where the loaded ends are precision machined and placed between two platens and compressed until failure. If little or no damage is present during the compression tests, the loaded ends may need to be potted to prevent end brooming. By putting a sandwich beam in a four point bend configuration, the region between the inner supports is put under a compressive load and a sandwich laminate with damage can be tested in this manner without the need for precision machining. Also, specimens with no damage can be taken to failure so direct comparisons between damaged and undamaged strength can be made. Data is presented that demonstrates the four point bend CAI test and is compared with end loaded compression tests of the same sandwich structure.
Nettles, Alan T.↗